Author Topic: chanel.rose - Gateshead  (Read 2475 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6226294) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline TDH82007

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This punt took place in late June.

Comms: Great. Pretty quick and a couple of AW emails later, the booking was made.

Location: Apartment directly opposite Hilton in Gateshead.

Price: £70 for 30 mins

Services: FK (borderline DFK), OWO, protected sex

The WG: Differs slightly from her photos in that she was slightly heavier looking when I arrived but to be fair, she carried it really well and doesn't look overweight or anything like that.

Summary: Chanel answered the door and was wearing some lovely underwear, which is always a good start. She led me to the bedroom, going past the living room where there was an older woman watching some shite on TV. Hmm, not keen on that personally. Into the bedroom, asked what the don'ts were, which was anal. I stripped off and handed over the tokens, which Chanel took into another room (presumably interrupting the random woman watching Bargain Hunt - must be her accountant...).

She came back in and we started with some FK and light touching before I lay on the bed for some OWO. This was good and lasted for a while before Chanel asked if I wanted to fuck. As ever, the answer was yes, so on with the wet suit and she climbed on board for a bit. I wasn't keen on this so flipped her over onto her back and gave her a good pounding. She was very receptive to this and seemed to enjoy herself. We then changed to doggy and she has a nice round arse in this position, so this was probably my favourite part. Unfortunately, the punt went slightly downhill from here as the wetsuit split and so had to be replaced. Another STI test needed afterwards for the same issue that's happened before (see other reviews). Anyway, I lay her on her back for more missionary and again the wetsuit split. Another change and I was getting to the PONR. I'd read her likes list so asked for a CIM/facial but she replied saying she didn't do that but I could cum on her tits. Not what your likes list says, pet...

Anyway, I duly obliged, cleaned up, and bailed, and arranged an STI test...

Visit Again?: No. She was quite attractive but with the accountant in the living room (unsettling for me personally) coupled with the misleading likes list means I wouldn't go back.
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac

Online dexpunt

Thanks for the review. I would have been interested but you've saved me £70 for another day. Lady in other room defo would have put me off and offering CIM on profile and not delivering will be a huge problem for many. If she is heavier in real life and only 21!  can only see this going 1 way

Cheers

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It seems it’s a common occurrence condoms breaking for you… :unknown: :unknown:
Maybe your just unlucky.. :unknown:
It happened in this review as well..
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284693.0

Offline Davey677

It seems it’s a common occurrence condoms breaking for you… :unknown: :unknown:
Maybe your just unlucky.. :unknown:
It happened in this review as well..
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284693.0

I was looking at that myself yesterday, it’s happened in a few of his reviews, most girls these days keep a variety of sized rubbers too, the op’s either got a hell of a knob on him or he’s tampering with them

Offline TDH82007

Haha tampering with them?! Yea it's definitely not that. It must be the ill-fitting condoms. I'm above average down there but not exactly John Holmes. They usually feel ok when first on but they're obviously too small if they're splitting.

Howay lads, there's definitely no tampering. I feckin' hate having to take an STI test for starters! Can't imagine why anyone would do that?
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Haha tampering with them?! Yea it's definitely not that. It must be the ill-fitting condoms. I'm above average down there but not exactly John Holmes. They usually feel ok when first on but they're obviously too small if they're splitting.

Howay lads, there's definitely no tampering. I feckin' hate having to take an STI test for starters! Can't imagine why anyone would do that?

No I can’t imagine why people would do that either  :unknown:
Maybe you should check your number on Client eye?

Offline williambream

No I can’t imagine why people would do that either  :unknown:
Maybe you should check your number on Client eye?

Checked both my numbers on that app and no hits - wooooo!

Offline Davey677

I think I’d start taking my own condoms along to meets if this was a regular thing for me, ones I knew were fitting for my size, but I’d take them in an unopened box with the film still on, so at least if the girl hasn’t got her own larger ones, I’d know we’d be covered, quick explanation to the sp how it’s happened on a few occasions and I’m sure they’d be happy you took some along

Gotta be better than taking that risk and going for sti checks every time
« Last Edit: September 02, 2021, 07:59:12 pm by Davey677 »

Offline tynetunnel

I bought condoms recently for the first time in ages for a meet with a sugar baby. In the Co-op a pack of 3 durex were almost a fiver ffs!

Offline TDH82007

I think I’d start taking my own condoms along to meets if this was a regular thing for me, ones I knew were fitting for my size, but I’d take them in an unopened box with the film still on, so at least if the girl hasn’t got her own larger ones, I’d know we’d be covered, quick explanation to the sp how it’s happened on a few occasions and I’m sure they’d be happy you took some along

Gotta be better than taking that risk and going for sti checks every time


Fair point but I’m a forgetful fucka and if I left some on me and the missus found them, I’d be fucked! It’s only happened twice when punting and never happened with any other extra curricular activities, so in % terms it’s rare. It’s just unfortunately happened on two separate occasions when punting. TBF, a WG is probably cleaner than most civvies given that an STI impacts income, surely…?
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac

Offline TDH82007

No I can’t imagine why people would do that either  :unknown:
Maybe you should check your number on Client eye?

Yea could be worth a look. Cheers for the suggestion.
Banned reason: undesirable boundary pusher
Banned by: daviemac