Abi of Woking – positive, but not for me

[Huawei]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Price: £150 for 1 hour.

Location: Small house, obviously her home.

Preamble: I’ve thought about seeing Abi on and off for quite a while, she often turned up in my searches. Finally decided to go for it a couple of weeks ago, just before she put her prices up, fortunately.

Comms: Efficient, responses to AW emails usually overnight or quicker. No phone number given, even when booking confirmed, so I just turned up at her door at exactly the booked time, which worked fine. In conversation it transpired that she thought that she had given me her number, but as I had asked several times, this seemed a little odd.

The girl: The girl in the pictures – no reason not to be, given that she’s widely published.

Service: I’ll keep this fairly brief, as the meet didn’t really do it for me. Door opened, shown into single downstairs room, she was wearing short figure-hugging red dress. Was offered a drink, had a chat while she made coffee, which I then took upstairs to the bedroom. Offered paperwork and asked for bathroom for a freshen up. When I came back, started kissing – sort of FK, wide open mouth, but no sign of her tongue 
Both undressed, and onto the bed. As others have mentioned, her breasts are almost non-existent, with fairly prominent nipples. OWO good, although not especially deep. I went down on her for a while, seemed well received, she’s quite lippy, which I like, but she was also fairly stubbly – this shows in some of her PG pics too. Onto fucking (covered obviously) in mish and CG, then more OWO. Finished with CIM and swallow, which was offered without question – didn’t see a drop 

Summary: All services available offered and willingly delivered. For me we didn’t click for some reason. There were a few minor things that I wouldn’t even mention usually, but collectively, perhaps they put me off a bit. I can’t give this anything but a positive, as there was nothing wrong, or anything she didn’t offer, just not my day.

Would I visit again? No, even before her price increase, but not because of anything that she did, or failed to do.

[Steely Dan]

I’ll keep this fairly brief, as the meet didn’t really do it for me.

Would I visit again? No, even before her price increase, but not because of anything that she did, or failed to do.

Your review your rating.

But why are you giving it a positive?  If others like her THEY can give her a positive.  If you didn't love it, then it should be a neutral or negative.  We all need to rate for our own experience, and what we like ourselves, not what we think others will like.  Will a guy who has basically the same taste as you like giving her his hard earned cash when there are POF?  See here too:

External Link/Members Only

I can’t give this anything but a positive,

Umm yes in fact there are 2 other scores you can give.

[Haderach]

Interesting, I reached out a few weeks ago enquiring about a booking, she came back quickly with a couple of options, one of which I agreed and suggested a time on that day, requesting her to confirm that would time be suitable. She read the email and then went silent, have heard zero since.

I never chase as a matter of principle and as such have move on. I wonder now if this was a lucky break for me, I cannot stand poor communication, not when I am paying nearly £200ph for a service.

[shyleo]

I have seen Abi 3 times now and each time has been great. Naughty GFE with lots of DFK.
So my experience with her has definitely been positive.

[Steely Dan]

I have seen Abi 3 times now and each time has been great. Naughty GFE with lots of DFK.
So my experience with her has definitely been positive.

Indeed.  And your review is very welcome.

But do you agree that the OP could reasonably give her a neutral since he had a neutral time, even though you had a great experience with her 3 times?

[southcoastpunter]

yes SD, the OP could have given her a neutral but reading his review, a positive is not at all unreasonable. its a solid positive experience but they just didin click. That happens sometimes.

You are a long standing and respected member - but i don't understand your apparent eagerness to get the rating changed?

[Steely Dan]

yes SD, the OP could have given her a neutral but reading his review, a positive is not at all unreasonable. its a solid positive experience but they just didin click. That happens sometimes.

You are a long standing and respected member - but i don't understand your apparent eagerness to get the rating changed?

I don't give a shit about this particular rating.  I posted on this review as an example.  Posters should rate THEIR experience for what THEY like.  Not worry about what other have rated or what others like. 

He didn't click.  So why is that positive?  He wont go back and fuck her again. So why is that a positive? She is 'not for me'. So why is that a positive? It seems to me he is rating for others or trying to be fair.  Both are wrong IMHO.  Fair? Yikes, that is not the ethos of the site.  Rating for others?  We don't know shit about what other guys want.

This rating can stand.  Of course.  But we need to challenge each other.  Ratings inflation helps no one.

[Huawei]

Your review your rating.

But why are you giving it a positive?  If others like her THEY can give her a positive.  If you didn't love it, then it should be a neutral or negative.  We all need to rate for our own experience, and what we like ourselves, not what we think others will like.  Will a guy who has basically the same taste as you like giving her his hard earned cash when there are POF?  See here too:

External Link/Members Only
Umm yes in fact there are 2 other scores you can give.

Hi Steely Dan,

Thanks for the comments, and apologies for not responding before now - not much free 'private' time 

I did think hard about the rating, and I appreciate you posting the link to the rating guide. I felt that with some of my early reviews (quite a while back now), too often I rated punts as Neutral as a form of 'sitting on the fence', so I decided when I got back into reviewing recently that I would try hard not to rate Neutral as much as possible. I don't know if this makes sense, but it was a conscious decision on my part.

So, when I looked at this punt, everything was good, nothing refused, etc. So a positive seemed fair, even if it didn't click for me. It certainly wasn't negative. I guess I would say it's bordering between neutral and positive.

Yes, I know when I said "I can’t give this anything but a positive" that there are 2 other possible ratings. Perhaps I could have worded it better - maybe something like "as everything was willingly offered, and I couldn't fault the service, but we didn't click, I would rate this a marginal positive" 

Not sure if that really answers your questions?

[Stevelondon]

No need to confuse the issue. People discussing your positive and saying it should be something else.

Who cares. I read the reviews and make judgements. I think everyone is intelligent do that.

I made contact with this SP too but as her prices are now heading towards £200.
I shall rethink most surely.

[Steely Dan]

I did think hard about the rating, and I appreciate you posting the link to the rating guide. I felt that with some of my early reviews (quite a while back now), too often I rated punts as Neutral as a form of 'sitting on the fence', so I decided when I got back into reviewing recently that I would try hard not to rate Neutral as much as possible. I don't know if this makes sense, but it was a conscious decision on my part.

Thank you so much for your thoughtful response. And keep reviewing.

My only further builds (more to others than to you - and more for future reviews than this one) is that the ratings guide came from much discussion from many punters.  And this discussion is forever open.  Since the rule is your punt your rating, we can express new views, and reach a new consensus.  And still all rate as we wish.

Also that many punter wanted a 5 point scale.  But many agreed (and the boss decided!) that 3 was enough. (I voted for 5..but am past this heh heh). So we need to use all 3 choices.  Rating neutral is *not* sitting on the fence, it is for those punts, that do not meet the criteria for positive, but are not a negative.  This is not being unsure.  This is *deciding* that this was the experience on the day.

And to all: No need to be 'fair'.  Be fair to punters only and so rate *your* experience on the day. And don't give one thought ever to what other punters rated her.  You were not there for their punt, and they were not there for yours. And we all have our own likes and wants.

[Al]

I think some of us are mindful that a non positive can potentially affect the SP so if they have done everything they advertised then it may feel harsh to give a neutral.

I agree you should read the content of the review - but sometimes the statistics matter when people look up the main review page to see x positive and y neutrals.

[Steely Dan]

I think some of us are mindful that a non positive can potentially affect the SP so if they have done everything they advertised then it may feel harsh to give a neutral.

I agree you should read the content of the review - but sometimes the statistics matter when people look up the main review page to see x positive and y neutrals.

I agree it is a reason punters may rate positive for an escort they didn't click with and wont return to. But it needs to be stated that it is not the right thing to do on UKP.  These sorts of punter should go be fluffy somewhere else.

Mindful to the escorts means to be polite, wash your bits and pay them.  Mindful to punters and being consistent with the ethos of this site means to rate the experience on the day.  Giving a neutral is not harsh. It is candid. It shows integrity.  For sure it does not mean they did anything wrong.  Not every escort is to everyones taste.  (e.g. watch out for positives from MrShins (can your legs take it?)! Or any BB lover) Many think the very idea of rating escorts is harsh.  But it has helped all of us have a better punt.

[smiths]

I think some of us are mindful that a non positive can potentially affect the SP so if they have done everything they advertised then it may feel harsh to give a neutral.

I agree you should read the content of the review - but sometimes the statistics matter when people look up the main review page to see x positive and y neutrals.

Whereas as long as its a genuine review of a genuine punt whether it affects the WG is neither here nor their to me. UKP is here to review WGs not be concerned what impact it might have if a neutral or negative is given. If I agree with a reviewers rating I see it that the WG should of offered a better service and up her game in future and positive reviews will come along. If she loses business due to a neutral or negative that's genuine that's her fault in my book.

WGs get paid a lot of money and for that their service should be tip top 100% of the time, same as anyone elses that I do business with outside of punting.

[SpaceRaiderDave]

WGs get paid a lot of money and for that their service should be tip top 100% of the time, same as anyone elses that I do business with outside of punting.

I think the op was indicating that the service of the WG was 100% but he didn't quite click with her in a way he has with other wg's in the past.

Every punt is slighlty different and they don't all fall easily into three categories. How a reviewer handles a borderline decision will also differ and I think in this case the op did the right thing my giving his verdict but also stating the reservations he had.   

[mh]

I think some of us are mindful that a non positive can potentially affect the SP so if they have done everything they advertised then it may feel harsh to give a neutral.

I agree you should read the content of the review - but sometimes the statistics matter when people look up the main review page to see x positive and y neutrals.

It is obviously the case that even if a SP does everything advertised it can be a neutral or even a negative depending on other factors. Looks, enthusiasm, personality, cleanliness. Back in the day - before UKP - I saw a girl in Reading who went above and beyond everything advertised, was eager to please, just my cup of tea body-wise, role-played perfectly. But her house and room were like a crack-den, the area unsafe and I booked a visit to the GUM clinic afterwards. Would not have been a positive!

As for statistics - not our problem. If you go by statistics alone you are missing useful information. If I see 50 positives but a neutral and a negative I view those first and decide whether to give them credence before I look at the positives. They provide very useful information.

[Huawei]

I think the op was indicating that the service of the WG was 100% but he didn't quite click with her in a way he has with other wg's in the past.

Every punt is slighlty different and they don't all fall easily into three categories. How a reviewer handles a borderline decision will also differ and I think in this case the op did the right thing my giving his verdict but also stating the reservations he had.

Thanks! That's a more eloquent synopsis than I managed 

[shyleo]

Seen Abi a number of times and had a great time.
She seems to have gone - nothing on AW

[advent2016]

Generally before I write a report I like to visit a SP two to three times unless the first one was a blatant negative e.g. B&S, non-delivery of agreed services as sometimes I punt because I'm having an off day.
Usually if I find a provider who is willing to gulp down and swallow all my load and they didn't do anything wrong I'd mark it a positive.

[MrMatrix]

Thanks for the review OP. Its your rating whatever. Having said that you have put in the relevant facts as you see it that other punters would want to know. For me I can extract this info and should I need clarification I'd ask. That being the case the review is OK - you said you wont go back and thats it, says it all.
Look forward to you next review- at least you're getting out more than I am atm.

[workinallweek]

Seen Abi a number of times and had a great time.
She seems to have gone - nothing on AW

gone as has her number it seems

[wokingguyforfun]

She's still very much around the area though, saw her out and about in Knaphill today!

[workinallweek]

She's still very much around the area though, saw her out and about in Knaphill today!

Have you booked her ?

[wokingguyforfun]

No as she's not around online at the moment.

[advent2016]

She's still very much around the area though, saw her out and about in Knaphill today!

Slightly creepy

[wokingguyforfun]

Slightly creepy

It's called coincidence pal, I'm not going looking for people.

[workinallweek]

Slightly creepy

have you never seen a girl you booked in the real world ?

[advent2016]

have you never seen a girl you booked in the real world ?

Yes, certainly but I wouldn't point her out in a forum when she isn't working (i.e. showing her phone number on AW), she  IMHO, deserves some privacy.

[workinallweek]

Yes, certainly but I wouldn't point her out in a forum when she isn't working (i.e. showing her phone number on AW), she  IMHO, deserves some privacy.

didnt see her number on here and i have her number and its a dead number now

[Waterhouse]

Yes, certainly but I wouldn't point her out in a forum when she isn't working (i.e. showing her phone number on AW), she  IMHO, deserves some privacy.

Not quite sure how saying that he saw her out and about in the town or whatever, is an invasion of privacy? 
I read it as he’s simply letting us know that she’s not disappeared off the face of the Earth even if she has retired, or, thankfully, not pushing up daisies.  Harmless comment IMO.