There s no requirement for ANY crime to have a victim statement
edit (now that I've caught up)
or a complaint
A police officer will investigate if they think a crime may have been committed a victim isnt even required let alone a statement
that applies to any offence including this one
to be obvious you can be stopped while driving because your number plate light isnt on - then breathalysed etc and end up being charged with 5 or 6 offences
FFS what the fuck is wrong with people.
Like I said to Doc I have no time for pedantic arseholes who are hell bent on derailing a thread just for the sake of it.
In a case like this, (OK so we'll try), a conviction would depend on what the victim said. (In a statement, whether verbally or in writing at the time or at the police station.)
Now I'm sure every one with an once of common sense knows that I am not referring to a situation like a murder, driving a car with a light out or any other offence that would not require a statement from a victim.
I am talking about one person putting his arm around the neck of another. If the police decided to treat all such incidents as crimes the courts would be full of married couples, groups of mates on a night out and anyone else who touched someone else.
Now leave me out of this, do not reply to me, do not use anything I have said to derail this thread any further. If anyone wants to continue being pedantic feel free to do so but do not quote me.