Amanda_Fox - Glasgow - Timewaster

[bellamy1403]

External Link/Members Only

£80 for 30 minutes + an extra £20 deposit on top of her standard rates which I will explain shortly

Comms: I intially reached out to Amanda to chance my arm, I was out with her age range being slightly too young. I clearly communicated this to her, however, to my pleasant surprise she agreed to meet me on the condition that I send her a £20 deposit in advance and on top of her usual rates.

Location: A very nice flat in a very nice area in Renfrew. A 40+ minute drive for me, however, which was made worse with what was about to happen.

Appearance: Tall, blonde, great figure and a gorgeous face. Amanda is the type of woman I have grown to prefer, older than me! I would safely place her in the early to mid 30s.

Meet: I arrived at her building a little early after a long drive and was told "Im not ready" without much else information. Finally, after Amanda ran over 15 minutes late, I was guided into her flat building and arrived at her front door. I knocked and she did the whole hide behind the door routine, but when we locked eyes and got a look at each other, she burst into hysterical laughter without even managing to say hello!

I am well aware that for a man in my early twenties I could probably still pass for a minor, so I wasnt offended by this, but she really got a kick out of it! We walked into the bedroom, while she is still giggling away and she turns, almost as if she is examining me. She says "Sorry, you are a nice looking boy, but you remind me of my little brother and you have to go" Ffs!

I totally appreciate that she had every right to terminate the meet if she wasnt comfortable, she even returned my £20 in cash as soon as she gave me the bad news. However, I clearly communicated what my age was and she still agreed to meet me on quite unfair conditions to begin with. I sent a deposit, wasted an entire afternoon driving for a total of 1.5 hours, wasted petrol, was kept waiting 15+ minutes in the car park for her to get ready, and then to be laughed at and turned away?

Obviously this is very circumstantial, and she is obviously good at what she does, but she conducted herself in an incredibly unprofessional manner and I wouldnt even want to return if she changed her mind tomorrow.

[Boinky]

The only thing I'd say to this is that is there a possibility, which you mentioned yourself, that she thought you were a minor?

If so you can't really blame her for trying to avoid a potential prison sentence in exchange for a few hundred quid. It's not as if she can ask you for ID.

While it's a PITA waste of your time, it's not like she tried to scam you as she repaid the money.

[jedi master]

Can see both points on this review and respect op review but surely a neutral review would have been more fair imo but it is your review at the end off the day.

As she did give you, your deposit back.

JM

[Jock D]

Absolutely warrants the negative review...thanks

[bellamy1403]

The only thing I'd say to this is that is there a possibility, which you mentioned yourself, that she thought you were a minor?

If so you can't really blame her for trying to avoid a potential prison sentence in exchange for a few hundred quid. It's not as if she can ask you for ID.

While it's a PITA waste of your time, it's not like she tried to scam you as she repaid the money.

That crossed my mind, but I remember her saying that she thought I looked 18-19, the same age as her little brother whom she said I reminded her of.

Again, Im not having a go at her for turning me away due to her own personal preferences, its the fact that she was well aware what she was getting into from my initial contact and still chose to let me waste half of my day, only to be laughed at and turned away a long way from home.

[Marcus0101]

It's no surprise something like this has been posted. Her Twitter last year was full of derogatory comments about punters, mainly about how the looked and how she wasn't attracted to them. Granted every guy that walks through the door isn't going to be Brad Pitt but pretty much mocking guys who she see's on social media tells you all you need to know about her, what she is really like and what she thinks of punters. Seems on this occasion her dislike has spilled over face to face, certainly not someone I would go near after reading her Twitter alone and now this. 

[henry brubaker]

It's no surprise something like this has been posted. Her Twitter last year was full of derogatory comments about punters, mainly about how the looked and how she wasn't attracted to them. Granted every guy that walks through the door isn't going to be Brad Pitt but pretty much mocking guys who she see's on social media tells you all you need to know about her, what she is really like and what she thinks of punters. Seems on this occasion her dislike has spilled over face to face, certainly not someone I would go near after reading her Twitter alone and now this.

Yeah I didn't think her Twitter portrayed her in a good light.

She's not exactly a stunner either. Cracking body, but average looking at best.

[Matrix]

Absolutely warrants the negative review...thanks

+1

[Marcus0101]

.

[Boinky]

That crossed my mind, but I remember her saying that she thought I looked 18-19

If you look 18-19 you could quite easily be underage. If I owned a pub or club and people look 18 they'd be getting ID'd. If they look 25 they don't.

[Scotpak]

If you look 18-19 you could quite easily be underage. If I owned a pub or club and people look 18 they'd be getting ID'd. If they look 25 they don't.

What's your point? Are you saying she doesn't warrant the negative? 

[rubntugn]

Had tried comms with her but thought she came across with an attitude.

[lykopra]

Seems she's now only seeing "mature, refined gentlemen over 30" and name-checking the OP as an update to her profile.

I'd actually added her to my HL with the recent reviews but given I'm neither mature nor refined, that rules me out.

[Boinky]

What's your point? Are you saying she doesn't warrant the negative?

The review is the OP's and for him to decide. My opinion is that if someone that potentially looks underage trots up to a WG's door, they can't be that shocked to get turned away. She's only protecting herself.

She didn't try to scam him out of money. She gave him a refund on his deposit.

[bellamy1403]

Ive just been officially name dropped on her profile 

"From now on, I will only see mature, refined gentleman over the age of 30, thanks Bellamy!x"

[Boinky]

And you thought you'd never get famous from punting.....

[Glesgaboy]

The review is the OP's and for him to decide. My opinion is that if someone that potentially looks underage trots up to a WG's door, they can't be that shocked to get turned away. She's only protecting herself.

She didn't try to scam him out of money. She gave him a refund on his deposit.

Spot on sir.
It’s that simple.   
I met this SP this week… easy Positive review to follow. …Already famous “ mature, refined gentleman over the age of 30” ….that’s me troops 

[Problem Child]

“ mature, refined gentleman over the age of 30” ….that’s me troops 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Scotpak]

quote author=Boinky link=topic=333674.msg3468512#msg3468512 date=1642371035]
The review is the OP's and for him to decide. My opinion is that if someone that potentially looks underage trots up to a WG's door, they can't be that shocked to get turned away. She's only protecting herself.

She didn't try to scam him out of money. She gave him a refund on his deposit.
[/quote]

Reading the review her issue wasn't that he looked 16/17. Where the op paid a deposit spent time traveling to her she could have asked for ID of she thought he was underage.

She fucked him about, her profile comes across with that European superiority complex.  If your fortunate enough to look young or look like her brother be prepared have your time wasted 100% the working girls fault.

The op chanced a meet the working girl could have said no or asked for a picture of him before agreeing to the meet but instead she had him run about only to laugh in his face sounds like a horrible cunt.

[Izazuel]

Everybody here make valid points (both for negative review and against it).
I had a very positive experience with her and got no bad vibes or attitude from the WG, might have been lucky (for once).
My logic against a negative review: she gave the money back, she apologised and gave (in my opinion) a logical reason for refusing the meet. I have a younger sister, about her age and if when meeting the WG I realised they look very much alike (not being a sick fuck), I would also decline the meet. There are many risks we take when punting, but this is something that feels like it's no one's fault.
Regardless of my opinion, OP has the final say in his review

[Scotpak]

In my opinion she should never have agreed to the meet.

If you have a preference on who you see based on age race etc then stick to it.  Working girls have the right to see who they want I'm not disputing that.

In this case she's agreed a punt to someone she wouldn't normally see got him to jump through hoops deposit kept waiting only to laugh in his face.  That's just a poor level of service all round

[bellamy1403]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Maybe I could borrow some of his grey hair then 

[Glesgaboy]

I'm very disappointed that PC has outed me in this way by accessing my personal social media photos.
Well, have some of your own medicine PC - see how you like our personal life being exposed....

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Kieslowski]

I'm quite baffled anyone would say the OP shouldn't have put this as a negative. SPs obviously have the right to refuse service - as does anyone providing any kind of service - but they do so knowing the likely consequence is a negative review. She clearly already had misgivings, hence the £20 deposit, so she should have simply turned him down then.

Looking a bit like someone's brother is a daft reason to refuse service - the professional thing to do would have been to compose herself, remind herself that it was not actually her brother, and then gone ahead with the punt.

Or are punters going to have to start providing SPs with mugshots to check we don't look like a friend or family member before completing a booking? 

She could at least have given the OP a wee blowy before sending him home, as a consolation prize...

[Problem Child]

I'm very disappointed that PC has outed me in this way by accessing my personal social media photos.
Well, have some of your own medicine PC - see how you like our personal life being exposed....

Hidden Image/Members Only

Piss off! There’s no way I’d join the military..

[Jock D]

I'm quite baffled anyone would say the OP shouldn't have put this as a negative.

+1

[Bru1901]

I would state a neutral at most.

She gave him the refund in cash as well as actually opening the door.

15 mins late is normal behaviour and i think in this case it was to ensure he would turn up

If he did then 15mins to get ready

Its the same as a punter booking an escort who ends up being 10 years older and walking.

In this case he looks younger than 21 and she did have a age rule already.

Imo she had the decency not to go ahead as opposed to having a shit punt.

[Matrix]

She agreed to a booking and wasted his time.

Stonewall negative.

Her choice to cancel the booking and his choice to post a negative.

[buddiemarvelous]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Matrix]

Hidden Image/Members Only

What is this shit?

[Glesgaboy]

It’s more of the above.
This time from her Twitter
No material difference from what’s on here
Why bovva?
Yawn