Sweet Chantelle - Bermondsey - Professionally handled

[DocJohnson]

External Link/Members Only

So after so many good reviews against her name, I decided to take a dip in Chantelle.  I plumped for £110 for 1 hr.  In summary, she was good - approaching very good - but we lacked a spark and she came across as a sex worker who is just doing her job, rather than a nymph who genuinely (or pretends) to enjoy the business. Admittedly YMMV and further visits might yield a better vibe. 

Comms
Great. All done by text. Reassuringly timely and responsive. Same day booking. Excellent English.

Location
As described by other reviewers, this is not a great general area. I wouldn’t have enjoyed visiting in the dark but my understanding is that Chantelle keeps daytime hours so this should not be a real concern.  On the plus side - plentiful parking available (up to 4hrs) for free in the daytime, nearby (5 min walk).

Venue
Apartment in a tired council tower block. Temperamental shower, creaky/load floor boards but otherwise fit for purpose. Accessible by lift. Other reviews mention specific entrance doors to walk through etc, so I followed those and with Chantelle’s instructions all was well.

Chantelle
Well described by others here but my suggestion is not to interpret the many positives to mean she is a total stunner. In my subjective opinion she looked like a 30 something healthy weight, average height, fake titted blonde girl with a slight Simona Halep look to her.  Not petite, not tall, not chubby. I would say in my visit she was not the most welcoming/cheery SP but she did feel like one of the most professional. That could be good or bad, depending on what you’re after. My subjective DJ rating for the package: 7/10.

Action
Welcomed and asked how long I wanted to stay (although had confirmed an hour previously). Offered shower (which C had to “set up”) and given clean towels.

On return from shower, asked what I wanted. Confirmed my hope was two pops in the booking from a combination of oral and sex (some oral covered and some oral uncovered) with CIM if she was lucky for my second orgasm.

All delivered competently, if not with passion. I did not want kissing. I felt she didn’t try and pretend/feign any enjoyment throughout but occasionally made an encouraging sound or two.  We conversed well and in my meet her general attitude/demeanour was one of going through the motions but admittedly with some technical skill.

The blowjob technique is gentle but with reasonable depth and persistence to please me.  No toothiness.  There was no rushing at all which is always a positive.  I was the one to request sex after starting with just over 5 mins of covered oral.

Chantelle let me lead and we transitioned to sex in various positions. This was good but in prone she unnaturally kept her face off the bed (it looked uncomfortable) so as to preserve her make-up / the sheets.  A little reminder that she was not exactly lost in any throws of passion and didn’t pretend to be either.

She served me well though and I admire her for delivering everything requested without any issue.   One pop by way of sex (I think in CG) and then one by way of OWO with CIM.  I felt relieved.

Overall DJ rating
7 or 7.5/10   

Will I repeat?
Possibly. She’s not the most convenient location for me and because I was not wowed I am unlikely to go out of my way now I have scratched the itch.  However, a useful plan B and she might make the roster as a fluffer on my 5 SP incalls in a day mission.

[webpunter]

For me the location & venue are important criteria
A superb place adds to the whole experience
Rare & usually comes with pricier burds
Most gaffs are average, which is both expected & fine
I'm more concerned with the area than what the accomo is like
Will give this burd a swerve
Crap venues detract big style for me
Edit: bold:  The risks of punting in council tower blocks are well documented on here 
Dunno why burds, who must make a few quid, don't bother investing in a better gaff
Paying just a bit more rent
They must have punters who rock up, get the jitters & decide to abandon the visit
Or those who brave it, their knob in charge, don't even consider a repeat visit
Plenty more fish in the AWank pond
Thanks for the intel, HL is -1
UKP at its finest 

Location
As described by other reviewers, this is not a great general area

Venue
Apartment in a tired council tower block.

[tantraman]

... she looked like a 30 something healthy weight, average height, fake titted blonde girl with a slight Simona Halep look to her.  Not petite, not tall, not chubby.

... body as per photos collected here

[DocJohnson]

For me the location & venue are important criteria
A superb place adds to the whole experience
Rare & usually comes with pricier burds
Most gaffs are average, which is both expected & fine
I'm more concerned with the area than what the accomo is like
Will give this burd a swerve
Crap venues detract big style for me
Edit: bold:  The risks of punting in council tower blocks are well documented on here 
Dunno why burds, who must make a few quid, don't bother investing in a better gaff
Paying just a bit more rent
They must have punters who rock up, get the jitters & decide to abandon the visit
Or those who brave it, their knob in charge, don't even consider a repeat visit
Plenty more fish in the AWank pond
Thanks for the intel, HL is -1
UKP at its finest 

I’m glad the review was useful to you WP. I have similar feelings regarding location/venue as you do. Venue doesn’t need to be a palace or high-end, just functional and clean and not seem like a drug den.  Smarter is better and for the sake of a few quid more on rent, SPs and punters would reap the dividends. £200 more on rent per month (<£50/week) would I guess very easily pay for itself by attracting repeat customers or less aborted visits from people who don’t like the look of a dingy place/location when they arrive.

The location on the other hand really ought to feel safe, accessible (e.g. nearby parking and you don’t need to practise orienteering to find it..) and preferably discreet. 

This is why I’ve been choosing to separate venue and location in my reviews so that Members like you can make a more informed decision. Chuffed it is paying off!!

Of course, we could get into the debate as to where punters should feel safe but generally a council tower block IMO is towards the lower end of my safety tolerance. Everyone has the right to take a different opinion though, just like how gorge they think the SP is.

 

[bedhedred]

I have visited her council block loads of times and I feel perfectly safe returning.

[lillythesavage]

I have visited her council block loads of times and I feel perfectly safe returning.

I don,t understand these comments either, London has very few of the shady places it had 30 years ago, and even then there was nowhere I was worried about going and there is not now.

Canning Town I see mentioned as a no go place at night, pre lockdown it was a tourist hotbed with the amount of cheap hotels and restaurants. None of them were getting mugged lol.

[DocJohnson]

I have visited her council block loads of times and I feel perfectly safe returning.

To be clear, I wouldn’t not go back to see Chantelle because of location now I’ve already been.

However, I probably would have thought twice about going in first place if I’d seen it from outside before making the booking.  Maybe I’m just not as comfortable outside the leafy suburbs as many others might be.   

Still, the tower block wasn’t enough to put me off in the day time once I got there.  And, as per my review and AW, Chantelle keeps daytime hours so visiting at night isn’t even an option. 

[JPin]

I don,t understand these comments either, London has very few of the shady places it had 30 years ago, and even then there was nowhere I was worried about going and there is not now.

Canning Town I see mentioned as a no go place at night, pre lockdown it was a tourist hotbed with the amount of cheap hotels and restaurants. None of them were getting mugged lol.

Yeah, but a myriad factors that play into how safe/comfortable some people feel in certain parts of the city; where you're from, your general confidence, whether you can handle yourself/how street-wise you are ... etc etc... London is way safer than it used to be for sure, but that doesn't mean it necessarily feels safe to everyone. I grew up on a council estate and spent a lot of my childhood in pretty rough parts of south London, so there isn't much that fazes me, especially now I'm much older. But I know that's not the case for every bloke traveling around the city on a punt.

[webpunter]

The intel is very informative

Dingy gaffs just don't do it for me
Back in the day i would rock up & knew it was gonna be average at best, probably worse
Knob in charge
Edit:  I was rarely wrong

IMO there is deffo a correlation between a dingy gaff & a dingy burd
Not always but mostly
I just don't do these anymore

I’m glad the review was useful to you WP. I have similar feelings regarding location/venue as you do. Venue doesn’t need to be a palace or high-end, just functional and clean and not seem like a drug den.  Smarter is better and for the sake of a few quid more on rent, SPs and punters would reap the dividends. £200 more on rent per month (<£50/week) would I guess very easily pay for itself by attracting repeat customers or less aborted visits from people who don’t like the look of a dingy place/location when they arrive.

The location on the other hand really ought to feel safe, accessible (e.g. nearby parking and you don’t need to practise orienteering to find it..) and preferably discreet. 

This is why I’ve been choosing to separate venue and location in my reviews so that Members like you can make a more informed decision. Chuffed it is paying off!!

Of course, we could get into the debate as to where punters should feel safe but generally a council tower block IMO is towards the lower end of my safety tolerance. Everyone has the right to take a different opinion though, just like how gorge they think the SP is.