Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Entrapped Punter Jailed  (Read 3758 times)

Offline Pythagoras

External Link/Members Only

There’s no fool like an old fool. As the saying goes.

Offline Lewwy

Yep, total fool. Having said that, "sting" operations like this make me feel very uneasy. I can accept it given that it's the proper authorities doing it in this case but lots of these things are carried out by self-appointed guardians of the people such as that Dark Justice lot. There is something extremely creepy and insidious with organisations like that and I've always had grave concerns about the people who populate them. 
Banned reason: Offered free booking because he wouldn't post details.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline myothernameis

There’s no fool like an old fool. As the saying goes.

To me this sounds like entrapment, and have highlight this part in red, so this old guy phones the advert, and gets told, only Lacy is available.  But at some point he should have said no, but what would happen he reported this to the police,

Quote
Alan Fitzgerald answered an online advert in the escort category for a 'hot teen girl' with a photo of an 18-year-old woman. Teesside Crown Court heard that when the 59-year-old rang the number on the advert, on September 24, last year, a man told him that they only had "Lacey" available, and asked him: " Our girls are young, is that what you're looking for?"

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,657
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
To me this sounds like entrapment, and have highlight this part in red, so this old guy phones the advert, and gets told, only Lacy is available.  But at some point he should have said no, but what would happen he reported this to the police,
Never mind entrapment, he should have reported it to the police instead of agreeing and going through with it. The more cunts like this that get caught the better.

Had he reported it he would have been a witness not the accused.

Offline Zeusthedoc

no sympathy

it was made clear to him that this is a 15 year old girl

wrong'un on so many counts!

Offline Fragilehand

Can't believe anyone is calling him a fool! Anyone under 16 is a massive no no not a fool but a dirty bastard. Deserves every thing he gets. And this is coming from someone who hates council estate pedo hunters. They do it for the views and I'm not a fan. But anyone who doesn't run a Mile when the lass is 16 or under gets no sympathy

Offline Lewwy

Can't believe anyone is calling him a fool! Anyone under 16 is a massive no no not a fool but a dirty bastard. Deserves every thing he gets. And this is coming from someone who hates council estate pedo hunters. They do it for the views and I'm not a fan. But anyone who doesn't run a Mile when the lass is 16 or under gets no sympathy

I, and I'm sure everyone else here, agree with you. I think the word "fool" wasn't used to imply that he wasn't a filthy, dirty pervert but rather just a way to construct a quick post.
Banned reason: Offered free booking because he wouldn't post details.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,657
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
I, and I'm sure everyone else here, agree with you. I think the word "fool" wasn't used to imply that he wasn't a filthy, dirty pervert but rather just a way to construct a quick post.
Things like this don't make me feel uneasy, they can use any means they like to catch perverted cunts like him. There again I wouldn't be tempted by anyone underage.

There's even a rule on here about it.

26 Allegations of underaged /trafficked/forced sex workers
Contact law enforcement.

Offline portable

Judge Simon Jackson said that no evidence of child pornography or meetings with other children, had been found on Fitzgerald's laptop, when police examined it, "but there was a lot of contact with adult escort agencies and massage services."

Urgh, tabloid journalism perpetuating the "sordid" image of escorting and lumping massage in with it for good measure. Classy. Are we still living in the 1960's or something?


Offline datwabbit

Yep, total fool. Having said that, "sting" operations like this make me feel very uneasy. I can accept it given that it's the proper authorities doing it in this case but lots of these things are carried out by self-appointed guardians of the people such as that Dark Justice lot. There is something extremely creepy and insidious with organisations like that and I've always had grave concerns about the people who populate them.

The advert was placed by Cleveland police.

Offline Tiger63

The more of these people that are taken of the streets the better it is...no matter how they are caught
They know exactly how old the child is and what they are asking for.

However the sentencing is a joke.

Offline Dimond dave

 :thumbsdown:  good he got what he deserves he could of reported to the police ,, that choose was open to him. Also was the decent and right thing.  Ignore it and Cease all contact.

But he did the vile act of turning up.  So. In a nut shell he got what he deserved.

Online PumpDump

Judge Simon Jackson said that no evidence of child pornography or meetings with other children, had been found on Fitzgerald's laptop, when police examined it, "but there was a lot of contact with adult escort agencies and massage services."

Urgh, tabloid journalism perpetuating the "sordid" image of escorting and lumping massage in with it for good measure. Classy. Are we still living in the 1960's or something?

Hit the nail on the head. Why is his use of escorts being used as an aggravating factor?

Online PumpDump

The advert was placed by Cleveland police.

I had responses to ads I placed on CL before where the responder would tell me they were 15 in the first communication. At that point I would end the conversation. I wonder if it was paedo hunting groups or the police.

Offline datwabbit

What bugs me about this being a police advert is that all over the country we've had large pedo gangs which have taken a long time to crack. One was in this region.

This guy does not fit the profile of the men caught in those gangs. So yes, he's one less on the streets, but if you've got limited funds, surely getting into those gangs is where you invest.

Online jeanphillipe

16 is the legal age in the UK right ?

I would stick to AW verified that way you know they are definately 18+  if you like younger looking girls.




Online PumpDump

16 is the legal age in the UK right ?

I would stick to AW verified that way you know they are definately 18+  if you like younger looking girls.

If you are paying for it she has to be 18+. What is bizarre is you can get marry a 16 year old but you are not allowed to take naked photos of her until she is 18!

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,657
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
16 is the legal age in the UK right ?

I would stick to AW verified that way you know they are definately 18+  if you like younger looking girls.
As you think the legal age to sell sex is 16, if I were you I would read this ↓ and educate myself, there are various things a punter can be prosecuted for and ignorance is no excuse.

                                  External Link/Members Only

Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,657
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
What bugs me about this being a police advert is that all over the country we've had large pedo gangs which have taken a long time to crack. One was in this region.

This guy does not fit the profile of the men caught in those gangs. So yes, he's one less on the streets, but if you've got limited funds, surely getting into those gangs is where you invest.
Placing adverts like that can lead to locating the very gangs you refer to. He didn't need to have child porn on his computer for him to be actively seeking below 18 escorts or to be part of a gang for that matter.

The child sex abuse ring that were jailed a while ago didn't have any child porn on their computers. By day they were loving husbands and fathers by night abusive cunts, that was one of the reasons they took so long to build a case against them.

Offline Lewwy

If you are paying for it she has to be 18+. What is bizarre is you can get marry a 16 year old but you are not allowed to take naked photos of her until she is 18!

You can. There's actually an exemption in the Act to allow it if the people concerned are married to each other.
Banned reason: Offered free booking because he wouldn't post details.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline datwabbit

Anything involving a transaction is 18. Non transaction sex is 16. Transaction doesn't have to be money but it's not worth the day in court arguing that because it wasn't money, doesn't make it transaction.

Remember there's under 18's on escort and arrangement sites using ages 18-19. That's as much legally underage as under 16 sex.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2022, 04:41:01 pm by datwabbit »

Online jeanphillipe

All the escorts I've been with have stated 25+ which probably in reality is 30 +

Really young looking girls dont do it for me generally

I have learned something new today (that age of consent differs if you are paying or not)
« Last Edit: September 23, 2022, 08:43:32 pm by jeanphillipe »

Offline datwabbit

All the escorts I've been with have stated 25+ which probably in reality is 30 +

Really young looking girls dont do it for me generally

I have learned something new today (that age of consent differs if you are paying or not)
Better to know now than have a copper tell you  :scare:

Offline Tiger63

Personally I think anyone who has a "thing" for young looking girls has a problem TBH.
Where does it end