Gym Girl - Glasgow

[scotland19something]

I've seen this SP previously and was very happy with the service, so I booked her again for a recent meet with her - here's my positive review (excuse any typos or missing info, doing it from mobile phone)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

It was an outcall £180 for 90 minutes.

Usual comms made via her profile, arranged to meet her at a mutual public location, headed back and the fun begins.

She has a cracking figure and body, started off with some light kissing then moved onto french kissing.
Then moved onto OWO this is were she begins to work her magic and take it nice n slow were she worked down my shaft then goes deeper down with some eye to eye contact until she's nearly balls deep.

Moving onto the bed I get her to lay down and start to return by giving her a good deep licking, not just the pussy area but also rimming her, I've got her legs held up in the air then pushing them back towards her so she can hold them back and wide apart - lovely site to see, got me even more harder 

After spending quite abit of time down there I went on top and I knew from previous she really seems to like it when she's on bottom as her legs I pinned right back and entered deep really deep she was gasping, I asked if she was in pain or hurt - quite the opposite she was really enjoying it, going at in deep & slow for a bit then she clung onto my back and pulled me down ontop of her and kissed me real deep, this got me fucking hornier so I started pounding away deeper and slightly faster (I'm a one pop type of guy so I didn't want to cum soon so was talking my time, as I was pounding away at here I could feel she was getting wetter and wetter and she was cumming, no fake noises.... plus her legs were shaking so I could see she wasn't faking it by cumming.

A shortr rest n chat about various general topic stuff.... then moved into 69 position and what a view to see, I went to work on both holes, slipping a finger in her ass and tongue .... she wasn't holding back taking me all the way deep down.

Moved onto doggy style and held onto her small waist and hips going at it and she's moaning away (not loud), after a bit got her to go on top and she starting bouncing up and down, I held onto her waist and tits driving her higher up into the air, whilst she's pounding away ontop.

Then I move to sitting up legs over the edge of the bed and got her to sit up straight on my cock and proceeded to spread her cheeks wide apart and thrusted her up and down whilst spreading her ass cheeks very wide she was happy to continue carrying on, so I did and kept this going for quite sometime until I eventually cum in the bag whilst deeply kissing her.

Got cleaned up, and a good wee chat afterwards, got freshened up and dropped her back off at place she was comfortable with.

I'm booking her again real soon, all in all an excellent service from her.

 

[Abdhal]

You've given her 2 positive reviews this year.
I didn't think that was allowed. 

[scotland19something]

no idea bud, can't imagine that could be a rule as that means only seeing the same SP once in a year for a review 

[Abdhal]

This is rule 4.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

[Goldfinch]

Edit:Rules already posted.

[scotland19something]

  oh well it's posted, it's a real review, I'm posting another one for someone else, guess yours the rules police 

[scotland19something]

I'm not touting (looking at my original review June and my second review now December time, so looks like it's within the rules)

I'm just about to post another SP I met not that long ago.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking.Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

[zag69]

Only outcalls. Fuck

[Goldfinch]

I'm not touting

Never said you were,it was put in bold for clarity.

[scotland19something]

Cheers, tbh I can see the reasoning behind the rules but a bit oot as a first reply from a member going straight to the rule book and wasn't exactly the reply I was expecting to see, like someone jumping down my throat.

So is it 6 months in a row you can't post another review to the same SP and just save them up after 6 months time ? bit odd if it is then memory gets rusty and details get lost.

Never said you were,it was put in bold for clarity.

[Goldfinch]

Cheers, tbh I can see the reasoning behind the rules but a bit oot as a first reply from a member going straight to the rule book and wasn't exactly the reply I was expecting to see, like someone jumping down my throat.

So is it 6 months in a row you can't post another review to the same SP and just save them up after 6 months time ? bit odd if it is then memory gets rusty and details get lost.

Another option would of been to add a comment to your previous review of her,saying you have seen her again,and state if the level of service has changed since your previous visit.

[scotland19something]

Another option would of been to add a comment to your previous review of her,saying you have seen her again,and state if the level of service has changed since your previous visit.

  I didn't realise that was possible, I only say that cause other members I've spotted jump in to the OP calling them out to create a review.

All good information and suggestions I'll be sure to take onboard (separately I just posted another review someone totally different and never seen before)

Rule #4 does say can post more than one review re SP: Members can post more than one review about an SP

[Goldfinch]

I didn't realise that was possible, I only say that cause other members I've spotted jump in to the OP calling them out to create a review.

All good information and suggestions I'll be sure to take onboard (separately I just posted another review someone totally different and never seen before)

[scotland19something]

Only outcalls. Fuck

Afraid so.

[scotland19something]

forgot to mention she is carrying some extra weight around her waist/stomach, there's no belly fat or anything like that just extra weight (ie not toned as before), personally I found her curvaceous and sexy.

she said cause she's not been going to the gym as much (can't blame her due to covid risks)

[Clattypats]

forgot to mention she is carrying some extra weight around her waist/stomach, there's no belly fat or anything like that just extra weight (ie not toned as before), personally I found her curvaceous and sexy.

she said cause she's not been going to the gym as much (can't blame her due to covid risks)

I still don't see FK, Anal play or 'A' levels on her LL as I alluded to in your first review... Must be an anomaly in her LL I'm taking it... 

[scotland19something]

sorrry nothing I can do about her profile, they were certainly there back when her profile first appeared.

try asking her ?, I don't keep my comms messages, personally speaking not every SP lists what they offer/don't offer on their profile.
I find being polite and respectful in my comms to SP's being up front on the services I'm looking for and sometimes I get lucky when they come back with they don't like to advertise but they do offer it.

Or maybe she doesn't offer it for folk she hasn't met before - donno can't speak for SP's profiles 

[Clattypats]

sorrry nothing I can do about her profile, they were certainly there back when her profile first appeared.

try asking her ?, I don't keep my comms messages, personally speaking not every SP lists what they offer/don't offer on their profile.
I find being polite and respectful in my comms to SP's being up front on the services I'm looking for and sometimes I get lucky when they come back with they don't like to advertise but they do offer it.

Or maybe she doesn't offer it for folk she hasn't met before - donno can't speak for SP's profiles 

Not decrying it was never on her profile at all

It wasn't in your first review and it isn't to date. At least its advertised now ...


Good detailed review all the same, thanks... 

[scotland19something]

cool, the first review was pretty full on quizitive and no doubt questions here and there would have been missed out.

 

[Glesgaboy]

Good review bud.
I guess that as it was a little bit gushing on praise it attracted the attention of folks perhaps concerned this was an ad of some sort blah blah blah

I’ve had my eye on her for a while as I hoped she would offer incall  in some days even just to exclusive aristocrats like masel… but not yet it seems….

[scotland19something]

Cheers! - my reviews current and past have been and will continue to be truthful and when praise is due then that's the whole point of doing a review from my own personal viewpoint anyways, and this SP for me was top notch

Good review bud.
I guess that as it was a little bit gushing on praise it attracted the attention of folks perhaps concerned this was an ad of some sort blah blah blah

I’ve had my eye on her for a while as I hoped she would offer incall  in some days even just to exclusive aristocrats like masel… but not yet it seems….

[Keema]

she said cause she's not been going to the gym as much (can't blame her due to covid risks)

Might need to change her name then!

[Max121]

Tried to book her a few times after the last review from the OP and as she only does outcalls it was no goer even suggested that I book a hotel etc . There was no response to any further emails etc .
This is one I would love to meet , Thanks for the review matey , I will try and send her further emails to see if I get a response .

[solway]

Age 46 ?

[GlasgowMan]

Strange review because her name is "Gym Girl" and her age is 46.
Come on man, she's a Gym Granny

[Courtney]

arranged to meet her at a mutual public location

…that doesn’t seem ideal.

[scotland19something]

Saw GymGirl again and she's been back working out again ... I really enjoyed my time with her. Gladly book her again.

(following what Goldfinch posted - see here)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=331381.msg3444860#msg3444860

[Ice121]

She only does out calls within 30 mins distance I’m 48 , ach well

[nike]

Saw GymGirl again and she's been back working out again ... I really enjoyed my time with her. Gladly book her again.

(following what Goldfinch posted - see here)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=331381.msg3444860#msg3444860

This is not ur personal blog. U don't need to post something, everytime u see a wg.
As a common sense "rule", unless their has been a significant change, in services or appearance, there is no reason to post, about same wg. The exception would be, if it has been a long time since ur last review.
That's my opinion. 

[GlasgowMan]

Saw GymGirl again and she's been back working out again ... I really enjoyed my time with her. Gladly book her again.

(following what Goldfinch posted - see here)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=331381.msg3444860#msg3444860

Thanks scotland19something, good to know

[Mothman]

She could be doing with a few more pics on her profile to be honest 

[scotland19something]

She could be doing with a few more pics on her profile to be honest

you could be doing with a few more reviews 

[the fitter]

  The thing that puts me off this SP, is the name and the details in her interview. The name could be seen as Jim Girl, and the details say.                                               
      How would you describe your non-binary gender?   Cisgender.  ?

[Problem Child]

  The thing that puts me off this SP, is the name and the details in her interview. The name could be seen as Jim Girl, and the details say.                                               
      How would you describe your non-binary gender?   Cisgender.  ?

Does cisgender not just mean the gender she was born with? I.e. NOT transgender.
Sounds fine to me..

[the fitter]

Does cisgender not just mean the gender she was born with? I.e. NOT transgender.
Sounds fine to me..

Your probably right, and I am just reading to much into it.

[FBman78]

  The thing that puts me off this SP, is the name and the details in her interview. The name could be seen as Jim Girl, and the details say.                                               
      How would you describe your non-binary gender?   Cisgender.  ?

I have to honestly say I don't know what any of these extra genders actually are, I lost track after trans.  For me if she looks female and feels to me like a female, then that is all that matters.

[Easygoingdude]

The term “cisgender” (pronounced “sis-gender”) refers to people whose gender identity and expression matches the biological sex they were assigned when they were born.

Source: Google

[Glesgaboy]

She could be doing with a few more pics on her profile to be honest

A few more photos now added by her.
Maybe she is reading this ….
Price rise too. ( maybe starting to get to the limit of what she can command given her age.)
Maybe in-calls will be the next change.
There’s clearly a bit of demand. 

[oddson1970]

l have been hoping she would do incalls too as outcalls are a no go for me.The price rise would maybe put me off now though as glesgaboy says, she is getting very close to her ceiling , price wise