Author Topic: Teresa Pleaser Peterborough - Bareback Warning  (Read 10360 times)


19 review(s) for teresa1000 (14 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline theking

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 30
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
External Link/Members Only

I am a big fan of Teresa….tall, long sexy legs but she told me she was 52 not 41, to be fair she looks great for her age. Body fantastic. Face….5/10 at best.

Anyway, I’d been a regular for a while and she offered me bareback for free…I stupidly did it and got tested….worse fucking few days of my life but I’m all clear.

Apparently she does this…if you are a regular, she lets you fuck bareback….it’s not great and I don’t know what the fuck came over me. One to avoid.
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline sniffer

On the one hand it's helpful to get info/alerts like this, but it seems a bit rough on the WG to do her bareback and then advise others to avoid her because she does bareback.

Offline Belgarion

Had stumbled across the profile a few times but never took the plunge.

Thanks for the warning.

Offline Milfman1112

Bit hypocritical i think,
You went  in bareback...
She obviously had trust in you as you did in her,
Maybe she saw your previous post on here saying about her not doing gfe and was trying to make it up to you?
Not saying she was right to do it and how do you know she does it for regulars?
« Last Edit: July 25, 2021, 07:49:37 am by Milfman1112 »

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Bit hypocritical i think,
You went  in bareback...
She obviously had trust in you as you did in her.


Big fan, face 5 out 10 at best, tested and clear in a few days, the pointed age mention, reads like a revenge a bit of a revenge mission.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Milfman1112

In previous 2 revies, she is hot, sexy and attractive?
Definatly something off here.

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
In previous 2 revies, she is hot, sexy and attractive?
Definatly something off here.

Yep, relying on a few days for test results is says he has no idea of sexual health process , then using a public forum to blame a woman for your own acts, I doubt she forced him.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline theking

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 30
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
All fair points in some ways, wish I’d never said anything.
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Mrcambridge69

Just a heads up. You’ll want testing at 2 months and 3 months for various infections that don’t show within a few days. If you met her in the last 90 days the wait to be all clear isn’t over yet.

Offline Clungehopper

I thought it was well known that some providers may offer BB to a regular customer ( I have certainly heard of this before), but it is all down to that punter at the time to choose what to do, you chose to do that, as someone says, on some level you must have trusted her enough. I have to admit to being dubious as your reviews raved about her before and indeed even made me put her on my HL as well. She will remain on there too.

You seem to have a previous issue on a review for another Peterborough Punt which was a return visit and slated that too (missing teeth and scrawny, if I remember correctly) .

Maybe return visits and regulars aren't your thing?? :unknown:

Offline Belgarion

Interesting how some folks are more upset with the OP than the potential barebacker.

Are you regulars receiving these services and upset your cover has been blown?

Offline Jacques Barstarred

This whole thread should be deleted.

@theking Discretion is a two-way street.

You wouldn't like it if she told a forum you have a boil on your bobbies helmet and smelt like a goat.

Offline The_Grinder

Interesting how some folks are more upset with the OP than the potential barebacker.

Are you regulars receiving these services and upset your cover has been blown?

Plenty of barebacking goes on, if a hooker wants to do it then what's the problem, its up to the punter weather he chooses to object or not

Offline cunnyhunt

Interesting how some folks are more upset with the OP than the potential barebacker.

The SP doesn’t offer sex on her profile just massage/HE. The OP has enthusiastically reviewed the SP twice already this year but seems to be experiencing some guilt after bareback fucking her when he could so easily have declined the offer.

Offline Milfman1112

Interesting how some folks are more upset with the OP than the potential barebacker.

Are you regulars receiving these services and upset your cover has been blown?

Its not the bare backing that is the issue here....
Read ALL the thread.

Offline Belgarion

Think there a few barebacking fans of her on this thread.

 :hi:

Offline Milfman1112

Think there a few barebacking fans of her on this thread.

 :hi:

Nope,
But you cant say someone is so good and a reg then slag them off when you bareback them, op had a choice that he took but went on to complain about bareback, that is the issue here :hi:

Offline Taxidriver1111

It's not the barebacking thats the issue. It feels more of a revenge post. He called her attractive in his first 2 posts, in this one 5/10 at best. And 5/10 isn't attractive in my book.

Have never had the pleasure,  but she is on my hotlist and if she does gfe again I might get round to seeing her

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Think there a few barebacking fans of her on this thread.

 :hi:



Tbf, that is the typical comment of a punter who has not read into anything before before posting, and sees a WG as less than human. If you had read the thread properly the reasons already pointed out would have been clear and the OP so obviously, from his previous posts about her, is taking out his own frustrations on a public forum.

Posting warnings is one thing, contradicting your previous thoughts is revenge and thoughtless, as is accusing people you do not know of having a hidden agenda.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline funfungoodguy

I said she was at least 50 which put ten years on her advertised age, and today's posts confirm that. If she's another one offering BB that's her consigned to the dismissed pile.
--
my earlier review;
External Link/Members Only
I Am giving it a definite Neutral,
"High Class" - definitely not - Rather untidy bedroom with clothes heaped on chair and old newspapers presumably from the more regular occupant of the bed, left on floor by bedside and all that kind of stuff that just leaves you thinking nobody has prepared to make it ready.
Very friendly and encouraging by text before the meet - all fine
But the issue is the "sexy toned body". She certainly very tall, but oh so thin, I'm afraid I found her just too skinny and bony. She does have large boobs that have been added on and do rather look that way given the very slight proportions of the rest of her.
She claim to be 41 and I would say is not a day under 50, which was also something of a disappointment.
So a good build up was left not really fulfilled. I just didn't find her all that sexy. From what I saw I would be very surprised if she is the massage expert that she claims to be.
So take a close look at the photos and based on the above perhaps ask a few searching questions.
Anyway, very short and brief but just beware.
FF

Offline Belgarion



Tbf, that is the typical comment of a punter who has not read into anything before before posting, and sees a WG as less than human. If you had read the thread properly the reasons already pointed out would have been clear and the OP so obviously, from his previous posts about her, is taking out his own frustrations on a public forum.

Posting warnings is one thing, contradicting your previous thoughts is revenge and thoughtless, as is accusing people you do not know of having a hidden agenda.

Yeah, member since Dec 2020 with 3 reviews is trying to tell me how to check the validity of reviews  :sarcastic:

Offline Lou2019

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 646
  • Likes: 76
  •  

Big fan, face 5 out 10 at best, tested and clear in a few days, the pointed age mention, reads like a revenge a bit of a revenge mission.

will I get into trouble Davie for agreeing eek ? does read a bit hmmmm ? even the age thing  :unknown: is it a bit like buyers remorse
Banned reason: Can’t stop having a pop at punters, on a punting forum, warned to many times now, no more!!
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline cunnyhunt

Yeah, member since Dec 2020 with 3 reviews is trying to tell me how to check the validity of reviews  :sarcastic:

If the time here means something to you, I’ve been a member since the very first day in August 2010 and agree with him that you’ve missed the point.
The punter made a decision to accept bareback then regretted it. His initial review said she was “clean and attractive” but now she’s a barebacker and a 5/10 facially.
This site was set up so that reviews meant something and weren’t just to blow smoke up the arse of the SP, part of the ethos was being able to question the reviewer when something doesn’t sound right.

Offline Milfman1112

If the time here means something to you, I’ve been a member since the very first day in August 2010 and agree with him that you’ve missed the point.
The punter made a decision to accept bareback then regretted it. His initial review said she was “clean and attractive” but now she’s a barebacker and a 5/10 facially.
This site was set up so that reviews meant something and weren’t just to blow smoke up the arse of the SP, part of the ethos was being able to question the reviewer when something doesn’t sound right.

Some people seem to think they are better than others just because they have posted more and done more reviews, just how it is sadly..

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
If the time here means something to you, I’ve been a member since the very first day in August 2010 and agree with him that you’ve missed the point.
The punter made a decision to accept bareback then regretted it. His initial review said she was “clean and attractive” but now she’s a barebacker and a 5/10 facially.
This site was set up so that reviews meant something and weren’t just to blow smoke up the arse of the SP, part of the ethos was being able to question the reviewer when something doesn’t sound right.

 :hi:, And Milfman too, my review count and length of time on this site is no reflection on punting experience. Trying to get a feel for a thread before posting is beyond some and brings out the school boy bravado if questioned. Facts and figures seem to be sticks and stones on here :D

Keyboard warriors are part of life on any online platform. as said, just part of life now.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Milfman1112

I think the sp also looks on here...
Gfe tab now gone.

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
I think the sp also looks on here...
Gfe tab now gone.

It is a public accessible forum, punters and search engines do point it out to SP,s, the human side to this game is often forgotten.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Milfman1112

It is a public accessible forum, punters and search engines do point it out to SP,s, the human side to this game is often forgotten.
I know it it and most sp will know of it,
Probably changed it due to op post.

Offline Belgarion

If the time here means something to you, I’ve been a member since the very first day in August 2010 and agree with him that you’ve missed the point.
The punter made a decision to accept bareback then regretted it. His initial review said she was “clean and attractive” but now she’s a barebacker and a 5/10 facially.
This site was set up so that reviews meant something and weren’t just to blow smoke up the arse of the SP, part of the ethos was being able to question the reviewer when something doesn’t sound right.

I have my views on the OPs behaviour but I'm surprised at the reactions in defence of barebacking.

As well as the attacks on the OP.

Like I said, some appear more upset about the batebacking being exposed than the barebacking itself.

Offline cunnyhunt

Like I said, some appear more upset about the batebacking being exposed than the barebacking itself.

They’ve always been here hiding in plain sight, although they usually start a thread to ‘expose’ under the counter BB as a ploy to gain intel. I’m sure this SP phone has been ringing non stop since this review went up.  :rolleyes:

Offline Wolfgagging123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
So I Contact her today wants a bank transfer before that’s a red flag and I say no so I get a text offering everything
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline finn5555

So I Contact her today wants a bank transfer before that’s a red flag and I say no so I get a text offering everything
a

Define everything and do you have proof  :rolleyes:

Offline Wolfgagging123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline rich_playboy

She's letting any random bust her nuts inside her. F!ck that!

Thats AIDS written all over her..

Offline Taxidriver1111


Offline Milfman1112

Yes I was fishing with text

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
A quick google of this number brings up someone in Bedford, or milton keynes depending on which ad you look at, also pics dont look like a 41 yr old (though they could be fake), ad also sounds foreighn?
« Last Edit: August 01, 2021, 07:07:46 am by Milfman1112 »

Offline finn5555

Yes I was fishing with text


That’s not her your talking bollocks.
Bit of a cuntish thing to claim  :rolleyes:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Wolfgagging123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Yes I now do believe that is not the same person but at the time it seemed correct as I sent my number in aw to her add as she looked hot I was not after bb and a little while later I get a text saying it was her sends me address today as still crazing me for a bank transfer and she puts a American address lol

(Private photo removed)

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: August 01, 2021, 11:55:13 am by daviemac »
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline winkywanky

This is an interesting thread.

From where I'm sitting it does sound like a revenge review. As lilythesavage and others have noted, pointed references to age etc. Although there is ane element of 'honesty' in that the OP puts his hands up to BBing her, of course the upshot is that the girl's reputation is damaged forever, whereas the OP has made one mistake and owned up to it, is now 'clean' and can move on with credibility intact. Actually, you don't know you're 100% clean until you have a test a few weeks after the act, and as ever credibility is at others' personal discretion.

Wolgagging appears to have irrefutable text evidence that she does actually do BB, but there is no phone number on her profile, and there is none stored on her UKP profile page either.  Can any of the several guys who have previously reviewed her confirm that the number displayed on those texts is hers?

Regarding BB in general, yes of course we all know that a lot of girls BB with punters without openly stating, and of course many girls have partners IRL and of course BB with them. Nevertheless, it is important for punters to know which girls are offering BB to punters, because by the nature of their job they are fucking lots of different guys, so the risk level to punters who don't want BB is increased. Fucking punters BB is of more relevance than them fucking their partners, simply because of the size of the pool you're being exposed to.


Offline finn5555

Her number ends 8553  :hi:

So I’m calling bullshit

Offline winkywanky

Yes I now do believe that is not the same person but at the time it seemed correct as I sent my number in aw to her add as she looked hot I was not after bb and a little while later I get a text saying it was her sends me address today as still crazing me for a bank transfer and she puts a American address lol



I see while I was writing my last post you have now bactracked  :unknown:.

Not only that, you have posted up a picture of a girl which for all we know isn't available publicly, which is a breach of UKP rules I believe?  :dash:

Did you actually write your AW email to the girl in question (Theresa), or are you bullshitting, either out of malice or simply showboating?

Offline winkywanky


Offline Wolfgagging123

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
I have no malice or showboating I sent her email which has date and time on it then about a hour later I started getting text messages and the only reason I posted a face picture as I now no that it’s not the real girl in question just random I get a text in time frame of a email

Hidden Image/Members Only
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline finn5555

I have no malice or showboating I sent her email which has date and time on it then about a hour later I started getting text messages and the only reason I posted a face picture as I now no that it’s not the real girl in question just random I get a text in time frame of a email

Hidden Image/Members Only

Your just trying to cover your arse and are making yourself look a cunt  :rolleyes:

Offline winkywanky

I have no malice or showboating I sent her email which has date and time on it then about a hour later I started getting text messages and the only reason I posted a face picture as I now no that it’s not the real girl in question just random I get a text in time frame of a email

Hidden Image/Members Only


Fair enough. We can take your word for that then, nevertheless, of course there's no date stamp on the whatsapp message to 'prove' it 100%.

Pretty sure you still broke the rules though, posting up her pic (actually, I see a vigilant daviemac has now removed it).

Something funny is going on though, with all this American business, perhaps her account has been hacked?

Offline MarkS69

3 reviews of the same lady from the OP:

Jan 5th 2021:  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=291414.0
Apr 22nd 2021: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=304953.0
Jul 24th 2021: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=316020.0

The first a full service, the second just massage and HE and the third a full on wah wah guitar bareback session.

I'm certainly in no position to judge anyone, as I've had some positively filthy punts over the years, but in none of them has a SP ever insisted that I fuck her bareback. I've had numerous offers of it, either through suggestion or just the omission of anyone reaching for a condom, but it's always been my choice. And as persuasive as my little head can be, the big head is always in control of making the decision in such circumstances.

I'd never judge a SP negatively just because she's offered bareback. Sometimes it's offered because the punter has been very vocal in telling the SP that she's the only person he visits. In my early 20's I fell into this with Sam from Westcliff Sauna. At the time she WAS the only SP that I saw and we did get to a point where bareback was the regular thing for us. We were both regularly tested and showed our certs before each session (on some occasions we even went to Southend Hospital to be tested together). I wasn't so naive at the time to think that she wasn't fucking anyone else, but I knew her well enough to know that she was being as safe as she could be. Afterall, there are plenty of STI's that can be transmitted, even if you're using a condom. I never came inside her though, as Sam always like a nice load in her mouth ;o)

Sadly, things nowadays have changed. The threat of HIV isn't on the news anymore and I think that has changed a lot of peoples attitudes. Personally, I still get regularly tested for STI's (to this day I've never had one), but it's free and it's easy, so you should all do it too if you can. Nowadays, I wouldn't risk bareback with a SP as I doubt many would have a second thought about getting tested.

Offline Lou2019

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 646
  • Likes: 76
  •  
as I doubt many would have a second thought about getting tested.

let me get this right, correct me if I'm wrong (taking BB out of the equation) are you implying many SPs don't get tested? that's a sweeping statement.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2021, 02:37:32 pm by Lou2019 »
Banned reason: Can’t stop having a pop at punters, on a punting forum, warned to many times now, no more!!
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline theking

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 30
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
Hey chaps….think what you like….simple fact is, if she likes you BB is on the table. Now if you want to interpret that as revenge…fine. I fucked her BB as a client and I would thought I would share to be helpful
Banned reason: Twat fake reviews multiple profiles theking Wolfgagging123 Smoothercriminal123
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
let me get this right, correct me if I'm wrong (taking BB out of the equation) are you implying many SPs don't get tested? that's a sweeping statement.

I don't believe many people, WGs, punters and civvies get tested on a regular basis, can I prove it, no, can it be disproved, no, its just my opinion.


Offline MarkS69

let me get this right, correct me if I'm wrong (taking BB out of the equation) are you implying many SPs don't get tested? that's a sweeping statement.
I'm assuming this is in response to my last post.
I'm also basing my response on the conversations I've had in the past with the SP's that I've spent time with. Most of them confirmed that they didn't go for regular tests. I'm not saying that's the case with all SP's, but it seems to be the case with the ones I've seen.
I, however do get regularly tested. I'm single, so I don't have to worry about bringing anything home to a girlfriend or wife, but I do care about my own health, and more importantly about other SP's that I'll be spending time with. Getting a test is easy and free and I'd like to encourage more punters and SP's to make it a more regular thing.