Author Topic: SexySara83 - Gateshead and Blackhall  (Read 2087 times)


2 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5750126) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by daviemac]

Offline Aldebaran

External Link/Members Only

£60 for 30 minutes

I booked this SP on the basis that I quite liked her profile, and there is already one positive UKP review about her when she called herself SexiLexi. I'm not going to argue with the other review, each to his own, but the original reviewer must have very different tastes or standards to me is all I can say.
OK, so she's chubby, that doesn't bother me in the slightest, I like chubby. Comms were good and a time arranged. I texted her before I set out to say I was on my way, not so much for her benefit but because I've had a few radio silent SPs once I got to the street and I didn't want another, but she confirmed there were no problems.
Got to the street just as my phone rang, and it was her to ask if I was anywhere near, not a good idea for SPs to ring clients, and certainly not when they are obviously going to be driving. She directed me round to the back door, presumably for discretion.
She opened the door wearing a rather unappealing pink dressing gown, but I could get past that as I'm not one for outfits anyway. First impressions were that she was very much as in her pictures, and if I hadn't liked them enough I wouldn't have booked her in the first place.
 Led the way upstairs, bedroom reasonably tidy but nowhere to put my clothes except on the floor.
Tokens exchanged, I noticed that the bedspread was actually a sheet of plastic. When I asked about this she said it was for COVID precautions, easy to clean and disinfect between clients. Fair enough I suppose but not exactly luxurious.
She asked what I wanted and I said GFE, and she asked if that included penetration! WTF? No, of course not, whoever heard of someone shagging their girlfriend? Rather daft question IMO!
She removed the dressing gown and was wearing a bra and very skimpy panties underneath. Tubby, wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea, but if it was only her weight that was a problem there wouldn't have been a problem for me, physically I found her attractive enough.
Anyhow, I asked for some finger play to start, and said as I didn't cum every time in a condom, she might have to finish me by hand. She seemed to take this as meaning I just wanted a wank, and started to bash the little man like he was a bell rope. It was uncomfortable. I asked her to use some lube or oil and she said she didn't have any! WTF? number 2! Someone who says on her profile that she's a first class experienced escort but doesn't have the basics for a hand job? By now I was struggling hard to remain interested, ( and to remain hard too ). Eventually, she did manage to find a small sachet of lube, but her wanking technique was so rough it didn't help much.
I asked her to take her bra off a so I could play with her impressive breasts, but she just stayed quite still and it was like groping a sex doll. She started wanking me again and asked if I was ready to cum, when I said not yet she said well I only had half an hour! WTF? number 3, this was only about ten minutes into the session!
I asked if we could do some full sex in the hope of reviving what was a very downhill situation, but after she put the rubber on me she said she would give me a blow job. I'm not a fan of covered oral, but to be fair it was better than the  awful hand job attempt, or it would have been if she hadn't kept stopping every twenty seconds to ask if I was cumming yet! I didn't push the full sex issue because by this time I really just wanted to be out of there.
In the end I stopped the session around the twenty minute mark. I wasn't nasty but I told her that she simply wasn't pushing my buttons at all. She was a bit apologetic, said she never had any complaints from her regs, and I actually felt a bit sorry for her. Not sorry enough to give her a neutral though, she's too hopeless for that even. She's not, in my opinion, a scammer, she's just not very good at what she does. Anyhow I just said that we all have different tastes and not to worry about it, and left. Maybe it sounds like I was a bit too nice about things, but she did look genuinely crestfallen that I hadn't enjoyed myself with her.
Personality and appearance, OK, but too many negatives for me. Plastic sheet on the bed, no oil or lube, too rough with the hand job, and no real response to fingering, and a feeling of being rushed to cum. There seemed to be a reluctance for FS too. Definitely wouldn't go back.

Offline dexpunt

Cheers for the review. Sounds horrendous although I have to be honest not someone I would have ever been interested in any way

Offline dexpunt

And the Photos don't match the link

Offline Aldebaran

And the Photos don't match the link

Don't know what you mean by that. The woman in the photos was definitely the one I saw.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,049
  • Likes: 784
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Don't know what you mean by that. The woman in the photos was definitely the one I saw.
The link you have posted is not the one that has been indexed. You saw SexySara83 the first index is for Smiley Sindy different AW numbers different photos different location.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2021, 10:56:21 am by daviemac »

Offline Aldebaran

Don't know what you mean by that. The woman in the photos was definitely the one I saw.

OK, I see it now, the photos at the top of my review are of a totally different girl. That's one for AW to sort out. The SP I saw was the one in the AW profile pics. I've no idea who the other one is.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,049
  • Likes: 784
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
OK, I see it now, the photos at the top of my review are of a totally different girl. That's one for AW to sort out. The SP I saw was the one in the AW profile pics. I've no idea who the other one is.
No it's down to Derrick101's mistake he indexed the wrong profile, the photos of the one you saw should be at the top now. I'll get the other indexing removed.

Offline Aldebaran

The link you have posted is not the one that has been indexed. You saw SexySara83 the first index is for Smiley Sindy different AW numbers different photos different location.

OK thanks DM, I'll leave you to sort out the correct indexing then if it's possible.

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,049
  • Likes: 784
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
OK thanks DM, I'll leave you to sort out the correct indexing then if it's possible.
It'll be taken out when Admin get's 5 minutes don't worry about it.

Offline waynekerr600

Thanks for the review.

Interesting to know that this is a Lexii rebrand.

You are aware that she has another disadvantage too?

B Bad not to make others aware.

Offline Aldebaran

Thanks for the review.

Interesting to know that this is a Lexii rebrand.

You are aware that she has another disadvantage too?

B Bad not to make others aware.

Not sure what you mean. You seem to be inferring she offers bareback, but that's not on her likes list. I wouldn't have touched her with a bargepole if it had been. Do you have info that she offered this in the past?

Offline waynekerr600

Not sure what you mean. You seem to be inferring she offers bareback, but that's not on her likes list. I wouldn't have touched her with a bargepole if it had been. Do you have info that she offered this in the past?

Yes. It was offered on her previous Lexii profile.

Offline Aldebaran

Yes. It was offered on her previous Lexii profile.

OK, I was totally unaware of that. I only surf Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Stockton AW pages usually, and she's only started popping up now and then on the Hartlepool page in the last couple of weeks. Never heard of her before that, nor is there any mention of her offering bareback on the positive review of her, in fact sex with a condom is described.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2021, 05:01:48 pm by Aldebaran »

Offline waynekerr600


OK, I was totally unaware of that. I only surf Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Stockton AW pages usually, and she's only started popping up now and then on the Hartlepool page in the last couple of weeks. Never heard of her before that, nor is there any mention of her offering bareback on the positive review of her, in fact sex with a condom is described.

In fairness it's easy to get caught out with this one. She's kept the same adult work profile but changed her name which makes it harder to spot. I recognised her pictures. Not a lot of Intel on here on her as I guess many guys have given her a swerve. It is mentioned in her other review as lexxi though.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2021, 05:30:04 pm by waynekerr600 »

Offline Aldebaran

In fairness it's easy to get caught out with this one. She's kept the same adult work profile but changed her name which makes it harder to spot. I recognised her pictures. Not a lot of Intel on here on her as I guess many guys have given her a swerve. It is mentioned in her other review as lexxi though.

Yeah, see what you mean. Unfortunately I only read the review and not the follow up comments. One to remember for next time.