Author Topic: Queen of Blow Pamela - Incall - Salisbury  (Read 1312 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6346142) (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Palace123

External Link/Members Only

B&S.

Arranged by text, confirmed services, double checked booking (explained it was a drive for me so needed definite confirmation)...not sure why I bothered.

Arrived, late opening the door so left on street wondering if I'd been given a fake address. Finally opens, upstairs..small girl but completely different and far less attractive opens. Straight off the bat I said where's the girl in the pics?....not there, never been there and never will be there. I explain my disappointment so she fetches her friend, this one looked even less appealing. So return back to the original WG to confirm price and services. Must have been a 2 minute conversation about the services I wanted because my texts obv went to someone else (DFK, owo and 69) I asked her three times to confirm the total price....in the end we agreed after double checking, I handed over money... but once I've handed it over she said she needed to have more.

I promptly remove the money from her hand and looked at her...  "I'll tell you what you can have, you can have nothing, you can have your time wasted too and you can have a bad review for dragging me here under false pretences and trying to be cute about the price".  A word of passing advice on the doorstep..."don't take customers for fools or you'll be treated as one yourself".

And that was that.  :hi:
« Last Edit: July 14, 2022, 07:06:44 am by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Hackneylad1

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,055
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 31
I have moved this from the East England page.

Are you sure its a positive?

Offline manofsimplepleasures

External Link/Members Only

B&S.

Arranged by text, confirmed services, double checked booking (explained it was a drive for me so needed definite confirmation)...not sure why I bothered.

Arrived, late opening the door so left on street wondering if I'd been given a fake address. Finally opens, upstairs..small girl but completely different and far less attractive opens. Straight off the bat I said where's the girl in the pics?....not there, never been there and never will be there. I explain my disappointment so she fetches her friend, this one looked even less appealing. So return back to the original WG to confirm price and services. Must have been a 2 minute conversation about the services I wanted because my texts obv went to someone else (DFK, owo and 69) I asked her three times to confirm the total price....in the end we agreed after double checking, I handed over money... but once I've handed it over she said she needed to have more.

I promptly remove the money from her hand and looked at her...  "I'll tell you what you can have, you can have nothing, you can have your time wasted too and you can have a bad review for dragging me here under false pretences and trying to be cute about the price".  A word of passing advice on the doorstep..."don't take customers for fools or you'll be treated as one yourself".

And that was that.  :hi:

Not a Positive then?

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,080
  • Likes: 161
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
Not a Positive then?

almost definitely not -  we forum helpers can change the rating but not until the Op himself has confirmed what he wants it to be.

(Otherwise Forum Helpers could just change a rating because they think it reads more like a neutral than a positive etc)

Offline ghostrider

I messaged her a few days back and told her she was using a fake pic,  she said she had just taken it but it was a screen grab.

Scamming cow.

Offline Palace123

Hi, thanks for amending to "negative" which was the original intention. Not sure what happened there.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac