Author Topic: Deceptive WGs, B & S Profiles, Fake Photos, Misleading Information etc.  (Read 2005 times)

Offline Putin

A thread for adding active deceptive profiles on AW, VS etc.

In this context, deception means the WG's profile is real, but the information given on the profile (i.e photos, stats, age, service etc) misinforms, misleads or deceives the punter.


This includes
...  Bait and Switch (B & S) profiles.
...  Profiles using very old or excessively photoshopped photos which is very different from reality.
...  Profiles using a fake and false identity... e.g. a photo of another WG, celebrity, pornstar, model etc.
...  Profiles showing a misleading age to make the WG appear much younger than she truly is... at least 10 years younger or more.
...  Profiles clearly showing an FS service or any other service (with no conditions attached). But when the punter arrives, the WG refuses to provide the service, or asks for extra money for it.
...  Swapped/Shared profiles - This should only be added if the name and photos on the profile have NOT been changed to reflect the current WG.


It excludes
... Scam Profiles or anything to do with financial fraud, theft or extortion... There is another thread for that.   https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.0
... Suspicious TS or gender deception profiles... There is another thread for that.  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=67631.0

Some examples include
...  You arrived at the location, the WG you saw clearly wasn't the lady in the pics, but she's still okay and looks good ... Please add.
...  It's the lady in the pics, she's still pretty, but my gosh, she's like 20 years older than the age stated/pics shown on the profile... Please add.
...  Before you made the booking on AW, the WG's "Enjoys list" clearly shows "Penetration (Protected)" (with no other conditions attached). You book for 30 mins. But when you arrive, the WG says "I'm sorry darling 15/30 mins is for massage/Handjob/BJ only. If you want FS, you have to pay extra, or you have to upgrade to an hour". Please add.


Tips
...  Please include a screenshot if possible.
...  New or unreviewed profiles are especially welcomed.
...  The thread is mainly for record-keeping so please keep discussions at a minimum.  :hi:
...  Please check to see if the profile has already been added to avoid duplicates.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Putin

QUEEN OF SOUTH

External Link/Members Only

Fake pics. The WG you will meet is very different from the photos on the profile.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 01:31:49 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

Ariana_Gia

External Link/Members Only

She's at least 50 or early 50s. And look much older than the 32 years currently shown on the profile.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 01:33:04 pm by Putin »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,298
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I tried this with B&S VS profiles, it didn't last long because most everyone can't be bothered to add another chore to their list of things to do (especially for profiles that may not last long).

Pretty much EVERY SP could be added to this thread in the cumulative, subjective lens of all UKPers and their differing (sometimes flawed, sometimes mistaken, sometimes mind-altered) opinions. 

Any punter doing their cursory appraisal of a profile will make his subjective judgements about the various "facts" on it before dialling, listing or moving on, why does he need to feel obliged to post the profile here, indeed post every profile from a Saturday night search for rented pussy?

Who's going to police this thread for repeated or malicious postings?  What about when an SP subsequently updates her profile?  What about when a blacklisted profile is passed to another SP who posts current pics?

Whether an SP looks (enough) like her photos is a key reporting fact in a review... REVIEWS are meant to be our contemporaneous reports of encounters with SPs who respond to bookings.

You mean well with your programmatic approach but this isn't a job for a mostly delinquent collection of punters (and hoard of leeches).  The success of it will rely on the already exploited diligence of a few (obsessive) punters already spending too much time on this site (!).  You need an ML/AI bot for this that is constantly updating every rationalised entry.

Offline Putin

You need an ML/AI bot for this that is constantly updating every rationalised entry.

Yes, I agree with you. It is not the most effective or efficient but we still have to try.

Offline Putin

I tried this with B&S VS profiles, it didn't last long because most everyone can't be bothered to add another chore to their list of things to do (especially for profiles that may not last long).

Pretty much EVERY SP could be added to this thread in the cumulative, subjective lens of all UKPers and their differing (sometimes flawed, sometimes mistaken, sometimes mind-altered) opinions. 

Any punter doing their cursory appraisal of a profile will make his subjective judgements about the various "facts" on it before dialling, listing or moving on, why does he need to feel obliged to post the profile here, indeed post every profile from a Saturday night search for rented pussy?

Who's going to police this thread for repeated or malicious postings?  What about when an SP subsequently updates her profile?  What about when a blacklisted profile is passed to another SP who posts current pics?

Whether an SP looks (enough) like her photos is a key reporting fact in a review... REVIEWS are meant to be our contemporaneous reports of encounters with SPs who respond to bookings.

You mean well with your programmatic approach but this isn't a job for a mostly delinquent collection of punters (and hoard of leeches).  The success of it will rely on the already exploited diligence of a few (obsessive) punters already spending too much time on this site (!).  You need an ML/AI bot for this that is constantly updating every rationalised entry.

True indeed, unfortunately, Pareto Principle applies everywhere including UKP.

Most members here don't leave reviews of their experience. If I were to make a wild guess, perhaps only 20% of UKP members and guests make contributions to the site.

Out of this, maybe only 20% actually leave reviews, while the remainder lurks in the background.

For some, making a review is seen as hard work and they don't have the time.

They may have a B & S encounter, don't report it, and the cycle repeats itself until somebody finally does a review or brings it up during a discussion.

For these lurkers, having a thread where they don't have to go through the process of writing a review of their B & S experience but simply dropping the link of the profile here, might sway them to contribute.

And if a WG changes her profile, just like any other thread, you simply add the new link.

And one more thing, any info or research on a WG on UKP is simply as good as how many entries or footprints she has on here. If she has no entry, then there is nothing to research on.

No thread is perfect, but you still have to create them as some punters may find it helpful in making their decision on whether to see the WG or not.

You win some, you lose some :drinks:



« Last Edit: November 27, 2021, 07:16:00 pm by Putin »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,298
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
True indeed, unfortunately, Pareto Principle applies everywhere including UKP.

Most members here don't leave reviews of their experience. If I were to make a wild guess, perhaps only 20% of UKP members and guests make contributions to the site.

Out of this, maybe only 20% actually leave reviews, while the remainder lurks in the background.

For some, making a review is seen as hard work and they don't have the time.

They may have a B & S encounter, don't report it, and the cycle repeats itself until somebody finally does a review or brings it up during a discussion.

For these lurkers, having a thread where they don't have to go through the process of writing a review of their B & S experience but simply dropping the link of the profile here, might sway them to contribute.

And if a WG changes her profile, just like any other thread, you simply add the new link.

And one more thing, any info or research on a WG on UKP is simply as good as how many entry or footprints she has on here. If she has no footprint, then there is nothing to research on.

No thread is perfect, but you still have to create them as some punters may find it helpful in making their decision on whether to see the WG or not.

You win some, you lose some :drinks:

Totally get you but who are you actually benefiting...  Any "sound" UKPer will review, so we get those in your 20% and they're likely to have done their own research and assessment beforehand i.e. they practice punting with some caution and (hasty) consideration even if we could all do it better and more consistently...  It is the silent ones who benefit from others documenting their every preparatory effort so you're improving the game for those who don't contribute.

A review doesn't have to take long or say much, especially if the punter walked, to whit:
1) click review button
2) Copy/Paste profile link to review
3a) Copy/Paste "Turned up, ghosted/B&S/lied about services/wanted more money*, walked". * Delete as appropriate.
3b) Copy/Paste "Turned up, B&S/lied about services/wanted more money*, stayed and it was meh/good*".  * Delete as appropriate.
4) Post review

We have good examples of concise, useful reviews that are barely 4 or 5 incomplete sentences.  The "friction" is minimal to making a worthy contribution that is more anonymous through it's brevity.  There is no obligation to write the World's best/worst recounted punt in 500 words or more.

Enabling people to avoid reviewing doesn't really help us. B&Ss can still result in a good punt as can following-thru despite dodgy info or extra charges.  We can only be thankful for the contrarian UKPers who proceed and review despite the cons of an encounter.

Creating a blacklist to wave-off encounters reduces the number of experiences to be recounted when those missed events could be useful.

If you're compiling these lists then don't you also need to compile "SPs that look just like their pics"; "SPs that honour their bookings"; "SPs who provide all services as listed and priced".   :unknown:

Offline Putin

.Julia.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

"New" girl. My arse. Turned out to be the same old hag as below:

External Link/Members Only

Thanked her for wasting my fucking time, turned on my heel and walked.

Today the thicko has the same phone number displayed on both ads  :angry: +44 7979 182299.

Hidden Image/Members Only   Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Putin

Brenda Yummy

External Link/Members Only

shorturl.at/diruK


Avoid. Fake profile. A completely different person. Pimp in the house. Awful experience and service. Lost 60 pounds basically,

BAIT & SWITCH//NOT THE WOMAN IN THE PICS
+447547864741 07547864741

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only




Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Putin

Curvy_Pakistani
External Link/Members Only

I have a feeling this profile is used by different girls , as the description and service levels vary wildly. Also some of the profile pics are not even the same person.

Yes, Profile pictures vary everytime, and they are not of the same person. this one is best AVOIDED.

I have punted her.. her photos are debatable if it’s her or not .. but highly unlikely in option.
Nevertheless she gave a ok service ... if the GFE is your things then she’s worth a shout. Although quite pricey for a covered (ow) service .

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Putin

Ebony Baileys    

External Link/Members Only

B& S

External Link/Members Only

It's not the girl in the pics. Based out of a shitty flat on church street. Too expensive imo.
I had a quick look and it looked like it may have been External Link/Members Only

who i've reviewed previously.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 06:34:46 pm by Putin »




Offline Putin

B & S

SEXXY BELA
External Link/Members Only   

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only


Further details

Anticipated that I may not be able to find their VS profiles, I took screenshots of their AW profiles instead. Easier to index and track.

There seems to be 3-4 girls, Malu, Bianca, Bela and Bruna advertised in this location, their AW below

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+ (This is the one I saw)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only (This is one I wanted, who wasn't found)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only (Seems to work here also but not seen)

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only (Fourth one who seems to work with them)

Screenshots of their AW below for posterity as well. I would go back to see Malu but if there's no guarantee I won't risk wasting my time.

The final screenshot is from the search results to easily see they all have the same location listed

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only 

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 07:35:39 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

B & S

HOT@MALU   
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Probably not going to meet the woman in the profile pictures:

External Link/Members Only

The photos are of a model called Lira Galore / Lira Mercer

External Link/Members Only

Anyone know what an edge control dealer is ?

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 07:50:16 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

B & S

Monica Blows
External Link/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

A B&S is an instant negative for me even though the girl i saw was a positive experience, although im not going to attach a positive rating to a false profile. I  I have no idea who i saw but obviously not the Dominican girl i was hoping to see from the profile so cant provide an AW link for the girl i actually saw. She said she was Columbian and for the older readers out there a Sunitta lookalike. Very sexy looking woman, slim C ? cup breasts with large nipples which she seemed to enjoy being sucked. She had made an effort with her appearance dressed in matching bra and nickers( so no panties Alma did have panties :D) and a see through negiligee thing. With 6 months + of sexual frustration to get rid of i was not going to walk although on principle i should have given the misrepresentation of the profile pictures.

The meet happened on Sunday 09 May 2021 and was a terraced house converted to flats about 5 mins walk from westbourne Park tube. Im sure ive been there before at some point in my punting career. The front door is left open and you are met as you walk up the stairs. I tried to discuss services but she has no english so just paid the £60 half hour fee and go with the flow. I didn't ask for or get oral and kissing wasnt available. I suppose for £60 is about right for the level of service recd. Anyhow i was in a bit of a rush so was in and out in 20 mins as i had other places to go. Had sex in a couple of positions but soon filled the bag as it was nice to feel a lovely pussy again after all these months off due to the bloody virus. She was a lovely submissive girl so it turned out ok.

Hopes this helps fellow punters who may be thinking of booking External Link/Members Only just be aware its likely you wont meet the girl from the profile.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 08:03:53 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

B & S

sexyhot_paula
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

As you will no doubt have the good sense to surmise, this is a South American knocking shop in West Norwood. Went along hoping to see the girl in the photos but ended up spending 2x30mins with two girls who bore no resemblance to her. Standard line-up - 4 gals in their skimpies. Was fine, friendly, OW, sex in as many positions as wanted, 69 20 quid extra (but I just had to second time around as I love to eat the poon), nice enough girls. No clock watching but very much a business operation.

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 08:19:00 pm by Putin »


Offline Putin

B & S

Lea Teen Babe
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Not much to say on this one. She’s not the girl in the pics, they give you a selection of 3 and they’re all munt. Brazilian brothel set up. One to avoid, I walked.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 08:43:29 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 09:03:08 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

B & S

Partygirl Ellaxox

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Knocked on the door and no answer was standing there for a couple of minutes finally a girl opens the door and guess what?
Surprise its not the girl i was going to see, i asked where she was and was told i could see her instead, i politley said no thankyou i came to see this girl tonight sorry and walked off.

Turns out her personal number is not her personal number its just like the profiles they clearly have a load of them and each one get answered by whoever total bait and switch.

I also have some other info linked to this WG and i believe sone of the others who may be working with her i shall post them up.shortly .

Bit of a shame as i felt she had potential i will be steering clear of this crew in Stratford from now on

I was ghosted by this profile a couple of months ago. Arranged the booking turned up on time but once i got to the address (i think it was pretty close to St Pancras) radio silence. Bloody annoying but unfortunately you get used to it in this game,goes with the territory. I dont like fake tits so she wouldn't have suited me anyhow.

The name she gave me when she gave me her personal number was Lehonna Gucci.
A quick google brings up a couple of sites.
Her viva street add which has the number she gave me on it

External Link/Members Only

Still no clear face pictures and another change of name to Rennew the stallion she mentions in the description about changing her hair which was something she actually said to me during the post punt chat.

And this one same name and number and again not the greatest of pictures.
External Link/Members Only

I.noticed a couple of other profiles on there which i noticed on aw and suspected worked in the same place.
Kinkyebonyrose
Tokyosloppyowo

However having just been back on viva and aw profiles appear to have vanished
« Last Edit: November 28, 2021, 09:47:18 pm by Putin »

Offline Putin

B & S

layla bangs
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


Nope, I booked her but then she kept moving the time until I got fed up and gave up. After travelling from West to East on a Friday afternoon, it was painful to be fooled around but I saved £140 in the end will use it to pump two more reliable WG when next I get the chance. So it's her loss! Will never be able to tell if she's really the one in profile pics cos never saw her.



I buzzed the bell and some slim / petite teen girl wearing waist beads opened the door.

Once in she said slight problem, the girl you booked is not working today  :dash: :dash: HUH I quizzed her about the texting, she said I can offer you two girls + myself pick one, well two other girls all teens roughly 18 - mid twenties came out, one of them in all her glory no clothing  :wacko:

At this stage I was asked to pick a girl, I reiterated that none of them was the girl in the profile picture, the story changed to " she had an in -call, then left - blame her not us )  :dash: :dash:

Still pressured at this stage, I picked the Ebony girl Mikela, once in the room we chatted, she had saggy boobs + a bit of a Bubble no love handles or belly, I almost went for her BUTT didn't want to risk it ( no review + B&S will win )

I apologies and walked, they still said to me on the way out " blame Chiina Doll not us "  :bomb: :dash:

Well in all, based on previous comments / post about no reviews for this SP, I decided to take one for the team, normally I wouldn't book her based on no reviews or well vouched post.

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only  Hidden Image/Members Only    Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only    Hidden Image/Members Only





« Last Edit: November 29, 2021, 12:55:45 am by Putin »

Offline Putin

« Last Edit: November 29, 2021, 12:55:10 am by Putin »

Offline Putin

« Last Edit: November 29, 2021, 10:48:07 am by Putin »

Offline Skyjuice1000


Offline Putin

« Last Edit: April 03, 2022, 09:52:58 am by Putin »