Baby-Dollxox Manchester

[roadrunner69999]

External Link/Members Only

Contacted Sacrlett via AW as no numbefr available. I don't believe she currently has a phone for work use, hopefully this changes in future. Comms via AW were spot on, prompt replies with detailed answers to my queries. I confirmed day before but due to injury on the day (long story and hospitilisation involved  ) I had to cancel late on. Scarlett was very understanding and replied very quickly enquiring into my health. I will book on next visit to Manchester as if service as good as comms she'll be very good meet.


Oh also, she's on pornhub so also counts as provider with free videos 

External Link/Members Only

[lewisjones23]

External Link/Members Only

Contacted Sacrlett via AW as no numbefr available. I don't believe she currently has a phone for work use, hopefully this changes in future. Comms via AW were spot on, prompt replies with detailed answers to my queries. I confirmed day before but due to injury on the day (long story and hospitilisation involved  ) I had to cancel late on. Scarlett was very understanding and replied very quickly enquiring into my health. I will book on next visit to Manchester as if service as good as comms she'll be very good meet.


Oh also, she's on pornhub so also counts as provider with free videos 

External Link/Members Only

not a review

[GingerNuts]

not a review

The OP had a booking, the only criteria.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

[OakTree]

The OP had a booking, the only criteria.

Clearly not, you moved this one to regional chat because you deemed it not a review because it lacked details.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=324620.msg3382361#msg3382361

[george r]

moved it...

[GingerNuts]

Clearly not, you moved this one to regional chat because you deemed it not a review because it lacked details.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=324620.msg3382361#msg3382361

A meeting took place in the "review" you quoted but nearly all the basic information wasn't provided. In this case all that could be said has been said. It's a mirror of the situation where negative reviews are posted when the punter cancels and the SP is a shit about it.

To bring clarity I've reported the OP for the moderators to advise.

[daviemac]

The OP had an agreed booking therefore it stands as a review.

As far as the other review mentioned is concerned despite a meeting taking place there is no details of any services. The fact the OP is based on the west coast, travelled to Preston and has seen her before does not help anyone decide to see her or not.

[GingerNuts]

The OP had an agreed booking therefore it stands as a review.

As far as the other review mentioned is concerned despite a meeting taking place there is no details of any services. The fact the OP is based on the west coast, travelled to Preston and has seen her before does not help anyone decide to see her or not.

Thanks for the clarification.

[Torhandle]

Shouldn’t it be in ‘Escort Reviews’ and not ‘Massage Reviews’?

[OakTree]

Well I can't say I see any clarification. I'm with Lewis. This isn't a review and I can't for the life of me see why someone would write a report on meet they had to bail out on.

As far as I can see if the review I linked to is shit (which I agree it is) then this one certainly is.

[Moby Dick]

Shouldn’t it be in ‘Escort Reviews’ and not ‘Massage Reviews’?

Should be in the bin.

[roadrunner69999]

Ok, I added this in review as thought that was right place to post it (sure I'd seen similar in past). Important info was that comms were good and she was cool with me needing to cancel late on so thought this info was of use to you all, and people wonder why some don't post enough! If board was more welcoming you'd get more info.

[Punterperson1971]

Ok, I added this in review as thought that was right place to post it (sure I'd seen similar in past). Important info was that comms were good and she was cool with me needing to cancel late on so thought this info was of use to you all, and people wonder why some don't post enough! If board was more welcoming you'd get more info.

Op you’ve been here 3.5 years you should know how this works and maybe man up a little

[Moby Dick]

I heard Debbies Nosh is a good place to dine, so I booked a table, and then realised I couldn’t make it for whatever irrelevant reason. So I cancelled at short notice and she was really cool about it. Haven’t got a clue what the place is like, the service, how the food tastes or if it is good value but I will be back, errrr I mean go for the first time, so it’s a positive from me

[daviemac]

I heard Debbies Nosh is a good place to dine, so I booked a table, and then realised I couldn’t make it for whatever irrelevant reason. So I cancelled at short notice and she was really cool about it. Haven’t got a clue what the place is like, the service, how the food tastes or if it is good value but I will be back, errrr I mean go for the first time, so it’s a positive from me

I don't know why you are posting this crap, the OP had an agreed booking, if the SP had cancelled she would have got a negative, he cancelled and she was OK with it therefore he has posted a review to reflect that.

It also shows there were no problems with communication with prompt replies and answers to questions.

Those who don't find it useful just ignore it.

[lewisjones23]

The OP had an agreed booking therefore it stands as a review.

As far as the other review mentioned is concerned despite a meeting taking place there is no details of any services. The fact the OP is based on the west coast, travelled to Preston and has seen her before does not help anyone decide to see her or not.

surely that rule should only apply to when a WG cancels at short notice

struggling to see what value this ‘ review ‘ has, apart from to bump up the OP’s stats or at a push prove the girl exists / takes bookings

[Bustydusty]

No way the sp should get a positive on her stats for this

[daviemac]

surely that rule should only apply to when a WG cancels at short notice

struggling to see what value this ‘ review ‘ has, apart from to bump up the OP’s stats or at a push prove the girl exists / takes bookings

If you don't find the information useful ignore it, it's quite simple.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).

The OP had an agreed booking and his review reflects the positive points in the booking process.

[Northerndave666]

Well I can't say I see any clarification. I'm with Lewis. This isn't a review and I can't for the life of me see why someone would write a report on meet they had to bail out on.

As far as I can see if the review I linked to is shit (which I agree it is) then this one certainly is.

And to rate it a positive, when no services happened?. Can't see what the point of this 'review' was? Do we need another section called 'Escort Comms' ?

I've seen Daviemacs explanation and understand if it's no use, move on and according to the rules it is a review......but maybe those rules need tightening?

[lewisjones23]

No way the sp should get a positive on her stats for this

100% agree

a positive review for being able to operate a phone 🤦🏻‍♂️

[Clitheroelad]

She looks like she has a love of pies.

[Moby Dick]

She looks like she has a love of pies.

Shepherds, cottage, chicken, steak n kidney, pork, throat, or cream?