Author Topic: Welsh Brunette - Cardiff  (Read 10879 times)


85 review(s) for Welsh_Brunette (83 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Lickster42

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location Cardiff
Price £160 (including £20 for CIM)
Services FK, 69, OWO, Missionary, Doggie & CIM

I had met Georgia a while ago during a duo with Lileth, I recalled her to be a real looker and an amazing kisser so had wanted to meet her again. I don't punt very often and try to be as choosy as I can. Anyway my recent meet up happened recently just as lockdown rules eased somewhat!

The place is a modern flat in the Bay near the Red Dragon centre. There is visitor parking on the estate but apparently parking will become difficult but parking across the road and nearby should be Ok.

On arrival I was buzed into th complex. Upon entering the room paperwork sorting was requested, all done and took a shower. I joined Georgia on the bed. Georgia has put on  some weight since last time, I would say she is a size 12/14 and had not made much of an effort other then a bit of eye liner, freckles and blemishes were quite clear. Georgia is a nice enough looking girl but I did expect a more presentation, am I being too picky?

I was looking forward to DFK so we went straight to that, immediately I noticed a slight stale, smoker's taste. She could have at least used some mouthwash and if she did it was not enough. Then moved on to OWO, she is very good at this however there was no eye contact and I asked for it but was very limited, a bit disappointed at the lack of eye contact. I asked for balling licking which she was happy to do. Onto 69, she has a sweet tasting pussy so this went for a while. We then revered back to DFK, with the taste of pussy in my mouth the stale taste was countered. During the DFK I fingered her with two digits and she played with the old boy. Onto covered sex several positions, smacked her arse a frew times during doggie.

I wanted her on knees for further OWO which she readily obliged, it got a bit dry so had to ask her to spit , plenty of ball licking again after asking but still no eye contact!

By now I was ready to cum so onto the bed, she swallowed it all like a gooden! I needed a break so had a quick shower and a drink of pop , which I had brought myself.

After about 15mins of chat I told her that we should move onto round two, after a bit of OWO the boy was in "semi mode". I asked her lick my balls again while I started to wank myself, I moved myself up a bit and although she didn't rim she came quite close. After about 10-15mins of OWO, balls licking etc I was ready to come but this time she didn't go for the CIM although I said that I was ready. I ended up jizzing over my stomach. A bit disappointing as I had paid for this extra, perhaps she wanted double payment for two CIM's?

Although this was a decent punt my neutral rating is based on the stale/smoking breath , not much effort by way make up, a bit plump, lack of eye contact during OWO and the 2nd CIM was not delivered.

Overall Georgia is a nice enough girl but this will be my last time with her.

« Last Edit: April 14, 2021, 06:24:52 pm by CoolTiger »

Offline ValleyMan73




Offline Grumpy Pumpy

Wow, a very surprising read. I've seen WB several times and always enjoyed excellent service. And found her to be good looking and in good shape. But, clearly, I've not seen her for over a year.

She's been one of the most consistent SPs around. It would be a shame if this had changed. Selfishly, I hope this was just a blip. Though, of course, it's still disapointing for Lickster

Offline justalad

Wow, a very surprising read. I've seen WB several times and always enjoyed excellent service. And found her to be good looking and in good shape. But, clearly, I've not seen her for over a year.

She's been one of the most consistent SPs around. It would be a shame if this had changed. Selfishly, I hope this was just a blip. Though, of course, it's still disapointing for Lickster
Echo the above.  Have not seen Georgia for a couple of years but she was on point when I last saw her delivering a good a service as ever.

Lockdown does strange things and maybe she’s had a blip with diet / exercise.

Also surprised to see that there was a taste of smoke indicating her being a smoker as I’ve not picked this up previously.  A BJ whilst she smokes would be a big turn on for me!

Offline justalad

First neutral in 7 years!  Fair play to the OP for providing an honest assessment of a well reviewed SP.

Offline justalad

Hopefully Georgia hasn’t lost plot following this review, her profile has now been removed from AW.

Offline Sticky2336

Had a booking with Georgia around 2weeks ago and while I appreciate the OP remarks on his encounter, I can only go on what my booking was like. Georgia has always had the highest of hygiene standards when I have seen her, as for her suggested weight gain I complemented on her appearance and thought she had actually lost a little. The service was as good as it's always been and that's why I keep going back.
Probably seen her around a dozen or more times over the last few years.
Good VFM and a good shag.

Offline Wignallsway

Hopefully Georgia hasn’t lost plot following this review, her profile has now been removed from AW.
Before I start I have never seen WB. I would imagine that a review like the one by the OP would damage the confidence/mental fragility of any girl doing this job. He has a right to post a review and that’s what we are all on here for, but some things are best not said. These girls are humans just like us and we don’t have a clue what’s going on in their lives. We have all had a tough year, but the pandemic has taken the bread out of some of these girls mouths, depression and anxiety can set in. I’m sure that some of the other girls are in the same situation, even more self conscience after putting on an extra few pounds. So let’s not be too harsh on them.

Offline justalad

Before I start I have never seen WB. I would imagine that a review like the one by the OP would damage the confidence/mental fragility of any girl doing this job. He has a right to post a review and that’s what we are all on here for, but some things are best not said. These girls are humans just like us and we don’t have a clue what’s going on in their lives. We have all had a tough year, but the pandemic has taken the bread out of some of these girls mouths, depression and anxiety can set in. I’m sure that some of the other girls are in the same situation, even more self conscience after putting on an extra few pounds. So let’s not be too harsh on them.
Can you see anywhere where I have stated anything harsh?

Covid has affected lots of people in lots of different ways.  My statement was hopefully WB hasn’t lost the plot following this review.  She’s been a great SP when I have seen her and there’ll be no complaints from me and if she did do a smoking fetish meet, I’d be there tomorrow.


Offline Brewmaster13


Offline Wignallsway

Can you see anywhere where I have stated anything harsh?

Covid has affected lots of people in lots of different ways.  My statement was hopefully WB hasn’t lost the plot following this review.  She’s been a great SP when I have seen her and there’ll be no complaints from me and if she did do a smoking fetish meet, I’d be there tomorrow.

This wasn’t a go at you, I was referring to the OP. Your comment was more of a concern for her, which is the right thing to say. Sorry for the confusion.

Offline justalad

This wasn’t a go at you, I was referring to the OP. Your comment was more of a concern for her, which is the right thing to say. Sorry for the confusion.
Lickster42 is more than entitled to post the review, the first neutral for the SP in 7 years.

He paid £160.00 and didn’t get the service he received previously.  It’s not a vindictive or vicious neutral, he’s given an honest overview of the service / looks he received from the SP on the day.

Offline Punting_Mad

She has posted a rebuttle to the review... Ouch!

Offline Wignallsway

Lockster42 does have the right to voice his opinion, but using phrases like fat isn’t right. This isn’t his first review that he has savaged a girl rightly or wrongly, in fact having to change his username because of his past reviews says a lot to me. These reviews can destroy a SPs reputation just based on one guys review. :dash:

Offline Wignallsway


Offline Punting_Mad


Offline justalad

Where is this ?
AW.  It’s a fair response from Georgia as you would expect given she has always been pretty straight either 1-2-1 or online.

Stating her size remains an 8 - 10 which is fair as a post from a OP says that he saw he recently and she’d not put any weight on and also that she doesn’t smoke (I’ve never got any scent of this and nor have countless others).

OP, what’s your thoughts?

Offline justalad


Offline Pendraig

I tend to agree, like all OP,s posts on here there subjective to that particular OP, at that time and place, I think what we need to take in is consistent poor reviews, and poor service,

Although I haven’t seen WB for a good while, I never had her down as a smoker, possibly taken it up again, who knows? May be she’s got a little complacent, but for me she’s one of the better ones in South Wales.

Offline Bonio

I saw her a few years ago and the OP can say whatever they feel. It was his money after all.

My punt with her was by no means the best I've ever had. I think the reviews on here have perhaps raised expectations a little far.

Offline Wignallsway

Great response from WB. As I suspected getting trolled on a platform like this is far too easy. As I said in a previous post there is a reason why the OP changed his username.....the mods should look at his previous posts under both usernames and see if his posts contain the same themes.

Offline Grumpy Pumpy

Fair rebuttal from WB.

I go by weight of evidence and, most of all personal experience. On both counts WB remains close to the top of my list of SPs I plan to see as restrictions ease.

And I imagine that will be case for quite a few others.

Offline martypoos

I paid a visit to WB with Lilith yesterday (review to follow) and for me she hasn’t changed at all, still gives a great service and looks fantastic.
Banned reason: Boundary pusher
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bonio

If I were WB I would remove the rebuttal from AW.

Offline Wignallsway

If I were WB I would remove the rebuttal from AW.

Why shouldn’t she defend herself. It’s the OPs post that should be removed or at least an apology.

Offline welshwaspy

Great to hear - how was the duo? I've booked them for Thursday morning?

Offline Bonio

Why shouldn’t she defend herself. It’s the OPs post that should be removed or at least an apology.

I'll ignore the removed/apology bit as that makes you look like a whiteknight to be honest.

Look up the Streisand effect. It (sort of) applies here. She is trying to counter a review on UKP, using AW. Only drawing attention to it. If I only used AW I wouldn't be aware of it. And it would certainly put me off if there was some 'unknown' negative being raised.

If I was on UKP, then I'd read 47 - 1 - 0 and make up my own mind. There are plenty of rebuttals from those who've used her.

Offline Grumpy Pumpy

I'll ignore the removed/apology bit as that makes you look like a whiteknight to be honest.

Look up the Streisand effect. It (sort of) applies here. She is trying to counter a review on UKP, using AW. Only drawing attention to it. If I only used AW I wouldn't be aware of it. And it would certainly put me off if there was some 'unknown' negative being raised.

If I was on UKP, then I'd read 47 - 1 - 0 and make up my own mind. There are plenty of rebuttals from those who've used her.

Interesting view Bonio. Which I think has a lot of merit. Objectively it may well make more sense to ignore it and let it blow over. But I guess that the instinctive desire to defend oneself is very strong. And understandable

Offline Bonio

Interesting view Bonio. Which I think has a lot of merit. Objectively it may well make more sense to ignore it and let it blow over. But I guess that the instinctive desire to defend oneself is very strong. And understandable

You can totally understand it - human factors always in the equation.

If you can remove that though, AW is a much bigger platform (no offence UKP) with a much lower bounce rate and much longer average user time. Transferring the details of a review from UKP to there is not sensible. Much better to ring-fence it and let it play out over here where the punters will actually provide a robust defence for her.

Offline Dan Dastardly

How can she do a rebuttal if her profile is not active ?

Offline Bonio

How can she do a rebuttal if her profile is not active ?

Sounds like a technical question. My point is I wouldn't advise answering a review made on UKP on a much bigger platform like AW.

Whether the SP can answer it on UKP or not is a separate issue.

Offline justalad

How can she do a rebuttal if her profile is not active ?
Profile now active.

Offline Steelworker

All very bizarre. Weight of evidence plus personal experience of many visits means WB still will be one I’ll go see first when I resume.

Offline Wignallsway

I’m no white knight, it’s just that “experienced” posters on here defending the OP when the majority of guys on here as you have said know the truth. The OP was taken on his word and that soon became fact ..shame on you.

Offline Bonio

All very bizarre. Weight of evidence plus personal experience of many visits means WB still will be one I’ll go see first when I resume.

Horses for courses I suppose. I think I saw her around the same time as I saw Sapphire - and clicked much better with her. Others then got pissed around by Sapphire and she upped her prices. So they'd have a different viewpoint. Sapphire 9.5/10 on the day. WB 7.5/10 so it was good, not great.


Offline Bonio

I’m no white knight, it’s just that “experienced” posters on here defending the OP when the majority of guys on here as you have said know the truth. The OP was taken on his word and that soon became fact ..shame on you.

I think you may be a little bit too senstive for this forum.

Offline iverthickone

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,816
  • Likes: 21
  •  
  • Reviews: 79
I think you may be a little bit too senstive for this forum.

Totally agree with you Bonio.

I have seen WB a lot.  I don't think she is overweight in the slightest, and I have never smelt smoke or seen any fags anywhere.  Personally I think she gives a cracking service, and have said so on here before.

She has the right to defend herself, as has the OP to make his comments, as have others to make their own minds up on the weight of all the info on this thread and others.  I do agree her pointing it out may be counter-productive too though, though they do say there is no such thing as bad publicity!

My concern is Wignallsway is coming across as at best naive, at worst a WK.  This forum is for views mate, a lot of which I can promise you you won't agree with - deal with it or don't log in.

Offline Wignallsway

Totally agree with you Bonio.

I have seen WB a lot.  I don't think she is overweight in the slightest, and I have never smelt smoke or seen any fags anywhere.  Personally I think she gives a cracking service, and have said so on here before.

She has the right to defend herself, as has the OP to make his comments, as have others to make their own minds up on the weight of all the info on this thread and others.  I do agree her pointing it out may be counter-productive too though, though they do say there is no such thing as bad publicity!

My concern is Wignallsway is coming across as at best naive, at worst a WK.  This forum is for views mate, a lot of which I can promise you you won't agree with - deal with it or don't log in.

I have made salient points regarding the OP whose comments have turned out to be lies in an attempt to destroy this girl as he has done in the past under Ser Davos with others. You then get seasoned posters praising him for his honesty !!! I am airing my views which a lot of you seem to have problems with. You state that there is no such thing as bad publicity, yes you are right in certain cases... but I don’t think so in this case.... who would happy to see someone who is fat, smokes, not made up and shows little interest, when they were expecting the exact opposite ...Jesus wept  :dash:

Offline Bonio

Totally agree with you Bonio.

I have seen WB a lot.  I don't think she is overweight in the slightest, and I have never smelt smoke or seen any fags anywhere.  Personally I think she gives a cracking service, and have said so on here before.

She has the right to defend herself, as has the OP to make his comments, as have others to make their own minds up on the weight of all the info on this thread and others.  I do agree her pointing it out may be counter-productive too though, though they do say there is no such thing as bad publicity!

My concern is Wignallsway is coming across as at best naive, at worst a WK.  This forum is for views mate, a lot of which I can promise you you won't agree with - deal with it or don't log in.

I agree 100% with you.

Although posters like Wignallsway are fantastic. To utter "shame on you" on a website for punters that pay to fuck prostitutes is gold dust and I look forward to many more contributions (when nanny allows).

Offline Wignallsway

I see that the South Wales keyboard warrior possie is circling....shame on you. Someone has a go at “one of your own” and all his mates attack you. I suppose it’s easy to do that from your pc.

Offline Bonio

I see that the South Wales keyboard warrior possie is circling....shame on you. Someone has a go at “one of your own” and all his mates attack you. I suppose it’s easy to do that from your pc.

People are actually offering you advice, no keyboard warrior-ing taking place that I can see. You just seem intent on protecting the honour of an SP that you haven't seen apparently.

You've said the OP's review should be removed and he should apologise. Why?

Even the people that have a different viewpoint haven't suggested that. Classic WK behaviour and some people are quite kindly suggesting that you take a step away from it.


Offline val33

You can excuse the comments on being size 12-14 as size is subjective - my ex was a size 14 on bottom but easily looked like a 10 to me, I was always in amazement of her actual size. My current partner is 10 on top but looks much bigger, looks like a 12/14. Men in general are clueless about women's clothing size. Comments on smoker's breath... that's an easy lie to spot, she's never smoked.

Offline Dan Dastardly

You can excuse the comments on being size 12-14 as size is subjective - my ex was a size 14 on bottom but easily looked like a 10 to me, I was always in amazement of her actual size. My current partner is 10 on top but looks much bigger, looks like a 12/14. Men in general are clueless about women's clothing size. Comments on smoker's breath... that's an easy lie to spot, she's never smoked.
Who has never smoked ?

Offline Dan Dastardly

You can excuse the comments on being size 12-14 as size is subjective - my ex was a size 14 on bottom but easily looked like a 10 to me, I was always in amazement of her actual size. My current partner is 10 on top but looks much bigger, looks like a 12/14. Men in general are clueless about women's clothing size. Comments on smoker's breath... that's an easy lie to spot, she's never smoked.
Who has never smoked ?

Offline Pendraig

On reflection, and reading the OP’s review, from memory WB is not just a non-smoker, but most definitely an anti-smoker, makes me question the validity of the review,

I think this is one of those threads that will keep going for a while,  :dash:

Offline Wignallsway

On reflection, and reading the OP’s review, from memory WB is not just a non-smoker, but most definitely an anti-smoker, makes me question the validity of the review,

I think this is one of those threads that will keep going for a while,  :dash:

Hallelujah  :dance btw I’m no white knight

Offline justalad

Hallelujah  :dance btw I’m no white knight
You are coming across as a WK.  Pendraig didn’t write the review, it was written by a OP. 

Offline Wignallsway

You are coming across as a WK.  Pendraig didn’t write the review, it was written by a OP.

Get over yourself. You was the poster who congratulated the OP with his review, and once WB posted on AW you quickly back tracked. Grow a pair and don’t just agree with someone who has a dubious past in his reviews. Challenge him, like other posters have, otherwise this forum becomes a site for idiots like him saying what he wants and getting away with murder.   :wacko: