Agreed. I've posted some negative reviews myself, but they're always objective and are balanced out in number by the positive.
If all you're posting is negative reviews, then I'd assume:
a) You only like to complain when things go wrong and never praise or share when they're right.
b) You're incapable of learning from your mistakes and keep booking crap SPs, despite the reviews from others on UKP.
c) Your hygiene is questionable, and why should any SP put up with that?
d) Your attitude sucks, you overstep the mark, or you're pushy and you annoy SPs - see c).
Given that at least 4 out of 5 of his reviews are of former eastern-bloc SPs, ie: mostly at the cheap end, then b) seems to be top of the list here.
It's worth noting that Sir Lancelot, the originator of this thread, has posted twice as many reviews in the space of just eight months, with a mix of positive and neutral, so I'd go with his version of events. Especially as he seems to have somehow mastered the mystical art of posting every single one of his reviews in the right place and can therefore follow simple instructions - just like (most) of the rest of us.
Maybe that's indicative that royd30 can't stick to the rules with SPs either, hence his string of only-negative reviews?
