Victoria.bbw Dunfermline

[Subboy1980]

External Link/Members Only

Saw this cow a few days ago.

Texted her and all comms were good.  She told me to call her once arrived.  Flat in centre of town.

Met her and she is huge.  A lot bigger than what her pics suggest.  I paid £70 half an hour.

Started off with a shit massage.  Then started wanking me off by hand.  I asked for a blow job owo but she wanted an extra £30, so I told her no.  At this stage I'm lying there thinking I could of had a wank back home for free.

On with the condom but as I wasn't enjoying myself was struggling to get hard.  I actually left as I didn't both find her attractive and she had that Eastern European chip on her shoulder.

Worst punt in a long time.  Avoid.

[horneyboy1975]

External Link/Members Only

Saw this cow a few days ago.

Texted her and all comms were good.  She told me to call her once arrived.  Flat in centre of town.

Met her and she is huge.  A lot bigger than what her pics suggest.  I paid £70 half an hour.

Started off with a shit massage.  Then started wanking me off by hand.  I asked for a blow job owo but she wanted an extra £30, so I told her no.  At this stage I'm lying there thinking I could of had a wank back home for free. God . I tried booking her the last time she was in Dundee , she would not budge on a a 10 am booking 10 30 only , so had to abort the booking as I would of made it work on time .Sad part punting has become a different ball game , I will only book a lady all included , It has become the new normal owo is extra . And the new normal is you view a profile and while viewing penis gets excited until you view prices only hour booking available WTF

On with the condom but as I wasn't enjoying myself was struggling to get hard.  I actually left as I didn't both find her attractive and she had that Eastern European chip on her shoulder.

Worst punt in a long time.  Avoid.

[Oldguy]

I always enjoyed visiting her in the past. That’s now 2 that I would call regulars gone now. Thanks for the warning.

[Subboy1980]

I always enjoyed visiting her in the past. That’s now 2 that I would call regulars gone now. Thanks for the warning.

Aye is that right old boy.  So where's your contribution?

[Clattypats]

I always enjoyed visiting her in the past. That’s now 2 that I would call regulars gone now. Thanks for the warning.

If you're outwith the time frame you can add to existing reviews... Summarize... 

[Oldguy]

Aye is that right old boy.  So where's your contribution?

I’ve seen nobody in the last 16 months. Mainly due to lockdowns and lack of money due to lockdowns.

[Clattypats]

I’ve seen nobody in the last 16 months. Mainly due to lockdowns and lack of money due to lockdowns.

For want of repeating myself, see my above post... 

[Oldguy]

I’m not asking you to repeat myself. I was answering subboy, not that it’s any of his business.

[Clattypats]

I’m not asking you to repeat myself. I was answering subboy, not that it’s any of his business.

I was giving you some constructive advice... Take it or leave it!  and lose that chip on your shoulder... 

[Oldguy]

Chip on my shoulder. Hahahaha

[Clattypats]

Chip on my shoulder. Hahahaha

If that's your best reply to what you should do with regards to contributing if you are outwith the "review time frame" then I need say no more... Was only a suggestion, but if this is your sole contribution, then I don't think anyone will bother...

Could site rules regarding it, but that probably won't matter either... Seems the Scottish board is a free for all for fannies! 

[Oldguy]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

[Clattypats]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

Thanks for your useless response...

If you actually read my first post on this thread properly I was trying to help you out if you couldn't review because of covid/time constraints... You chose not to heed my advice

There is only one "fud" as you put it, on this thread, and it's not moi... 

[mills_and_bhuna]

Bit strange.
You saw her last year and gave her a neutral when you reviewed in January.
Not sure why you suddenly thought it would be better.
Maybe she recognised you and suspected you gave her a bad review.
Reading the two reviews together it certainly sounded like a big change in her attitude

[Subboy1980]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

Is not against site rules to call a fellow op offensive names?  Not a nice way to speak to someone.

[lykopra]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

Who hurt you so bad you have to resort to name-calling strangers on the internet?

[Slaveofnature]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

I think you are over reacting. Clatty simply gave a quite polite suggestion which if you acted on it would help everyone get a better picture of this SP. It is after all what the site is about. 

[Cactus]

Bit strange.
You saw her last year and gave her a neutral when you reviewed in January.
Not sure why you suddenly thought it would be better.
Maybe she recognised you and suspected you gave her a bad review.
Reading the two reviews together it certainly sounded like a big change in her attitude

Agreed, seems a bit strange that in the January review she was the girl in the pictures and fairly attractive, then in June she’s huge.

Personally, I wouldn’t revisit someone I’d previously given a neutral. I did so once with Atomicredi (spelling?) as I gave her the benefit of the doubt that my slight funk may have contributed to lack of spark/connection, but second time was as poor as the first.

[Subboy1980]

Agreed, seems a bit strange that in the January review she was the girl in the pictures and fairly attractive, then in June she’s huge.

Personally, I wouldn’t revisit someone I’d previously given a neutral. I did so once with Atomicredi (spelling?) as I gave her the benefit of the doubt that my slight funk may have contributed to lack of spark/connection, but second time was as poor as the first.

Nothing strange about it...  I gave the wg another chance but didn't enjoy it.  I don't see why that is strange. 

[mills_and_bhuna]

Nothing strange about it...  I gave the wg another chance but didn't enjoy it.  I don't see why that is strange. 

a chance of what?
You said that you couldn't fault her service but you basically didn't like fat women.
So the only thing that would redeem her going by that is losing 3 stone.
Which is unlikely.
There's no way I'd be going back to someone I'd given a poor review.
I would go back to see her but you've got me worried that she is bigger than I remember her from over 2 years ago.
She was big but she's tall and carried it fairly well and I thought she was fairly attractive facially.

[Subboy1980]

a chance of what?
You said that you couldn't fault her service but you basically didn't like fat women.
So the only thing that would redeem her going by that is losing 3 stone.
Which is unlikely.
There's no way I'd be going back to someone I'd given a poor review.
I would go back to see her but you've got me worried that she is bigger than I remember her from over 2 years ago.
She was big but she's tall and carried it fairly well and I thought she was fairly attractive facially.

Good for you son. 

[Subboy1980]

a chance of what?
You said that you couldn't fault her service but you basically didn't like fat women.

No your wrong in saying and I quote "didn't like fat women".  You have made an incorrect assumption.  A little lesson for you is never assume.  If you have a problem with my review then I suggest you get a grip and stop winging like a wee kid.

I'm entitled to my own review and opinion, just like you.  Im still not entirely sure what your problem is as you have not explained yourself.  You make false assumptions.  I will no longer reply to any of your bull shit comments as I'm bored of it now Mr Bhuna.

[mills_and_bhuna]

a chance of what?
You said that you couldn't fault her service but you basically didn't like fat women.

No your wrong in saying and I quote "didn't like fat women".  You have made an incorrect assumption.  A little lesson for you is never assume.  If you have a problem with my review then I suggest you get a grip and stop winging like a wee kid.

I'm entitled to my own review and opinion, just like you.  Im still not entirely sure what your problem is as you have not explained yourself.  You make false assumptions.  I will no longer reply to any of your bull shit comments as I'm bored of it now Mr Bhuna.

Who's whinging?
I'm just commenting on a review which I'm entitled to do.
Especially if there are two reviews and some of the points made seem contradictory.
You maybe never said "I hate fat birds" in these words but I'm pretty sure most people reading the two reviews will be puzzled as to why you returned given that you said it was her physical attributes that were the reason for the original neutral.
I think you need to grow a thicker skin.
And you will also notice I haven't descended to abuse and petty slanging.

[Subboy1980]

Who's whinging?
I'm just commenting on a review which I'm entitled to do.
Especially if there are two reviews and some of the points made seem contradictory.
You maybe never said "I hate fat birds" in these words but I'm pretty sure most people reading the two reviews will be puzzled as to why you returned given that you said it was her physical attributes that were the reason for the original neutral.
I think you need to grow a thicker skin.
And you will also notice I haven't descended to abuse and petty slanging.

In case you might not understand In my previous post, (I will REPEAT this yet again since you seem uneducated) I gave the wg another chance - its really simple for most people who read the reason why I returned.  You seem to find it very difficult to grasp this.  Another chance- that's it nothing more to it than that.

You made inaccurate assumptions which I pointed out to you on an earlier post.  Im looking forward to your next review and I will see what I can pick/assume things you write..

[Cactus]

External Link/Members Only

Saw this cow a few days ago.

Texted her and all comms were good.  She told me to call her once arrived.  Flat in centre of town.

Met her and she is huge.  A lot bigger than what her pics suggest.  I paid £70 half an hour.

Started off with a shit massage.  Then started wanking me off by hand.  I asked for a blow job owo but she wanted an extra £30, so I told her no.  At this stage I'm lying there thinking I could of had a wank back home for free.

On with the condom but as I wasn't enjoying myself was struggling to get hard.  I actually left as I didn't both find her attractive and she had that Eastern European chip on her shoulder.

Worst punt in a long time.  Avoid.

Saw this lady around July time last year in Dunfermline.  I fancied a bbw for a change.  Paid £ 70 for 30 mins.  Texed and called her to get location and the flat was on The New row right in the centre of town.

It is her on the pictures, quite tall bbw and she looked really nice.  Money paid and i lay on bed till she came back after stashing the cash.  Started with owo which was ok, perhaps a little mechanical for me, just felt she was going through the motions...

On with the rubber and started mish for a few mins.  Then doggy but I found the size of her ass a bit to big for me and it put me off a little.  I know some guys will probably like this but for me to big.  After this she wanked me off until I finished.  A little chat and massage.  She is friendly and easy to talk with but I just felt there was no chemistry between us.

Overall, nice looking lady and I'm sure there will be guys out there who like the bbws but not quite for me.  Im not going to be harsh here and give a neutral as she still done what I wanted in the room. 

External Link/Members Only

[Cactus]

Your review so your ratings. I know Fife is something of a wasteland, so can understand why a second chance might be more appealing.

In the space of about a year:
She’s gone from friendly and easy to talk to; to a cow.
She’s gone from quite tall BBW and she looked really nice; to huge & a lot bigger than her pics suggest.

It would have been good if your original post stated you’d seen her before and she’d gone downhill in service, personality, attitude, appearance & size.

Your cash and your review, ultimate just sorry you had a shit punt.

[luvtoseeafacial]

In case you might not understand In my previous post, (I will REPEAT this yet again since you seem uneducated) I gave the wg another chance - its really simple for most people who read the reason why I returned.  You seem to find it very difficult to grasp this.  Another chance- that's it nothing more to it than that.

You made inaccurate assumptions which I pointed out to you on an earlier post.  Im looking forward to your next review and I will see what I can pick/assume things you write..

I had fancied meeting her, so after reading your review checked out her other reviews and saw your first one. After reading that one then your second my first impression was you had forgotten you had met her before.

In your first review you DIDN'T say you didn't like fat women, but you did say you didn't like her large ass and bbw's were not for you. So you said in a more polite way you didn't like fat women.

[Clattypats]

In case you might not understand In my previous post, (I will REPEAT this yet again since you seem uneducated) I gave the wg another chance - its really simple for most people who read the reason why I returned.  You seem to find it very difficult to grasp this.  Another chance- that's it nothing more to it than that.

You made inaccurate assumptions which I pointed out to you on an earlier post.  Im looking forward to your next review and I will see what I can pick/assume things you write..

Tbh.. @cactus has nailed it in reply#25 

[mills_and_bhuna]

In case you might not understand In my previous post, (I will REPEAT this yet again since you seem uneducated) I gave the wg another chance - its really simple for most people who read the reason why I returned.  You seem to find it very difficult to grasp this.  Another chance- that's it nothing more to it than that.

You made inaccurate assumptions which I pointed out to you on an earlier post.  Im looking forward to your next review and I will see what I can pick/assume things you write..

uneducated ?
You seem to like throwing around the odd insult .
If I was you I'd get my spelling sorted before calling anyone uneducated.
I think people reading all this and the two reviews can see what I'm on about.
I just thought it was strange that you'd go back bearing in mind your reason for the neutral in the first review was that she delivered all services asked for and she was friendly .
You specifically said you were thinking of giving her a negative .
I'm just puzzled how you thought 'giving her another chance' was going to work given that she's only in control of her standard of service (friendliness, provision of agreed services, etc.).
And you didn't have any complaints on that score before as your beef was that she physically wasn't to your taste.
So you were expecting her to be better looking or were you thinking you were suddenly going to be more attracted to big women?
Your review is your review and you are quite entitled to score it as you like .
And I'm just as entitled to ask for clarification on certain points which seem to be contradictory as others have already pointed out.

[Subboy1980]

uneducated ?
You seem to like throwing around the odd insult .
If I was you I'd get my spelling sorted before calling anyone uneducated.
I think people reading all this and the two reviews can see what I'm on about.
I just thought it was strange that you'd go back bearing in mind your reason for the neutral in the first review was that she delivered all services asked for and she was friendly .
You specifically said you were thinking of giving her a negative .
I'm just puzzled how you thought 'giving her another chance' was going to work given that she's only in control of her standard of service (friendliness, provision of agreed services, etc.).
And you didn't have any complaints on that score before as your beef was that she physically wasn't to your taste.
So you were expecting her to be better looking or were you thinking you were suddenly going to be more attracted to big women?
Your review is your review and you are quite entitled to score it as you like .
And I'm just as entitled to ask for clarification on certain points which seem to be contradictory as others have already pointed out.

You say your puzzled... there is nothing to be puzzled about.  You do not make any sense and cast false assumptions.  You have read my review and have caused more irritating bull shit comments which do not make sense.

It's up to me to decide who I see, how much I pay and what I thought of them.  Also since your are "puzzled" why don't you go and visit her again and write a review, or is that to puzzling for you to go back and visit the same wg?  So explain why you are confused?

There is nothing to be confused about.  I think the reason why your are puzzled is because it would appear on reading your comments you have no substance behind your puzzled assumptions.

Yes other ops can visit as many wgs as they want.  Yes I can visit the SAME wg as many times I like without someone making false inaccurate assumptions. 

As mentioned before I'm looking forward to reading your next review whenever that might be...

[Subboy1980]

Also forgot to mention in my last post Bhuna - you have been a member here since 2016 and only done 8 reviews.  That's not much of a contribution for the length of time being on here. 

You only visit wgs once maybe twice a year and yet your confused why I go back and see another wg.  I think you need to make more contributions first before trolling round other ops reviews, making false assumptions and causing yourself to be puzzled.

[DoctorSalchicha]

If anybody is a fanny it’s you. You seem to send your time just wanting to argue and criticise people on here. I know like a child you’ll want the last word on this so I won’t reply to your response. Have a good day you fud.

Six months here, where are you reviews big boy?

[Inthehouse1]

Yes other ops can visit as many wgs as they want.

I think you need to make more contributions first before trolling round other ops reviews

OP stands for Original Poster. Use it properly.

[mills_and_bhuna]

Also forgot to mention in my last post Bhuna - you have been a member here since 2016 and only done 8 reviews.  That's not much of a contribution for the length of time being on here. 

You only visit wgs once maybe twice a year and yet your confused why I go back and see another wg.  I think you need to make more contributions first before trolling round other ops reviews, making false assumptions and causing yourself to be puzzled.

at this stage it's like arguing with a drunk .
Who's making assumptions now ?
I've been punting less than 5 years.
I didn't punt for well over a year due to a pandemic which is particularly risky for those with compromised immune systems .
I've had a few repeat bookings as well when I was more active before.
But apparently now 8 reviews in less than four years active punting is insufficient to comment and ask for clarification.
I'll leave it for other members to decide on whether I'm justified in my comments.