Author Topic: EP-x - Cheltenham  (Read 6611 times)


43 review(s) for miss-evie-passionné (37 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline Magic500

Occured a couple of months back.
Emailed on AW and she communicated swiftly.Opted for hour.
I was in a town not very far away visiting a friend and decided to go see her and luckily she could do the time I wanted.

It was in central Cheltenham and parking was available just outside her place.
I believe she has some issues with a nosey neighbour so I just parked and followed her instructions.
The flat was not very nice. Cluttered and quite small. Stunk of cigarettes and vape.

The girl herself isn't as attractive as I had imagined or hoped. Nice tits and a curvy body which wasn't very gym toned. What I found more of a turn off tho was her attitude.
Very brusque and quite arrogant. Seemed streetwise and clearly has been doing it a while.
She has an attitude of 'like it or f** off'.

Owo had to be requested but she prefers with condom. CIM not available. Quite a mechanical punt..no real eye contact.
Tried a few positions and came. The doggy was ok and bit of an effort from her in CG  which is how I came.
Threw some toilet roll over so I could clean up.
Spent some time chatting. Said she runs a business.. but when asked about what she does, said it was private and doesn't want to discuss these things with clients....said she runs three businesses actually and only does this when she wants rather than through desperation.

She vaped whilst chatting and wasn't mindful of the smoke being blown towards me.
I didn't find her very pleasant nor sexy.
Inflated prices for what she does. Will give a neutral rather than negative as the doggy and CG was ok
Won't be back.


Offline Cheltclient

Rating is your call but thanks for the review. Gives me all the information I need to stay clear

Offline justalad

Owo had to be requested but she prefers with condom. CIM not available.
Sorry to hear that you had a shit punt.

Never known the SP to provide OWO, her profile and LL state OW as has been my experience previously.

Offline Danj89

Sorry to hear about your experience i used to see her back in the day (under old chloe kumms profile) and the meets used to feature a bit more enthusiasm and owo so was enough for me. Shame to hear the levelof service not the same as before.

Offline Magic500

Yes I know she has been in the game quite a long time.

Offline Moby Dick


Offline Magic500

On this occasion it was £150 and £20 for the owo. Though it's not advertised and not for all.

Previously she used to be £120 for the hour years back if I remember correctly

Offline sensualencounter

On this occasion it was £150 and £20 for the owo. Though it's not advertised and not for all.

Previously she used to be £120 for the hour years back if I remember correctly
I’m calling bullshit on this. She hasn’t offered owo (whether included or extra) for at least 4 years. She makes it clear on her aw profile it’s ow / covered oral only and she has also mentioned it on EH and previously on UKE.
I’ve seen her regularly for the past 3-4 years and I’ve asked previously but she has never changed.
So, either you’re talking shit or you’re an incredibly lucky punter to be offered it.

Offline Cheltclient

I’m calling bullshit on this. She hasn’t offered owo (whether included or extra) for at least 4 years. She makes it clear on her aw profile it’s ow / covered oral only and she has also mentioned it on EH and previously on UKE.
I’ve seen her regularly for the past 3-4 years and I’ve asked previously but she has never changed.
So, either you’re talking shit or you’re an incredibly lucky punter to be offered it.

I’ve not seen this SP so you’re def better judged than me on such a call.

I remember I saw a Welsh escort years ago - think her name was Carmen Brooke - and I recall she wasn’t offering OWO and her profile was quite stern about it. I hadn’t seen her before but asked if there was any way I could have OWO as wouldn’t book otherwise and would be gutted (charmer me). And I remember I was expecting a barrage of abuse but she agreed. Didn’t even have to pay extra. So guess it can happen. Mind you, with Carmen, I don’t think she never provided OWO. It was something she used to provide.

Offline sensualencounter

I’ve not seen this SP so you’re def better judged than me on such a call.

I remember I saw a Welsh escort years ago - think her name was Carmen Brooke - and I recall she wasn’t offering OWO and her profile was quite stern about it. I hadn’t seen her before but asked if there was any way I could have OWO as wouldn’t book otherwise and would be gutted (charmer me). And I remember I was expecting a barrage of abuse but she agreed. Didn’t even have to pay extra. So guess it can happen. Mind you, with Carmen, I don’t think she never provided OWO. It was something she used to provide.
I’m still calling bullshit. I’ve asked over the years and even offered extra but no budging. And anyway, OP’s logged on since my accusation and hasn’t bothered refuting it. That to me is good enough proof he’s talking shit.
What makes it even more suss is the OP and I had a to and fro on another one of her reviews about ow/ owo a couple of months back as the other reviewer said (incorrectly as he admitted) he was expecting owo. And the OP had the perfect opportunity to raise this then but didn’t.

Offline bristolnick

I saw her mentioned a few times on the Welsh board and was interested. Think i might stay away after this review.

Offline Thepacifist

Every time I’ve seen her it’s been OW.

Offline justalad

Every time I’ve seen her it’s been OW.
+1 and I’ve seen her 4 times over a 4 year period.

Offline Cheltclient

I’m still calling bullshit. I’ve asked over the years and even offered extra but no budging. And anyway, OP’s logged on since my accusation and hasn’t bothered refuting it. That to me is good enough proof he’s talking shit.
What makes it even more suss is the OP and I had a to and fro on another one of her reviews about ow/ owo a couple of months back as the other reviewer said (incorrectly as he admitted) he was expecting owo. And the OP had the perfect opportunity to raise this then but didn’t.

As I said you’re def better placed to question it. Does seem odd if it’s very much OW for everyone else.

Offline Danj89

I think 4 years is about right, used to see her when she toured swindon and she used to do owo and one day got a text saying 100% deffo off the cards.

Offline Magic500

I’m calling bullshit on this. She hasn’t offered owo (whether included or extra) for at least 4 years. She makes it clear on her aw profile it’s ow / covered oral only and she has also mentioned it on EH and previously on UKE.
I’ve seen her regularly for the past 3-4 years and I’ve asked previously but she has never changed.
So, either you’re talking shit or you’re an incredibly lucky punter to be offered it.

The owo was extremely poor anyway. Just licked the sides and the condom came on very quickly . 
Call it what you will. The punt definitely occurred -I don't have the time to write fiction.


Offline Ckumms

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 12
  • Likes: 3
  •  
I don’t make a habit of replying to reviews on here but I am going to categorically state that I did not perform oral without a condom. The reason I don’t offer oral without is because I caught an STI (oral Gonorrhoea) few years back that took weeks to shift. I have not offered it since I became Brooke.. I’m not sure why OP would lie so I’m going to assume it’s just a lapse in memory but I’d hate for anyone to think I offer it as I have many clients that come SPECIFICALLY because I do not offer unprotected services anymore.

I’m genuinely sorry you didn’t have a good time OP - I’m not going to get into the other things in the review as I really don’t want a slanging match but the OWO is simply incorrect. Why would I offer it to someone I’ve not seen before but none of my regulars? Makes no sense.

Evie

Offline lamboman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,115
  • Likes: 6
  •  
  • Reviews: 30
I don’t make a habit of replying to reviews on here but I am going to categorically state that I did not perform oral without a condom. The reason I don’t offer oral without is because I caught an STI (oral Gonorrhoea) few years back that took weeks to shift. I have not offered it since I became Brooke.. I’m not sure why OP would lie so I’m going to assume it’s just a lapse in memory but I’d hate for anyone to think I offer it as I have many clients that come SPECIFICALLY because I do not offer unprotected services anymore.

I’m genuinely sorry you didn’t have a good time OP - I’m not going to get into the other things in the review as I really don’t want a slanging match but the OWO is simply incorrect. Why would I offer it to someone I’ve not seen before but none of my regulars? Makes no sense.

Evie
That's put the cat among the pigeons.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2022, 09:40:34 am by daviemac »
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Magic500

I don’t make a habit of replying to reviews on here but I am going to categorically state that I did not perform oral without a condom. The reason I don’t offer oral without is because I caught an STI (oral Gonorrhoea) few years back that took weeks to shift. I have not offered it since I became Brooke.. I’m not sure why OP would lie so I’m going to assume it’s just a lapse in memory but I’d hate for anyone to think I offer it as I have many clients that come SPECIFICALLY because I do not offer unprotected services anymore.

I’m genuinely sorry you didn’t have a good time OP - I’m not going to get into the other things in the review as I really don’t want a slanging match but the OWO is simply incorrect. Why would I offer it to someone I’ve not seen before but none of my regulars? Makes no sense.

Evie

Thanks for your reply here. As far as I remember, and I do recall the punt, it was along with two others I had in the Cheltenham area including one on the same day before going on to Swindon.
I won't argue with you over the contents of my review as you know full well that it occurred. This is not the arena to debate with you the service that was offered to me nor the manner in which it was offered. It is my version of events as they took place.
I stand by my review. However thank you for highlighting that it may have been a lapse in memory on my part.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2022, 09:40:48 am by daviemac »

Offline Magic500

Must have clicked the wrong 'quote' but reply was directed at Evie.
Thank you

Offline sensualencounter

OP this is EXACTLY the arena to debate services as you’re saying you got owo, yet a lot of punters are saying we haven’t had owo and she doesn’t offer it. And now the escort herself has said she doesn’t offer it and didn’t do it in your booking.

So it looks like you’re lying about that for some strange reason. Which makes me wonder what sort of character you are to lie. Not only that but you could damage the escort’s business here. She has stated pretty clearly and yet your lie could cause her a lot of harassment from people now expecting owo. This could end up with some punters going along and then trying to boundary push and put her in an awkward and potentially dangerous situation.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,629
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
Having met EP and uploaded a neutral review shortly before the OP, then I concur with some aspects of his report eg she does seem arrogant, it was similarly an underwhelming experience, she isn't gym toned and her flat is small and cluttered.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=353352.0

But it was definitely default OW, not OWO.

After being bullish and saying he stood by his version etc, the OP then admits at the end that he might have misremembered. :unknown:

We weren't there so can't say for sure, but given posts from the SP, the OP and other punters, plus her known anti-OWO stance, the most likely scenario is that he got confused with one of 2 other SPs he met around the same time. But punters will make up their own mind based on all the above.

OP this is EXACTLY the arena to debate services as you’re saying you got owo, yet a lot of punters are saying we haven’t had owo and she doesn’t offer it. And now the escort herself has said she doesn’t offer it and didn’t do it in your booking.

So it looks like you’re lying about that for some strange reason. Which makes me wonder what sort of character you are to lie. Not only that but you could damage the escort’s business here. She has stated pretty clearly and yet your lie could cause her a lot of harassment from people now expecting owo. This could end up with some punters going along and then trying to boundary push and put her in an awkward and potentially dangerous situation.

Fine to challenge him over OWO if you've actually met EP but that's already been done and the content and tone of your post, and accusing the OP of lying and being of poor character makes you seem like a whiteknight.

« Last Edit: September 11, 2022, 11:17:29 pm by Cunning Punt »

Online southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,076
  • Likes: 161
  •  
  • Reviews: 27

After being bullish and saying he stood by his version etc, the OP then admits at the end that he might have misremembered.

We weren't there so can't say for sure, but given posts from the SP, the OP and other punters, plus her known anti-OWO stance, the most likely scenario is that he got confused with one of 2 other SPs he met around the same time. But punters will make up their own mind based on all the above.

Fine to challenge him over OWO if you've actually met EP but that's already been done and the content and tone of your post, and accusing the OP of lying and being of poor character makes you seem like a whiteknight.


if you look at it again CP -  He was challanged by other guys and has been adament that he got owo. he got challenged by the WG and again if you look at his reply

Thanks for your reply here. As far as I remember, and I do recall the punt, it was along with two others I had in the Cheltenham area including one on the same day before going on to Swindon.
I won't argue with you over the contents of my review as you know full well that it occurred. This is not the arena to debate with you the service that was offered to me nor the manner in which it was offered. It is my version of events as they took place.
I stand by my review. However thank you for highlighting that it may have been a lapse in memory on my part.

he still maintains he was right. It was only his last sentence that he conceded that he may have been wrong. so either he was  lying or he is a very argogant man who has trouble accepting he was wrong to the extent he is happy to cast aspersions on a WG that could cause her significant issues. isn't that a sign of a poor character?

Offline sensualencounter

Having met EP and uploaded a neutral review shortly before the OP, then I concur with some aspects of his report eg she does seem arrogant, it was similarly an underwhelming experience, she isn't gym toned and her flat is small and cluttered.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=353352.0

But it was definitely default OW, not OWO.

After being bullish and saying he stood by his version etc, the OP then admits at the end that he might have misremembered. :unknown:

We weren't there so can't say for sure, but given posts from the SP, the OP and other punters, plus her known anti-OWO stance, the most likely scenario is that he got confused with one of 2 other SPs he met around the same time. But punters will make up their own mind based on all the above.

Fine to challenge him over OWO if you've actually met EP but that's already been done and the content and tone of your post, and accusing the OP of lying and being of poor character makes you seem like a whiteknight.
See Southcoastpunter’s reply - he sums up exactly what I was going to write perfectly.

Offline lamboman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,115
  • Likes: 6
  •  
  • Reviews: 30
Have to say I've never forgotten if someone gave me a BJ with or without a condom.
Think the OP is a bullshitter.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,629
  • Likes: 30
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
It was only his last sentence that he conceded that he may have been wrong.

That was as I described, ie he was adamant/bullish then at the end he conceded he may have been wrong, which appears a backtrack. Though I guess I hesitate before going so far as accusing other punters here of lying or being of bad character.

Offline justalad

19 reviews, 8 neutral and 4 negs.  The OP is either a hard man to please or maker better choices.