Author Topic: Delectable Divorcee of Reading  (Read 5057 times)


1 review(s) for Delectable Divorcee (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Uoti2

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

1.5 hour Incall in Reading

Communication: by AW email, then text, then voice call. Very good: friendly, quick and informative.

Location: apartment in the outskirts of Reading. Easy to find and with plenty of free, on-street parking.
Inside, the apartment was grubby and untidy, but it was safe and comfy, and we had it all to ourselves.
Discretion: When you leave, you will smell like an ash-tray.

Appearance:
Beauty is subjective, but I did not find Kimberly immediately physically attractive. She was dumpy, she looked more like fifty than forty, and her hair was a mess. At her advertised hourly rate of £150 - in Reading, not London - and with her profile text twice using the term "well groomed", a punter could reasonably expect much more.
Kimberly was clean and smell-free (apart from the all-pervading smell of cigarettes and incense).
At the time of my punt, Kimberly had only one photo on her AW profile, and it showed nothing useful, so "looked like her pictures" is moot.

Personality:
Kimberly's strong suit: she was smart, sassy, friendly, and thoroughly charming the whole time.
She gave me a very warm welcome, and after the paperwork, instead of the standard rush into a dark bedroom, we had drinks and a short but engaging chat on the sofa in a sunlit front room. Kimberly was genuinely interesting to talk to and I liked her a lot. She pretended convincingly that she liked me, too, and it's even possible that she actually did.
(Native English speaker, so no language problems.)

Services: DFK, OWO, CIM, receiving oral, penetration (protected), hand relief, multiple comes
Once in the bedroom, we started with some DFK, which Kimberly did well and with enthusiasm. After some very agreeable snogging and groping, I unsubtly arranged myself in a "get down there" body shape, and she took the "hint".
Kimberly's OWO was brilliant. Easily the best I've ever had, by a long, long way. It was so good that I came within five minutes of her having started work on me, and I came REALLY hard, right there in her mouth.
While I was lying in an ecstatic daze, Kimberly used some tissues to clean up - and then she blithely said, "This is the best time to touch someone, just after they've come" and took my still-hard and very sensitive cock back into her mouth. Aaah! She was obviously enjoying making me squirm as she deliberately over-stimulated my post-orgasmic tender bits. Fucking hell, it was intense.
Recovering prior to round two, I went down on her. She didn't come, but she did get rather wet. After some more OWO, which was just as good as the first time, it was on with a condom and into a vigorous and lengthy spell of doggy.
Eventually, we both ran out of energy, so we lay back down, I took off the condom and Kimberly got to work on me with her hands, which was exactly what I wanted. Even better, without being prompted, she applied copious amounts of lube. Halle-fucking-lujah: a WG who knows when and how to administer a lubed-up handjob! Her technique was better than most, and after a few suggestions from me, she got it pretty much spot on. She kept me on the edge of coming for quite a while, and again, I suspect that she enjoyed the intensity of basically torturing me, just as much as I did.

During the session:
No clock-watching. I left ten minutes after time was up and neither of us knew or cared.
No time-wasting.
No interruptions. Her mobile rang once, but she ignored it, and switched it to silent at the first suitable juncture.
Kimberly gave me her full attention throughout.

After we finished:
We chatted amiably while I was dressing and preparing to leave. Kimberly snogged me with real feeling when I was ready to say goodbye. I think she might genuinely have been up for more, despite our being well past finishing time, and our progress to the front door of the apartment was slow because of all the physical contact, mainly initiated by her.

Summary:
Pros: great personality and conversation; all agreed services provided enthusiastically; astoundingly good OWO and CIM; good DFK; very good hand technique; no clock-watching; no time-wasting; no distractions; safe; friendly; easy parking
Cons: not good-looking; no useful public profile pictures; venue was disordered and smelly (mostly cigarettes)

Would recommend to others? Yes, definitely, as long as you value excellent service over looks
Would I see her again? Yes, but not at her standard price: it's far too high

Offline HappyandLucky

Thx for posting, had considered her in the past and now glad I didn't.  Dumpy and £150  :scare:

For £150 there are many that provide a great service and catch the eye.

Offline nigel4498

Thx for posting, had considered her in the past and now glad I didn't.  Dumpy and £150  :scare:

For £150 there are many that provide a great service and catch the eye.

Have to agree. She bid on one of RB's awhile back, a lot less then £150 too.
Passed her by thankfully.



Offline Uoti2

I'm glad I was able to save you some money, and also to save both your time and hers. It's unpleasant for both parties when a punter has to walk because he doesn't find the WG attractive.

For £150 there are many that provide a great service and catch the eye.

I have yet to encounter one!
Did you have anyone in particular in mind?

Offline HappyandLucky

If you can travel try

External Link/Members Only

Good looking, tight fit body, great service and £100 for the hour

Offline Uoti2

If you can travel try

External Link/Members Only

Good looking, tight fit body, great service and £100 for the hour
Thanks for the tip. I appreciate your taking the trouble.

For me, going to a punt in Hounslow adds ninety minutes' travel time and fifteen pounds of fuel, each way. That means that my one-hour punt at £100 is going to take four hours and cost £130. Ouch.

Still, it's good to know that they're out there. Somewhere.

Offline HappyandLucky

I understand the travel time etc. She often works at Heathrow hotels so may cut your time and petrol spend down a little.

Cornish sub

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

1.5 hour Incall in Reading

Communication: by AW email, then text, then voice call. Very good: friendly, quick and informative.

Location: apartment in the outskirts of Reading. Easy to find and with plenty of free, on-street parking.
Inside, the apartment was grubby and untidy, but it was safe and comfy, and we had it all to ourselves.
Discretion: When you leave, you will smell like an ash-tray.

Appearance:
Beauty is subjective, but I did not find Kimberly immediately physically attractive. She was dumpy, she looked more like fifty than forty, and her hair was a mess. At her advertised hourly rate of £150 - in Reading, not London - and with her profile text twice using the term "well groomed", a punter could reasonably expect much more.
Kimberly was clean and smell-free (apart from the all-pervading smell of cigarettes and incense).
At the time of my punt, Kimberly had only one photo on her AW profile, and it showed nothing useful, so "looked like her pictures" is moot.

Personality:
Kimberly's strong suit: she was smart, sassy, friendly, and thoroughly charming the whole time.
She gave me a very warm welcome, and after the paperwork, instead of the standard rush into a dark bedroom, we had drinks and a short but engaging chat on the sofa in a sunlit front room. Kimberly was genuinely interesting to talk to and I liked her a lot. She pretended convincingly that she liked me, too, and it's even possible that she actually did.
(Native English speaker, so no language problems.)

Services: DFK, OWO, CIM, receiving oral, penetration (protected), hand relief, multiple comes
Once in the bedroom, we started with some DFK, which Kimberly did well and with enthusiasm. After some very agreeable snogging and groping, I unsubtly arranged myself in a "get down there" body shape, and she took the "hint".
Kimberly's OWO was brilliant. Easily the best I've ever had, by a long, long way. It was so good that I came within five minutes of her having started work on me, and I came REALLY hard, right there in her mouth.
While I was lying in an ecstatic daze, Kimberly used some tissues to clean up - and then she blithely said, "This is the best time to touch someone, just after they've come" and took my still-hard and very sensitive cock back into her mouth. Aaah! She was obviously enjoying making me squirm as she deliberately over-stimulated my post-orgasmic tender bits. Fucking hell, it was intense.
Recovering prior to round two, I went down on her. She didn't come, but she did get rather wet. After some more OWO, which was just as good as the first time, it was on with a condom and into a vigorous and lengthy spell of doggy.
Eventually, we both ran out of energy, so we lay back down, I took off the condom and Kimberly got to work on me with her hands, which was exactly what I wanted. Even better, without being prompted, she applied copious amounts of lube. Halle-fucking-lujah: a WG who knows when and how to administer a lubed-up handjob! Her technique was better than most, and after a few suggestions from me, she got it pretty much spot on. She kept me on the edge of coming for quite a while, and again, I suspect that she enjoyed the intensity of basically torturing me, just as much as I did.

During the session:
No clock-watching. I left ten minutes after time was up and neither of us knew or cared.
No time-wasting.
No interruptions. Her mobile rang once, but she ignored it, and switched it to silent at the first suitable juncture.
Kimberly gave me her full attention throughout.

After we finished:
We chatted amiably while I was dressing and preparing to leave. Kimberly snogged me with real feeling when I was ready to say goodbye. I think she might genuinely have been up for more, despite our being well past finishing time, and our progress to the front door of the apartment was slow because of all the physical contact, mainly initiated by her.

Summary:
Pros: great personality and conversation; all agreed services provided enthusiastically; astoundingly good OWO and CIM; good DFK; very good hand technique; no clock-watching; no time-wasting; no distractions; safe; friendly; easy parking
Cons: not good-looking; no useful public profile pictures; venue was disordered and smelly (mostly cigarettes)

Would recommend to others? Yes, definitely, as long as you value excellent service over looks
Would I see her again? Yes, but not at her standard price: it's far too high
I'm a bit confused by this as her profile only gives outcall prices, no mention of incalls. And strange that if it was an incall she charged the same rate as for an outcall, given there'd obviously be no travelling expenses incurred on her part.

Cornish sub

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

1.5 hour Incall in Reading

Communication: by AW email, then text, then voice call. Very good: friendly, quick and informative.

Location: apartment in the outskirts of Reading. Easy to find and with plenty of free, on-street parking.
Inside, the apartment was grubby and untidy, but it was safe and comfy, and we had it all to ourselves.
Discretion: When you leave, you will smell like an ash-tray.

Appearance:
Beauty is subjective, but I did not find Kimberly immediately physically attractive. She was dumpy, she looked more like fifty than forty, and her hair was a mess. At her advertised hourly rate of £150 - in Reading, not London - and with her profile text twice using the term "well groomed", a punter could reasonably expect much more.
Kimberly was clean and smell-free (apart from the all-pervading smell of cigarettes and incense).
At the time of my punt, Kimberly had only one photo on her AW profile, and it showed nothing useful, so "looked like her pictures" is moot.

Personality:
Kimberly's strong suit: she was smart, sassy, friendly, and thoroughly charming the whole time.
She gave me a very warm welcome, and after the paperwork, instead of the standard rush into a dark bedroom, we had drinks and a short but engaging chat on the sofa in a sunlit front room. Kimberly was genuinely interesting to talk to and I liked her a lot. She pretended convincingly that she liked me, too, and it's even possible that she actually did.
(Native English speaker, so no language problems.)

Services: DFK, OWO, CIM, receiving oral, penetration (protected), hand relief, multiple comes
Once in the bedroom, we started with some DFK, which Kimberly did well and with enthusiasm. After some very agreeable snogging and groping, I unsubtly arranged myself in a "get down there" body shape, and she took the "hint".
Kimberly's OWO was brilliant. Easily the best I've ever had, by a long, long way. It was so good that I came within five minutes of her having started work on me, and I came REALLY hard, right there in her mouth.
While I was lying in an ecstatic daze, Kimberly used some tissues to clean up - and then she blithely said, "This is the best time to touch someone, just after they've come" and took my still-hard and very sensitive cock back into her mouth. Aaah! She was obviously enjoying making me squirm as she deliberately over-stimulated my post-orgasmic tender bits. Fucking hell, it was intense.
Recovering prior to round two, I went down on her. She didn't come, but she did get rather wet. After some more OWO, which was just as good as the first time, it was on with a condom and into a vigorous and lengthy spell of doggy.
Eventually, we both ran out of energy, so we lay back down, I took off the condom and Kimberly got to work on me with her hands, which was exactly what I wanted. Even better, without being prompted, she applied copious amounts of lube. Halle-fucking-lujah: a WG who knows when and how to administer a lubed-up handjob! Her technique was better than most, and after a few suggestions from me, she got it pretty much spot on. She kept me on the edge of coming for quite a while, and again, I suspect that she enjoyed the intensity of basically torturing me, just as much as I did.

During the session:
No clock-watching. I left ten minutes after time was up and neither of us knew or cared.
No time-wasting.
No interruptions. Her mobile rang once, but she ignored it, and switched it to silent at the first suitable juncture.
Kimberly gave me her full attention throughout.

After we finished:
We chatted amiably while I was dressing and preparing to leave. Kimberly snogged me with real feeling when I was ready to say goodbye. I think she might genuinely have been up for more, despite our being well past finishing time, and our progress to the front door of the apartment was slow because of all the physical contact, mainly initiated by her.

Summary:
Pros: great personality and conversation; all agreed services provided enthusiastically; astoundingly good OWO and CIM; good DFK; very good hand technique; no clock-watching; no time-wasting; no distractions; safe; friendly; easy parking
Cons: not good-looking; no useful public profile pictures; venue was disordered and smelly (mostly cigarettes)

Would recommend to others? Yes, definitely, as long as you value excellent service over looks
Would I see her again? Yes, but not at her standard price: it's far too high

Cornish sub

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sorry, don't know what happened there, me quoting the OP's op twice. Don't know how to delete the second one, so maybe Admin can. Thanks.

Sheerharvestry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm glad I was able to save you some money, and also to save both your time and hers. It's unpleasant for both parties when a punter has to walk because he doesn't find the WG attractive.

I have yet to encounter one!
Did you have anyone in particular in mind?

Leticia of Reading? £150 for an hour right now, going up to £170 in September unfortunately but apparently she's worth it.

Offline rubric

I have yet to encounter one!
Did you have anyone in particular in mind?

Laura Super Star, Letitia, Lucy2015? 

I think bad things persist because people when people accept poor levels of service (as this appears to be) for fairly significant sums (150ph should get you a decent service).

Offline Uoti2

Would recommend to others? Yes, definitely, as long as you value excellent service over looks
I think bad things persist because people when people accept poor levels of service (as this appears to be) for fairly significant sums (150ph should get you a decent service).

Offline rubric



If you aren't fussed about looks - then I'd suggest you also try Gabriella in Reading (in addition to the girls listed above), she's cheaper, no great looker but does do a good service.

I should say that the reason for my post is that I feel for 150p/h you should be able to expect more than a visit to a unkempt dinner lady, no matter how exquisite the service :)
« Last Edit: August 12, 2014, 01:17:08 pm by rubric »

Offline Uoti2

If you aren't fussed about looks - then I'd suggest you also try Gabriella in Reading (in addition to the girls listed above), she's cheaper, no great looker but does do a good service.

I should say that the reason for my post is that I feel for 150p/h you should be able to expect more than a visit to a unkempt dinner lady, no matter how exquisite the service :)
Beautifully put!

I'm now wondering how many dinner ladies also work as prostitutes. What if a male teacher took an "extended break" to nip out for a punt and the WG turned out to be Doris from the canteen? Given how punters' tastes vary, perhaps she wouldn't need to change uniform. She might even have to dispense baked beans (in the standard way, or otherwise).

Back on-topic: yes, you make a good point. The term "service" is not precisely defined, and you are quite reasonably suggesting that it should include appearance.

You might also have pointed out (but generously didn't, thank you) that the lack of a face pic, or indeed any useful photo whatsoever, could be taken as a warning sign on any WG's profile, and might suggest to the punter that he think again.

All I can say in response is that when I visited Kimberly, it was right at the end of a very, very bad punting week, one that I felt obliged to redeem somehow, otherwise even I might have walked.

More generally, I wouldn't say I'm uninterested in looks, but I do seem to have different standards from those of many UKPers.

Btw, thanks also for the suggestions of other WGs.

Offline Stiltskin

If you aren't fussed about looks - then I'd suggest you also try Gabriella in Reading (in addition to the girls listed above), she's cheaper, no great looker but does do a good service.

I'd second that. I'm a bit fussy about looks, but Gabriella gives a good service and is very friendly. Her location is a bit remote, right out in the sticks, but this was a plus point for me.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline Silver Birch

Leticia of Reading? £150 for an hour right now, going up to £170 in September unfortunately but apparently she's worth it.

I'm a big fan of Leticia External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only but I won't pay £170/hr   :(

touch.and.go

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest