Is it? Genuinely welcome your view.
I commented because it seemed an odd thing for whoever it was to get outraged about it. It’s an additional screening test when they’re already drawing blood.
Screening the general population for low testosterone would seem illogical. However, this is a targeted population facing high physical and mental demands. Military service involves intense training, deployments, stress, sleep deprivation, head injuries, and physical strain, all of which can contribute to lower testosterone. Have seen Jason Fox speaking on this recently.
I very much doubt Jason Fox has low testosterone.

Whilst that is a flippant comment, there is some relevance which I will return to.
Firstly, an Endocrinologist or Urologist will tell you the subject of testosterone levels is hugely complex. Not least because they vary for each individual on a daily basis and what is ‘normal’ for one person is not for another. Investigation requires not just one test but a minimum of two and often more as well as other investigations for the cause. A single low figure test should not result in offering TRT.
Yes chronic stress, for example, may produce hormonal imbalance, including testosterone levels. However, if as a result this produces symptoms, you would need to treat the cause, ie the stress. It is highly unlikely, in most cases, that you would opt for TRT. To do so is just ‘fire fighting’ and potentially harmful.
So ‘when I was a lad’ and well beyond, the chances of anyone under 30, having a low testosterone level was considered exceedingly low. (1%) At thirty to forty it became slightly higher, but still very low. Both groups will almost always be picked up due to investigation of symptoms and not blood level T screening.
Age related lower levels only begin to kick in after 50+ and once again in most cases are of no medical significance.
So fast forward to now and studies are claiming that this figure has risen to up to 20%. This is blamed predominantly on obesity and lifestyle etc. It has become a huge online money-making industry (to scam level). Just google TRT. Now call me an old cynic but ……
Putting that dubious statistic aside, the general fitness levels required in the military and subsequent training etc mean that 20% figure is likley of little relevance and once again, anyone under forty who had significant lower levels would soon be picked up due to symptoms.
So, let’s look below at the demographic of the ages of the US Military. The average is is under 30 and I understand the vast majority of front line active personnel are also under 30.
So how many people would you expect annual mass screening of T blood level testing to pick up?
Is such a screening test medically logical? Do you see where I am coming from?
Hidden Image/Members Only