I disagree with those that do not understand the power of UKP
I have no doubts this site does have an influence on how busy a WG gets.
OK the shite ones probably won’t notice a drop in footfall; they will still get enough punters who don’t use this site.
However as soon as a new lass gets a positive review from an established punter, you find there is a bit of a feeding frenzy and she soon gets numerous other reviews plus all the others we don’t see.
Controversial, but in a bid to slow down pussy inflation then perhaps rather than a strike why not only review negatives and keep positives to sensible rates say £80hh, £140hr, or less, maybe for a month or two, or make positives only visible to contributing members, whatever.
It just seems every review I read these days is of an inexperienced chancer asking minimum £100hh plus extras. I don’t fault the lass, but why do we write fluffy reviews promoting them so that she gets busy, puts up her prices even more, plus the experienced established MILFs (my preference) take note and put up their prices.
SO....Why do we put so much emphasis on writing reviews and sharing positives with the leeches. Does it help us if all it does is drive up prices. I look back and think many of us (including me) have been doing it wrong.