External Link/Members OnlyExternal Link/Members OnlyFirstly, apologies for the length of this review but it's something I feel quite strongly about.
This is not a standard review but I wanted to call out a wg who in my view has a misleading profile.
I think it is really important that we know the recent histories of girls we meet, particularly if they are in stark contrast to the image they portray in their current profiles.
I have a seen this wg a few times now and generally enjoyed my visits but always had the suspicion that she is not overly into vanilla meets, which is my thing.
And I'll not be seeing her again after I recently found out about her background.
Now I know some of you are into gangbangs, bukkake meets and such like but they are absolutely not for me and I generally avoid girls who do them or who have done them and this girl specifically says in her list of don'ts that she doesn't do partying.
This wg currently markets herself as an elite escort with pricing to match but this hides her recent past.
From around 2017 to 2019, she had a different aw name.
She used to be called Clara_Rose or EnglishClaraNW (aw number 4488183) and was a regular at parties run by Adult Parties NW, adultparties.org.uk.
I think it also fair to say she was at the extreme end of being a party girl as you can see from a ukp review where she was the one girl subject of a 14 man gangbang and bukkake party.
The event was advertised as a 20 man gangbang, which I reckon by any measure can be classed as extreme.
Apparently she was handcuffed as well with her hands above her head, increasing the risk of risky sex with no control over who takes her or how.
I mean if a girl is handcuffed at a party, who puts the condoms on the guys and who makes sure they stay on, for example.
I'm struggling to link to the page so,
Search for 'Claras cum and go' in the search box on here and you will see the review.
A particular concern for me with parties like this is that, as far as I am aware, the wg has no control over who attends these parties and therefore is possibly at an increased risk of catching sti's, particularly in a 14 man gangbang, bukkake type situation.
And, according to the reviewer, the place stank of weed so if she was high whilst engaging in a gangbang, again this is indicative of a very disturbed and dangerous attitude to the health risks associated with this kind of work. You're not exactly thinking straight if you're high on weed.
It really does display a singular and unfortunate attitude to risk in my view and this, what we all do, is a very risky business certainly from a health point of view and we don't need wg's who make it worse.
And my understanding is that during this period she was a Mum as well, which on a personal level, I find disturbing.
I wanted to write this review because I think this gives a good indication of the kind of wg she really is rather than the way she describes herself in her current profile.
If you read her feedback very carefully, it's clear she's more into the heavy kink stuff than the vanilla stuff. I guess a leopard never changes its spots.
She describes herself as being an elite escort in her current aw profile, which is a totally false description given her party background where punters used to pay between around £40 to £80 and for that price could participate in everything that was on offer (and that included anal) over a 2 hour period.
And she did these parties for well over 12 months, often described as 'no holes barred'.
What is even more disturbing is that one of the girls she used to regularly do the parties with, and I think she still offers FFMs with, was the subject of these comments about a possible bare backing party run by the same party organiser.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=231959.msg2365006#msg2365006To be fair, the organiser, I think he's called Andy, did deny sending the email but the weird thing is that the guy who wrote the review, after he sent an email criticising the idea of a bb party, got a reply from the organiser saying we don't want your opinion.
Would be strange for a hacker to reply like that surely.
Now I don't know if Jen/Clara used to offer a bb service but she regularly appeared with this particular wg in parties both before and quite some time after the bb party was allegedly offered.
Me, I would have binned the parties straight away but she didn't, she carried on for ages afterwards.
Again, strange and unfortunate attitude to risk.
And her stated fussiness in her profile in insisting on feedback should be seen in stark contrast with doing these parties not so very long ago when she will have had no control over who attended the parties.
She also says in her profile that she does it for fun (I guess not for the money then!) and yet she works flat out for around 5 days each month, which would suggest otherwise as she apparently has a full-time job as well as doing this.
She also is a very strict timekeeper. There is no leeway at all, which again indicates she is in it for the money.
All this said, she is very attractive and does give good service but her attitude to risk, particularly health related risk, her recent past and her deliberately misleading profile has put me off seeing her again.
And had I known about her recent past, I would never have seen her in the first place.
And as for saying in her list of don'ts that she doesn't do partying! Well she sure as hell used to.
I really don't like wg's who deliberately mislead us in their profiles, which is why I wanted to write this review.
