Author Topic: Leyla - UK Glamour Girls - Bayswater - More Meets  (Read 5081 times)


6 review(s) for LilyRoseUK- (6 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Payyourwaymate]

Offline Momodan38

Note - Decided to do another review for Leyla. Met her a few more times recently since my last review (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=301170.0). Similar, but a bit more info which I feel justifies a fresh review.

Link/s - External Link/Members Only

Known as Scarlett with - External Link/Members Only
Known as Olivia with - External Link/Members Only
Known as Sasha with External Link/Members Only
Known as Olivia with External Link/Members Only
Known as Lucy with External Link/Members Only

Price - £600 for 1 hour Incall

Location - States Baywater, about 10 mins walk from the station. Royal Oak is closer.

The girl - My type of girl, IMHO she's FAF, big fake tits but with a natural feel and responsive nipples, plastic look, pretty/slutty face, BJ lips. Hint of a tan, and nice long legs. Feet is also amazing. Pictures are very accurate.

Comms - All via text.

Place - Modern and spacious flat. Clean showers.

Session - I have already reviewed Leyla once, But very quickly - I did my usual thing. Started off with some intense DFK. Played with her fake tits, enjoyed licking and kissing her whole body as well as enjoying her beautiful feet. Received an excellent OWO before finishing off in missionary.

Additional things I have found that made these sessions better -

a) Her GFE skills are substantially better. She was always a pleasant and eager girl, but she’s added touches like kissing and licking my neck, upper body and nipples.

b) Started out even more intensely on each occasion, not even getting a chance to take my boxers off.

c) Would stick her hands in my boxers, stroking me before starting off her OWO.

d) kissed and licked my upper leg during the BJ phase. I thought this part was already good, see my other review. But she managed to make the whole experience even better. Also mixed in a footjob.

e) again, adding to the GFE experience, she was very close up during the break, rubbing my shoulders, sitting next to me, stroking my tool.

Overall she made an extra effort to make the whole experience even better. As well as her overall look, she has a slutty look about her which just feels me with lust. She is a very pleasant girl and is very eager to make me happy.

Downside to seeing her on incall is her dog. She has it in another room, but on short notice bookings I found it can bark like crazy at times. Some douche punter gave it to her for valentines day apparently.

For now, I feel fully satisfied. Probably won’t attempt to see her for another 6 months or so, as I have plenty of others I want to try, but I’m sure I will end up seeing her again before the year is out. Probably the last of my 're-reviews'.


Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: May 25, 2021, 02:10:12 pm by Momodan38 »

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
What you really mean by re review is I can afford to bash 600 whenever I feel like it while the rest of you plebs are moaning, on multiple threads, about price increase, bit like throwing in the 400 you spent in a strip club into your post. What did that have to do with anything ?

What other reason is there to post a review of someone you posted a double review of 8 or 9 weeks ago that cost you 1600 quid?

This is just boasting bollocks :lol:
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Dangermouse82

Each to their own. If op wants to spend big bucks then go ahead. I wouldn't personally. As long as he reviews that's all I care about

Offline Momodan38

What you really mean by re review is I can afford to bash 600 whenever I feel like it while the rest of you plebs are moaning, on multiple threads, about price increase, bit like throwing in the 400 you spent in a strip club into your post. What did that have to do with anything ?

What other reason is there to post a review of someone you posted a double review of 8 or 9 weeks ago that cost you 1600 quid?

This is just boasting bollocks :lol:
Yeah sorry for triggering you. I should take your lead and see more munters for 50p from the boondocks of London.

Posting boasting bullocks? You really should not talk, all those ‘hot” SB ‘s you have access to, yet seeing the WGs you have seen lately. :lol: :lol: :lol:

The £400 in the strip club, as stated would not make much sense to you. It was nothing compared to what others have splashed in there and other strip clubs.

None of it was as a means of boasting, yes some self gratification is there as with all posters, but the point was to mainly share info.


PS: your really not gonna like my next few punts.

Offline bst

Posting boasting bullocks? You really should not talk, all those ‘hot” SB ‘s you have access to, yet seeing the WGs you have seen lately. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Lol Lol Lol. At least what you post about exists. Lilly will make up a different excuse every time when he's asked to share details on where he finds these SBs and such.



I like what I see Momo. Added to my to dos. Fuck the dog though  :lol:
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Momodan38

Lol Lol Lol. At least what you post about exists. Lilly will make up a different excuse every time when he's asked to share details on where he finds these SBs and such.
  :D

You called him out on it and then finally goes for a punt or two with ... :lol: Wonder how ‘hot’ these prized SBs were.

I like what I see Momo. Added to my to dos. Fuck the dog though  :lol:
:drinks:

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,657
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
She does look FAF  - thanks for the review and updated info OP. It all helps in making a choice imo.

As for the price, pay it, or don't, seems pretty simple to me  :unknown: Imagine shopping at Lidl and crying outside Waitrose :lol:

Offline Momodan38

She does look FAF  - thanks for the review and updated info OP. It all helps in making a choice imo.

As for the price, pay it, or don't, seems pretty simple to me  :unknown: Imagine shopping at Lidl and crying outside Waitrose :lol:

+1

Thanks. To be honest, if more seasoned members complained about this re review, I would seriously take that advice into account. Hell, if pointed out that I did something wrong I’m more than happy to apologise for it. In the end I felt a re review is justified.

Offline Heph

What you really mean by re review is I can afford to bash 600 whenever I feel like it while the rest of you plebs are moaning, on multiple threads, about price increase, bit like throwing in the 400 you spent in a strip club into your post. What did that have to do with anything ?

What other reason is there to post a review of someone you posted a double review of 8 or 9 weeks ago that cost you 1600 quid?

This is just boasting bollocks :lol:

This can just get in the bin: it's not about you, or your preferences.

Offline Circusboy

That’s a load to spend on a single punt, but it’s great to see the expensive girls get reviewed too.

Personally I prefer to have a longer punt if I’m spending that much. Most I have spent on a punt was just over 1K but that was a trip to a Berlin fetish club and the girl in question was with me for 36 hours.

Offline Momodan38


Offline The Italian Stallion

One of the things I learned in one year:
The strength of this forum (I quote it) because the other forum I visit is in my country, but I learned that human nature is the same no matter the geographical location, mentality, and so on probably because we learn from each other and that we already we have access to much more information than 10 or 15 years ago.
On the topic:
when a reviewer writes by repeating and repeating information about a certain girl, he rather harms both the girl and us, because this increases the call traffic to the girl, which will certainly be a problem for her and for those who try to call her.
 With try to book or, it will be impossible on a certain day or for sure, there will be people who will be deceived and wasted time, which in turn leads to negative reviews for the girl and frustration and loss to man. As a result, it will confuse the rest of the people who seek information for a certain lady.
I think the idea of ​​this forum is as follows:
Your review, either mine or anyone else's, is written as information for the one who reads it and accordingly protects us from fraud, this is the most important thing.
To be honest, no one, in particular, cares how you or I or anyone has spent time with a certain girl because no one can just feel the same way as you or I from words.
What I like most about this site is that it teaches us all to think about what we say, because once we say something this it stays public.
And if we judge a man on the outside by his deeds, here we judge on a man by his words. Greetings! :hi:

Offline Momodan38

@ The Italian Stalion

I guess your still upset about me shutting down your attempt to talk to me about under duress girls in another review. Now your bringing up trafficked girls despite this SP being British?

Seriously buddy, I really just wanted to avoid this rabbit hole subject. No offence. All I wanted to was give relevant info, even if it is somewhat self gratifying. If this SP was well reviewed then I may have thought otherwise.

Hopefully someone can engage you with your concerns, or open a new discussion thread, or better yet find a relevant discussion thread and talk about it there. All the best  :hi:

Offline The Italian Stallion

@ The Italian Stalion

 Now your bringing up trafficked girls despite this SP being British?
Where in the comment did I mention something like that?
This is my analysis and I believe that many punters would agree with this because in reality things sit this way. In my personal opinion.
As well as the fact that I did not write this as a critique.

Offline Liverpool

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,346
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
I'm having trouble seeing what people find so wrong about the review. I've never come across the OPs reviews before, but on the strength of this one it's informing, a little bit gushy but then the OP isn't the only one to have done this. Yes the girl is expensive but so what. The OP isn't spending my money, so why should anyone care? He's not bragging and UKP is a broad church that caters for £30 Soho trips through to high end experiences like this.

Offline Momodan38

Where in the comment did I mention something like that?
This is my analysis and I believe that many punters would agree with this because in reality things sit this way. In my personal opinion.
As well as the fact that I did not write this as a critique.
fair enough. I read your statement wrong.

You said “call for traffic” and I misread it as “trafficked girls” apologies for that.

Now your saying I should not have posted this review, because many more punters will call her? But she has only two reviews? What about girls that have several dozen reviews from different punters? You see the lack of logic?

And this SP is an agency worker so she won’t be receiving nuisance/time wasting calls. The agency will handle that. If you mean calls that will generate more meets and income, then isn’t that what an SP wants? She can pick and choose whatever hours she wishes to work.

Again, sorry for shutting you down before, I may be wrong but you seem upset with me for that reason. You have never complained to other reviewers who have done re reviews before. It wasn’t meant as a rude gesture on my part.

Offline The Italian Stallion

fair enough. I read your statement wrong.

You said “call for traffic” and I misread it as “trafficked girls” apologies for that.

Now your saying I should not have posted this review, because many more punters will call her? But she has only two reviews? What about girls that have several dozen reviews from different punters? You see the lack of logic?

And this SP is an agency worker so she won’t be receiving nuisance/time wasting calls. The agency will handle that. If you mean calls that will generate more meets and income, then isn’t that what an SP wants? She can pick and choose whatever hours she wishes to work.

Again, sorry for shutting you down before, I may be wrong but you seem upset with me for that reason. You have never complained to other reviewers who have done re reviews before. It wasn’t meant as a rude gesture on my part.
Thanks for understanding.
 No, your review is not wrong in terms of your design.
But maybe I was left with the wrong impression, but isn't that one of the reasons why agencies are raising prices?It is not because of you that I speak specifically in principle!
As well as one of the reasons for the red threads of disappointed colleagues lost time after a "supposedly" confirmed reservation?
There is a saying in my country that it is in the dispute that the truth is born....As long as he's friendly, I add :) :hi:
« Last Edit: May 25, 2021, 09:48:30 pm by The Italian Stallion »

Offline Momodan38

I'm having trouble seeing what people find so wrong about the review. I've never come across the OPs reviews before, but on the strength of this one it's informing, a little bit gushy but then the OP isn't the only one to have done this. Yes the girl is expensive but so what. The OP isn't spending my money, so why should anyone care? He's not bragging and UKP is a broad church that caters for £30 Soho trips through to high end experiences like this.
.

Thanks.

Re the “gushy” part, fair enough, I only do this as I believe I have enough non gushy reviews hopefully to give me somewhat of an allowance from time to time to be gushy when the moment is right.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
A report on a high-priced SP is welcome.   :drinks:

The extras you describe that provoked this "new" review are nothing exceptional.  Given how soon after the previous review this comes and thus the frequency of your visits since the first, we would all expect an SP to be improving by at least this much, at her price point I'd expect her to be picking me up from work in a supercar. 

You've enjoyed a very pretty lady but the looks of this escort can be found for less than half the rate paid here and by all accounts a similar experience can be had from many super-hunnies sporting all manner of hairy or bald fruit between their legs.  Many of us have had this level of attention (and more) from plenty of SPs over the years, and I still do experience this with parlour matrons and indie AW girls and all for far less.

It's great that you're (finally) getting a good servicing but you really shouldn't have to be paying that amount of cash (so often) to do so.

Offline Momodan38

@LLPunting - Thanks. Comments regarding the re-review duly noted. Only decided this as this SP was not reviewed here other than my original one, but you make a good point.

I have to disagree with your “half the price” comment. I’ve seen SPs with a wide range of pricing, going as low as £60, it’s not like I’m blindedsided by the glamour. Yes end of the day service is generally the same, especially for a vanilla guy like me. It’s all down to my personal taste however.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
@LLPunting - Thanks. Comments regarding the re-review duly noted. Only decided this as this SP was not reviewed here other than my original one, but you make a good point.

I have to disagree with your “half the price” comment. I’ve seen SPs with a wide range of pricing, going as low as £60, it’s not like I’m blindedsided by the glamour. Yes end of the day service is generally the same, especially for a vanilla guy like me. It’s all down to my personal taste however.

 ;)

Just be sure that (post) Lockdown fever isn't making you reach deeper for something (not your pocket billiards) that can be found more readily.

Just read reviews about "Beautiful Dayanna" and she's pretty damn photogenic too.  Think what she could do to you if you spread out your 600x over a little bit of time.  You might be our first UKP wedding!

Offline Momodan38

Just read reviews about "Beautiful Dayanna" and she's pretty damn photogenic too.  Think what she could do to you if you spread out your 600x over a little bit of time.  You might be our first UKP wedding!
  :P

Nice face, the rest just not up my alley.

Offline rbtgrr

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 206
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
For what it is worth I saw her about 4 years ago. She was £400 then.
12th best escort I have seen.
She was extremely good looking and there were no problems at all.
She's had her boobs done now but there was nothing wrong with them before.

« Last Edit: May 26, 2021, 01:59:13 pm by rbtgrr »
Banned reason: You’re not my matey correct, Twat
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Nagilum

Well at least you get the additional hour for £400  :D

Good review, little too rich for my blood on a single punt but thank you  :hi: