Horny-Hannah - Glasgow

[PR67]

External Link/Members Only

Had a half hour in call a couple of weeks ago. £80.

I questioned to myself whether or not the pics were actually her. She's didn't look all that different body shape wise, arse maybe wasn't as impressive as in the pics, but she had massive tattoos that should be visible in the pics but aren't, maybe they're just old pics.

She started off with going to put a condom on for OW. I said I wanted OWO but she said she didn't do this. I know that's a lie but not going to argue. Her OW was actually pretty good to be fair.

Went down on her for RO. No bad smell but she didn't taste the freshest, a little sweaty.

I ask her to go on top first and she refuses because my cock is too big. Fuck me, here we go I thought. I'm fairly happy with my cock size but I'm not exactly slinging it over my shoulder.

She lies on her back and tells me I can't lift her legs up. She positions herself at such an angle that I can't really get in fully. It's not really doing anything for me so after a few minutes I ask her for doggy so I can get a proper look at her arse and fuck her deeper. "Don't do doggy". Fuck off. I can take 1 position rule in a 15 minute quickie but I'm not spending half an hour fucking her in missionary when I can't even get it fully in. I start to lose interest and my hard on. She ends up wanking me off to finish. Was back in the car after 20 minutes.

Really disappointed with this punt, had much higher hopes walking in.

[The dicker]

That’s disappointing as her pics do look good

[David1970]

Thanks for the review, sounds like a nightmare.

[mr small]

Another one off the to do list 

 

[The dicker]

External Link/Members Only

Had a half hour in call a couple of weeks ago. £80.

I questioned to myself whether or not the pics were actually her. She's didn't look all that different body shape wise, arse maybe wasn't as impressive as in the pics, but she had massive tattoos that should be visible in the pics but aren't, maybe they're just old pics.

She started off with going to put a condom on for OW. I said I wanted OWO but she said she didn't do this. I know that's a lie but not going to argue. Her OW was actually pretty good to be fair.

Went down on her for RO. No bad smell but she didn't taste the freshest, a little sweaty.

I ask her to go on top first and she refuses because my cock is too big. Fuck me, here we go I thought. I'm fairly happy with my cock size but I'm not exactly slinging it over my shoulder.

She lies on her back and tells me I can't lift her legs up. She positions herself at such an angle that I can't really get in fully. It's not really doing anything for me so after a few minutes I ask her for doggy so I can get a proper look at her arse and fuck her deeper. "Don't do doggy". Fuck off. I can take 1 position rule in a 15 minute quickie but I'm not spending half an hour fucking her in missionary when I can't even get it fully in. I start to lose interest and my hard on. She ends up wanking me off to finish. Was back in the car after 20 minutes.

Really disappointed with this punt, had much higher hopes walking in.

What is she like facially?

[Don-Pedro]

Out of interest what is your size, pal?

[GlasgowMan]

Good review, good info
mikemole (well known member) gave her a positive so maybe you got her on a bad day.

[PR67]

What is she like facially?

She was alright looking facially. Not ugly but not stunning, maybe a 6 or 7 out of 10. Weirdly I felt like I recognised her.

[PR67]

Out of interest what is your size, pal?

Haha. I like to round it up to 8 inches and I've got decent girth too. Big enough to refuse anal without being marked down in a review but not doggy or on her on top.

[PR67]

Good review, good info
mikemole (well known member) gave her a positive so maybe you got her on a bad day.

I'd been trying to book her just before his review went up and my meet took place not long after I read his review, one of the reasons my expectations were higher walking in. Also knew that she was lying about no OWO because of that review, apart from the fact OWO is on her likes list. His review was just a blow and go though. Based on her OW, if i'd have gotten OWO and it stopped there it may have been positive.

Wouldn't mind Mikemole commenting and saying if she had tattoos on her legs as I just read his review again and I don't remember the dyed red hair. Feel pretty stupid for not remembering her hair colour but it didn't stick in the mind. Now wondering if I got someone else.

[mikemole]

Good review, good info
mikemole (well known member) gave her a positive so maybe you got her on a bad day.

Or perhaps I got her on a good day.  Either way, inconsistent service is not acceptable.

[mikemole]

I'd been trying to book her just before his review went up and my meet took place not long after I read his review, one of the reasons my expectations were higher walking in. Also knew that she was lying about no OWO because of that review, apart from the fact OWO is on her likes list. His review was just a blow and go though. Based on her OW, if i'd have gotten OWO and it stopped there it may have been positive.

Wouldn't mind Mikemole commenting and saying if she had tattoos on her legs as I just read his review again and I don't remember the dyed red hair. Feel pretty stupid for not remembering her hair colour but it didn't stick in the mind. Now wondering if I got someone else.

Was hard for me to gauge full service off a B&G, but she didn't hesitate with OWO - I would've walked if she'd insisted on OW.  Her profile soon after had more details about the hair colour and I think she's changed it again.  As for tattoos, can remember a few but I didn't really explore her body as you would with FS.  Sorry to hear you had a shit punt 

[Mrbigbum]

She has posted on her profile saying she  edits and blurs her pics for her own reasons , also have a big paragraph about being clean or she will cut the service or ow if she doesn’t think your clean as you wouldn’t go down on her if she wasn’t fresh , which to me is reasonable,

[PR67]

She has posted on her profile saying she  edits and blurs her pics for her own reasons , also have a big paragraph about being clean or she will cut the service or ow if she doesn’t think your clean as you wouldn’t go down on her if she wasn’t fresh , which to me is reasonable,

Bit of a suspicious first post. Your punctuation is also very similar to the profile in question.

I was asked if I wanted I shower when I arrived. I had one about an hour before and said that but also said I’d have one if she wanted me to. She said only have one if I felt I needed one, which I felt I didn’t. She made no indication that services would change. I’ve had punts before where I’ve been told beforehand no owo without a shower and I’ve no problem with that.

I did have a shower afterward though. There was no shower gel or shampoo in the shower, I used the hand soap from the sink. There was also no clean towels, got told to use one of the two wet towels hanging up. So the profile is bullshitting about that too.

The OW was the best thing about the punt though. If the rest of the punt had been decent it would’ve been a small comment on a positive review.

[Glesgaboy]

Well spotted
The other recent review confirms she reads content on here and doesn’t like negs 

[Problem Child]

Well spotted
The other recent review confirms she reads content on here and doesn’t like negs 

..or full stops.

[PR67]

She has posted on her profile saying she  edits and blurs her pics for her own reasons

The new pics just put on the profile are clearly edited to remove tattoos. The previous pics did not look they were edited with Microsoft Paint. Maybe I was right and that wasn’t your arse after all.

[Bru1901]

She looks good but sounds a little nedish

Shes added a disclaimer saying no owo unless you shower and no doubt its a time wasting tactic

Also the use of 'a' rather than 'I' to me sounds very nedish

[PR67]

She looks good but sounds a little nedish

Shes added a disclaimer saying no owo unless you shower and no doubt its a time wasting tactic

Also the use of 'a' rather than 'I' to me sounds very nedish

She added that bit after I replied saying I'd been told that no shower means no OWO on punts before. If she wants freshly washed cocks in her mouth then I've no problem with that, it's a reasonable request that I've had a few times before, but I should be told beforehand that OWO depends on a shower. I wouldn't expect it to come off my time though.

She deleted a massive paragraph about showing up unclean and not getting full service. Think that was damage control after my review and to indicate this negative and the shit service I got is purely based on my unwashed cock. Think she went a bit OTT and would've been better ignoring it completely, while taking on board what I've wrote, rather than trying to pretend to be a punter and posting a comment on here and changing her profile.

While I think her initial pictures were fake, there was nothing about her personality, looks or body that wouldn't make me return. Negative was purely based on the service I got, although fake pics should probably be a negative straight away. In fact, if she let me fuck her properly in doggy then this would've maybe been a neutral. Been told no to SP on top a number of times but struggling to remember any half hour punt I've had where I've been refused doggy, it's how 90% of my punts finish.

[Bru1901]

Tbh she reminds me of a punt i had in 2019 or early 2020 that ranks as my worst punt

Disinterested. Just in it for the money and jaded.

These days i look for clues and if its a fuckabout im out. Too many are increasing rates etc

Lowering services

Using covid as an excuse

[Atomcat58]

Bru1901
I agree with your comments ,to many WG's in it for as much cash as possible not interested in the punter ,increase their fees and services getting fewer and if you want some more owo,cim anal etc its more cash on top .
Covid always being used as a valid reason ,when its not its just to feed there habit and blled the punter dry ,i have said it before and will continue if enough punters say NO the fees and the WG's bad attitude then eventually the WG's will get the message,we dont all think with our dicks ??

[Uncle Buck]

To many WG's in it for as much cash as possible not interested in the punter

Does that really surprise you? Surely you’re not naive or delusional enough to think it’s job satisfaction an SP goes to work every day for!

Than again, i think you might be.

[Atomcat58]

Uncle Buck
No am not delusional at all ,am just saying that if the punter stops thinking with his dick and realises that the rise in fees are down to the WG's being greedy and using Covid as an excuse to put fees up

[Problem Child]

Does that really surprise you? Surely you’re not naive or delusional enough to think it’s job satisfaction an SP goes to work every day for!

Than again, i think you might be.

Some do coz they enjoy sex, but most do coz they think it’s easy money. That’s why there’s so few good hookers out there. It’s not an easy job and most of the really good ones  would probably excel in an other lines of work  too.

[Uncle Buck]

Some do coz they enjoy sex, but most do coz they think it’s easy money. That’s why there’s so few good hookers out there. It’s not an easy job and most of the really good ones  would probably excel in an other lines of work  too.

With the exception of “it’s not an easy job”, I disagree with everything you say in your post. Complete nonsense.

[Problem Child]

With the exception of “it’s not an easy job”, I disagree with everything you say in your post. Complete nonsense.

What do you disagree with?
I’m talking about the girls who have dozens of positives on here with only one or two negs which are obviously bullshit when you read them.
To give that level of service to every punter day in day out, no matter how they may be feeling at the time and on top of that if they’re busy also organising their time properly so as to not fuck people about.
It’s not rocket science, but that kind of ethic and dedication to service would serve you well in most lines of work.

[Bru1901]

Its one of the reasons ive been using seeking more than AW.

Less chance of a bad punt and more relaxed

[DaVINCI]

Its one of the reasons ive been using seeking more than AW.

Less chance of a bad punt and more relaxed

But is seeking not a hefty monthly sub and aren’t the girls expensive plus no reviews either. 

[Uncle Buck]

What do you disagree with?

I disagree that some do it because they enjoy sex.
I disagree that most do it because they think it’s easy money.
I disagree that is why there’s so few good hookers out there.
I agree it’s not an easy job.
I disagree that most of the really good ones would probably excel in an other lines of work too.

Disappointing that I had to explain my views on every point you made but then again maybe I was optimistic thinking you’d understand when I said “I disagree with everything you said except........”. These are only my opinions and not based on fact.

Hope this clears it up for you.   

[Bru1901]

Its one of the reasons ive been using seeking more than AW.

Less chance of a bad punt and more relaxed

[DaVINCI]

Its one of the reasons ive been using seeking more than AW.

Less chance of a bad punt and more relaxed

Yes, you have advised that already 

Is seeking not a hefty monthly sub and aren’t the girls expensive plus no reviews either.  At least with A/W etc and here you have a chance of alleviating a crap punt.

What makes you think you’ll have a better punt on Seeking - looks to me as if you are shooting in the dark and going by looks alone 

[Problem Child]

I disagree that some do it because they enjoy sex.
I disagree that most do it because they think it’s easy money.
I disagree that is why there’s so few good hookers out there.
I agree it’s not an easy job.
I disagree that most of the really good ones would probably excel in an other lines of work too.

Disappointing that I had to explain my views on every point you made but then again maybe I was optimistic thinking you’d understand when I said “I disagree with everything you said except........”. These are only my opinions and not based on fact.

Hope this clears it up for you.

Fair enough.
Sorry to disappoint you.
If there’s any way I can make it up to you just let me know

[Al Bundy]

She was alright looking facially. Not ugly but not stunning, maybe a 6 or 7 out of 10. Weirdly I felt like I recognised her.

Thanks for the review, she's in my area and I would have gone today if it wasn't for you, and the fact that I paid for her private gallery which explicitly stated that face pics were available in - and they weren't!!!

[Samg1984]

Good review, good info
mikemole (well known member) gave her a positive so maybe you got her on a bad day.

Hehe well known member 🤣🤣