Meggan - Shoreditch

[ebony_lover]

Link: External Link/Members Only
tel: 07398064617
Location: in call, flat in Shoreditch
Paid: £160 for 1 hour

Meggan seems to be perpetually touring, and claims to have no permanent UK address, although most commonly seems to be found in Watford.

This week she was in my area, and none of my usual ebony girls were available, so I decided to branch out and try a Mexican.

Flat was fine, clean but not fancy. Shower available. Seems to be shared with some other Mexican girls. Threesomes are available but the others didn’t look half as attractive.

Meggan’s main appeal is her face and breasts, both of which are accurately shown in her photos. She’s a friendly girl, and her English is good enough for general chit chat although perhaps not meaningful discussion. Service was good, with titty fuck, blowjob and cowgirl all as requested and with some enthusiasm.

Escorting is an unusual career, and so I try to understand the motivations of the girls who choose it. One of the main reasons I prefer ebony girls is they tend to be “natural sluts”. They spend much of their free time fucking random strangers for free and one day they realise they could be getting paid for doing the same thing. Eventually they can become jaded, would like to retire but can’t became they are addicted to the low effort / high money lifestyle. But in the early years, with an ebony girl you can get a pretty “authentic” experience, i.e. the same experience that a very attractive man who picked her up in a club would get for free.

Meggan doesn’t fall into that category. Her real life is in Mexico, she’s just in the UK to make money. She does the job well but it’s just a job. She watches the clock and kicks you out the second your time is up. If you don’t mind that then I highly recommend her. Personally it’s not what I usually like but I still think it’s worth it occasionally for those tits.

[king tarzan]

Forget her personal lifestyle crap
Completely irrelevant

What physical services did you get???

[Mario7769]

Nice casual racism there in your "review". Ebony girls are "natural sluts"? What the fuck is wrong with you?

[Crockers]

Link: External Link/Members Only
tel: 07398064617
Location: in call, flat in Shoreditch
Paid: £160 for 1 hour

Meggan seems to be perpetually touring, and claims to have no permanent UK address, although most commonly seems to be found in Watford.

This week she was in my area, and none of my usual ebony girls were available, so I decided to branch out and try a Mexican.

Flat was fine, clean but not fancy. Shower available. Seems to be shared with some other Mexican girls. Threesomes are available but the others didn’t look half as attractive.

Meggan’s main appeal is her face and breasts, both of which are accurately shown in her photos. She’s a friendly girl, and her English is good enough for general chit chat although perhaps not meaningful discussion. Service was good, with titty fuck, blowjob and cowgirl all as requested and with some enthusiasm.

Escorting is an unusual career, and so I try to understand the motivations of the girls who choose it. One of the main reasons I prefer ebony girls is they tend to be “natural sluts”. They spend much of their free time fucking random strangers for free and one day they realise they could be getting paid for doing the same thing. Eventually they can become jaded, would like to retire but can’t became they are addicted to the low effort / high money lifestyle. But in the early years, with an ebony girl you can get a pretty “authentic” experience, i.e. the same experience that a very attractive man who picked her up in a club would get for free.

Meggan doesn’t fall into that category. Her real life is in Mexico, she’s just in the UK to make money. She does the job well but it’s just a job. She watches the clock and kicks you out the second your time is up. If you don’t mind that then I highly recommend her. Personally it’s not what I usually like but I still think it’s worth it occasionally for those tits.

Racist twat.

I must've fucked about fourty odd women over the  last 2.5years, all bar one White.

Many told me they love sex and are doing the job so they may as well get paid for it.

[JonasG]

The hell is this review? And it doesn't really sound like a positive either?

Seen her twice in the last few months, first time I gave a neutral then saw her a 2nd time a few weeks back and she was quite brilliant. That encounter would be very much a positive.

Based off that 2nd encounter she's a top tier WG IMO, but not sure on her consistency levels though.

[ebony_lover]

My apologies. Can’t seem to edit review but I will examine my own prejudices and endeavour to avoid perpetuating racist stereotypes in future.

Perhaps my review focussed too much on the negatives. The sex was good, the girl was honest and reliable and I enjoyed it, so for me that’s overall positive. I just wanted to emphasise it was more professional than girlfriend experience so I might not go back.

[king tarzan]

My apologies. Can’t seem to edit review but I will examine my own prejudices and endeavour to avoid perpetuating racist stereotypes in future.

Perhaps my review focussed too much on the negatives. The sex was good, the girl was honest and reliable and I enjoyed it, so for me that’s overall positive. I just wanted to emphasise it was more professional than girlfriend experience so I might not go back.

Will you become a tree hugging hippie?

[irwinuk]

didn't know this forum had some woke sjw lads lurking around. isn't that a direct moral conflict to prostitution?
thank the guy for the review and move along. keep the morality discussions some real life events where they are truly needed, not a post about a punt.
 

[Heph]

Will you become a tree hugging hippie?

Quite!

His original remarks were no different in most respects than the race-determined stuff we routinely hear about [enter any nationality here] women.

Single parent households per head of population will show us that, for example Chinese born or descended women tend not, relative to other groups, be quite so promiscuous. Whether this says stuff that we're uncomfortable with is on us.

[Titti Tatti]

Quite!

His original remarks were no different in most respects than the race-determined stuff we routinely hear about [enter any nationality here] women.

Single parent households per head of population will show us that, for example Chinese born or descended women tend not, relative to other groups, be quite so promiscuous. Whether this says stuff that we're uncomfortable with is on us.

Or they have a different attitude to contraception? To marriage and divorce? At least the first guy realised the rubbish he was talking. Can you?

Kudos to the guy who called out the racism. It's completely unnecessary.

[0mard3000]

That's some racist shit right there.

[oinki]

didn't know this forum had some woke sjw lads lurking around. isn't that a direct moral conflict to prostitution?
thank the guy for the review and move along. keep the morality discussions some real life events where they are truly needed, not a post about a punt.
 

Thank him for what exactly? I know more about the dude's view of black woman than what services he had. This is as good as an aw positive review (I.e. not a lot). You should be saying keep your views away from the review and write the services you had (at minimum) + review the services.

[JonasG]

I mean it's a shit review first and foremost excluding his weird views.

Thank him lol.

[Heph]

Or they have a different attitude to contraception? To marriage and divorce? At least the first guy realised the rubbish he was talking. Can you?

Kudos to the guy who called out the racism. It's completely unnecessary.

Widely observed outcomes resulting from cultural attitudes to contraception and absent fathers may well be a stand-in for 'slut-life', or whatever the chosen term under discussion might be. No matter than it makes some bum-cheeks squeak in recognition of trends they don't like. No: we daily see "Rom this / Rom that" and scarcely an eyelid bats.

But, yes, what any of it has to do with a Mexican woman is beyond me.

[king tarzan]

External Link/Members Only

It's all mixtures virtually globally

100% purity?? Who knows

[irwinuk]

Thank him for what exactly? I know more about the dude's view of black woman than what services he had. This is as good as an aw positive review (I.e. not a lot). You should be saying keep your views away from the review and write the services you had (at minimum) + review the services.

I can't see why people think that is racist. if i say that i like oriental girls because they moan every 5 seconds and giggle like highschool girls does that make me a pedo ? if he had the fetish for white girls and saw them as slut material, would that have been racist too ? Or face slapping during oral makes a guy a abuser?
I really think you guys really find context in everything. It's just a view / fetish. I don't know the guy and maybe he is, maybe he isn't racist but i don't feel like this specific review is as bad as you guys make it sound. As a guy said here: isn't it the same thing with all the 'typical rom behaviour' 'EE gipsy' etc. no one bats an eye there so why all this fuss all of a sudden

[Atrueyorkie]

OP, I like ebony/black girls too as most members who read my reviews know.

But your statement was completely irrelevant to the actual WG that you were reviewing for one. Where was the relevance to add that in?

Secondly to what you actually said. I’m still processing how you thought you could slyly insert that comment and think that was okay. You made a blanket statement, generalising a “whole” race. I actually cannot believe you wrote that. Had a read, then hit the post button.

You make such a sweeping statement as if you’ve got some factual evidence to back up this absurd claim.

You are probably those clients they talk about who request race play.

You “cannot” make a general derogatory statement like that and expect that to be swept under the carpet.

That was so dumb

[Atrueyorkie]

I can't see why people think that is racist. if i say that i like oriental girls because they moan every 5 seconds and giggle like highschool girls does that make me a pedo ? if he had the fetish for white girls and saw them as slut material, would that have been racist too ? Or face slapping during oral makes a guy a abuser?
I really think you guys really find context in everything. It's just a view / fetish. I don't know the guy and maybe he is, maybe he isn't racist but i don't feel like this specific review is as bad as you guys make it sound. As a guy said here: isn't it the same thing with all the 'typical rom behaviour' 'EE gipsy' etc. no one bats an eye there so why all this fuss all of a sudden

You’re first sentence is retarded. Pick up a dictionary, Google the word, soak it in. Then re-read what he wrote and then ask that dumb question again. You clearly don’t know the definition to be even putting an opinion on it

[Gurgel9165]

Getting Incel vibes from some people here. Black women come from different nations and cultures. To say that an African American women and a Sudanese woman can be expected to be equally promiscuous because of the colour of their skin is simply racist and a bit daft to be honest.

[king tarzan]

Getting Incel vibes from some people here. Black women come from different nations and cultures. To say that an African American women and a Sudanese woman can be expected to be equally promiscuous because of the colour of their skin is simply racist and a bit daft to be honest.

Long as she's hot slut who cares where she is from
Good old old skool days yahoooooo

[pantywetter]

Strange review and strange replies.

All most of us care about is how well she sucks and fucks.

Any feedback on that?

[Heph]

You’re first sentence is retarded. Pick up a dictionary, Google the word, soak it in. Then re-read what he wrote and then ask that dumb question again. You clearly don’t know the definition to be even putting an opinion on it

It always helps when we direct someone to the dictionary, if our own very first word isn't itself a typo that most schoolkids would know how to avoid.

As to the business of definitions, a belief in the inherent superiority/inferiority of races hasn't much to do with the OP's description: for a start, it's confined to one sex. Perhaps he has that belief, but it was reasonable to see and assume that that was his narrow experience of modern, younger, working/benefits class London women...who happen to be 'ebony'. Is it a gross generalisation? Yes; but then much of the talk here goes in that direction before too long. Would there have been similar accusations if, say, a black member here had given their views on the virtues of pounding drunken Irish sluts? I don't doubt there'd be some, but there's certainly a great deal less when it comes to Roms, Asians or (as in this case) Latinas: it is significantly tolerated. And is it any more demeaning than referring to BBCs breeding / smashing white sluts? No, not really.

[JO6688]

Strange review and strange replies.

All most of us care about is how well she sucks and fucks.

Any feedback on that?

See myy review when she toured Chigwell. She can take a good pounding and sucks good (for extra £20). She can be enthusiastic.

[JonasG]

When on her game she's top.

Really gets into it.

[jonesfromthere]

It always helps when we direct someone to the dictionary, if our own very first word isn't itself a typo that most schoolkids would know how to avoid.

As to the business of definitions, a belief in the inherent superiority/inferiority of races hasn't much to do with the OP's description: for a start, it's confined to one sex. Perhaps he has that belief, but it was reasonable to see and assume that that was his narrow experience of modern, younger, working/benefits class London women...who happen to be 'ebony'. Is it a gross generalisation? Yes; but then much of the talk here goes in that direction before too long. Would there have been similar accusations if, say, a black member here had given their views on the virtues of pounding drunken Irish sluts? I don't doubt there'd be some, but there's certainly a great deal less when it comes to Roms, Asians or (as in this case) Latinas: it is significantly tolerated. And is it any more demeaning than referring to BBCs breeding / smashing white sluts? No, not really.

' I prefer ebony girls is they tend to be “natural sluts'.
You're defending this shit? Freedom of speech I guess, right?

[HighlyMotivated]

Oh my god who cares... if he said the same thing about Romanians or Thais no one would care. The real annoyance is the pointless commentary in this review

[Heph]

' I prefer ebony girls is they tend to be “natural sluts'.
You're defending this shit? Freedom of speech I guess, right?

'tend'

If that's his narrow experience and view, that's his narrow experience: that's his loss. Just like the Arab guys I've met who like British women (by which we can invariably discern they overwhelmingly mean 'White, socially lower caste') "Because they are all whores". Or indeed, my Dutch SB who, never tires of opining that "British girls are so slutty; and such drunks" (in fairness, being young, she probably presumes to include non-whites in that); or a Ghanaian former gf who said "your British women are so loose", or a Japanese friend who says... do I really need to go on?

So, yeah. Pretty Much.

Oh my god who cares... if he said the same thing about Romanians or Thais no one would care. The real annoyance is the pointless commentary in this review

Quite: I can't say that the people complaining on this page engage in the same behaviour themselves or look the other way on occasions similar comments or observations are made about other races, but nonetheless, we all know we frequently see it.

[Atrueyorkie]

It always helps when we direct someone to the dictionary, if our own very first word isn't itself a typo that most schoolkids would know how to avoid.

As to the business of definitions, a belief in the inherent superiority/inferiority of races hasn't much to do with the OP's description: for a start, it's confined to one sex. Perhaps he has that belief, but it was reasonable to see and assume that that was his narrow experience of modern, younger, working/benefits class London women...who happen to be 'ebony'. Is it a gross generalisation? Yes; but then much of the talk here goes in that direction before too long. Would there have been similar accusations if, say, a black member here had given their views on the virtues of pounding drunken Irish sluts? I don't doubt there'd be some, but there's certainly a great deal less when it comes to Roms, Asians or (as in this case) Latinas: it is significantly tolerated. And is it any more demeaning than referring to BBCs breeding / smashing white sluts? No, not really.

Clearly cherry picking. I’ll leave my original statement unedited. I’m not writing a dissertation so I’ll let you dissect and pick up whatever you want.

It would be the same stance/approach for any other demographic for me. I take no sides but I will highlight and point out dumb sweeping statements.

The original statement still stands and is factual. You clearly haven’t read it “in full” also (the definition), which shows in your reply. I’m not going spell it out as you’re supposed to be a grown adult with basic understanding, but alas. I don’t get paid to reply or educate unfortunately.

[Heph]

Clearly cherry picking. I’ll leave my original statement unedited. I’m not writing a dissertation so I’ll let you dissect and pick up whatever you want.

It would be the same stance/approach for any other demographic for me. I take no sides but I will highlight and point out dumb sweeping statements.

The original statement still stands and is factual. You clearly haven’t read it “in full” also (the definition), which shows in your reply. I’m not going spell it out as you’re supposed to be a grown adult with basic understanding, but alas. I don’t get paid to reply or educate unfortunately.

Good, but look up 'factual'. Appreciate that it is different from our opinion, however sincere our conviction in a notion may be. Nothing you wrote previously was factual.

Clearly the OP was given to making some crass, sweeping statements that don't reflect well on him. What's less clear are his attitudes to race, since, AFAIK, we don't know his, and whatever his casual inner thoughts might be, we saw none of the separatist or conqueror mentality usually evident in those who are supremacist types.

Again; those who eff-up their opening words, should probably avoid presuming to educate others, whether that's on definitions, basic understandings, or their particular take on Critical Race Theory.

enough from me, too

[Atrueyorkie]

Good, but look up 'factual'. Appreciate that it is different from our opinion, however sincere our conviction in a notion may be. Nothing you wrote previously was factual.

Clearly the OP was given to making some crass, sweeping statements that don't reflect well on him. What's less clear are his attitudes to race, since, AFAIK, we don't know his, and whatever his casual inner thoughts might be, we saw none of the separatist or conqueror mentality usually evident in those who are supremacist types.

Again; those who eff-up their opening words, should probably avoid presuming to educate others, whether that's on definitions, basic understandings, or their particular take on Critical Race Theory.

enough from me, too

The worrying part is that you’re a forum helper. The community is fucked.

[Saltnpepper]

Link: External Link/Members Only
tel: 07398064617
Location: in call, flat in Shoreditch
Paid: £160 for 1 hour

Meggan seems to be perpetually touring, and claims to have no permanent UK address, although most commonly seems to be found in Watford.

This week she was in my area, and none of my usual ebony girls were available, so I decided to branch out and try a Mexican.

Flat was fine, clean but not fancy. Shower available. Seems to be shared with some other Mexican girls. Threesomes are available but the others didn’t look half as attractive.

Meggan’s main appeal is her face and breasts, both of which are accurately shown in her photos. She’s a friendly girl, and her English is good enough for general chit chat although perhaps not meaningful discussion. Service was good, with titty fuck, blowjob and cowgirl all as requested and with some enthusiasm.

Escorting is an unusual career, and so I try to understand the motivations of the girls who choose it. One of the main reasons I prefer ebony girls is they tend to be “natural sluts”. They spend much of their free time fucking random strangers for free and one day they realise they could be getting paid for doing the same thing. Eventually they can become jaded, would like to retire but can’t became they are addicted to the low effort / high money lifestyle. But in the early years, with an ebony girl you can get a pretty “authentic” experience, i.e. the same experience that a very attractive man who picked her up in a club would get for free.

Meggan doesn’t fall into that category. Her real life is in Mexico, she’s just in the UK to make money. She does the job well but it’s just a job. She watches the clock and kicks you out the second your time is up. If you don’t mind that then I highly recommend her. Personally it’s not what I usually like but I still think it’s worth it occasionally for those tits.

Racist uneducated Twat 

[Heph]

The worrying part is that you’re a forum helper. The community is fucked.

Not a single thing you wrote was factual: it was all, incontestably, opinion or conjecture. Some of it, not much, I happen to agree with - and even the OP has said that he will reflect on his words - who knows he may have a mea culpa for you. But AFAIK, like the rest of us, you know next-to-nothing about him, from what he wrote here; we'd therefore be unwise to judge too harshly, until we know more.

Meanwhile I stand by the rest of my own earlier observations, particularly about the evident prevalence of blind spots and double standards, and will add to them a healthy scepticism about those who are eager to cast first stones.

[Atrueyorkie]

Not a single thing you wrote was factual: it was all, incontestably, opinion or conjecture. Some of it, not much, I happen to agree with - and even the OP has said that he will reflect on his words - who knows he may have a mea culpa for you. But AFAIK, like the rest of us, you know next-to-nothing about him, from what he wrote here; we'd therefore be unwise to judge too harshly, until we know more.

Meanwhile I stand by the rest of my own earlier observations, particularly about the evident prevalence of blind spots and double standards, and will add to them a healthy scepticism about those who are eager to cast first stones.

More than happy to take to PM. You’re still just cherry picking and it’s boring have to repeat over and over.

[oinki]

Thought you both were done.

But AFAIK, like the rest of us, you know next-to-nothing about him, from what he wrote here; we'd therefore be unwise to judge too harshly, until we know more.

Like you say, so why judge someone for having an opening sentence with a spelling mistake. Could have been autocorrect, could have been whatever. It's an Internet forum not an essay to be published.

[Heph]

why judge someone for having an opening sentence with a spelling mistake. Could have been autocorrect, could have been whatever. It's an Internet forum not an essay to be published.

You can go and check from my post: I didn't. What I did do was point out that if we are going to say someone's uneducated or retarded, and refer them to a dictionary to check a definition (which we ourselves appear to have wrong), we should probably make sure that evidence of our own basic education is on-point from the get-go. 'Your' doesn't get changed to 'you're' because of autocorrect: it happens because someone doesn't recognise the difference at the time they type it. See?

Anyway, yes; I think we're done.

[oinki]

You can go and check from my post: I didn't. What I did do was point out that if we are going to say someone's uneducated or retarded, and refer them to a dictionary to check a definition (which we ourselves appear to have wrong), we should probably make sure that evidence of our own basic education is on-point from the get-go. 'Your' doesn't get changed to 'you're' because of autocorrect: it happens because someone doesn't recognise the difference at the time they type it. See?

Anyway, yes; I think we're done.

Providing excellent help to the forum. You are sure of how his autocorrect works then. Good stuff.