ElizabethJanex - Derby

[tonyalto]

External Link/Members Only

meet was in an apartment in Derby City Center

Cost - £150 for 1hr

Pretty, blonde hair, size 10, nice body

Round 1 - OW - my choice.  Good technique and good eye contact.

Round 2 - her on top and then doggy with me standing - the way I like it.  Nice bum to look at whilst I did the deed.

Nice girl would definitely recommend.

[ElizabethJanex]

Thank you for this review dearest xxxxxx

[hunkybc]

Hmmmm...so im slightly suspicious of these reviews of EJ....both punters have only submitted two reviews each and both their second reviews are for EJ on the same day!?  With a response from said Service Provider....?  Am I overthinking something here?

[gbyld87]

Hmmmm...so im slightly suspicious of these reviews of EJ....both punters have only submitted two reviews each and both their second reviews are for EJ on the same day!?  With a response from said Service Provider....?  Am I overthinking something here?

Tbh I always think a response to a review from the 'reviewee' (??)  seems a bit off somehow.  Superficially there's no harm in it, but I know exactly what you're getting at.

[ElizabethJanex]

Hmmmm...so im slightly suspicious of these reviews of EJ....both punters have only submitted two reviews each and both their second reviews are for EJ on the same day!?  With a response from said Service Provider....?  Am I overthinking something here?

Hey In all honesty I myself was also surprised to see 2 reviews in a day as I haven't had one for a while.
Nothing suspicious though, I have absolutely no control over who writes what and when and also unless specifics are mentioned I often don't know who it is leaving the review.

I myself, always respond to my reviews, not just here but elsewhere also. This of course being the main site.
Whilst I have heard that some people don't trust AW reviews (why? I don't know)  I can assure you that I am 100% genuine and have 100% positive feedback both here, on AW and on a couple of other sites too.

I respond to feedback either to say thank you for the review or to address any issues (still yet to happen) but its also good for me to see how well I'm doing and if theres anything I need to improve, whether it be communication, location instructions or something more specific to the job.

As addressed in similar suspicions on a previous review the moderator himself even agreed with a client that because of lockdown there are lots of accounts who haven't made many reviews at all because they simply haven't seen anyone. I was also told by the moderator that I'm fine being a member and commenting and responding provided I don't advertise or solicit which I don't.

So I hope that clears up a few things. I don't need to play an angle
Best
EJ

[Straightsix]

Whilst I have heard that some people don't trust AW reviews (why? I don't know) 

You really don't know?

[ElizabethJanex]

Well, I mean I know that some reviews are quite basic and fake accounts can be made and things like that where as here they are more detailed which is great for clients but for the most part surely if somebody has a lot of feedback and every single one is good then surely thats a pretty good indicator that the girl is decent.

Ive always thought that the nightmare escorts which unfortunately there are so many, expose themselves pretty quickly in their bad feedback or just generally their bad profiles and worse their bad meetings.

[Straightsix]

If I left you feedback stating you had hygiene issues,  how would you react? You hadn't accepted my booking so my feedback would be labelled 'feedback only' on your feedback. You now have the option of accepting my booking and choosing a red negative, saying whatever you like which would then be displayed on my feedback. What would you do?

[ElizabethJanex]

My goodness me, I didn’t see the “if” and I thought you were saying you’d left me feedback because I had bad hygiene! Haha I was just thinking “What?!”

I think I understand where you’re coming from but surely that doesn’t happen when dealing with decent people. Of course not everyone is but I’d like to think that both escort and client can tell when they’ve dealt with someone nasty and untruthful.

But yes I would be absolutely fuming is the answer to your question.

[punter_1991]

External Link/Members Only

meet was in an apartment in Derby City Center

Cost - £150 for 1hr

Pretty, blonde hair, size 10, nice body

Round 1 - OW - my choice.  Good technique and good eye contact.

Round 2 - her on top and then doggy with me standing - the way I like it.  Nice bum to look at whilst I did the deed.

Nice girl would definitely recommend.

Really tempted to see her but just wish she offered CIM or facial 

[Natwest]

The problem with AW reviews is simply that if a punter gives a negative review, he is going to get negatively reviewed in return. It's a while since I have punted but if I had a good experience I left a positive review on AW. If I had a bad experience I just didn't review to avoid aggravation. Without a doubt, UK Punting is the most reliable place to make decisions. I rarely read the reviews on AW and since finding this site never have.

[Straightsix]

But yes I would be absolutely fuming is the answer to your question.

...and thats why AW feedback is useless. No lady likes to be told she hasn't washed before a meet. And you'd be surprised at how many that don't (and they looked 'decent'). Its not the cheap girls either.
There are other aspects too that may seem trivial but certainly guarantee men a 'negative rated' retaliation.

[ElizabethJanex]

That’s so gross but thankfully this is not , nor would it ever be me 

[ElizabethJanex]

...and thats why AW feedback is useless. No lady likes to be told she hasn't washed before a meet. And you'd be surprised at how many that don't. Its not the cheap girls either.
There are other aspects too that may seem trivial but certainly guarantee men a 'negative rated' retaliation.

I wasn’t talking though about leaving people negative reviews , it was more about the idea that if an escort has lots and lots of feedback and it’s 100% positive that surely a indicator that she’s decent and vice versa that if a client has lots and lots of feedback and it’s all good then I would certainly trust that he would too, be ok x that’s all I meant

[Straightsix]

But plenty of positive feedback doesn't mean there were no issues does it? Why would a man say you had hygiene issues when he doesn't intend on seeing you again? Do you realise that just one negative would write you off in the minds of other girls? You'd only leave him negative feedback so why would he bother telling the truth...make sense?
In my books, the only valid feedback for an escort on AW is repeat feedback from repeated visits from more than one person.

[ElizabethJanex]

Yes that’s fair for the most part but please don’t think there aren’t awful dudes out there who for whatever reason have some kind of vendetta against escorts and wouldn’t leave bad feedback for the sake of upsetting an escort. There was a guy a few years back on A different platform who said I’d seen him on this particular date. Described an absolutely bizarre scenario and as it turned out I wasn’t even in the country m and he did this to a few ladies m. So , unfortunately there are very much nasties on both sides who spoil the broth somewhat but in terms of aw reviews being trustworthy or not, I can see where it is you yourself are coming from xx

[Hotdogboy88]

I don’t take AW as a sure thing. But if a girl has loads of positives of guys with loads of positives then I falling on the side she pretty reliable. I will then always check on here to see if they compare and in the past they do so more often than not. They don’t have the best system but it can be an ok guide at least to find the better girls, finding the dodgy ones it’s not so good at. Doesn’t come close to the review system here.

[ElizabethJanex]

That’s what I meant. I think you worded it better than I did

[NickyBobby]

As has been mentioned before

I should have highlighted this:
Not just you as sometimes your just answering questions, but a reminder to other members too…

2 Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but zero-tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers.

[ElizabethJanex]

Forgive me , I was lead to believe by a moderator in a previous thread that addressing issues is ok.

[gbyld87]

I don’t take AW as a sure thing. But if a girl has loads of positives of guys with loads of positives then I falling on the side she pretty reliable. I will then always check on here to see if they compare and in the past they do so more often than not. They don’t have the best system but it can be an ok guide at least to find the better girls, finding the dodgy ones it’s not so good at. Doesn’t come close to the review system here.

There's clear motivation for people to leave misleading / overly-favourable reviews on AW, or abstain from leaving negative ones.  On here, the same motivations still exist to a degree, but are much less prevalent. I find it interesting that you can barely, if ever, find a provider with a string of negatives (or even simply a majority negative review count) on AW - surely it's not the case that there are no bad providers on there. 

I have first-hand experience of appalling experiences with providers that have extensive, positive feedback on AW.  A counter to that might be that i'm simply an undesirable client and that my experiences were the exception, but I don't believe that's the case at all.  At this point, i personally struggle to trust ANY AW profie without corroboration on UKP, regardless of the number of reviews they have on there.  It's a useful way of providing insight into whether a provider is genuine (e.g. if they have an AW profile to go with their Viva ad, i'm much more likely to believe that Viva ad is real), but it doesn't tell me anything really as to whether they'll be any good.

[Dodgelad]

Forgive me , I was lead to believe by a moderator in a previous thread that addressing issues is ok.

EJ, Please continue to engage until a moderator says otherwise, sometimes its good to read from the SP perspective. Members do not have to read the thread, they choose to, nobody receives annoying unwanted notifications 

[Kev40ish]

Forgive me , I was lead to believe by a moderator in a previous thread that addressing issues is ok.

I’m quite happy for you to answer questions and contribute giving your perspective 
Just ensure there is no touting or flirting going on…

[ElizabethJanex]

I don’t believe I have at all but please tell me if I have

[Kev40ish]

I don’t believe I have at all but please tell me if I have

All good at the moment 

[Straightsix]

Yes that’s fair for the most part but please don’t think there aren’t awful dudes out there who for whatever reason have some kind of vendetta against escorts and wouldn’t leave bad feedback for the sake of upsetting an escort. There was a guy a few years back on A different platform who said I’d seen him on this particular date. Described an absolutely bizarre scenario and as it turned out I wasn’t even in the country m and he did this to a few ladies m. So , unfortunately there are very much nasties on both sides who spoil the broth somewhat but in terms of aw reviews being trustworthy or not, I can see where it is you yourself are coming from xx

Here is the difference. If a SP has negative feedback she will still receive custom. You can even read this on the forum here. The other day I read a negative review for a SP who already had 4 or so negatives just on this forum and even though we pride ourselves on our reviews. So what's going on here? The fact is; if a SP has negatives she will still receive custom. If a guy has negatives then it's game over (unless he contacts SPs via their advertised number so they don't ever see his profile feedback). SPs do not have the ability to gauge malicious feedback left by other SPs. It doesn't matter, its a negative to them, a no go area.
The unpleasant contingent is there for sure and under no circumstances would I ever condone malicious behaviour. What you will also find on this forum is paying for pussy veterans who can spot bullshit and malicious feedback from a mile and we have always called such characters out.

Having said such, it would be nice of SPs to admit that 99% of profiles out there are full of deceit. Lies about age, filtered or old images, the promise of euphoria...its all horseshit yet no service provider has ever apologised for the skullduggery that is prevalent amongst the majority of your fellow SPs.
What if negative feedback was left for every single SP who blatantly lies about their age? Would that be fair? Who's to say some men cannot handle their unfulfilled desires when promises are broken after money is paid?
The male libido is is a powerful emotion few understand. It will disregard negative feedback. Most have difficulty controlling it, this is evident from many a review here. Unless a review reads as imminent danger, its nothing but a gauge to consider when choosing a SP.

[ElizabethJanex]

Again that’s not always true. I’ve seen plenty of clients who have clearly had bad run ins with dodgy escorts who have left bitter negative feedback . Provided there is some other feedback to go on of course x

[Hotdogboy88]

There's clear motivation for people to leave misleading / overly-favourable reviews on AW, or abstain from leaving negative ones.  On here, the same motivations still exist to a degree, but are much less prevalent. I find it interesting that you can barely, if ever, find a provider with a string of negatives (or even simply a majority negative review count) on AW - surely it's not the case that there are no bad providers on there. 

I have first-hand experience of appalling experiences with providers that have extensive, positive feedback on AW.  A counter to that might be that i'm simply an undesirable client and that my experiences were the exception, but I don't believe that's the case at all.  At this point, i personally struggle to trust ANY AW profie without corroboration on UKP, regardless of the number of reviews they have on there.  It's a useful way of providing insight into whether a provider is genuine (e.g. if they have an AW profile to go with their Viva ad, i'm much more likely to believe that Viva ad is real), but it doesn't tell me anything really as to whether they'll be any good.

Pretty much what I said about cross referencing they reviews with ours.

[ElizabethJanex]

Which I think is a totally fair way of researching who is good and who isn’t

[Straightsix]

Again that’s not always true. I’ve seen plenty of clients who have clearly had bad run ins with dodgy escorts who have left bitter negative feedback . Provided there is some other feedback to go on of course x

Sorry, elaborate on what's 'not true' please? If negative feedback stated "he tried to put it in my anus" would you still see him?
And What do you constitute as 'dogdy' escorts? Those that DON'T tell the truth? Every punt has the negative potential. 

Out of curiosity, is your age listed on your profile correct? How about filters?

[ElizabethJanex]

first of all , let me start by saying that I'm not trying to or interested in any kind of argument big or small.

In regards to whats not true, I meant its not always true that if a client has some bad feedback that it instantly puts him on a black list for all escorts. It doesn't. It simply depends on how much negative feedback there is compared with how much good there is. Your example of , what if he had "he tried to put it in my anus"left as a negative, if that was one comment amongst 10s of positive feedbacks then I would absolutely give the benefit of the doubt. When I said "dodgy" escort I wasn't referring to slight fibs about age or anything like that (yes my age is real and my photos aren't filtered though they are professionally taken with some ever so slight smoothing of the skin but as my reviews say, I am absolutely likened to my photos though they do need updating as my hair is different but I have a shoot scheduled for next week )  Anyway, I meant as in the ones who lie in negative feedback because lets say she absolutely was not who she was in her photos or there was a "boyfriend" in the flat or something like that and the client has rightly so, walked out without paying and the escort has left nasty dishonest feedback. That to me is a dodgy escort, somebody who lies in a clients feedback. I absolutely see your point and think that everything you have said is fair from your point of view and yes of course every punt as the potential for negativity, I totally agree.

[ElizabethJanex]

What if negative feedback was left for every single SP who blatantly lies about their age? Would that be fair? Who's to say some men cannot handle their unfulfilled desires when promises are broken after money is paid?

Just to answer this, yes I think that would be fair to leave feedback for someone who is clearly years out of what their profile says, absolutely. Yes we know that many escorts lie about there age but if its say, a 33 year old who really does look like a 28/29 year old who says that they are 28/29, who would ever really know? BUT if it were say a 50 something year old claiming to be 30 or someone who , as you said is BLATANTLY LYING, meaning you can absolutely see the years of difference, then I think that would absolutely warrant a bit of stick yes.

[Straightsix]

Yes we know that many escorts lie about there age

Many? Are you lying or just ignorant? The honour amongst SPs is commendable!
So what about you Lizzy? How many years have you shaved off? If a few years go unnoticed why even lie at all? Have you deliberately chosen to lie? Have you chosen to be unnecessarily deceitful?
Do you really believe your lies go unnoticed or do you think a man just wants a peaceful life hence the positive feedback? What if a man left you a negative rating because he knew you lied about your age? Would you retaliate?
 

[HailWood]

I know of a few escorts who shave a couple of years off their age for discretionary reasons and a few who are just over a decade tipping point who keep their age under it for a few years so that they show up on AW searches.

Either way, I have no issue with a woman misleading me about her age so long as she looks and feels that advertised age.

[Hotdogboy88]

Many? Are you lying or just ignorant? The honour amongst SPs is commendable!
So what about you Lizzy? How many years have you shaved off? If a few years go unnoticed why even lie at all? Have you deliberately chosen to lie? Have you chosen to be unnecessarily deceitful?
Do you really believe your lies go unnoticed or do you think a man just wants a peaceful life hence the positive feedback? What if a man left you a negative rating because he knew you lied about your age? Would you retaliate?

You had a bad day six? Or a bit up the influence writing this. 

[ElizabethJanex]

Many? Are you lying or just ignorant? The honour amongst SPs is commendable!
So what about you Lizzy? How many years have you shaved off? If a few years go unnoticed why even lie at all? Have you deliberately chosen to lie? Have you chosen to be unnecessarily deceitful?
Do you really believe your lies go unnoticed or do you think a man just wants a peaceful life hence the positive feedback? What if a man left you a negative rating because he knew you lied about your age? Would you retaliate?

Given the slightly pokey tone of your response and the fact I already said my age is accurate and that I’m
 Not interested in arguments I’m not going address this.

Only that I  somewhat agree with the part about why shave some years off If it’s unnoticed.

[ElizabethJanex]

Many? Are you lying or just ignorant?

As discussed in another thread, things like that  are just simply rude and unnecessary. I’ve noticed that whilst I’ve remained respectful and open to your comments that you have gotten slightly more annoyed it seems, in every response given.
There’s no need at al, it’s a discussion and you have no idea what my truth is. Just because you may have had some bad experiences with escorts doesn’t make all of us deserving of that attitude and hen talking about things. Good grief, could you imagine if I or other escorts (not saying there aren’t some) treated every man rudely because of bad experiences. We’d be rude all time and that’s not right or acceptable and it’s just a waste of energy.

I hope in all sincerity that you have a lovely chilled Sunday and that your future experiences with escorts are amazing every time.
Xx

[Straightsix]

I know of a few escorts who shave a couple of years off their age for discretionary reasons and a few who are just over a decade tipping point who keep their age under it for a few years so that they show up on AW searches.

Either way, I have no issue with a woman misleading me about her age so long as she looks and feels that advertised age.

Most if not all profiles are deceitful. Stating the correct age is nothing but an incremental discrepancy and there is no particular reason I single out this lie. Untruths on a profile are irrelevant as you say and we all choose to ignore.....
But that is not what we are discussing here. Please read on and let me know your thoughts.

[Straightsix]

You had a bad day six? Or a bit up the influence writing this. 

Oh dear, yeah. It has been a very successful and productive week. The drinks cabinet was indeed serving last night.
It seems I'm upsetting people again.
Please don't misconstrue what's written here. I'm not targeting Lizzy. She has raised a valid point and I am only expressing my views and hopefully she will understand too.
Let me know what you think after I have addressed her.👍

[ElizabethJanex]

Expressing views is fine but there’s no need to get even a little bit irate with me for talking from my experience in a civilised manner.
My original comment on here was to simply address that there was no need for a couple of members to be suspicious about my being genuine after two reports were made in the same day and I asked a perfectly acceptable question regarding the trusting of aw feedback. Since that , it’s somehow been taken to some slight extremes with various examples of why bad feedback is left and what I would do if someone did this or that and how I would respond.
I’ve seen your point Straight, but I’m not going to engage further with you simply because your tone has taken a turn so much so that I’m not interested in being belittled by anyone when I’ve done absolutely nothing to warrant it.
Im a nice person and all I’ve done is merely engage in what should’ve been a civilised discussion and nothing of an argumentative or rude nature .

But again, I do wish you all the best x

[Hotdogboy88]

Oh dear, yeah. It has been a very successful and productive week. The drinks cabinet was indeed serving last night.
It seems I'm upsetting people again.
Please don't misconstrue what's written here. I'm not targeting Lizzy. She has raised a valid point and I am only expressing my views and hopefully she will understand too.
Let me know what you think after I have addressed her.👍

Not upsetting at all mate. Just you were asking questions that had already been answered. 

[Straightsix]

Expressing views is fine but there’s no need to get even a little bit irate with me for talking from my experience in a civilised manner. I'm not 'irate' but I understand why you'd infer such. It would have helped if you answered the question I put to you (regarding your age)but I'm not surprised you chose to dissemble.
My original comment on here was to simply address that there was no need for a couple of members to be suspicious about my being genuine after two reports were made in the same day and I asked a perfectly acceptable question regarding the trusting of aw feedback. Yes, and this is the point at which I entered (reply #5)

You really don't know?

Since that , it’s somehow been taken to some slight extremes with various examples of why bad feedback is left and what I would do if someone did this or that and how I would respond.
The only 'extreme' here is how you have reacted to trivial matters. How would you react if I said you were unwashed before our appointment? Would you be kind in response? Are you now getting a picture of why it's easier for men choosing 'positive' feedback rather than mention something trivial as age or dress code? All service providers behave as you do when faced with a slight grievance. It really isn't worth leaving anything other than a 'positive'. On this forum we punters can criticise without the unpleasant repercussions of SPs as you have demonstrated here on this thread. On this forum you will find we can be critical yet still offer a 'positive'. We discuss the services provided and try to filter through the horseshit profiles. We're not interested in our next meeting becoming obstructive, we accept the lies and move on. No worries, honestly.

I’ve seen your point Straight, but I’m not going to engage further with you simply because your tone has taken a turn so much so that I’m not interested in being belittled by anyone when I’ve done absolutely nothing to warrant it.

No, you haven't seen my point at all and I'm still here explaining why it's not worth leaving anything other than a positive rating on AW feedback. Sure, you don't have to engage if it troubles you but why would I 'belittle' you? Does it upset you that I call you 'Lizzy'? or question your deception? I really couldn't care for either and here is why. You're a service provider (not aimed exclusively at you btw), you're only as relevant for the time my libido is engaged in conjuction with the funds in my wallet. After 15 minutes I'm done (this obviously doesn't apply to stalkers). I get on with more important things in life. I have no reason to 'belittle' you and you'd do well to understand your position in this punting world.

Im a nice person I'm sure you are, have you lied about your age? and all I’ve done is merely engage in what should’ve been a civilised discussion and nothing of an argumentative or rude nature .
No you haven't, I can understand why you would misconstrue what I stated, that's precisely the point I was trying to make. SPs are not open to criticism whatever the discrepancy on a profile or service provided....hence the 'positive' feedback. I hope you now understand.

But again, I do wish you all the best x No you don't, stop lying. 🤭

[ElizabethJanex]

As per the gentleman above, you're asking questions which have already been answered...twice.

Saying " are you lying or just ignorant?" and asking how many times Ive been unnecessarily "deceitful" and other things you've said, are loaded questions and statements with language designed to provoke a reaction. You seem like a smart person so you absolutely will know this already.
Indeed you have provoked a reaction, I don't take well to unnecessary rudeness.
Its almost like you absolutely don't want me to see your point of view for the sake of getting an argument across.
Your criticisms are valid and have nothing to do with me but for some reason you've directed them at me when Ive nothing wrong.
We were simply discussing and you took it to places that I'm still confused as to how they're relevant.

But this response here

"You're a service provider (not aimed exclusively at you btw), you're only as relevant for the time my libido is engaged in conjuction with the funds in my wallet. After 15 minutes I'm done (this obviously doesn't apply to stalkers). I get on with more important things in life. I have no reason to 'belittle' you and you'd do well to understand your position in this punting world."

O the irony!

That has told me absolutely everything I needed to know.

Good day to you Sir.





 

[Straightsix]

As per the gentleman above, you're asking questions which have already been answered...twice. help me out here please,  where? Exactly?

Saying " are you lying or just ignorant?" and asking how many times Ive been unnecessarily "deceitful" and other things you've said, are loaded questions and statements with language designed to provoke a reaction. Exactly,  which is why it's easier to leave 'positive' feedback rather than face the wrath of a scorned woman seem like a smart person so you absolutely will know this already. Yep, I did. Which is why I'm surprised you didn't say "yes I've lied about my age as does every woman selling her body so fuck you Straightsix....but no, you chose to avoid the question because what we punters regard as a trivial matter was criticism to you which is why you're now upset.
Indeed you have provoked a reaction, I don't take well to unnecessary rudeness. Yes, rudeness, hence its easier to leave positive feedback...I think you're definitely getting there!
Its almost like you absolutely don't want me to see your point of view for the sake of getting an argument across. Not sure what this means?
Your criticisms are valid and have nothing to do with me but for some reason you've directed them at me when Ive nothing wrong. Obviously you're hurt and upset, is it because I called you ignorant? Or because you're avoiding answering me?
We were simply discussing and you took it to places that I'm still confused as to how they're relevant. Yep, you're still confused as to why it's easier just to leave 'positive' feedback on AW?...apparently some question has been answered twice? ...or didn't you like being called ignorant?

But this response here

"You're a service provider (not aimed exclusively at you btw), you're only as relevant for the time my libido is engaged in conjuction with the funds in my wallet. After 15 minutes I'm done (this obviously doesn't apply to stalkers). I get on with more important things in life. I have no reason to 'belittle' you and you'd do well to understand your position in this punting world."

O the irony!

That statement is true. It does not mean I am misogynistic or a hater of service providers. You provide access to your vagina in exchange for money. How else would you describe it? Does this pain you? There is no reason for you to feel 'belittled'.  I for one appreciate women like you and I would never judge a lady for selling her body. If you feel 'belittled' then maybe it's you who has issues with the choices you have made.

That has told me absolutely everything I needed to know. So just to reiterate please,  going back to the original question:

Whilst I have heard that some people don't trust AW reviews (why? I don't know) 

Now do you understand? If so, please,  just briefly, emotions aside....tell me why people don't trust AW reviews?

Good day to you Sir. Thanks Lizzy. X

[ElizabethJanex]

Oh you are very good Sir.
Very good indeed.

As per your question if you read through the responses properly like you’ve expected me to,you would see that I have answered your question plainly as the gentleman above has also seen.

In fact, more so than this I’ve even agreed with you that women who lie about their age to a point that is significantly noticeable, should be called out.

Moving on , all in all I have seen and understood your discrepancies with aw feedback, thank you for explaining this to me but I think we’ve exhausted this now wouldn’t you say?
After all, there are more important things to be getting on with aren’t there?

Have a good night x

[Straightsix]

Oh you are very good Sir.
Very good indeed. Yeah Whatever

As per your question if you read through the responses properly like you’ve expected me to,you would see that I have answered your question plainly as the gentleman above has also seen. What question are you even talking about? Why do I have to keep asking? I'm really sorry but I'm not very clever.  I certainly don't have a degree or some doctorate in foreskinology. Can't you just copy and paste the answer? I've obviously missed the question being answered....somewhere.

In fact, more so than this I’ve even agreed with you that women who lie about their age to a point that is significantly noticeable, should be called out. Sure, but this is irrelevant. Its the reaction of SPs that is the issue here as demonstrated by your good self. 👍

Moving on , all in all I have seen and understood your discrepancies with aw feedback, thank you for explaining this to me but I think we’ve exhausted this now wouldn’t you say? Ah, but have you really? Say it please. Tell me why AW feedback is useless. Let's see if you have understood what we have talked about.
After all, there are more important things to be getting on with aren’t there? Yes indeed but every Friday night is pussy time where I seek the services of women like you. I then get a takeaway and drink alcohol at home afterwards. It's such a wonderful service women like you provide. Thank you. Never feel ashamed by what you have chosen to do, and please...don't retire.

Have a good night x see you tomorrow/today baby x

[ElizabethJanex]

I’ll have you know I have a PHD in foreskinology. My undergrad was in Dicks and it comes handy from time to time. 

Just to satisfy your need to have achieved the art of teaching today …

AW is untrustworthy because as you say it is easier for a client to leave positive feedback than suffer the “wrath” of a “scorned woman” if he did indeed have even the smallest discrepancy whether it be an age or hygiene issue as an example. Here , guys can be as honest as they like noting all good things and all/any bad things giving a full rounded and informative report.

I’m
Going to whisper this very quietly *i understood this from about your third comment Sir, it really  wasn’t  a hard thing to grasp but thank you oh wise master *

Now , if you’ll excuse me I must get back to reminding myself how utterly awful the final series of Game Of Thrones was.

I wait with baited breath for my certificate and gold star

A’ thank you kindly x

[ElizabethJanex]

“Yes indeed but every Friday night is pussy time where I seek the services of women like you. I then get a takeaway and drink alcohol at home afterwards. It's such a wonderful service women like you provide. Thank you. Never feel ashamed by what you have chosen to do, and please...don't retire.”


…… it’s Monday darling. Have some rest x

[Straightsix]

I’ll have you know I have a PHD in foreskinology. My undergrad was in Dicks and it comes handy from time to time.  ...and you were thinking of retiring?

Just to satisfy your need to have achieved the art of teaching today …not an art at all, hard work more like.

AW is untrustworthy because as you say it is easier for a client to leave positive feedback than suffer the “wrath” of a “scorned woman” if he did indeed have even the smallest discrepancy whether it be an age or hygiene issue as an example. Here , guys can be as honest as they like noting all good things and all/any bad things giving a full rounded and informative report. Thank you,  I accept your answer x.

I’m
Going to whisper this very quietly *i understood this from about your third comment Sir, it really  wasn’t  a hard thing to grasp but thank you oh wise master * you're still lying when you don't need to, this is not your profile

Now , if you’ll excuse me I must get back to reminding myself how utterly awful the final series of Game Of Thrones was. Agree, what an anticlimax! The red witch though, she was fucking horny until she removed her necklace. See the resemblance to SPs?

I wait with baited breath for my certificate and gold star Only thing you'd get from me is my cock. And this:👍.

A’ thank you kindly x you're most welcome

[Straightsix]

“Yes indeed but every Friday night is pussy time where I seek the services of women like you. I then get a takeaway and drink alcohol at home afterwards. It's such a wonderful service women like you provide. Thank you. Never feel ashamed by what you have chosen to do, and please...don't retire.”


…… it’s Monday darling. Have some rest x

The libido never rests, I wouldn't expect any woman to understand.