Author Topic: Rupali indian, Heathrow - aged aunty with average service  (Read 2316 times)


2 review(s) for Rupali Indian (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by puntingpumping1920]

Offline Strike101

Saw Rupali around 4 weeks ago.

Comms: pretty good. Responded via aw and then text. Arranged a meet for around 3pm.

Location : temp apartment near Heathrow.

Venue : basic single room. She made me stand outside for a few minutes. Then again once i was in the building. This got pretty annoying. At one point i asked her what her problem is. She apologised and stated she had to be sure im not a relative of some sort.

Chick: wore a saree to greet me. She has definitely aged. I would say early 40s. Saggy stomach. Decent breasts. She was probably a looker 10-15 years ago but a bit too aged for my liking.

Service: paid for 45m. Dfk. Owo. Several positions

Action: started with some deep fk with tongue. Then good owo with plenty of spit. Followed by mish, riding, doggy. She was pretty loose but fairly responsive. Finished me off with owo. Cleaned me up. Chatted for a bit. Then out the door

Overall: tough to judge. I didnt really find her attractive on account of her saggy bod (probably size 14-16). Face was decent. 5/10 body. 6/10 face. Service was above average. If you want to see an indian woman who probably looks like the indian chick whos been working in your office for the last 20 years then she might be your cup of tea. I can't give her a negative because she can't really do much about her looks (other than hit the gym). Service was decent so I'm gonna go with a neutral. I wouldn't book again

External Link/Members Only

Offline advent2016

Profile gone.
Some pictures would have been nice.

Offline Strike101

Profile gone.
Some pictures would have been nice.
She takes it down on days shes not working

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,272
  • Likes: 68
  •  
  • Reviews: 135
What age did her profile say?

I think it was much younger than early 40s.

Either way her pics don't represent what you saw IIRC.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2021, 12:56:20 pm by JonasG »

Offline Junkyardgrunze

What age did her profile say?

I think it was much younger than early 40s.

Either way her pics don't represent what you saw IIRC.

Her profile states she is 29 and the photos seem to be around the age. That means she is either uploaded very old photos or fake photos.

Offline Strike101

What age did her profile say?

I think it was much younger than early 40s.

Either way her pics don't represent what you saw IIRC.

She claims to be 29. I'm pretty sure she's crossed 40 mate but obviously not 100%.
The photos could conceivably be her but they're definitely old



Offline Diggler fights back!

OP are the photos accurate?

Read carefully, to quote OP

She claims to be 29. I'm pretty sure she's crossed 40 mate but obviously not 100%.
The photos could conceivably be her but they're definitely old.

Offline darkknightrises

Read carefully, to quote OP

She claims to be 29. I'm pretty sure she's crossed 40 mate but obviously not 100%.
The photos could conceivably be her but they're definitely old.

Her Profile had  31 years old yesterday .... Maybe she thinks she is Benjamin Button   :unknown:.

Offline Diggler fights back!

Her Profile had  31 years old yesterday .... Maybe she thinks she is Benjamin Button   :unknown:.

The mysterious case of BB is common place with working girls. I normally go with the expectation of them being 10yrs older then stated age. Some of them take the ultimate piss and put down 20yrs less. AW should regulate it’s advertisers a lot more. They do very little to help.

Offline advent2016

She takes it down on days shes(sic) not working

yes, I get that but it's polite to attach photos to a review or a link to them if they've been posted before. Thanks to others who have. :)

Looking at her COF/CIM/SWA prices, she's not for me, I prefer a single fee based on the time and not the service.
I find her NBA statement a bit worrying and disingenuous
« Last Edit: April 10, 2021, 01:07:06 pm by advent2016 »