Author Topic: Jules/mke/Bletchley  (Read 3650 times)

Offline bedhedred

Before all this happened I'd had a proper seeing to in the Hub...
Hidden Image/Members Only

Jules. She is cute. Very nice body. She smiled a little, but didn't get too involved or make much eye contact.

Only lips kissing. No click. I didn't get any sense her connecting with me. She was pulling away and flinching somewhat.

Owo. Technique was basic. Head bobbing. Needs to learn. She did more wanking than I like. I had to keep her on task. No real idea what to do or how to intensify things. I'd been with one of the experienced girls at the Hub an hour before and the contrast was jarring. She wanted to rubber up and shag within two minutes. I had to tell her two or three times to keep at it. Eventually, I thought that the atmosphere might sour if I had to keep insisting.

She is not keen on the blow job.

69: Pussy tastes good. Lovely arse to fondle.

Lovely tight shag. She shied away from any further kissing. I rammed her for less than 10 minutes. I was revved enough to have quite a big orgasm even though most of my load went in the other girl earlier.
Hidden Image/Members Only

Conclusion:A low positive, but I would not return. 20 minutes out of 30.

For £60, I can't really complain.

For context, one might not feel happy paying £80 for this in London...

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 23, 2021, 09:20:46 pm by bedhedred »


Offline Marvelous

I did see her when i went to see Angel, little cutie and im tempted. Funny thing is she got a neutral on that other shite site which is extremely rare! from some fluffy who gave Clarissa a postive, a girl i gave a neutral to and you a negative so that says it all about this one.

Offline bedhedred

She was better than Clarissa. I clearly recall.

Clarissa was tricky, difficult and stubborn. Jules was basically a bit distant and rushing. But somehow it all worked properly.

Angel is just a much more welcoming and sparkly person. The contrast was immediately noticeable. I might want to pay £80 for Angel, but no rushing would be acceptable.

Angel is the taller girl kissing her in the last row of shots.

« Last Edit: June 23, 2021, 09:38:26 pm by bedhedred »

Online scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,737
  • Likes: 248
  •  
  • Reviews: 179
It's your review bhr so your call, but I think you're in a generous mood to give this as positive

Offline bedhedred

It's your review bhr so your call, but I think you're in a generous mood to give this as positive

I paid 60 quid for a big explosive come in an 18 y o hottie.

If you go on the London board you will see a discussion of price rises at HoD. As part of a day trip to fuck at MK, this does not deserve being downgraded to neutral. It is partly because I see 60 quid as a painless amount to part with.

Makes sense?

This one was very similar...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=309662.0

This one would have been positive at 60, but not at 80...
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=308139.0
« Last Edit: June 23, 2021, 10:56:40 pm by bedhedred »

Online scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,737
  • Likes: 248
  •  
  • Reviews: 179

Offline Joey2315

Having seen her and discussed with you previously, I agree that she is a cute girl and if I’d gone for £60 P&D with her like I should have, I’d have probably given her a neutral rather than negative.
I can’t see how you can give a positive to someone who doesn’t offer the services they clearly list though. To me that is an instant neutral at best. I guess we all have our way of rating a session.

Offline simon07

I saw her and I agree, not much with kissing on lips, did manage down below and 69 too. Fucking in various position. Overall i thought she was shy and yet did not fuss about my ‘biggish cock’ like some Roms do.
I would give her a positive.

Any intel on April, pictures look good and yet i feel she is a wet fish?

Offline Joey2315

BHR did a review of April recently. Unfortunate she has become jaded and no longer worth a visit anymore by the look of things.

Offline bedhedred

I had a sh1t punt with Riley as well. Will review later.

Offline Joey2315

I had a sh1t punt with Riley as well. Will review later.
That back angle in her 4th photo doesn’t exactly scream sexy to me, I can’t lie  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: June 25, 2021, 12:31:06 pm by Joey2315 »

Offline MysteryManNo.7

I saw her and I agree, not much with kissing on lips, did manage down below and 69 too. Fucking in various position. Overall i thought she was shy and yet did not fuss about my ‘biggish cock’ like some Roms do.
I would give her a positive.

Any intel on April, pictures look good and yet i feel she is a wet fish?

Not seen her but from what i've heard and read (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=312666.msg3267645#msg3267645) she's gone from being quite good to jaded and complete crap.

Offline simon07

Oh well April is out and Riley the porn star is no good either.

There are some Brazilian gals, sadly a shadow of the glamourous gals we had a few years ago. Look dull & lumpy.

Offline bedhedred

Oh well April is out and Riley the porn star is no good either.

There are some Brazilian gals, sadly a shadow of the glamourous gals we had a few years ago. Look dull & lumpy.

I've fucked Luiza 4 or 5 times. I rate her general demeanour and her owo is top of the range.

Offline simon07

I've fucked Luiza 4 or 5 times. I rate her general demeanour and her owo is top of the range.

Good to know  :drinks:

Offline Son of the Desert

Do you think Jules and Angel will do interactive duos as their pictures imply?