Author Topic: English_Holly Fareham, Hampshire: overall, overpriced & vanilla  (Read 1653 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5023731) (1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Derrick101]

Offline electricwizard09

External Link/Members Only

Arrangement
Arranged over number, she seems a bit more out of touch and not as on it as the other two Garden girls (Lilly & Fearn, the latter I’ve reviewed before), very sporadic and difficult to message, maybe email would’ve been better but doubt it.

Price
These girls seem to up their prices every few months. Now I get the cost of living crisis is a big deal at the moment but 380 for two hours? Is like a London price and for what you get, it certainly isn’t worth it. I tend to try for 2hr appointments for first meets but this was too steep so just went for the hour at 190, which was still in the upper tier and not worth the service.

Looks
Facially, she’s very pretty, light makeup but done so it’s noticeable. Really red lipstick and very chatty and eager. Her body houses a fairly good pair of tits, although her arse and body are a bit… doughy (?). She’s not fat, just seems to distribute her weight evenly around her body which makes her seem a bit more bulky than her associates. Hair was tied up which tells me she was rushing getting ready, wore a nice blue dress that was great to touch and take off.

Meet
Place is located just up the road from the train station, not far off Highlands Road. Handed over the money after a quick meet and chat. Flat is where they all work, basic studio, bed in the middle of the room, sofa on the other side, can’t really complain but can’t complement it either. Bed is a metal frame which I find hot however if you’re worried about creaking and neighbours hearing, it’s probably not the meeting point for you. Exchanged kisses which are delivered with appeasement and a keen attitude, she moved my hands up and around her body to fondle and take off her dress, doing the same to my clothes. A bit of biting from both parties she seemed to be on board with. And then OW. If it was a usual price for a vanilla experience, I wouldn’t bat an eye for this, but at nearly 200 an hour, I don’t agree. The girls mention in their Q&As that OwO is dangerous yet allow RO? Perhaps they’ve just had dirty clients that put them off, anyway it wasn’t doing it for me so onto sex (didn’t bother with RO, two can play that game). My partner isn’t a fan of CG so been wanting it for a while, this was good, really good rhythm and would occasionally edge me; perhaps the highest point of the meet. Then onto doggy and finally missionary, lots of kissing throughout and would occasionally scratch my back which is a win in my book. Finished about 55 mins into the meet and said little in the time after. It was good, just not great and at 190 an hour, it sort of put me off by the end. Especially as it became clear that chatting in the five minutes I had left wasn’t an option.

Verdict
If it wasn’t for the CG, I honestly think it would be a negative. 190 for OW and then saying it’s to do with STIs but allowing DFK and RO I think is frankly silly. Seems friendly enough, although nowhere near as chatty as Fearn (Lilly I am yet to see this year), but just very bland. I expect vanilla with these girls but with a cheeky twist, but that’s not what you get here I’m afraid. I wouldn’t say avoid, but if you aren’t pulling in enough money to see her, I wouldn’t say it’s worth it.

Offline Bornslippy

I have come to the conclusion that by adding the word British, into the profile title, the cost increases by 15%, the services decrease by the same amount, and the bodywork is not particularly that good.

Offline Vice Admiral

Exchanged kisses which are delivered with appeasement.

So, I suppose that (in between the kisses) she waves a bit of paper about and speaks of "peace for our time" – just as as Neville Chamberlain did at Heston Aerodrome when he got back from Munich in September 1938.

When in the bedroom with hookers, there’s a lot to be said for a bit of 1930s and 1940s roleplay.  However it's best not to go the full Max Mosley.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,598
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Cheers for the review, OP. I agree £190 for average vanilla is pretty steep, though I'm sure she has a bunch of regs who love her to bits. However, IMO it is very unfair to complain about lack of OWO at that pricepoint when you knew that beforehand. If it's such a big deal for you then why did you book?

Offline Bornslippy

OWO should be a basic service of any working girl

Offline electricwizard09

Cheers for the review, OP. I agree £190 for average vanilla is pretty steep, though I'm sure she has a bunch of regs who love her to bits. However, IMO it is very unfair to complain about lack of OWO at that pricepoint when you knew that beforehand. If it's such a big deal for you then why did you book?
It’s not, my point is the double standard put there and then the need to say it’s for hygiene. It’s clearly not, it’s blatant they’ve just had bad experiences. Just say that.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,598
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
It’s not, my point is the double standard put there and then the need to say it’s for hygiene. It’s clearly not, it’s blatant they’ve just had bad experiences. Just say that.

You seem to be contradicting yourself. You appear to have a beef about price (which you knew in advance) vs services offered. I agree with you though, saying no OWO and citing hygiene yet offering RO/kissing is a moot point. I don't have the stats but I would hazard a guess that the risk of catching a STD is higher through giving OWO than it is through kissing or being licked out.


...
And then OW. If it was a usual price for a vanilla experience, I wouldn’t bat an eye for this, but at nearly 200 an hour, I don’t agree.
...


Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,047
  • Likes: 159
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
OWO should be a basic service of any working girl

No - any WG has the right to offer or not offer any service they want - and provided its clear what is on offer and what is not, then you can't reasonably complain. Just like they have the right to charge what they want. you just have to decide if you want to see her or not.

To me, owo is essential so i don't choose any that don't offer it. Quite simple really!!

Offline Mightier Than

No - any WG has the right to offer or not offer any service they want - and provided its clear what is on offer and what is not, then you can't reasonably complain. Just like they have the right to charge what they want. you just have to decide if you want to see her or not.

To me, owo is essential so i don't choose any that don't offer it. Quite simple really!!

Agreed entirely, if the SP is honest on AW of what they offer, and the price, then there's no problem.  I'm a big fan of OWO, and would normally only visit SPs who do it.  But one of my favourite WGs has never offered it to clients and I still see her.

Offline Bornslippy

No - any WG has the right to offer or not offer any service they want - and provided its clear what is on offer and what is not, then you can't reasonably complain. Just like they have the right to charge what they want. you just have to decide if you want to see her or not.

To me, owo is essential so i don't choose any that don't offer it. Quite simple really!!
Jesus. calm down dear. it was only my opinion.
And no I will not visit a girl, who does not offer OWO....hence my opinion
« Last Edit: October 13, 2022, 09:59:43 am by Bornslippy »