Author Topic: Bella Cartier - Southfields (incall) - something unusual?  (Read 5065 times)


4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5454895) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
4 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7573744) (4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline LNDNman

Link: External Link/Members Only


Time: 30mins
Price paid: £150
Girl: Uber sexy, nice underwear, excellent english.
Comms: responsive and easy to arrange, all by text
Looks: Before meeting, I was a little apprehensive (see notes below) as these super edited/filtered/airbrushed photos can be hugely misleading. These are the main photos on her profile. However, it is definitely the girl and she is simply stunning. She told me that she wasn’t wearing make-up that day, which is my preference anyway, at least when girls are naturally (very) attractive. She has dark hair, very natural beauty, pale soft skin and firm pert breasts (see notes below), a very nice and shapely arse. She is about the stated height of 5’7”, but initially seemed taller on arrival due to some 4” heels.
Pussy: looked very nice, no hair, nicely moist and smelt freshly showered (see notes below)
Attitude: 11/10 - very seductive, friendly and interesting, willing to please and enthusiastic delivery of all services. In fact, her enthusiastic delivery was quite something, very active in all positions and leading with what she knew I wanted.
Venue: Full Victorian house in Southfields. Front door is a shabby replacement and deceives the interior which is a nice and modern renovation. Decent bedroom where there are plenty of toys on the side and a big shower room which has lots of supplies.
Experience: It was a great overall experience. Bella (or Ana as I understand she used to go by) is a pro. Has a fantastic body, is super sexy and seductive and maintains intensity in the meeting throughout. When I arrived, I had come from work, so took a quick shower and returned to the bedroom where she removed the towel and immediately go to work on the OWO whilst I was still standing initially and then moving to lay back on the bed. Great technique which really got me going as a precursor for what was to come in the next 15-20mins.
Applying the condom with her mouth, she then got on top in cowgirl for a few thrusts before turning round into reverse cowgirl with was a fantastic site to behold. She was riding and in control and it was great. She leant backwards so that her back was up against my chest and I fucked that tight pussy hard as she made some satisfying noises.
I did want to go down on what looked to me like a perfect pussy so I rolled her over onto her back, but before my tongue met her skin, she was pulling me up into a missionary position saying she wanted my cock (see notes below). Well, who was I to not continue to give her the D. Her pussy felt so good, like perfect tightness and her thrusting and movement was also just on absolute point. Throughout this there was lots of DFK, from the point which she leant back onto me and was twisting her neck to do so.
We had been at it for a good 15-20mins and I needed to get off, so we got into doggy which I had been holding on as much as I could so I could finish in doggy. Still kissing from behind she then put her head into the pillow and her ass up and continued with backshots (in the urban diction sense of the definition). Couldn’t hold any longer and did the business. It was a proper fuck which felt like there was good chemistry there (but possibly just her pro act…).

Notes to consider (important): After visiting her, I noticed on her profile that she states her gender as “Bi-gender”. I won’t tell you what that means, but it did then make me question… why wouldn’t she let me go down on her?… is that an Adam’s apple in the photo where she’s arching her neck back?… the boobs, I couldn’t see any scarring for a boob job, but it could easily have been an under the muscle job and her nipples were quite small… Is she a TS?
I love punting TS girls, I have done for 10 years or so, but this caught me slightly off guard as I could swear she was not - but now I am questioning whether she was… ultimately, it doesn’t matter and it doesn’t bother me - it was a great punt.

Would I return: yes and I can’t bloody wait.

Below photos are the ones from her profile and I consider the ones at the top without make-up to be most accurate to her real life appearance.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only is there an Adam’s apple?

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: September 03, 2021, 03:27:47 pm by LNDNman »

Offline alabama1

She states her gender on AW as female, not "bi-gender"  :unknown: And as for her not letting you go down on her, maybe she had a smelly fanny that day. :unknown: (RO is on her likes list).

Offline LNDNman

Ahh interesting… well she has changed it then. Definitely said bi-gender. Lol

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Thanks for the review  :drinks:

Possibly been around longer than the profile, something familiar about some of her photos...

Haven't seen one of those Vauxhalls in ages, looks good with the super-saturated colour, shared platform with another rollerskate roadster...

Offline Gynaemyte

She states her gender on AW as female, not "bi-gender"  :unknown: And as for her not letting you go down on her, maybe she had a smelly fanny that day. :unknown: (RO is on her likes list).
See her "Interview".
I initially wondered what a "Big ender" was.

Offline alabama1

See her "Interview".
I initially wondered what a "Big ender" was.
That may have blown my theory out of the water  :D

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Wtf she's a transformer? Oh lord save us 😭😭😭😭😭.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
See her "Interview".
I initially wondered what a "Big ender" was.

"Bigender is a gender identity which can be literally translated as 'two genders' or 'double gender'. Bigender people experience exactly two gender identities, either simultaneously or varying between the two. These two gender identities could be male and female, but could also include non-binary identities. For other identities for those who experience multiple genders, please see multigender.

Bigender people may also identify as multigender, non-binary and/or transgender. If a bigender person feels that their identity changes over time or depending on circumstance, they may also identify as genderfluid, which describes any person whose gender identity varies over time. "

Source- External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline LNDNman


Offline stawek

Check her videos. You don't need to pay to view the initial still shot and one of those is her showing off her pussy.

If she were really a post op she wouldn't.

Bi-gender doesn't really mean anything. Her interview is completely made up, anyway.

Anyway, if she's a man I'm happy to be bisexual for her :)
« Last Edit: September 06, 2021, 08:04:06 am by stawek »

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Check her videos. You don't need to pay to view the initial still shot and one of those is her showing off her pussy.

If she were really a post op she wouldn't.

Bi-gender doesn't really mean anything. Her interview is completely made up, anyway.

Anyway, if she's a man I'm happy to be bisexual for her :)

You might be, some of us may not be. I for one would not risk it. OPs review alludes something might be off. Her interview states she is Bi-gender. The definition of Bi-gender clearly means something from my previous post looking for the definition but because this person is attractive you are willing to shrug it all off huh? I swear horny men think different LOL.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2021, 08:47:30 am by Payyourwaymate »

Offline PLeisure

Thanks for reviewing - she sounds promising/ looks good.
How deep was her voice?

You paid £150 for 30mins and received OwO. Did she charge the £100 as indicated in her Extras section?

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 153
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
"Bigender is a gender identity which can be literally translated as 'two genders' or 'double gender'. Bigender people experience exactly two gender identities, either simultaneously or varying between the two. These two gender identities could be male and female, but could also include non-binary identities. For other identities for those who experience multiple genders, please see multigender.

Bigender people may also identify as multigender, non-binary and/or transgender. If a bigender person feels that their identity changes over time or depending on circumstance, they may also identify as genderfluid, which describes any person whose gender identity varies over time. "

Source- External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

I wish someone would explain this to me in words I understand. Not trying to cause offence but it just goes over my head. For example what does someone mean when someone says they identify as female? Does it mean they like all the stereotypical things women like? If so, doesn't that go against equality? Genuinely confused here. None of this stuff existed when I was a young one!
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I wish someone would explain this to me in words I understand. Not trying to cause offence but it just goes over my head. For example what does someone mean when someone says they identify as female? Does it mean they like all the stereotypical things women like? If so, doesn't that go against equality? Genuinely confused here. None of this stuff existed when I was a young one!

Modern society complicated bullshit..

Being plain and simple to the point is deemed offensive nowadays.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
I wish someone would explain this to me in words I understand. Not trying to cause offence but it just goes over my head. For example what does someone mean when someone says they identify as female? Does it mean they like all the stereotypical things women like? If so, doesn't that go against equality? Genuinely confused here. None of this stuff existed when I was a young one!

It means that in terms of how they see themselves by gender, they see themselves as a female biologically speaking and have physical attributes that allows them to associate themselves as a female in terms of identity. So you can see them as a Human, recognise them by their physical attributes that you are looking at a female, in relation to how females are categorically identified. So to call them anything else other than a female is incorrect. Not that they like stereotypical things women like.

For example I identify as a male. For the sole reason that genetically I was born a male and I have the biological features associated with males. People have and do identify as different genders, genetically and biologically speaking...this is not correct. Due to particular societal viewpoints in terms of a blend of human rights and expression, they have allowed people to identify what they see themselves as they want, as they believe that people should have the right be able to identify as how they naturally see themselves, even if this goes against the "natural order" itself. This goes against scientific categorisation to allow order of variables and groups; so from a technical level of identifying genders, it makes no sense to identify as something that from a scientific viewpoint and naturally, one is not.

For example, if I was to get a sex change and say I am a female now and identify as one, this is allowed. Genetically I am still a male, I was not born with female reproductive organs, XX chromosomes or have the natural physical attributes of a female so identifying as a female is not biologically accurate per say. However, because I no longer "identify" as a male, In the sense I truly believe I am a woman mentally and see myself as a woman.... I can argue that I am a female if that makes sense, even though I biologically was not born with female reproductive organs, I do not have XX chromosomes, would need hormone treatments and the like to maintain a feminine appearance or to try and recreate one. 

There is a clash with the abstract ideology of identity and the physical scientific reality of grouping variables in their unchanged natural state of being. That's is what's leading to all this fuckery of transgender, bi-gender etc identity issues.

Hope that clarifies.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2021, 01:55:14 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
It means that in terms of how they see themselves by gender, they see themselves as a female biologically speaking and have physical attributes that allows them to associate themselves as a female in terms of identity. So you can see them as a Human, recognise them by their physical attributes that you are looking at a female, in relation to how females are categorically identified. So to call them anything else other than a female is incorrect. Not that they like stereotypical things women like.

For example I identify as a male. For the sole reason that genetically I was born a male and I have the biological features associated with males. People have and do identify as different genders, genetically and biologically speaking...this is not correct. Due to particular societal viewpoints in terms of a blend of human rights and expression, they have allowed people to identify what they see themselves as they want, as they believe that people should have the right be able to identify as how they naturally see themselves, even if this goes against the "natural order" itself. This goes against scientific categorisation to allow order of variables and groups; so from a technical level of identifying genders, it makes no sense to identify as something that from a scientific viewpoint and naturally, one is not.

For example, if I was to get a sex change and say I am a female now and identify as one, this is allowed. Genetically I am still a male, I was not born with female reproductive organs, XX chromosomes or have the natural physical attributes of a female so identifying as a female is not biologically accurate per say. However, because I no longer "identify" as a male, In the sense I truly believe I am a woman mentally and see myself as a woman.... I can argue that I am a female if that makes sense, even though I biologically was not born with female reproductive organs, I do not have XX chromosomes, would need hormone treatments and the like to maintain a feminine appearance or to try and recreate one. 

There is a clash with the abstract ideology of identity and the physical scientific reality of grouping variables in their unchanged natural state of being. That's is what's leading to all this fuckery of transgender, bi-gender etc identity issues.

Hope that clarifies.


Lots of modern day gender nonsense
This irritating left wing hippie lovers United generation really gets on my nuts, and the so called modernists with the times of going back generations..

That's why the world is so fucked up!!

The simplicity factor is made completely complicated nowadays

Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LNDNman

Thanks for reviewing - she sounds promising/ looks good.
How deep was her voice?

You paid £150 for 30mins and received OwO. Did she charge the £100 as indicated in her Extras section?

Nope, I paid £150 - no extra.

Voice was very deep and gravelly…. No no no, it was feminine - no reason to alert me to her not being biologically female.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2021, 05:09:51 pm by LNDNman »

Offline PLeisure

Nope, I paid £150 - no extra.

Voice was very deep and gravelly…. No no no, it was feminine - no reason to alert me to her not being biologically female.
Good to know on both counts - thanks for clarifying  :hi:

Offline KorbenDallas

I recon that she was trying to say that she likes to fuck girls and guys - is bisexual. 

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
I recon that she was trying to say that she likes to fuck girls and guys - is bisexual.

I don't think so, her profile is written very clear and succinctly. Big difference between bi-gender and bi-sexual. Also, under orientation on her profile it already says bi-curious.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2021, 08:54:16 am by Payyourwaymate »

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 153
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
It means that in terms of how they see themselves by gender, they see themselves as a female biologically speaking and have physical attributes that allows them to associate themselves as a female in terms of identity. So you can see them as a Human, recognise them by their physical attributes that you are looking at a female, in relation to how females are categorically identified. So to call them anything else other than a female is incorrect. Not that they like stereotypical things women like.

For example I identify as a male. For the sole reason that genetically I was born a male and I have the biological features associated with males. People have and do identify as different genders, genetically and biologically speaking...this is not correct. Due to particular societal viewpoints in terms of a blend of human rights and expression, they have allowed people to identify what they see themselves as they want, as they believe that people should have the right be able to identify as how they naturally see themselves, even if this goes against the "natural order" itself. This goes against scientific categorisation to allow order of variables and groups; so from a technical level of identifying genders, it makes no sense to identify as something that from a scientific viewpoint and naturally, one is not.

For example, if I was to get a sex change and say I am a female now and identify as one, this is allowed. Genetically I am still a male, I was not born with female reproductive organs, XX chromosomes or have the natural physical attributes of a female so identifying as a female is not biologically accurate per say. However, because I no longer "identify" as a male, In the sense I truly believe I am a woman mentally and see myself as a woman.... I can argue that I am a female if that makes sense, even though I biologically was not born with female reproductive organs, I do not have XX chromosomes, would need hormone treatments and the like to maintain a feminine appearance or to try and recreate one. 

There is a clash with the abstract ideology of identity and the physical scientific reality of grouping variables in their unchanged natural state of being. That's is what's leading to all this fuckery of transgender, bi-gender etc identity issues.

Hope that clarifies.

Ok, thanks for trying to explain to me. So does a man just have to make a decision that he is a female and now he is and should be considered a female by everyone? What if I disagree, if he look like a man to me, with obvious masculine features. Surely I am not expected to pretend he is a woman?

Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Ok, thanks for trying to explain to me. So does a man just have to make a decision that he is a female and now he is and should be considered a female by everyone? What if I disagree, if he look like a man to me, with obvious masculine features. Surely I am not expected to pretend he is a woman?

Minds have become so deluded that a man that turned into a woman now is a woman for the moranic mind..
It's a bloke geezer period.. man man man!!
Get it ain't no woman!!

Ruus cluut boombacluut maan!!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,596
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
It can be a fucking minefield and the only thing you can be guaranteed of is that you're pissing someone off somewhere for not having an open mind.

One good starting point for me ias Payyourway mentions) is to remember the difference between sex (what nature gives you - male / female / intersex) and gender (how people identify - man / woman / other). Good luck everyone.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,069
  • Likes: 98
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Ok, thanks for trying to explain to me. So does a man just have to make a decision that he is a female and now he is and should be considered a female by everyone? What if I disagree, if he look like a man to me, with obvious masculine features. Surely I am not expected to pretend he is a woman?

It depends where you are in the world....yes, countries where there is legislation that allows one to identify as whatever gender they choose, you have to pretend the person is said gender, if they have legally identified as what ever they say they are and have documentation as proof stating they are legally the said gender they would like to identify as. It's messed up but that's where we are lol.

Offline Heph

I wish someone would explain this to me in words I understand. Not trying to cause offence but it just goes over my head. For example what does someone mean when someone says they identify as female? Does it mean they like all the stereotypical things women like? If so, doesn't that go against equality? Genuinely confused here. None of this stuff existed when I was a young one!

It means they are deluded / and/or mentally ill.