BLONDE FIT CHARLOTTE - Whetstone N20

[whoya.kiddin]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

+447881309376
£70/30m £100/hr + £20 CIM
💰 🍌 ✌️ 🍭 🤤 🧕 😘 💆‍♂️ 🏄 👣 👺

Does what she says on the tin (almost) but take a view about value.

Booking was easy by text on the day for an afternoon booking.  The limited communication which I will return to later is evident by text.  You need to keep it really simple.

It is a well known value hotel 10 minutes from Harrow and Wealdstone station.  The entry instructions are slightly odd with her asking you to enter hotel without telling you the room.  She meets you in vestibule before admitting entry as an additional layer of security.  She  was friendly on arrival and asked me to wash my hands.

I was neutral about her looks.  The photos of her body in particular are flattering and I suspect taken a number of years ago and it is for this reason I am not reproducing the current profile pictures in my review.  If you look through the threads here there is some pretty accurate face pics which are worth sorting out.  I would give her 666 for face figure and services.  To be fare I do not generally punt SP’s this old.

Previous reviews have referenced her “poor English”.  My reservation and the reason I will not be booking again is that she will not engage in any sort of discussion about services beyond a very basic description.  I am about 90% certain the stuff about language is a subterfuge and that rather she is not prepared to discuss or agree services – she has a “take it or leave it” menu.  If you are a vanilla guy this will be fine.  If you want anything other than her basic service I would caution about booking her.  Swallow is listed in her profile but it certainly was not available for me. I got charged a £20 extra for CIM on an £100 hour booking. I thought she was overpriced for the looks and service on offer.

She was polite, friendly and showed a good level of attention in the room. Her hand skills are quite limited.  Her oral is better but no more than average.  She took CIM well.  You can tell I am underwhelmed. The session finished due to me rather than her.  So there is no particular warning here.  At the end I think she realised I was quite a “good” prospective punter and was making noises about me visiting again.   The point is by this time she had also already made it quite clear that she was not interested in my service request (or offering good value for money) and I knew I would not be going back. 

[whoya.kiddin]

Modertors - sorry I have published as a discussion rather than a review.  Could you move to the London reviews please with a NEUTRAL rating.

Thanks

[Fuzzyduck]

Modertors - sorry I have published as a discussion rather than a review.  Could you move to the London reviews please with a NEUTRAL rating.

Thanks

[bediscrete]

And should be Harrow and Wealdstone not Whetstone

[Fuzzyduck]

And should be Harrow and Wealdstone not Whetstone

Good point. Perhaps OP could clarify. Harrow & Wealdstone is some distance from Whetstone.

[Moorg]

I saw her in a budget chain hotel in Whetstone a few weeks ago.  Totteridge and whetstone nearest tube.

Agree with review, mine pending. Neutral.

[whoya.kiddin]

Good point. Perhaps OP could clarify. Harrow & Wealdstone is some distance from Whetstone.

Sorry I completely fucked this up and it was Whetstone - not Harrow and Wealdstone  -  where I saw here.  If the moderators are able to correct the mistake in the body of my review to align it with the (correct) heading it will be clearer.  Apologies again for the confusion.

[The_Don]

old profile:

External Link/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

I got charged a £20 extra for CIM on an £100 hour booking. I thought she was overpriced for the looks and service on offer.

She was polite, friendly and showed a good level of attention in the room. Her hand skills are quite limited.  Her oral is better but no more than average.  She took CIM well.  The point is by this time she had also already made it quite clear that she was not interested in my service request (or offering good value for money) and I knew I would not be going back.

Useful details that may helps punters, when researching this W/G for a punt.

Thank you for sharing via this review.

At the end I think she realised I was quite a “good” prospective punter and was making noises about me visiting again.

'For some' (W/G)

Hidden Image/Members Only

[whoya.kiddin]

The_Don,  thanks for your post but I fear you are in breach of the recent rule change on reproducing photos that are not currently published in an SP's public profile (past publication does not count).  I got a gentle wrist slap for this on my last review (though it later transpired they were published at the time in an alternative Vivastreet profile). 

[Fuzzyduck]

The_Don,  thanks for your post but I fear you are in breach of the recent rule change on reproducing photos that are not currently published in an SP's public profile (past publication does not count).  I got a gentle wrist slap for this on my last review (though it later transpired they were published at the time in an alternative Vivastreet profile).

My understanding is that this only applies to non-public domain (PG, verification) and social media pics, so it's OK to repost pics that were in the public domain in the past ie older profile and public gallery images.

[The_Don]

My understanding is that this only applies to non-public domain (PG, verification) and social media pics, so it's OK to repost pics that were in the public domain in the past ie older profile and public gallery images.

+1

I got a gentle wrist slap for this on my last review (though it later transpired they were published at the time in an alternative Vivastreet profile).

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=339101.msg3520781#msg3520781

The_Don,  thanks for your post but I fear you are in breach of the recent rule change on reproducing photos that are not currently published in an SP's public profile (past publication does not count).

The pictures are quoted from Diggler fights back! review  from https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=271515.msg2776230#msg2776230 iirc were part of the the old A/W profile I linked to, also see below quotes and links that are current still active on A/W for the old profile

External Link/Members Only
Pictures are very accurate
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[whoya.kiddin]

 

[daviemac]

The_Don,  thanks for your post but I fear you are in breach of the recent rule change on reproducing photos that are not currently published in an SP's public profile (past publication does not count).  I got a gentle wrist slap for this on my last review (though it later transpired they were published at the time in an alternative Vivastreet profile).

On that review I asked where the photos you posted came from and you thought they were from her PG.

Hi Daviemac, I put a note in the review that they downloaded when I used the chrome extension.  TBH I am not quite sure how this works but I think it means that they are in her private gallery but others have uploaded them to the extension? Please delete them if they are not allowed under the rules on images.  Also  I will leave it to you if the location is too obvious from my description (although it is a busy road and i have not given the specific address).

Under the current rules photo's from private galleries are not allowed to be posted or linked to no matter where they came from or how they were obtained.

Nothing wrong with reposting or linking to previously posted public gallery pics as long as they don't include any veri, pg or social media ones. If there are any such photos in the link to be posted just edit them out.

[whoya.kiddin]

Thanks for clarifying that previously published profile non-veri pictures are allowed.

[smiths]

old profile:



Useful details that may helps punters, when researching this W/G for a punt.

Thank you for sharing via this review.


'For some' (W/G)

Hidden Image/Members Only

This WG looks a lot like Stefani Aniston who worked at the Fun House in Harrow Weald and who i reviewed on here.

[ragout]

Could be sisters? Maybe the same, cos' when I saw Stefani (before I was a member), her repertoire was pretty much as the OP described.

[The_Don]

This WG looks a lot like Stefani Aniston who worked at the Fun House in Harrow Weald and who i reviewed on here.

one and the same:

External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

one and the same:

Good spot Don.