Camille St Clair, Battersea - (ex Allure) - scratched the itch but never again

[NotThe]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

When: end of 2021

Where: a modern flat near Battersea park. Decent size for a modern one-bedroom, cosy.

How much: £500 for a 1-hour incall. She's now £650. There is expensive, there is taking the piss, and there is charging £650 for 1 hour!!!

Would I return? No, not even if she were £200 an hour

Face: 6/10. I know this is subjective, but I found her to be much less attractive than her pics

Body: 5/10. She's slim, petite, but has no boobs whatsoever. I knew she had small boobs, obviously, but I didn't expect her to have no boobs. She even joked that I have bigger boobs than her. To be honest, I found it very, very off-putting. I prefer big natural ones, can live with nice, firm, small ones, but she really has zero boobs, as in, literally nothing. I even wondered if she had undergone some surgery to remove them but couldn't notice scars.

The experience: She welcomed me in high heels and took me to the living room, where she offered me a drink. I immediately noticed that she couldn't walk properly in those high heels and found this very off-putting. After paperwork and a shower, the action started in the bedroom.
She listened to what my likes and dislikes were, and delivered skilfully. She removed my bath robe then undressed herself very slowly, with plenty of teasing. Plenty of kissing all over before pushing me on the bed and engaging in a nice, slow, OWO, then round one ended in CG. After a small break, more OWO then doggie. I am not into PSE but I have little doubt she could deliver on that front, too.

I can't really fault her for anything: I knew what the price was so obviously I cannot complain that it was too much - but I can say that she's not worth the money, especially at her increased rate of £650, and that in fact I wouldn't even see her for £200.

I am giving her a neutral because I found her not attractive, much worse-looking than her pictures, and because the absolutely-zero-boob thing was a huge put off.

I am not giving her a negative because she delivered a good service.

Given all the reviews, I was expecting a very-good-but-not-worth-repeating type of service (that's what I meant bu scratching the itch) but it's not what I got.

Who should / shouldn't see her? Well, first of all, regardless of her service, at £650 you need to be really minted, but, if you want to spend your money like that, who am I to judge. If you can spend this kind of money, it might make sense to see her if you are fine with a girl with absolutely zero boobs; worth repeating that I am not saying small boobs, but flat-like-an-ironing-board type. If that's OK by you, then, yes, she can deliver a good service and can probably range from GFE to a more adventurous PSE. Oh, and, like I said, I didn't find her facially attractive, but I get it these things are very subjective.

[Stevelondon]

If an itch is worth scratching, then scratch it. Its only money after all. 

There are always going to be those out there who pay way over the odds on a regualr basis, simply because they feel the need to do so.
Spend more, get a more beautiful woman and better service...as we all know. That is definitely not the case.

Can't blame these SP's who ask for a lot though. Its a business and in business its all about making money and beiing succesful at it.

[Mango_007]

thanks for the review. i've always found them useful.
hmm.. i've always been keen to see her but the (lack of) tits does hold me back. That and i think you have to be super organised and book way in advance.

price is subjective, yes 650 for an hour is a lot of money, but it depends on their skills, experience and your desires + resources.
look forward to your next review

[NotThe]

@Stevelondon
Of course. I don't "blame" Camille in any way. I tried. She did deliver a good service, but it was not for me. End of story.

I get the impression that these girls who end up charging so much do it because/when they start getting a lot of business from regulars who book them for extended periods of time, things like long weekends or even holidays away. If you look at the pictures that Bree / Billie Farlow External Link/Members Only used to post, unless it's all photoshopped, she goes on exotic holidays flying first class (not business), is driven in Bentleys and Rolls Rovers, etc.

@Mango_007 Yes, horses for courses. But, unless you specifically craze that type of petite, boobless body type, there is much better on offer even at those prices.
Billie Farlow is £500 an hour.
Harper May is £600 https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=314878.0    External Link/Members Only
Naomi Van Cartier is £250 https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=291552.0

[king tarzan]

🛑

[Neil197]

From the reviews I've read, my understanding is that her price is what it is due to the fact she provides a "no-holds barred" service i.e. there is very little she won't do.

So that needs to be taken into consideration as well as her looks.

I can't really understand the complaint about her small breasts - it's pretty fucking obvious from her pics she isn't in any way busty or enhanced.

[NotThe]

@Neil197, good colour on the up-for-anything nature of this girl, that may well explain a few things.

As for her breast, it's simple. Someone like Naomi van Cartier (see link above) has small, one might even say tiny, breasts, but they are there, they are not non-existent.

Camille has no breasts. As flat as an ironing board, and I am not exaggerating.

[king tarzan]

@Neil197, good colour on the up-for-anything nature of this girl, that may well explain a few things.

As for her breast, it's simple. Someone like Naomi van Cartier (see link above) has small, one might even say tiny, breasts, but they are there, they are not non-existent.

Camille has no breasts. As flat as an ironing board, and I am not exaggerating.

Fried egg/pancakes

[Neil197]

At that end of the market, the main selling point is paying that price point for an encounter with an SP with that very specific, polished look - I guess best-described as a hybrid between a catwalk model (face) and glamour model (body).

I believe I read on here somewhere that Camille is actually a model? or has done modelling work in the past. Certainly many of her photos look to have been taken from a modelling shoot rather than an escort shoot.

Also worth mentioning (as I've previously stated on here) there is absolutely no relationship between and escort's physical appearance and her ability (or lack thereof) to provide value for money.
 

[Griffin75]

I have no idea why the OP saw Camille given she is clearly as flat as a pancake.
All her previous reviews are clear on this..

[Griffin75]

I have no idea why the OP saw Camille given she is clearly as flat as a pancake.
All her previous reviews are clear on this..

Quoting a previous review..
“ great arse BUT absolutely no tits, none”

[RobinBrod]

Completely agree with Griffin. There are masses of photos of Camille and also masses of reports on here. It is very obvious that she has mini / no boobs. If it's important for you to have boobs in your SP don't go with Camille. Equally, don't go with Camille if you are then going to complain about her being too expensive. Personally I find her incredibly sexy, a real turn on and a total star in bed, but then that's just my view. We are all entitled to our opinions!

[Colston36]

0

If an itch is worth scratching, then scratch it. Its only money after all. 

There are always going to be those out there who pay way over the odds on a regualr basis, simply because they feel the need to do so.
Spend more, get a more beautiful woman and better service...as we all know. That is definitely not the case.

Can't blame these SP's who ask for a lot though. Its a business and in business its all about making money and beiing succesful at it.

And people on here moan about prices going up£I wonder if she's worth 3 £200 sluts. Hard to believe though she does seem quite filthy.

[jamiekinkxxx]

I have no idea why the OP saw Camille given she is clearly as flat as a pancake.
All her previous reviews are clear on this..

100% agree. Plenty of reviews, that OP clearly read, but then complains when she has A cup breasts? Seems crazy to spend her prices when you like boobs? BUT each to their own.

[NotThe]

Guys, we are not understanding each other.

What party of "I knew they were going to be small but I didn't expect them to be non-existent" is unclear?

Also, define "complain". I knew what she cost before booking, obviously, and I knew that, even if it had been a mindblowing experience, I would not have come back. I am not "complaining" as in I feel ripped off, I am simply stating that, at these prices, I do not return even if the experience is good (eg Harper May was mind-blowing but no way am I seeing her again); additionally, I didn't like her for the reasons I mentioned, and would not go back regardless of price. That is simply my very subjective opinion. I shared this review, like all others, in the hope it can be useful for other punters.

Indeed, you will notice most of my reviews have a section about who should / shouldn't book the girl in question, because it is pointless to give absolute judgements, we are all different, and you may love what I hate, and viceversa.

Happy punting!

[Mango_007]

well said 'Not The'

there is a difference between expecting small / A cups tits vs. no tits. i found that useful.
if it's small/A cups i can go for it, if it's no tits e.g. like a pre-puberty person i think i'll give it a miss.
i can't imagine it's as flat as a pre-puberty.... but that is what OP has implied.

[NotThe]

@Mango_007 I'm not implying it, I'm saying it out loud: no tits whatsoever, like pre-puberty or after a surgery which removes the breasts.

To be clear, not saying no one should book her: some people don't mind, some people found her more attractive than I did, and she seems to be up for anything, which can be important to some people.
I am just saying people should be clear on what to expect.

[Griffin75]

The point I was making per my quote is that previous reviews stated she literally has no tits....

[NotThe]

The point I was making per my quote is that previous reviews stated she literally has no tits....

This much wasn't clear to me. To be fair, it is entirely possible that this was my fault and that other punters pointed it out clearly but I missed it, and/or that I took their comments (I don't now remember exactly which reviews I had read before booking) to be more figurative than literal (as in no tits = small ones).

Anyway, what's done is done, all that matters is that other punters have a tiny bit more of information so they can make more informed choices.

[Griffin75]

 

[Seansf]

NT, I find your review baffling. You knew what she looks like and you received the excellent service that you were expecting…so, why all the negativity? Is her increased rate structure troubling you? I am stumped! 

[king tarzan]

NT, I find your review baffling. You knew what she looks like and you received the excellent service that you were expecting…so, why all the negativity? Is her increased rate structure troubling you? I am stumped! 

Sounds like premium price for average looker with pancakes on her chest instead of ⚽⚽ ya Ruus cluut boombacluut maan 👊👊👊🥊🥊🥊

[Dashing]

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[Neil197]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

These look very much like they're from a modelling shoot, not an escort shoot. As per my previous post.

[jamiekinkxxx]

Having met her she is IMHO a STUNNER (as pictures above show), with a 10/10 body to match! All personal preference though... eye.. beauty...beholder... and all that :-)

[hermanmunster]

Having met her she is IMHO a STUNNER (as pictures above show), with a 10/10 body to match! All personal preference though... eye.. beauty...beholder... and all that :-)

It is amazing how she can be viewed so differently (by men with the same desires).  For me there is absolutely nothing remotely attractive about her face or body.  The personality can override disappointments about the facial attractiveness (or lack of), but when the body is part of what creates a satisfactory service it can be more difficult to overlook.

[NotThe]

@Seansf, I don't know how else to say it.

I was expecting small but not non-existent boobs.
Facially I did not find her attractive at all in the flesh.

All of this contributed to a sub par experience, even if she did deliver a good service.

If you find her facially cute (I did in the pics not in real life), and don't mind no boobs at all (not small nut none at all) I'm sure you will have a good time.

[Seansf]

While I haven’t met Camille in person (hard to do during a pandemic when living across the Atlantic), I have had video chats with her. I find her face and body very attractive. And she most certainly won me over with her delightful personality.  Horses for courses. 

[HighHeelLover]

Dear OP

I just have to question why did you go and see her?? She’s very well documented on here and you haven’t faulted her for her services but you have questioned her looks?? She has tones of photos flying around and all have had some touch ups but not to the point where she unrecognisable. She still very much the girl in the pictures. On GG her breast are stated at 32A which is small in deed so I’m not to sure what you were expecting. And if you had read the last review of her which i thought you would have if  you researched her before making a booking even they say she had an iron board chest. As for prices she’s still £500 if you contact her directly. Her prices on GG probably have gone up as they take a cut.

And quote from yourself “I’d rather have 5 ok punts at £200 then 2 out of this world punts at £1000” after you saw Gabie aka Harper. But yet you still had the urge to go and see someone else for that price??

We all know a high price tag doesn’t guarantee a top quality service.. so this one’s on you for not doing your research properly on this

[NotThe]

@HighHeelLover,

I am honestly fed up with having to explain and repeat myself over and over again. I will say this one last time, and after this I will no longer waste any more time clarifying the same things for the nth time:

• I was expecting small boobs; I hadn't appreciated they were going to be non-existent. Yes, it is entirely possible that this is my fault for missing the reviews which mentioned this point very explicitly. I have already said it. What more do you want me to say?
  
• I found her different in the flesh and didn't like her appearance in person compared to the pictures. Horses for courses. What more do you want me to add? I didn't say this angrily, as if she had fooled me, I said it matter-of-factly. It can happen. It happened. End of story. I am well aware that many people feel differently. Such is life.
  
• On why I sometimes punt at this price: for me it's like treating myself to a starred restaurant. I know it's not worth it in terms of value for money, I know I won't go back regularly, but every now and then I like to do it anyway. What other people think of this I honestly could not care less
  
  

[Ceejiq]

Thanks for the info, OP. I like extremely flat chested girls, so it's good to know. By the sounds of it, good punt, but not your cup of tea.