Author Topic: Fuckme_Carmenxo Glasgow  (Read 15897 times)


32 review(s) for Fmc_xo (22 positive, 2 neutral, 8 negative) [Indexed by Clattypats]

Offline mikemole

Nice one.  :drinks:

Glad she’s just as good on return visits.
I’m looking forward to her return.
I’ve had a few great punts recently , but Carmen was the most fun.

+1

She certainly compares to the standard of SP I've seen in the North East recently.  Hopefully I won't need to produce clinic results in future, since I've seen her a few times.  Couldn't be arsed with that.

Offline Gunner1

Seems odd to me that she is asking for proof, but you can put 2 + 2 together and probably see why.

I wanted to meet her, but I won’t be visiting her if I have to ‘prove’ myself to be STD clear - I assume she will be presenting her “certificate” to prove her side checks out? Despite the fact she will prob have serviced 100 cocks since then.

Seems pointless to me tbh because as mentioned from the time you get tested and get the results you could catch something, there’s many factors. Plus if she’s not going to ask her regulars for proof why does she think they can’t get a STD?

Offline mikemole

Seems odd to me that she is asking for proof, but you can put 2 + 2 together and probably see why.

I wanted to meet her, but I won’t be visiting her if I have to ‘prove’ myself to be STD clear - I assume she will be presenting her “certificate” to prove her side checks out? Despite the fact she will prob have serviced 100 cocks since then.

Seems pointless to me tbh because as mentioned from the time you get tested and get the results you could catch something, there’s many factors. Plus if she’s not going to ask her regulars for proof why does she think they can’t get a STD?

Her body, her choice.  It's been well discussed on this excellent and accurate account of her services provided.

Only time will tell if it works out for her - she may have a rethink if it starts to hurt her pocket.

Offline pilgrim

Various folk purport to be scrupulously clean and get tested regulary so it should be no drama to them and most folk have a smart phone which could show a copy of a certificate or txt msg from Sandyford or elsewhere relating to test results.

Personally I dont think its an unreasonable request.  Shes going to get hit in the pocket if she doesnt weed out the undesireables, therefore I think this is the best option and its free.  If we are getting regular checks then we have got nothing to hide or fear?

Offline Bigdog82

I defo would rather show a test result than her deciding to only change to OW,
It’s inconvenient and as everyone has previously said, you could still have something picked up whilst waiting on the results, but it certainly reduces the risk slightly which can only be a good thing 😁

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Her body, her choice.  It's been well discussed on this excellent and accurate account of her services provided.

Only time will tell if it works out for her - she may have a rethink if it starts to hurt her pocket.
I agree, her body her choice, and the fact is I actually was looking to book her when she was with GEA, as I quite liked the sound of her service provided - maybe apart from screaming the place down  :D...

Subsequently when she went Indy, her poor comms or lack of paired with a couple of cancellations put me off slightly...

My main point being relating to STI screening/certs was that it isn't infallible and isn't a concrete indicator someone is clean, whether that be WG or punter in general... Anything could happen between being tested and getting the results, then factoring in that it's recommended by GUM punters get checked every 12 weeks approx there is that window of time also...

In no way was I suggesting punters don't get tested, it goes along way to, if anything, keeping yourself safe and others, but will never be "concrete" due to time lapses, but at least said person won't be a "walking STI"...  :hi:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
I can understand dman being confused and thinking you're arguing against testing because that's exactly what you're doing with this warped logic.

So I'm arguing against testing, when I get tested every 12 weeks, how does that work?

It's also a good idea if you punt on a regular basis to get the Hep B vaac, something I've also done, how many can say the same?

Your use of the word warped is very apt coming from you... Oh, the Irony!... ;)

Offline Dman88

So I'm arguing against testing, when I get tested every 12 weeks, how does that work?

It's also a good idea if you punt on a regular basis to get the Hep B vaac, something I've also done, how many can say the same?

Your use of the word warped is very apt coming from you... Oh, the Irony!... ;)

You said it’s pointless for Carmen to require testing, that’s arguing against it.

I do see the point you’re making about the window between getting tested and getting results. There is no way to completely eliminate the risk (except if she stopped working or offering OWO) but it does reduce it a great deal so I don’t see how it can be a bad thing  :unknown:

Imagine your hypothetical shagger was let loose for 12 weeks. 2.5 civvies p/w x 12 = 30 potential infection zones. You would drive yourself crazy thinking that way, better to just get tested  :hi:

Offline Falkirk GND

Imagine your hypothetical shagger was let loose for 12 weeks. 2.5 civvies p/w x 12 = 30 potential infection zones. You would drive yourself crazy thinking that way, better to just get tested  :hi:

Or if he’s married - ZERO civvies a week (including the Mrs) and a bi-annual punt these days with lockdown etc. when he can escape the trouble and strife for long enough to get his hole from a hooker.  :crazy:
« Last Edit: June 21, 2021, 08:56:38 am by Falkirk GND »

Offline Dman88

Or if he’s married - ZERO civvies a week (including the Mrs) and a bi-annual punt these days with lockdown etc. when he can escape the trouble and strife for long enough to get his hole from a hooker.  :crazy:

That sounds a bit like me except for the married part  :D

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
You said it’s pointless for Carmen to require testing, that’s arguing against it.

I do see the point you’re making about the window between getting tested and getting results. There is no way to completely eliminate the risk (except if she stopped working or offering OWO) but it does reduce it a great deal so I don’t see how it can be a bad thing  :unknown:

Imagine your hypothetical shagger was let loose for 12 weeks. 2.5 civvies p/w x 12 = 30 potential infection zones. You would drive yourself crazy thinking that way, better to just get tested  :hi:
I'm not arguing against anyone getting tested, whether that be WG or punter, there is a difference...

I wouldn't read too much into my "hypothetical punter" it was an intentional exaggeration to try to get my point across to you , which you seen to get now...  :)

Offline Dman88

I'm not arguing against anyone getting tested, whether that be WG or punter, there is a difference...

I wouldn't read too much into my "hypothetical punter" it was an intentional exaggeration to try to get my point across to you , which you seen to get now...  :)

Well I’m glad you can agree now  :thumbsup:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Well I’m glad you can agree now  :thumbsup:
Strangely enough I do agree with myself and what I've said... :D :thumbsup:

Offline Dman88

Strangely enough I do agree with myself and what I've said... :D :thumbsup:

Your maturity is admirable, how lucky the Scottish members are to have you representing the forum. Keep up the good work  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: June 21, 2021, 09:49:58 am by Dman88 »

Offline OGS20

Your maturity is admirable, how lucky the Scottish members are to have you representing the forum. Keep up the good work  :thumbsup:

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Banned reason: Shit stirring walloper.
Banned by: Ali Katt

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Your maturity is admirable, how lucky the Scottish members are to have you representing the forum. Keep up the good work  :thumbsup:
Luckier than having that backtracking, lying, warped :D wrong un above anyway... :lol:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,172
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Luckier than having that backtracking, lying, warped :D wrong un above anyway... :lol:

...oh no I see he’s back posting again. :scare: The evil has returned. :diablo: :scare:

Offline mickey1967


I see she's back working again next week, anyone tried setting up a booking? Interested if she's still insisting on test results, can't see that working for her long term.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
I see she's back working again next week, anyone tried setting up a booking? Interested if she's still insisting on test results, can't see that working for her long term.
Yip, back today, unfortunately I'm busy this week so won't look to book  :(

Cue Dman88 posting again though as it's related to GEA...  :bomb: :wacko:

A couple more reviews of her being Indy wouldn't go amiss before I decide though... Anyone?...  :cool:

Offline PR67

I see she's back working again next week, anyone tried setting up a booking? Interested if she's still insisting on test results, can't see that working for her long term.

I tried but she read my message with no reply.

Offline Anndyy

Is it sexy Farah's new account or a different girl. Some photos look similar.

Offline Problem Child

Is it sexy Farah's new account or a different girl. Some photos look similar.

Nah, she was Alisha at GEA
Hot farah was Farah

Hot Farah has a new account hot Scottish farah

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=28251