Does punt length equal better service?

[nigel4498]

Relatively new to punting, nine months roughly and was wondering if the length of the punt equated to a better service from the WG.
All my punts have been one and half to two hours or longer and luckily all, bar one ( and that was a plan z) have been positive.

I would like to think that  WG's would give the same service regardless of the punt length but have noticed in reviews that shorter punts( 15 and 30 minutes) seem to receive a negative.

Have any of you any thought on this?

[Ben4454]

I think the majority of replies here will answer no it is quality over quantity.

But in my opinion I believe it is completely up to the punter. I usually schedule only one hour punts but sometimes  I like the company in a date-like setting. Maybe a bit fluffy of me but it isn't a harm every now and then when you fancy something a bit different !

In conclusion I would try long and short punts to see what you like the best. Find out if you like shagging multiple WG's or like one longer session with only one - btw both have benefits and cons depending what you're into.

I was actually going to make a thread about this but glad someone got there first - would be interesting to hear the views of the other posters.

[The High Sparrow]

from what a couple pf the girls i see more regulars told me, they do prefer a longer booking because they have to prepare for each punt beforehand with shower, make up etc. so fewer but longer booking means less prep work. as to if longer booking produces better punts, I seem to get better service when i make longer bookings.

[smiths]

Relatively new to punting, nine months roughly and was wondering if the length of the punt equated to a better service from the WG.
All my punts have been one and half to two hours or longer and luckily all, bar one ( and that was a plan z) have been positive.

I would like to think that  WG's would give the same service regardless of the punt length but have noticed in reviews that shorter punts( 15 and 30 minutes) seem to receive a negative.

Have any of you any thought on this?

In my experience a good WG will offer a good service irrespective of the punt length, BUT some dont want less than an hours booking so over price their half hour prices to discourage punters from booking less than an hour.

[Marmalade]

In my experience a good WG will offer a good service irrespective of the punt length, BUT some dont want less than an hours booking so over price their half hour prices to discourage punters from booking less than an hour.

This is true (it is more cost-effective). If I was a prossie I wouldn't want to bother my arse for a half-hour of getting fucked. Thank you for putting this point.

But the opposite is also true (I have suggested this on a parallel thread). I even suggested to a couple of women I knew who prossied for a while that they'd be better off making a one hour minimum and they both said they liked the half hours. They can overcharge and don't have to worry about how they will fill the time. Many of them find the "personality" stuff harder work than the physical (and in half an hour there's no time to get into so much play-acting, either on their part or listening to the punter).

[Tjkooker]

Depends on the girl and service you are after.

One very pretty girl I see I only ever book half hour punts where I'm in the door and fucking straight away. No chat, minimal foreplay clothes still on.
Other girls I will book 2hrs as I prefer to get a chat and some extended foreplay before sex.
Overnights are great with the right girl. Right mix of sex, kinky play and chat is unbeatable. Only had a 50% hit rate on these though. Had my last one in November. Probably won't do another as it was a bit of a letdown.

[pleasure]

I usually go for half hours as they just suit me better. On the few one hour punts I've done, I did seem to get better service, but that's probably just co-incidence - or something to do with the fact I'll only book a girl for a whole hour if she looks pretty amazing in the first place.

[Steve2]

1/2 hr works for me but sometimes I will book an hr but it never seems to be "better"

[seeker]

So Tj , who is this very pretty girl 
Only asking as our neck of the woods is pretty barren right now .
I only do half hours now ...wam bam thankyou mam 
You can tell by the w.g pricing structure if she likes longer or shorter bookings .

[shagbambi]

I believe that the better working girls tend to shine over longer bookings.  More and varied foreplay, more sex, especially if you can pop a couple of times in the session.  Lots more variation also visually (different stages of undress).  However when these bookings go wrong they are a train smash.

As you can guess I always go for longer bookings though a quick suck and fuck always has its place.

[CBPaul]

I normally go for 1 hour as I can cum twice in that time. If I'm not sure about the prossie though I will go for 30 mins - it's pointless wasting time and money on those that get round 1 out of the way quickly and sit back to watch MTV for the next 45 minutes until you make yourself hard again.

The longest I've booked is 1.5 hours, back in my early days of indie incalls and wondering exactly the same as the OP. Tried twice and on both occasions came 3 times but otherwise it was exactly the same mix as a 60 minute booking so it really wasn't worth the extra IMHO.

The service depends on the prossie, enthusiastic ones will be good whether you book 1/2 hour or 2 hours and vice versa.

I would add that I don't go in for having a regular,  never seen the same prossie more than 3 times, so for me to book longer than 60 minutes for an unknown would be stupid. Might work differently for those having a regular of course.

[CBPaul]

from what a couple pf the girls i see more regulars told me, they do prefer a longer booking because they have to prepare for each punt beforehand with shower, make up etc. so fewer but longer booking means less prep work. as to if longer booking produces better punts, I seem to get better service when i make longer bookings.

Of course they like longer bookings, same money for less work. Unless you have a bucket of viagra and unbelievable stamina it means less work full stop.

[ciscoxxx69]

I tend to go for an hour or occasionally longer - 90mins/2hours.....I even did 3 hours with Dee because it is such good VFM and she is so easy to be with, and so easy on the eye.

I have had a couple of 45min punts, but 30mins would just be too short for me......

I am a one pop only guy, so I prefer a natural flow to proceedings and would feel a time pressure to cum if it was just 30mins......on average I guess I am ready to unload around the 45/50 min mark.

If I am on a 90/120min punt, it's usually cos I want to be edged and teased and played with or I have two ladies to play with.......(Ah, wistfully remembers Lucy2015/NSS - SW section, March.......)

[touch.and.go]

In my view yes it does - if its my first time with a girl I book an hour as a taster session and then my normal bbooking is 2 hrs but with one WG i always booked her for 4 hrs - got a good discount and we fucked each other to death every time. If you genuinely like the girl, why not? 

[Jimmyredcab]

Of course they like longer bookings, same money for less work.

Sadly you are spot on, a two hour booking will involve lots of talking and timewasting.     

My ideal duration is 45 minutes, 30 minutes can sometimes feel rushed but an hour booking rarely lasts an hour.

Even if the girl doesn't advertise 45 minute bookings it is worth asking, she can only say no.   

I don't understand 15 minute bookings, I would rather have a wank. 

[Jimmyredcab]

In my view yes it does - if its my first time with a girl I book an hour as a taster session and then my normal bbooking is 2 hrs but with one WG i always booked her for 4 hrs - got a good discount and we fucked each other to death every time. If you genuinely like the girl, why not?

Some of us older guys are unable to "fuck to death".     

I have no desire to pay a girl to talk to me.     

[cockneybstrd]

I used to like a longer bookings of 2 hours (I still dont mind a 90 minute one) but I would much rather have two one hour bookings these days.

I always have a feeling with half hour booking its going to be a beat the clock challenge where I am rushing to cum

[Rochdull lad]

My bookings with my Regulars are always at least 2 hours; but I use 1-hour bookings to "audition" replacements if a Regular retires.

[potato]

Big subject this.  Longer bookings suit my punting style and I am lucky to have a regular that doesn't seem to know what a clock is. If I was paying for "time on the clock" then I would curtail my booking to 2 hours after I had seen someone once and decided whether they were suitable for a longer booking. It depends so much on the girl that there is no hard and fast rule.  If it's a conveyor type girl then once she has been through her repertoire then that's it - so I would say a longer booking would be a waste.  An inventive girl is a different matter all together and a longer booking would probably reap its rewards. It's wise to have an agenda on longer bookings to keep things moving along.

How do you define a longer booking anyway?  To a 30 mins punter a longer booking maybe 60 mins. To me, 60 mins would be the short trial booking for a well researched girl with a longer session if suitable - 2-3 hrs plus as a start point.

[vorian]

All depends on my requirements on the day and of course the girl, I see one who is fantastic at shorter 45 min one cum sessions and one who is great at the longer (2/3 hour plus) roleplay edging/teasing multi cum sessions. Both have merit and fulfil different needs.