Author Topic: Lucy_Lust99 - Glasgow  (Read 5660 times)


14 review(s) for Lucy_Lust99 (11 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Jock D]

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Incall  £90 30mins.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

A bit of background, I've been sitting on this one for a wee while now, as this punt took place in the summer...on one of the hottest days of the year.

My windows of opportunity for punting are limited and mostly at short notice. Over the years, this has lead to many disappointing, desperate last minute bookings...and unfortunately this is another(expensive) one to add to the list.

I spent virtually a whole morning doing my due diligence on here, scanning AW, even VS and unsuccessfully tried to book 4 or maybe 5 other SP's...before turning my attention to Lucy. She has a string of positive reviews on here and only one negative...which augured well... and was able to offer me a late afternoon appointment.

Comms
All done by text and no issues.

Location
As previously mentioned in other reviews, she works in a commercial/business  building in the city centre. It's probably a 5min walk from both Central and Queen St stations. I'm kind of used this type of venue for massage appointments...but these type of premises are far from ideal imo. She's on the top floor, and there's no lift, not a problem for me, but might be for some. I didn't meet/see anyone on my way up...but passed 3 different people on my way out.

SP & Service
I'll try and be fair and balanced here...
Positive points
She's young...though probably a good couple of years older than her stated age of 22.
She's smiley, friendly and welcoming.
She willingly delivered her service and took direction...she was obviously out to please.

Negative points
She's a BBW...the AW profile says size 14 and this has been backed up by some reviewers.

No chance she's at least an 18... compounded by the fact that she's relatively short in height.

I found her body to be totally off-putting. This obviously had a massive negative effect on the appointment...particularly the shagging part. Her owo was good tbf, and got me hard. When it came to fucking...wee Jock was withering both in mish and doggy...so I gave up and let her go back to sucking me off again...which she did to completion and swallowed my deposit..


Summary
It's a big fat Negative from me...£90 for a blow job with a lassie that I just didn't fancy in the slightest.

Offline oddson1970

A good review and good to get a bit of balance after her mainly positive reviews.IMO she looks bigger than a 14 in her pics and they ,more than likely ,are flattering.Bigger girls are not my thing but if she was pretty facially and provided a decent service then l would consider it but not now after this review, thanks.

Offline Uncle Buck

Good review. There’s not a hope in hell I’d have her down as a size 14... looks much bigger and not my type but as least you gave it a good even if “wee jock” wasn’t as keen as you might have been  :lol:

Offline Max121

Great Review and thanks for the heads up
She has been on my hit list for quite a while but the location and timing never worked out
and sometimes hard to get hold of .
As a size 18 she is a no no for me then 👍🏼

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Good review Jock :thumbsup:

Her recent ratings haven't been particularly great, whether that's down to a drop off in service or just members having a different perspective :unknown:

Never really peaked my interest, so never tried to book, nor will try...

Offline Thepunteruk

I am no expert on women's dress sizes. I don't imagine any of us are. Other reviews have stated she is a 14, as you have mentioned (yes, to their eyes).
Whether she is a 14 or a 16, who knows?
There is no way on earth she is a 18/18+.
I've been with women that size, and they have rolls of fat.
Their arms can't hang naturally due to their excess flab.
One I used to see regularly, who would tour up here. I went mainly for her insane deep throat talents.

Anyway, for the record, this girl is exactly as her photos show her to be. Whether (to anyone's eye, that's a 14/16/18), is their opinion. But, her photos are her, and obviously recent. She has a belly, an ass, thick thighs and big bouncing tits. Very plain looks.
But I've found her customer service absolutely spot on. Has never said no to any of my requests, and can clearly go beyond the normal escort stuff too (as her extras tab offers).

Offline Thepunteruk

Edit; found the girl I meant. Sadly, her profile is down. But she was a size 18.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=4598

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
I am no expert on women's dress sizes.
 
Whether she is a 14 or a 16, who knows?

There is no way on earth she is a 18/18+.

On the first point...spot on.

On the second point...I do...she's a size 18 minimum.

On the third point...I refer you to your first point.

In every review I've ever written since I joined UKP...I've given an honest account of my experience.

Whilst I aknowledge that some aspects of a review are purely subjective, the size issue is not...and I, 100% stand by what I stated in my review.




Offline Thepunteruk

Jock, I was being flippant on my first point. I've seen fuckme Carmen, miss Alex (valentina velvet), all the way up to beautiful belle as mentioned. Sizes 6-8, to BBW 18+.
Lucy is not a size 18 (minimum, or 20 as you infer).
So let's agree to disagree, respectfully.

Offline MGDC

Similar to my experience Jock but purely down to service she got a neutral from me. Concerning the size its hard to say what is a 14 or 18+ but her height does make her look larger than maybe she is. Still for me it would be classed as a BBW booking.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115
Jock, I was being flippant on my first point. I've seen fuckme Carmen, miss Alex (valentina velvet), all the way up to beautiful belle as mentioned. Sizes 6-8, to BBW 18+.
Lucy is not a size 18 (minimum, or 20 as you infer).
So let's agree to disagree, respectfully.

You're in complete denial, mate.

I reviewed Busty Pam, a couple of months back...now she is a genuine 14...though advertises as a 10 :lol:

However, her body is curvy but really sexy and a proper turn on and she is nowhere near the size or shape of Lucy...Fact!

Offline Ebonylover

If Lucylust offered a blow and go meet id definitely be in there but 90 for a size 18 meet is too much

pity cos it seems she sucks cock well

Offline Asian guy

I’m not a fan of bbw’s but I’ve made an exception for Lucy. She might possibly be around a 16/18 but she is very good looking in my opinion and delivers an excellent service. I’ve now seen her 4 or 5 times and always came away happy. She’s quite submissive and takes direction well.

The reason I don’t like bbw’s is because one’s i had seen in the past usually didn’t have great hygiene down below. This has never been an issue with Lucy.

Offline Aberlad

Sorry to bump this but quite interested to see what the OP says about the pictures on her profile?

Are they accurate or flattering?

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,702
  • Likes: 34
  •  
  • Reviews: 115

Offline CrespinWolfe

Very flattering. What they fail to show is that she has a huge big hanging gut.

Offline henry brubaker

Very flattering. What they fail to show is that she has a huge big hanging gut.

You can see from the pics she's holding it in.