Author Topic: Amber - Roses Retreat - Prestwich  (Read 3369 times)

Offline Cliff Booth

External Link/Members Only

This punt took place back in the summer on one of those nights when I came home from work with a fearful horn that needed dealing with. Roses is always a dependable enough place with fairly reasonable rates, so I checked out the rota and decided to book Amber for 30 minutes – she’s pretty well reviewed on here.
 
There’s plenty been written about Roses too, it’s an end terrace property on Bury Old Road in Prestwich that just looks like a normal house from the front. The entrance is to the rear via a back door, that has a covered porch/smoking shelter around it. There’s a free council car park a few paces away and plenty of nearby street parking.

Knocked at the door and was let into the ‘reception area’, which is the kitchen. Had my temperature taken and was given a spray of hand sanitser. Handed over £40 to the house and was asked if I wanted a shower, which I did - It was a warm night. Then an attractive forty-something MILF-type with shoulder length, brownish blonde hair and blue eyes wandered in and introduced herself as Amber. The website says she’s 5’-6” and size 12, which is probably about right.

I nipped upstairs for a quick shower. The bathroom/toilet is a reasonable size, and the shower is in good order. There’s also a glory hole drilled through the bathroom door.

Amber arrived and we went into one of the bedrooms. The action started with a good, sloppy blow job (OWO) with plenty of spit, ball licking and plenty of eye contact. Her technique was good, and she took my length about three quarters of the way. Amber had removed her top by this point to reveal a pair of big, natural tits.

She’s one of those ladies that seems to have a thing about playing with bloke’s nipples, and she gave mine plenty of tweaks. Have to say it does fuck all for me but if that’s your thing, she’s your gal.

Had a bit of a kiss whilst I played with her tits, but it was only light lip kissing and not particularly erotic. I could taste tobacco on her, so she’s clearly a smoker. I was also getting a slight smell of stale sweat, which had me thinking that she may not have showered prior to seeing me. As mentioned, it was a warm night, so there’s no excuse for that. As a consequence of this I decided not to chance RO which I usually always go for on a punt.

Then it was on with the noddy and into the action. Went at it for a while in mish and then doggy, which was pretty good, and which Amber took with plenty of enthusiasm, before going for the CIM finish. She went back to work on me with a mixture of sucking and wanking until I offloaded about three days’ worth, which she spat out into a wet wipe.

Had bit of small talk and I handed over the extra £20 for OWO/CIM (so £60 in total, although I think the rate has gone up a fiver since then). I then took another shower and headed off.

In summary, a pretty basic parlour P&D with an experienced WG. I did find her attractive, friendly, and pleasant, and the service was delivered with enthusiasm. However, the smell of sweat killed it a bit for me, so it’s a neutral from Cliff.       

Offline Lancastrian1

Good review mate.

I saw her with kassy a few years ago. She was better than kassy.

I was told amber was Lindsay at Sheridans but im not so sure.

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,800
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
Good review mate.

I saw her with kassy a few years ago. She was better than kassy.

I was told amber was Lindsay at Sheridans but im not so sure.

She deffo was Lindsay.

Offline Mjg

Whos the best booking at roses I've seen roxy and Lauren

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Whos the best booking at roses I've seen roxy and Lauren

Are reviews on the way?



Offline Lancastrian1

Kelly was the best service for me

Offline sandy2000

Kelly was the best service for me

I agree. I must have forgot to review, and it’s ages ago now so too late, but Kelly is great. An amazing figure for her age, like a teen.

Offline Bustydusty

Megan was good but no longer there - I’d go back to see her again

Offline Lancastrian1

Melinda was really good too but not sure if she's still working anywhere.

Offline TomTank

Obviously your choice of rating, but could be a bit unhelpful to fellow punters given the reason for the rating, as her service is fantastic.
I would have thought that issue would only happen on a hot day and probably not going to be an issue for any of the rest of us.

As pointed out she was Lindsay at Sheridan's, and also Lindsay at that place that Nicola had in Bolton on Horwich Road (formerly run by the now sadly passed Honey). I had a fantastic domme session with her on her first day there, and have had some crackers recently with her at Roses (probably need to catch up on some reviews)

Would be great to see Melinda back at Roses.
Also Martine, Scarlett, and a few others are very much missed ....


Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Obviously your choice of rating, but could be a bit unhelpful to fellow punters given the reason for the rating, as her service is fantastic.
I would have thought that issue would only happen on a hot day and probably not going to be an issue for any of the rest of us.

As pointed out she was Lindsay at Sheridan's, and also Lindsay at that place that Nicola had in Bolton on Horwich Road (formerly run by the now sadly passed Honey). I had a fantastic domme session with her on her first day there, and have had some crackers recently with her at Roses (probably need to catch up on some reviews)

Would be great to see Melinda back at Roses.
Also Martine, Scarlett, and a few others are very much missed ....

The OP has left a neutral review and explained why, there were aspects of the meeting he wasn't happy with and that's all there is to it. Other members can read the review and make up their own mind.

Offline TomTank

The OP has left a neutral review and explained why, there were aspects of the meeting he wasn't happy with and that's all there is to it. Other members can read the review and make up their own mind.

The clue in my reply is in the first sentence "Obviously your choice of rating"
I've read the review, made up my own mind, and decided to share my thoughts ..... would you prefer me to keep my thoughts to myself?

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
The clue in my reply is in the first sentence "Obviously your choice of rating"
I've read the review, made up my own mind, and decided to share my thoughts ..... would you prefer me to keep my thoughts to myself?

I'd say you've gone further than share your thoughts. You stated it's the OP's review and rating but then go on and then tell us the review is a bit unhelpful, she gives fantastic service, how it's a non-issue and what wonderful times you've had with her.

As you say, you should probably have posted a review of a more recent meeting yourself. If you post one now it'll be against the backdrop of your comments on this review.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2021, 09:16:07 pm by GingerNuts »

Offline TomTank

I'd say you've gone further than share your thoughts. You stated it's the OP's review and rating but then go on and then tell us the review is a bit unhelpful, she gives fantastic service, how it's a non-issue and what wonderful times you've had with her.

As you say, you should probably have posted a review of a more recent meeting yourself. If you post one now it'll be against the backdrop of your comments on this review.

Of course they are my thoughts and I'm not sure how my thoughts can go further than being my thoughts.
My thoughts are that it's unhelpful because many people only read the headlines, and the reason for the neutral probably wouldn't apply to most of us.
And I will choose when I post my reviews according to what suits helping fellow members and preserving my anonymity.

Quote
If you post one now it'll be against the backdrop of your comments on this review.
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?




Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Of course they are my thoughts and I'm not sure how my thoughts can go further than being my thoughts.
My thoughts are that it's unhelpful because many people only read the headlines, and the reason for the neutral probably wouldn't apply to most of us.
And I will choose when I post my reviews according to what suits helping fellow members and preserving my anonymity.

Whatever your thoughts they led you to downplay a neutral review you don't seem to think she deserved. If she doesn't shower it's helping fellow members to inform them.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

You seem keen to defend this girl's reputation.

Offline TomTank

Whatever your thoughts they led you to downplay a neutral review you don't seem to think she deserved. If she doesn't shower it's helping fellow members to inform them.

You seem keen to defend this girl's reputation.

I haven't downplayed it at all.
As per what I always do, I've given comments to be helpful to this community.

If I was interested in this girl's reputation I would have posted some reviews myself a while ago, but I just haven't got round to it.
Your comment, that any review I now post, should be seen against the backdrop of this thread, suggests you are a lot more interested in her reputation than I am.



Offline Cliff Booth

Wow, I go away for a couple of days and all hell breaks loose. I think my review was perfectly helpful and I gave the reasons for the neutral, which was largely down to the smell of sweat and the the apparent lack of showering between punters. I've seen a couple of other girls at Roses prior to joining UKP, and as soon as the punt was over they just gave themselves a once over with a wet wipe and put their clothes back on. This is a no no for a lot of punters and, as WGs demand good hygiene from us it should be reciprocated. The fact it was a hot night was no excuse for smelling of stale sweat, I'd showered prior to leaving home but took another quick one at Roses to freshen up again purely out of common courtesy. I believe the whole point of this site is to be honest about your experience and rate the punt accordingly, which I did on this occasion. Then it's up to other punters to make their own minds up.

Offline Lancastrian1

Wow, I go away for a couple of days and all hell breaks loose. I think my review was perfectly helpful and I gave the reasons for the neutral, which was largely down to the smell of sweat and the the apparent lack of showering between punters. I've seen a couple of other girls at Roses prior to joining UKP, and as soon as the punt was over they just gave themselves a once over with a wet wipe and put their clothes back on. This is a no no for a lot of punters and, as WGs demand good hygiene from us it should be reciprocated. The fact it was a hot night was no excuse for smelling of stale sweat, I'd showered prior to leaving home but took another quick one at Roses to freshen up again purely out of common courtesy. I believe the whole point of this site is to be honest about your experience and rate the punt accordingly, which I did on this occasion. Then it's up to other punters to make their own minds up.

I agree it was very helpful, you rated it neutral and gave the reason why. It's up to the readers what they make of it and whether they go to see her or not.


Offline Bustydusty

Wow, I go away for a couple of days and all hell breaks loose. I think my review was perfectly helpful and I gave the reasons for the neutral, which was largely down to the smell of sweat and the the apparent lack of showering between punters. I've seen a couple of other girls at Roses prior to joining UKP, and as soon as the punt was over they just gave themselves a once over with a wet wipe and put their clothes back on. This is a no no for a lot of punters and, as WGs demand good hygiene from us it should be reciprocated. The fact it was a hot night was no excuse for smelling of stale sweat, I'd showered prior to leaving home but took another quick one at Roses to freshen up again purely out of common courtesy. I believe the whole point of this site is to be honest about your experience and rate the punt accordingly, which I did on this occasion. Then it's up to other punters to make their own minds up.
Thank you it was a good review- no idea why it got hijacked

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
Despite what some might think it's good for members to know if a WG can be a bit stinky. If they don't wash when it's warm you have to wonder if they bother at other times and it's just not as easy to sniff out.

Offline Access

Thank you it was a good review- no idea why it got hijacked
Looks like it was hijacked by a bit of white knighting..

It’s a good review and it’s imperative, to most of us at least, that good hygiene is practiced by the SP.
Your review is spot on, in fact it would be a borderline negative with bad hygiene for me.

Your review carries credibility in my opinion and you shared valuable elements as stated above.

Offline TomTank

Looks like it was hijacked by a bit of white knighting..

It’s a good review and it’s imperative, to most of us at least, that good hygiene is practiced by the SP.
Your review is spot on, in fact it would be a borderline negative with bad hygiene for me.

Your review carries credibility in my opinion and you shared valuable elements as stated above.

I haven't criticised the review, and yes it's a good review and I understand the neutral.
My only thought was that I don't think she has many reviews, and if I were glancing through the site, the neutral would probably take her off my radar, and yet I've had a couple of fantastic domme sessions with her recently.
That's not white knighting, that's providing context to the review. that might be helpful to others.




Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,800
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
I haven't criticised the review, and yes it's a good review and I understand the neutral.
My only thought was that I don't think she has many reviews, and if I were glancing through the site, the neutral would probably take her off my radar, and yet I've had a couple of fantastic domme sessions with her recently.
That's not white knighting, that's providing context to the review. that might be helpful to others.

He's reviewing his experience with her, not yours  :unknown:

Offline TomTank

He's reviewing his experience with her, not yours  :unknown:

and I'm replying with my thoughts, as many people do on any review on here

Offline Lancastrian1

and I'm replying with my thoughts, as many people do on any review on here

You said it was unhelpful. It's unanimous that it was a helpful review.

Offline Kool Keef

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,800
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 196
and I'm replying with my thoughts, as many people do on any review on here

Read like you was WKing

Offline TomTank

You said it was unhelpful. It's unanimous that it was a helpful review.

I said the rating might be unhelpful .... I didn't say it was wrong, or that it should be changed, just that it might be unhelpful, and I didn't comment on the actual review

Offline GingerNuts

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,820
  • Likes: 111
  •  
  • Reviews: 48
I said the rating might be unhelpful .... I didn't say it was wrong, or that it should be changed, just that it might be unhelpful, and I didn't comment on the actual review

The rating was entirely helpful and, I'd go as far as to say, "correct".

Quote
Give a positive rating if you want to unequivocally recommend the provider to other punters, at the price you paid. If you would repeat the punt as it was, or plan to revisit, you should probably give a positive rating. Note Bait & Switch bookings should not be recorded as a positive rating against original profile, even if you had a good experience. (If you would not repeat based on the girl/experience - not because you just never repeat - then rate neutral or negative.)

Quote
Give a neutral rating when you have reservations about recommending the provider to other punters, or you don't fully meet the requirements above for positive. Describe your reservations in your review.

Offline pegman8

We can all only review what we find on the day, and it is up to each one of us if we take notice of what is said.

Offline TomTank

A few people seem to have objected to my comment here, so it's probably me in the wrong..... apologies if it offended you.
However if there is any White Knighting involved in my reaction, it's not support for the girl, but support for the service / price / value for money.

I am at breaking point with the number of girls taking the piss and everywhere putting their prices up.
I'm mostly into a domme service and before covid could usually rely on a decent service with some great MILFs at Roses for £40, and some decent younger ones at Georgian/Baileys for £45, and La Maison for £50

They've all not only put their prices up, but the girls are blatantly refusing to start a session until they've nailed you for an extra tenner. And it really pisses me off and sets the session off on the wrong foot when I refuse OWO and they instantly come back with "well it will be extra for kissing, RO, touching me, using the bed, taking my clothes off, breathing, bla bla bla"

So, back to Amber.
I saw her years ago at Sheridans, and a while back at Roses, but not for a long time, mainly because I mostly used my punting budget to see Martine, Libby and a couple of others.
Martine has left and Libby isn't into the domme as much any more so I tried Amber again, and the service was very good, and no silly extras. So I've seen her a couple of times since.

Any "White Knighting" on my post was very much because she is one of the few around, where you can still get a decent session under £50 without silly extras, so yes I did feel the need to defend her ..... just don't want another good value girl packing it in .......





« Last Edit: December 08, 2021, 12:30:13 pm by TomTank »