Author Topic: SophieFylde, Lytham  (Read 9022 times)


9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5904222) (7 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline jono482

1st post , so go easy.

I saw her a few weeks ago and after reading another review about her and the possibility of BB , decided to post .

Comms : all done by text , she can be slow at replying , but did do eventually.
Looks etc : Great body, facially about a 7/10 , not stunning , it is definitely her in the AW profile pic.
The punt : Small bungalow on main road just outside Lytham , plenty of side streets for parking
                Sorted the paperwork  . I'll cut to the chase . After about 10-15 mins of foreplay , receiving
                OWO , rimming , FK . **I can catergorically state that there is no way she was going to stop
               me from barebacking her ** 
                I made my excuses and left .

               She charged £140 for 1 hour .
               Be warned , the previous post about BB is spot on .
   
External Link/Members Only
               
               

Offline Davey Dykes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,720
  • Likes: 31
  •  
  • Reviews: 119
Reads as complete shit stirring to me, I await to be proven wrong.

Offline Bikerman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 545
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
Lets see what she did to stop him from fucking her...so why pay £140 then walk ..must have money to burn.. if i had any doubts about bb i wont go.. but she is on my to do list  even if OWO and cum in mouth
Banned reason: Shitstiring troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jono482

Look , I said 'go easy' . Im giving people the heads up about issues with this individual.
If you want to ignore it , fine . Its not shit stirring , it is fact .

Offline Captain caveman 69

So you stood up with a raging hard on and fucked off ...I made my excuses and left what are you a news of the world reporter..... what a fooking pack of lies :diablo:

Offline jono482

News of the World , Fuck me , how old are you ? 80 ?
No , I just shagged her bareback ,  you prick .

Offline mexicola

1st post , so go easy.


It's actually your second post numpty, your first one was in 2019.

It's your first review in 5yrs of being a member.  :dash:
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 03:32:19 pm by mexicola »

Offline Puntaway

**I can catergorically state that there is no way she was going to stop
               me from barebacking her ** 
                I made my excuses and left .

Over the years I’ve developed a fool proof way of never getting caught out barebacking anyone. It’s really easy. All you do is - just before you stick your cock in, put a condom on it, whether she’s asking you to or not. Works every time for me. For SP’s and even Civis.

Offline Degsy101

True. Doesn't ring true and her profile clearly states she doesn't do bb. And in any case even if she does just wear a condom.

Offline Bikerman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 545
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
So you stood up with a raging hard on and fucked off ...I made my excuses and left what are you a news of the world reporter..... what a fooking pack of lies :diablo:
My thoughtd exactly.....
Banned reason: Shitstiring troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline OakTree

It does seem dubious to go and see someone that has allegations off BB going back to at least January, pay 140 quid then walk when he suspects she may go through with a BB service.


Offline yorkieyorkie

Yeah OP seems full of shit.

It’s a crappy read review anyway  :hi:

Offline jono482

And you wonder why fellas dont post reviews and comments on here .
Wish I hadn't bothered .
 
She is 100% a barebacker .

Go and fill your boots .

Offline Yakata


**I can catergorically state that there is no way she was going to stop me from barebacking her ** 
             

This statement doesn't make sense in the context of the rest of your post as the way it is worded, you are saying that you did bareback her but left her a negative review because of it.

Is that what you're saying?  If you did then the negative review makes no sense as that was obviously your decision and you went through with it. If you didn't then it contradicts the above statement (but then I take it, it was a typo).

Did you or did you not bareback her?

Offline oatcake1967

This statement doesn't make sense in the context of the rest of your post as the way it is worded, you are saying that you did bareback her but left her a negative review because of it.

Is that what you're saying?  If you did then the negative review makes no sense as that was obviously your decision and you went through with it. If you didn't then it contradicts the above statement (but then I take it, it was a typo).

Did you or did you not bareback her?

+1 I am also confused did you bareback her ??

Offline bdyno

This statement doesn't make sense in the context of the rest of your post as the way it is worded, you are saying that you did bareback her but left her a negative review because of it.

Is that what you're saying?  If you did then the negative review makes no sense as that was obviously your decision and you went through with it. If you didn't then it contradicts the above statement (but then I take it, it was a typo).

Did you or did you not bareback her?
It could also be read to mean that he was going to bareback her whether she wanted him to or not.

Offline OakTree

It is poorly worded and can read two ways. Either she was going to make him bareback her or she wasn’t going to stop him if she did. I’m presuming he meant the latter in that she was quite willing to let him.

By the sounds of it he didn’t go through with it so it really is his perception and not something that actually happened. I’ve had it where the girl has teased and you do think fuck, she’s not going to slip it in her is she? It’s part of the act and they’ve always rubbered up (well rubbered me up) when it got down to the fucking.

The OP sounds a bit of a drama queen and may well have read the situation wrong but going on her past history (Which begs the question why did he book her) she may well have let him.

Offline usroads

From the OP's review I'm actually wondering whether or not he actually fucked at all? Or just walked when BB became apparent?

Offline Access

News of the World , Fuck me , how old are you ? 80 ?
No , I just shagged her bareback ,  you prick .
He stayed here that he did actually bareback her?
But then made his excuses and left.
I smell BS.
Contradictory and unclear posts from the OP.
Unless he barebacked her, realises he’s probably in for a dose, then left in fear after letting his dick rule his brain.

Offline chrishornx

As someone who has seen her I have to say the review just reads wrong and reads like someone out to discredit the SP and his aggressive attitude his

nobody can ever unequivocally prove, either way, if an escort is a barebacker but when she visited me I purposefully asked her outright if she was ok with BB and she made it clear there was no chance. She was happy to walk until I explained I was just double checking because of a previous review

It seems odd that she wanted to BB this OP and was not going to take no for an answer and his attitude towards Caveman just seems wrong

I call this review as bullshit .

Offline Biscuit


nobody can ever unequivocally prove, either way, if an escort is a barebacker

They will prove it to themselves if if they bareback her  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 17, 2021, 09:58:18 am by Biscuit »

Offline chrishornx

They will prove it to themselves if if they bareback her  :rolleyes:

if 'her' is the SP who is They?

Offline bdyno

They will prove it to themselves if if they bareback her  :rolleyes:
But that doesn't prove it to anyone else.



Offline mexicola

if 'her' is the SP who is They?

"They" is the punter. It's how you conjugate the verb (that was a long time ago at school !)
« Last Edit: May 17, 2021, 12:32:53 pm by mexicola »

Offline CoolTiger

Reads as complete shit stirring to me, I await to be proven wrong.

She is definitely a Barebacker. Google her AW profile, it has been mentioned on a dedicated site for barebacking.


Offline Victor

I saw her a couple of months back and BB was never an issue in so far as I did not want it nor did she offer it.

Seems strange that she appears to have encouraged it.

Aside from that I found her service to be superb, a natural submissive who really did everything I asked.

Offline Access

I saw her a couple of months back and BB was never an issue in so far as I did not want it nor did she offer it.

Seems strange that she appears to have encouraged it.

Aside from that I found her service to be superb, a natural submissive who really did everything I asked.
A proper review would be helpful in these circumstances

Offline usroads

Hell - this girl is getting a shed load of publicity - guys who want to fuck her protected (to see if BB is offered) and guys who'd like to fuck her raw. Can see her prices at £200 ph soon

Offline bdyno

Hell - this girl is getting a shed load of publicity - guys who want to fuck her protected (to see if BB is offered) and guys who'd like to fuck her raw. Can see her prices at £200 ph soon
Mad isn't it!

At £140 I was tempted despite the allegations.  That extra tenner puts her at the absolute max I'd pay for anyone and I'm not convinced she's worth it.

And I know it's only a tenner, but it fits the same psychological theory of why so many things cost 99p...  That final step is always the big step which makes you question it a little bit more.

Offline Pussi



but when she visited me I purposefully asked her outright if she was ok with BB and she made it clear there was no chance. She was happy to walk until I explained I was just double checking because of a previous review .

Nobody asks upfront “are you ok with Bb” as a way of double checking unless you’re looking for that particular service

Offline usroads

I've read her AW Profile and all the UKP Reviews.
I reckon she's a very submissive "pleaser" - the client gets what the client wants - and in a steamy session I reckon a client could slip in raw with no problem. The first review of her going raw "in the heat of the moment" sits  correct in my mind.
Maybe anyone thinking of booking her, and licking her out, should go early in the day.  :rolleyes:

Offline chrishornx

Nobody asks upfront “are you ok with Bb” as a way of double checking unless you’re looking for that particular service

bollocks

 I did as I didn't want a BB anywhere near me so in texts I gently asked if it was on offer and her response was a definite no

Asking her to confirm she didn't BB would be of no use at all 

Offline mexicola

bollocks

 I did as I didn't want a BB anywhere near me so in texts I gently asked if it was on offer and her response was a definite no

Asking her to confirm she didn't BB would be of no use at all

How come you never reviewed her then ?


Offline Pussi

bollocks

 I did as I didn't want a BB anywhere near me so in texts I gently asked if it was on offer and her response was a definite no

Asking her to confirm she didn't BB would be of no use at all

Your post above mentions “when she visited me” , “she was ready to walk” which to me means she was already in your property for an outcall? Possibly. So the texts don’t matter.

If you didn’t want bb anywhere near you, you wouldn’t have booked her because she’s done bb before. Unless you met her before this whole debacle. Regardless of all that it’s pretty obvious that she maybe offering bb to clients that she likes, or when she gets get twat licked so you just take your chances.

Also what a terrible review by the OP

Offline chrishornx

Your post above mentions “when she visited me” , “she was ready to walk” which to me means she was already in your property for an outcall? Possibly. So the texts don’t matter.

If you didn’t want bb anywhere near you, you wouldn’t have booked her because she’s done bb before. Unless you met her before this whole debacle. Regardless of all that it’s pretty obvious that she maybe offering bb to clients that she likes, or when she gets get twat licked so you just take your chances.

Also what a terrible review by the OP

terms of phrase

when she visited me I asked her beforehand in text messages if she did BB and she was adamant she wouldn't and told me she wouldn't visit if I wanted it but I assured her I didn't ...so the texts did matter

my meet with her was before all this furore

Offline mexicola

terms of phrase

when she visited me I asked her beforehand in text messages if she did BB and she was adamant she wouldn't and told me she wouldn't visit if I wanted it but I assured her I didn't ...so the texts did matter

my meet with her was before all this furore

So before she was outed as a barebacker you were texting her asking about bareback ?   :lol:

nobody can ever unequivocally prove, either way, if an escort is a barebacker but when she visited me I purposefully asked her outright if she was ok with BB and she made it clear there was no chance. She was happy to walk until I explained I was just double checking because of a previous review

So which previous review  suggests she does bb before it all kicked off in the Dec 2020 thread ?
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=288898.0
« Last Edit: May 18, 2021, 11:09:17 am by mexicola »

Offline Billbo53

now she put it up to £150 lol Taking the piss

Offline gazmac2020

I have nobbed her a while ago, and she was going to let me slip it in un protected...

There were jonnies on the side, and i almost got carried away with my cock on her lips....

Offline usroads

Your review would have been appreciated - Positive or Negative - you say which

Offline mexicola

There are 3 punters in this thread who have met her but not left reviews.  :dash:


- Victor who didnt ask for bb, or her offer bb

- Gazmac2020 who felt bb was going to happen, but covered up at the last moment

- Chrishornx who asked Sophie for bb  before she was outed as a bb girl, but she refused it


The more reports the murkier the story gets on Sophie
« Last Edit: May 18, 2021, 04:21:08 pm by mexicola »

Offline usroads

SP's openly advertising bareback are well documented in the UKP Regions
I reckon we need an ongoing topic "UTC Barebackers"
Sophie's top of the list

Offline Captain caveman 69

No wonder she's put her prices up all this free publicity  :D

Offline chrishornx

There are 3 punters in this thread who have met her but not left reviews.  :dash:


- Victor who didnt ask for bb, or her offer bb

- Gazmac2020 who felt bb was going to happen, but covered up at the last moment

- Chrishornx who asked Sophie for bb  before she was outed as a bb girl, but she refused it


The more reports the murkier the story gets on Sophie

careful Mexico don't go misquoting me There is subtle but important difference between what I did which was to ask if she did BB and a person asking her for BB

Had she said yes I would have not seen her


there was a solitary mention that she might do BB so I needed to check before seeing her as I would never entertain a barebacker hence why I phrased  the question as I did

as you feel the more reports make the case murkier it is a good job the 3 you name didn't do reports

Offline gazmac2020

There are 3 punters in this thread who have met her but not left reviews.  :dash:


- Victor who didnt ask for bb, or her offer bb

- Gazmac2020 who felt bb was going to happen, but covered up at the last moment

- Chrishornx who asked Sophie for bb  before she was outed as a bb girl, but she refused it


The more reports the murkier the story gets on Sophie

Yup agreed, and one of them, "I was gonna do it" and didnt !   :diablo: :diablo: :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:
« Last Edit: May 18, 2021, 08:36:56 pm by CoolTiger »

Offline Pussi

SP's openly advertising bareback are well documented in the UKP Regions
I reckon we need an ongoing topic "UTC Barebackers"
Sophie's top of the list

No one would “out” a UTC BBer since they would keep the WG to himself and enjoy BB meets whilst all the other sad punters get covered. Little did he know the WG most likely is offering BB to others...

Also a UTC Barebackers thread/topic would go into the hundred of pages. Most WGs are UTC BBers so that would mean most members (including mods) here have visited BB escorts.

Offline CoolTiger

No one would “out” a UTC BBer since they would keep the WG to himself and enjoy BB meets whilst all the other sad punters get covered. Little did he know the WG most likely is offering BB to others...

Also a UTC Barebackers thread/topic would go into the hundred of pages. Most WGs are UTC BBers so that would mean most members (including mods) here have visited BB escorts.

Why sad?

you have been here for 5 year, so care to back up?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2021, 12:57:15 am by CoolTiger »

Offline usroads

No one would “out” a UTC BBer since they would keep the WG to himself and enjoy BB meets whilst all the other sad punters get covered. Little did he know the WG most likely is offering BB to others...

Also a UTC Barebackers thread/topic would go into the hundred of pages. Most WGs are UTC BBers so that would mean most members (including mods) here have visited BB escorts.
Ahhh OK - glad we got that cleared up.
I find it strange that Sophie's got Anal listed in her Likes and none of the reviewers mention fucking her up the arse.

Offline Yakata

Ahhh OK - glad we got that cleared up.
I find it strange that Sophie's got Anal listed in her Likes and none of the reviewers mention fucking her up the arse.

Personally I'm not arsed (excuse te pun) about taking a girl up the arse. Definitely not a SP anyway. I've done it with other women which satisfied the 'desire'. So just not bothered about it really.