LolaWild XXX - Timewaster, annoying - Shepherd's Bush

[dfg]

External Link/Members Only

Happened, or rather - didn’t happen a little while back.

Had seen her 2-3 times when at Maxes, and was keen to repeat the great experience.

Texted her on a Thursday to see if she was free on the Monday. No reply for ages.

Then get a reply over the weekend. Up for meeting, but please can I confirm that I’ve met her before. I give details of our previous meetings eg where they were in Earls Court, which seemed to satisfy her, and we agree to meet on the Monday at her place near Shepherds Bush. Address to be given on the day. Lots of gushy texts, saying she can’t wait to see me, we’ll have a great time etc..

On the morning of the day I text to ask for the address. Nothing, but like a fool I go over to Shepherds Bush and text again. Go home again after waiting until the supposed meeting time to come and go.

Two hours later I get a message. I hadn’t confirmed who I was, and she’d therefore taken a booking from someone else. But she was free later in the day if I wanted to see her. Would be great to see me etc..

Clearly she’d decided to see a regular, or someone offering longer than my 90 minute booking, at short notice.

Very unimpressed.

[Deeplove]

External Link/Members Only

Happened, or rather - didn’t happen a little while back.

Had seen her 2-3 times when at Maxes, and was keen to repeat the great experience.

Texted her on a Thursday to see if she was free on the Monday. No reply for ages.

Then get a reply over the weekend. Up for meeting, but please can I confirm that I’ve met her before. I give details of our previous meetings eg where they were in Earls Court, which seemed to satisfy her, and we agree to meet on the Monday at her place near Shepherds Bush. Address to be given on the day. Lots of gushy texts, saying she can’t wait to see me, we’ll have a great time etc..

On the morning of the day I text to ask for the address. Nothing, but like a fool I go over to Shepherds Bush and text again. Go home again after waiting until the supposed meeting time to come and go.

Two hours later I get a message. I hadn’t confirmed who I was, and she’d therefore taken a booking from someone else. But she was free later in the day if I wanted to see her. Would be great to see me etc..

Clearly she’d decided to see a regular, or someone offering longer than my 90 minute booking, at short notice.

Very unimpressed.

Her day is very unplanned, if she can't make it, she'll ghost you and then bring up something to suggest its totally your fault, it's happened to me around 3 times so far, I've just given up seeing her now.

[MLawro93]

She wouldn't offer you another slot if she couldn't verify who you were for the earlier agreed time as the same thing applies for the new one. Surely she sees the bullshit in her excuse? 

By all accounts, if you manage to see her, you'll be in for a cracking punt otherwise she will like others have said already, ghost you.

[dfg]

Exactly per the two comments above:

1. Made up a BS excuse, attempting make it my fault.

2. Increased the BS levels further by suggesting we meet.

Had a great time with her when at Maxes, which I realise was a decade ago now, but based on my experience won’t try and book her again on principle.

[Deeplove]

Exactly per the two comments above:

1. Made up a BS excuse, attempting make it my fault.

2. Increased the BS levels further by suggesting we meet.

Had a great time with her when at Maxes, which I realise was a decade ago now, but based on my experience won’t try and book her again on principle.

When I was ghosted I was still at home so wasn't too bad, but it was difficult as I took the time out etc etc, I don't like to make plan b as then I'll have to let one of them down

[ah333]

Feeling very fortunate after reading these experiences that my meet went smoothly, she was flaky on comms in terms of response time but other than that I booked a day and time about a week in advance and it was all good. I do think she's worth it, but if I got messed around I wouldn't be returning.

[dfg]

Feeling very fortunate after reading these experiences that my meet went smoothly, she was flaky on comms in terms of response time but other than that I booked a day and time about a week in advance and it was all good. I do think she's worth it, but if I got messed around I wouldn't be returning.

Think you did well. Really nice going. Suspect that if I was to persevere then a great session would result, but am not having her treat me with contempt. Am a reliable punter, and expect the same in return. No second chances.

[Bartolomeo]

Exactly why I am apprehensive about trying to do a 2nd booking with her.

[bluegene]

Exactly why I am apprehensive about trying to do a 2nd booking with her.

Do what I did, book and have a backup in case things go south.

[Bartolomeo]

Problem is that Lola is also prone to shifting time at short notice. I'll just have to suck it up and take the risk.

But the lining up of plan a and b like you did sounds a very good idea if i ever book a hotel again for outcall 

[dfg]

The problem with having a Plan B is that it dicks someone else around, and I just don’t like doing that.

In fact I originally booked someone else when Lola (or whatever she calls herself these days) didn’t reply straightaway, and then cancelled them with 48 hours notice after Lola finally replied - which doubley fucked me off when she ghosted me.

[The_Don]

OP did a lot of leg work in advanced and confirmed a booking. She wasted his time, with no offer Redemption for cancelling 

Deserved negative, for this W/G that has form for time wasting.

[bonapati]

I agree she deserve a negative for ghosting the OP but I’m not sure she is about to become punctual anytime soon.

Lola, Lola… yep one wild hooker. she takes some handling but bloody worth waiting for if you get the opportunity. I have seen her 4 times since my last review and it just gets  extremely filthier. We just get busy, the lady meet also extended to the garden. She has a lot dirty ideas up her head.

Any about her flakiness, this is my advice it may or may not work but has for me all the time. It’s important to understand hookers have different personas. Lola is a veteran, living on her old Maxes reputation, she is in demand and knows she is might be losing and you will likely keep trying until it’s your time or you give up. (same goes for Giaxo and Tanya). Best thing to do is “ask when they can fit you in” and “how long for” - mornings to midday are the best but allow Lola to add 30 mins on, then another 30 or 15 mins more as the booking gets closer. So in essence if you book her for 12 noon assume the meet will happen at 1.15 or 1.30pm.

The hardest part is contacting her and getting response. Lola is a night bird, I would suggest later hours of the night towards midnight… and stay there as she might replied so don’t let the comms go cold. Don’t expect a same day booking unless you are extremely lucky. She may ignore your message 3 days prior the meeting but if she confirms the day before she is likely to send her address the next day. If she gives her address then you have scored. The rest is up to you being patience from here on. Good luck!

I know it’s hard work, but sometimes if you want something you have find a way to get it (even if you are paying for it)

P. S maybe someone will start thread on “flakey and unreliable hookers”

[dfg]

I completely get how that works for you, and am glad for you that it does. The risk vs reward, and the ways to minimise the risk. Wish you well.

It doesn't work for me though. I expect reliability, respect for others’ time and no BS, hence the Negative (which I don’t think you’re arguing against).

Sounds like she has much more form for dicking people around and for ghosting them than many realise, so suggest people write Negatives in instances like mine when they’re deserved (in my opinion).

[salazar]

I agree she deserve a negative for ghosting the OP but I’m not sure she is about to become punctual anytime soon.

Lola, Lola… yep one wild hooker. she takes some handling but bloody worth waiting for if you get the opportunity. I have seen her 4 times since my last review and it just gets  extremely filthier. We just get busy, the lady meet also extended to the garden. She has a lot dirty ideas up her head.

Any about her flakiness, this is my advice it may or may not work but has for me all the time. It’s important to understand hookers have different personas. Lola is a veteran, living on her old Maxes reputation, she is in demand and knows she is might be losing and you will likely keep trying until it’s your time or you give up. (same goes for Giaxo and Tanya). Best thing to do is “ask when they can fit you in” and “how long for” - mornings to midday are the best but allow Lola to add 30 mins on, then another 30 or 15 mins more as the booking gets closer. So in essence if you book her for 12 noon assume the meet will happen at 1.15 or 1.30pm.

The hardest part is contacting her and getting response. Lola is a night bird, I would suggest later hours of the night towards midnight… and stay there as she might replied so don’t let the comms go cold. Don’t expect a same day booking unless you are extremely lucky. She may ignore your message 3 days prior the meeting but if she confirms the day before she is likely to send her address the next day. If she gives her address then you have scored. The rest is up to you being patience from here on. Good luck!

I know it’s hard work, but sometimes if you want something you have find a way to get it (even if you are paying for it)

P. S maybe someone will start thread on “flakey and unreliable hookers”

I get it too but when you live abroad and visiting London is something you do twice a year, unreliability is a huge no no

[bonapati]

I get it too but when you live abroad and visiting London is something you do twice a year, unreliability is a huge no no

If there were Oscar’s for being unreliable… she will be up there at the but her service further up than that !

[hendrix]

If there were Oscar’s for being unreliable… she will be up there at the but her service further up than that !

Yep  and even less competition in London for her now with very few, if any, able to get close to that service level.

[bonapati]

Yep  and even less competition in London for her now with very few, if any, able to get close to that service level.

Very correct, I just about came out of her flat alive the last time I saw her - Where does she get that energy from?
I have tried to stay away for that level of PSE for awhile, but Ive been dipping in and out recently and it's been a blast.

[Makka124]

Yep  and even less competition in London for her now with very few, if any, able to get close to that service level.

Seems like London is drying up in terms of quality, there are some gems still but difficult to arrange in the diary

[hendrix]

Seems like London is drying up in terms of quality, there are some gems still but difficult to arrange in the diary

I don't track what's going on in the more gfe world, but proper full on pse providers like Lola are at an all time low 

[Makka124]

I don't track what's going on in the more gfe world, but proper full on pse providers like Lola are at an all time low 

Yes, some agency advertise PSE and the girl hasn’t a clue

[gandal]

We have an appointment in a couple of weeks, close easter holidays. Let's hope so

[Andersen45]

I completely get how that works for you, and am glad for you that it does. The risk vs reward, and the ways to minimise the risk. Wish you well.

It doesn't work for me though. I expect reliability, respect for others’ time and no BS, hence the Negative (which I don’t think you’re arguing against).

Sounds like she has much more form for dicking people around and for ghosting them than many realise, so suggest people write Negatives in instances like mine when they’re deserved (in my opinion).

Agreed.

[Macmillan1964]

There are less good pse providers . My mate loves pse escorts and he always say that

[dfg]

There are less good pse providers . My mate loves pse escorts and he always say that

Que? 

[The_Don]

Que? 

Macmillan1964 got the hammer for

Banned reason: Spamming with two accounts