One was for normal sort of driving and the other was a motorway course. Classed as separate courses which is lucky.
I was tempted to appeal, but how do you prove anything? A photo saying 123mph or 71mph tells nothing.
Some police forces take away the option of a course if you ask to see evidence and give 3 points etc. if you lose the appeal.
Comes across as the usual guilty until proven innocent.
They do make mistakes, the first letter is generated automatically and they do make it hard to appeal, with threats to not allow courses, but the court can impose the same penalty and a course.
The last one I appealed and took to court was dismissed by the court or not contested, I do not know which because I forgot to attend, I had sent the not guilty letter and my reasons, the camera being illegally situated, with incorrect warning signs.
The one before that, I was not driving the car, could have been several people, they insisted I must name a single driver, appeared in court and explained I could name several possible drivers but not one and the form did not allow for this.
The magistrate asked if I had replied on time by letter explaining this, which I had, twice, and the prosecution produced to him, and said as far as he is concerned I had complied and dismissed the case.
Your first situation is difficult if they had proof, the second seems like you were caught by faster moving vehicles and it just happened to picture you, the first letter would then be generated, your acceptance of guilt probably meant it was never looked at by a human, just a paperwork exercise. If I was sure of my speed I would have appealed that one, but I enjoy a day in court
