Palomaxx - Birmingham

[Cheshuk]

I contacted the SP and got a quick response and good communication. I met her at an apartment and there was free parking outside. I paid £150 for an hour.

I was looking forward to this me based on the pictures, however the reality seemed to be that whilst they are her in the pictures, which are professionally done. She doesn't look as you would expect. She answered the door with her hair up, no perfume or even body spray and no make up, she has a good body but I would say facially she is average about a 6 or 7 out of ten.

She tries hard in the service, but since I didn't find her attractive I just didn't enjoy it. We did missionary doggy cowgirl and OW, with light kissing

Personality wise she is friendly and chatty, but since I'm not there for conversation it was not a worthwhile experience. I've given it a negative as having seen her I regret not walking, I wouldn't give every profile I don't find attractive a negative. However since the pictures led me to believe I would be meeting a girl of a different calibre, in addition to the fact she didn't make any effort, I think that deserves the downgrade from a neutral to a negative

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Kerosene]

Good comms, friendly and makes an effort are the key takeaways I'm seeing here.

[alabama1]

Flatters to deceive springs to mind. From my experience anyway 

[alabama1]

Good comms, friendly and makes an effort are the key takeaways I'm seeing here.

She doesn't look like her pictures mate !

[Cheshuk]

Good comms, friendly and makes an effort are the key takeaways I'm seeing here.

It should be good comms, friendly but makes no effort appearance wise and not hot

[guymids-72]

I was left underwhelmed when I met and reviewed.
It was all just a bit formulaic and meh

[Cheshuk]

I was left underwhelmed when I met and reviewed.
It was all just a bit formulaic and meh

I feel like a tit for not reading the reviews properly, it was all there to say it'd be a waste of time

[alabama1]

She has also toned down her ' i don't do OWO anymore' . It's gone from something like, 'i don't do it anymore, even for my fluffy regulars' to, 'sorry'. I am surprised that she has any regulars (or maybe she no longer does), the way she treats everyone with contempt. And £150 for OW is a joke.

[Cheshuk]

Just to add she contacted me regarding the review, and she pointed out that it says on her profile she doesn't wear make-up. I had missed this point, so feel it should be a neutral based on that. Since it's my own fault for booking and not reading properly. If mods could change it I have no issue there.

[Tightpants]

Just to add she contacted me regarding the review, and she pointed out that it says on her profile she doesn't wear make-up. I had missed this point, so feel it should be a neutral based on that. Since it's my own fault for booking and not reading properly. If mods could change it I have no issue there.

Reads as a negative regardless as to the make-up issue. Sounds like she has been in your ear.

[johnny56]

She has also toned down her ' i don't do OWO anymore' . It's gone from something like, 'i don't do it anymore, even for my fluffy regulars' to, 'sorry'. I am surprised that she has any regulars (or maybe she no longer does), the way she treats everyone with contempt. And £150 for OW is a joke.

Yes she had a big essay on it the little slut, and boasted about how there were many new punters willing to take the place of regulars, who no longer wished to book her due to lack of OWO. As you say total contemp for people. This whore needs knocking down a peg or two, a dusty phone would bring her back in line, but you'll always have the idiots booking.

[Cheshuk]

Sounds like she has been in your ear.

I accept that, despite her being in my ear, I felt she made a fair point. I've left it in the hands of the mods and they can decide. In the interest of honesty I thought it was relevant to mention that this consideration was based on her contacting me. As imo the reviews hold value with the full truth

[Placebo88]

I accept that, despite her being in my ear, I felt she made a fair point. I've left it in the hands of the mods and they can decide. In the interest of honesty I thought it was relevant to mention that this consideration was based on her contacting me. As imo the reviews hold value with the full truth

Thanks for a good and honest review. The devils in the details and the parts about her attitude were encouraging compared to some past reports.

Her profile definitely gives out mixed messages about what to expect. Her pics create an image of a fashion magazine model posing for the camera, and if you find someone who looks like they have just got out of bed/ the shower then it doesn't match what you booked. I appreciate the practicalities so she should include a few more representative pics too.

I have seen her private gallery on Adultwork. It includes done up face pics and a few more natural ones and there is a significant difference between the two.

[Cheshuk]

Thanks for a good and honest review. The devils in the details and the parts about her attitude were encouraging compared to some past reports.

Her profile definitely gives out mixed messages about what to expect. Her pics create an image of a fashion magazine model posing for the camera, and if you find someone who looks like they have just got out of bed/ the shower then it doesn't match what you booked. I appreciate the practicalities so she should include a few more representative pics too.

I have seen her private gallery on Adultwork. It includes done up face pics and a few more natural ones and there is a significant difference between the two.

Cheers, I haven't seen the private gallery, however that's exactly my issue whilst her face is hidden.. the professional pictures make you expect a certain type of girl. That's what I meant by 'I wouldn't give every profile I don't find attractive a negative. However since the pictures led me to believe I would be meeting a girl of a different calibre'

[jay121]

Just to add she contacted me regarding the review, and she pointed out that it says on her profile she doesn't wear make-up. I had missed this point, so feel it should be a neutral based on that. Since it's my own fault for booking and not reading properly. If mods could change it I have no issue there.

Did you see her quite recently as am surprised that she was able to work out who you were as there not too much detail to give that away in your review

[estats]

Interesting now 25% of Palomas reviews are neutral or negative and that has got more a case over recent times.

Just curious as well, didn't she raise her rate to £180 in recent times, but I just checked it is back to £150?

[alabama1]

Interesting now 25% of Palomas reviews are neutral or negative and that has got more a case over recent times.

Just curious as well, didn't she raise her rate to £180 in recent times, but I just checked it is back to £150?

That is correct. She will probably put OWO back on her likes list soon too. 

[pbrown355]

I don't think I mentioned it in my review but the comment that the profile pictures don't properly match with the reality, photographic model vs normal girl, was something I did notice too. It didn't bother me and didn't think much of it but it's true all the same and may bother someone else. Showing the real her in private gallery pics is all very well but you shouldn't need to pay to see what a £150 ph girl looks like

[Cheshuk]

Did you see her quite recently as am surprised that she was able to work out who you were as there not too much detail to give that away in your review

It may have been the comments about her hair being up that I think she figured it out, as I asked her to let her hair down and she did

[daviemac]

Just to add she contacted me regarding the review, and she pointed out that it says on her profile she doesn't wear make-up. I had missed this point, so feel it should be a neutral based on that. Since it's my own fault for booking and not reading properly. If mods could change it I have no issue there.

Not going to happen mate, you posted as a negative and that's the way it will stay. Changing review ratings because some prossie has asked undermines the whole ethos of the site.

Whatever issues you had about makeup or whatever else should have been discussed and resolved in the meeting by her pointing out what you had missed on her profile.then your review could reflect that.

[Brumish]

Just to add she contacted me regarding the review, and she pointed out that it says on her profile she doesn't wear make-up. I had missed this point, so feel it should be a neutral based on that. Since it's my own fault for booking and not reading properly. If mods could change it I have no issue there.

I'd change my number if I were you. She has form of being a bit nasty. Think she framed a couple of members on here including Lilith (who states naivety lol)...think she also has pimp like mates who had posed as punters on here before.
If she is scorned, she might be a handful to deal with

[Wood2017]

Her available services already didn't align with service options i like to have in a booking i.e. the lack of OWO, CIM, fingering etc so i was extremely unlikely to visit anyway but if she is 'catfishing' to a degree and way less glamorous in a meet than she's presenting then that cements my decision to avoid her.

Thanks for sharing your experience OP 

[Cheshuk]

Not going to happen mate, you posted as a negative and that's the way it will stay. Changing review ratings because some prossie has asked undermines the whole ethos of the site.

Whatever issues you had about makeup or whatever else should have been discussed and resolved in the meeting by her pointing out what you had missed on her profile.then your review could reflect that.

Sure no issue there, as I said its in the hands of the mods so will ago with your decision

[The Owl]

Interesting now 25% of Palomas reviews are neutral or negative and that has got more a case over recent times.

Just curious as well, didn't she raise her rate to £180 in recent times, but I just checked it is back to £150?

No idea why Paloma thought she was worth £180 for a vanilla service of no OWO and CIM. She doesn't even wear make up but won't offer facials. You could get all that for £10 less from Lilith Noir. Even now at £150 Paloma seems horribly overpriced, but with a picture of a PS5 in her gallery with the tagine 'best gift ever' its obvious she's after clients with more money than common sense.

[Cheshuk]

Just an update. It came to light today that she made false reviews about me on a site (not sure which one). I think one of the comments did mention that she does this.

I had a booking today, initially the girl wouldn't take it because she said I had bad reviews, the second one I imagine is from another sp who has done the same thing. I think the other one was a review I left in London as a neutral the other day, and there is a guy connected to that profile who has likely done this.

I clearly have to be less identifiable in the reviews I write. Fortunately she saw my aw profile reviews so agreed to meet me. All she told me was that it came from Birmingham a couple of months ago so there's no doubt in my mind that it's this sp, who is manipulating those sites still to get revenge on punters who leave her negs. Clearly no regard for peoples personal information either. The word that came up apparently on the review which I haven't seen was abusive, which certainly isn't true unless leaving a negative review is abuse.

Putting this here as a warning

[delta69]

Just an update. It came to light today that she made false reviews about me on a site (not sure which one). I think one of the comments did mention that she does this.

I had a booking today, initially the girl wouldn't take it because she said I had bad reviews, the second one I imagine is from another sp who has done the same thing. I think the other one was a review I left in London as a neutral the other day, and there is a guy connected to that profile who has likely done this.

I clearly have to be less identifiable in the reviews I write. Fortunately she saw my aw profile reviews so agreed to meet me. All she told me was that it came from Birmingham a couple of months ago so there's no doubt in my mind that it's this sp, who is manipulating those sites still to get revenge on punters who leave her negs. Clearly no regard for peoples personal information either. The word that came up apparently on the review which I haven't seen was abusive, which certainly isn't true unless leaving a negative review is abuse.

Putting this here as a warning

She Might of left you as a timewaster on saafe forum, or on client eye

[Brumish]

I'd change my number if I were you. She has form of being a bit nasty. Think she framed a couple of members on here including Lilith (who states naivety lol)...think she also has pimp like mates who had posed as punters on here before.
If she is scorned, she might be a handful to deal with

Like I said pal...get your number changed and you'll be a different man!   

[Cheshuk]

Like I said pal...get your number changed and you'll be a different man!   

Cheers I've done that already, is there anything else to look out for

[Brumish]

Cheers I've done that already, is there anything else to look out for

Should be sufficient unless you let out other linkable deets. If ever any prossies ask you to park in a certain place...don't do it 

[Cheshuk]

Should be sufficient unless you let out other linkable deets. If ever any prossies ask you to park in a certain place...don't do it 

Thanks actually never been asked that, definitely got to be smarter from now on

[pbrown355]

I've had that "you can park outside" thing. Never done it

[joninbristol]

I was on the end of similar demands from one who as thankfully left AW, detailed here:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284010.0

You've got to question their motivation for being insistent on you parking in a specific place. It's not normal behaviour.
OK, safety and security is one thing, but anyone intent on harming an SP isn't going to fall for it, or use their own car/ reg. plate anyway. And if your personal safety is highest on your priorities, or you're risk averse, you probably shouldn't be in this game anyway, as a punter or as an SP.

So you're left with a) blackmail b) damage or c) theft from a motor vehicle.
The latter is the most likely as a) is hard to do, b) has no gain, but with c) their accomplice will know how long you'll be inside the SP's place for. Instant monetary gain with minimal risk if you've anything worth taking inside your car.
And who needs the hassle of a broken window, even if you've not. 
For me it's the only thing that computes, but maybe I'm thinking too logically.