Author Topic: Tammy 69 Bristol - Time waster and Piss taker! (Read 2570 times)

jburke1215 · « **on:** January 21, 2022, 10:07:04 pm »

Tammy 69 - Time waster and Piss taker!

External Link/Members Only

In my defence I played along as, at the time, I was working at a client’s office literally 10 minutes walk from the postcode provided and apart from getting pissed off I at least hadn’t had to travel and also curious to see where this would lead.

Long story short, 3 bookings, no meets, numerous excuses then ‘Ghosted’.

Tammy advertised a 3some with Molly, so before Christmas I booked for early New Year, start the year with a ‘Bang’.

Few days before texted her to confirm, ‘sorry babe, lost all my texts, what do you want’...good start !

Re-made booking and the day arrived. 20 mins before she rang ‘very sorry…hairdresser taking longer than expected, can we put it back an hour?’ No problem, I’m still in the office so more coffee for me.

Then, ‘sorry.. Forgot school run, put back another hour?’
Then ‘sorry….. Mollys car broke down, put back another hour?’
Then ‘sorry….. Traffic terrible, put back another hour?’
Now end of day I text her for actual address……nothing, ‘Ghosted’

Next day she rang me, ‘very, very sorry, it was a day from hell. Can we re-book for next week and I’ll give you a discount?’......Okay, re-booked but not really believing her.

Next week came and 20 mins before, she rang ‘sorry…..but just started my period, can we put back another week?’

Night before the 3rd booking I text to confirm and she replied everything is good.

Next day didn’t even bother to leave the office but sent text for the address and …....nothing, ‘Ghosted’.

So, 3 attempts 0 meets.

Some people describe her as a nice person but scatty, I would describe her as a rude, unprofessional piss taker.

She has been in the business long enough to know how it works. If you don’t want to see me just say ‘No’ there are others who happily provide a service for my money.

I was only 10 minutes walk from the BS16 postcode she gave me and so not a problem, but if I had travelled or taken time out I would be absolutely livid.

I don't understand this type of attitude, if you don't want the business don't advertise, if you do want it then do the f*"king job.

joninbristol · « **Reply #1 on:** January 21, 2022, 10:22:59 pm »

Thanks for flagging her up to us all, she sounds like a complete tool.
Glad you didn't waste any time travelling at least.

Did consider her as a possible for later whilst lockdown was in force.
Now blacklisted, thank you.

ico23 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 21, 2022, 10:24:22 pm »

Off the hotlist. Cheers mate.

bristolnick · « **Reply #3 on:** January 22, 2022, 01:47:44 pm »

Was she one of the Bath Babes from back in the Day?

CoryLahey69 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 22, 2022, 07:37:57 pm »

Quote from: bristolnick on January 22, 2022, 01:47:44 pm

Was she one of the Bath Babes from back in the Day?

Yes, it looks like the lady I saw at Bath Babes, many years ago. To be fair, she was pretty good, in terms of service, at least in a structured brothel style environment, where her own organisational skills aren't testing. Not sure how her body has aged, as some of her AW photos were clearly taken at Bath Babes.

jburke1215 · « **Reply #5 on:** January 22, 2022, 10:23:30 pm »

I think the main point I got from this non event is that AW reviews are to be taken with a ton of salt, it's helpful to see they have them but don't take them as a 'Gold standard'.

At the end of the day we're still dependant on the WG being professional.

fluffer · « **Reply #6 on:** January 24, 2022, 06:41:23 am »

Quote from: bristolnick on January 22, 2022, 01:47:44 pm

Was she one of the Bath Babes from back in the Day?

Any idea which one she was from bath babies.
There are a few videos floating around and would be good to see her face?

Incognita · « **Reply #7 on:** February 06, 2022, 02:42:12 pm »

She was Tammy when with Bath Babes. I don't doubt she's sometimes let clients down but surely 19 vg reports on AW can't all be false?

joninbristol · « **Reply #8 on:** February 06, 2022, 02:48:42 pm »

It's a reasonable point.

Usually when I look for fake reviews on AW, I look for similar wording, a cluster of reviews all around the same time, and lots of "Member not active" reviewers, or reviewers who have only reviewed one or two SP meetings. And we're not seeing that in this case, although there are plenty with only half a dozen reviews, which could be interpreted as a warning sign. Bottom line is, if an SP is on a bad streak as reported here, UKP takes precedence over anything in AW reviews, but there's always an offchance that an SP could be being nobbled here by another SP or ex - though to be very clear I'm NOT suggesting that in your case jburke, just that it can happen. Thankfully the admins are good at weeding out that sort of thing.

May be she was just having a totally sh*t day/week/month in this instance, we all have one occasionally. But not answering someone you've already let down multiple times isn't good for business, so no argument there with the OP. Put it down to a blip and see if she redeems herself in the future is probably the best way forward.

Incognita · « **Reply #9 on:** February 06, 2022, 04:51:29 pm »

Well reasoned!

joninbristol · « **Reply #10 on:** February 06, 2022, 05:08:49 pm »

Quote from: Incognita on February 06, 2022, 04:51:29 pm

Well reasoned!

Thanks Incognita - I don't always pull it off (reasoning, that is...)

Incognita · « **Reply #11 on:** February 06, 2022, 05:54:58 pm »

Ha ha!

jburke1215 · « **Reply #12 on:** February 08, 2022, 04:03:15 pm »

Quote from: joninbristol on February 06, 2022, 02:48:42 pm

It's a reasonable point.
Usually when I look for fake reviews on AW, I look for similar wording, a cluster of reviews all around the same time, and lots of "Member not active" reviewers, or reviewers who have only reviewed one or two SP meetings. And we're not seeing that in this case, although there are plenty with only half a dozen reviews, which could be interpreted as a warning sign. Bottom line is, if an SP is on a bad streak as reported here, UKP takes precedence over anything in AW reviews, but there's always an offchance that an SP could be being nobbled here by another SP or ex - though to be very clear I'm NOT suggesting that in your case jburke, just that it can happen. Thankfully the admins are good at weeding out that sort of thing.

May be she was just having a totally sh*t day/week/month in this instance, we all have one occasionally. But not answering someone you've already let down multiple times isn't good for business, so no argument there with the OP. Put it down to a blip and see if she redeems herself in the future is probably the best way forward.

Hi joninbristol

Very valid points, and in general I’m all in favour of ‘second chances’..…but when three let downs , well I think I need to let others know of my experience so they can make up their own minds.

As I said, she has been described elsewhere as good, but equally I found a ‘great reliable plumber’ on ‘Trustatrader ‘ who didn’t know his arse from his elbow, so reviews are obviously based on personal experience.

Having said that, I’ve put up some good reviews as well so it’s not all negative, and there seems to be more WGs around so perhaps a little more competition will improve service…..we can only hope

joninbristol · « **Reply #13 on:** February 08, 2022, 04:09:18 pm »

Agreed, there are good reviews on AW and I've found a few SPs that way before I found this site.
Absolutely - the half arsed SPs will fall by the wayside as business picks up again.

mynameisjoe · « **Reply #14 on:** February 09, 2022, 08:42:10 pm »

Think I want too meet her even more now!

Author Topic: Tammy 69 Bristol - Time waster and Piss taker! (Read 2570 times)

Member Benefits