Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Is anyone else frustrated with the camgirls and content ticking escort boxes!  (Read 1919 times)

Offline ir34

Adultwork search is insufferable as quite literally half are content and cam whores.

Offline gbyld87

Adultwork search is insufferable as quite literally half are content and cam whores.

Absolutely.  Straight on the blacklist whenever I find one.

Offline hairymonster

Can spot most of them a mile off, 500 ph and BB ticked.

Offline shagmore

Yes, fully agree.
AW does have serious issues that should be addressed

Offline papak

Can this be a thread for pointing out camgirls falsely advertising themselves as escorts? If so I can start off:

louisebabexx - External Link/Members Only

Chloe-Miller - External Link/Members Only

NaughtyCougarNina - External Link/Members Only

BrunetteDollEvieXX - External Link/Members Only

Offline Longshot

This has always happened but got ridiculously worse since covid as many girls have been reluctant to meet face to face.

Dont really think theres much anyone can do except avoid them and dont give them the oxygen of even making an enquiry

Offline MajorPayne

Adultwork search is insufferable as quite literally half are content and cam whores.
Yes totally though I get why they do it.

Offline ir34

Can this be a thread for pointing out camgirls falsely advertising themselves as escorts? If so I can start off:

louisebabexx - External Link/Members Only

Chloe-Miller - External Link/Members Only

NaughtyCougarNina - External Link/Members Only

BrunetteDollEvieXX - External Link/Members Only



See this one for example ID 6058723



Offline Newtothisstuff

I'm not too bothered at the moment because I'm not punting right now. I can sort of understand why girls are doing it. Some are desperate for money and some others are pages set up by pimps who don't care anyway.  I gather that some girls have switched to cam work and actually increased their incomes if you believe the stories on other sites.
I don't much care at the moment what AW is like. BUT the test will come when lockdown rules ease off and visits are legal again. When that time comes, it is gong to annoy me and I'll just end up having to block lots of profiles. Dumb move on the girls/pimps part. If the girls do start booking meets, people like me who have previously blocked them will never know.

Offline Leedsub

Yes!!

Finally someone has mentioned it. Every time I do a search I feel like posting this exact message. Just puts me off them full stop even if they do go on to escort after the lockdowns.

My theory is most of these girls have never been escorts or can girls and have turned to it for extra income due to lockdowns. Ticking all the boxes just gives them more exposure. Little do they know they’re being blacklisted by actual punters.

Offline DrGFreeman

so just filter them out
on the search screen, bottom right, you can order results by, escort
then any girl with no escort feedback is at the bottom

Offline isaac_gauss

I don't want to filter out new legitimate escort profiles.

If only we could share blacklists. That would be a way to solve this and many problems with AW. I think we could, with some clever browser extension or userscript programming.

Offline Corus Boy

Can spot most of them a mile off, 500 ph and BB ticked.

+1

Some are members of groups who only do webcamming.

And you get a feel from the profile picture and just move staight on.

Just live with it.

AW make money from webcamming, audio, Private Galleries, and many other sources.  Seemingly small amounts but multiply it by the 1,000s of profiles, I suspect that they are raking it in, so do not expect and action from them.

Offline stevedave

Yes, it is very frustrating, especially as more often than not they are really fit (if genuine).

My favourite ones are the ones who have the escort box ticked but put stuff in their blurb like "if you ask me to meet you'll be blocked"  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Offline mikef2008

Good thread. Lots of cockteasers out there on AW. However I've been camming with a girl who I believe is genuinely going to start escorting post-lockdown. Cant wait to get my jab and go see her. The only problem is she is on the expensive side

External Link/Members Only


Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Good thread. Lots of cockteasers out there on AW. However I've been camming with a girl who I believe is genuinely going to start escorting post-lockdown. Cant wait to get my jab and go see her. The only problem is she is on the expensive side

External Link/Members Only

At £300 per hour meet??

Offline ir34

Good thread. Lots of cockteasers out there on AW. However I've been camming with a girl who I believe is genuinely going to start escorting post-lockdown. Cant wait to get my jab and go see her. The only problem is she is on the expensive side

External Link/Members Only
t

Oh matey...

Offline southcoastpunter

+1


Just live with it.

AW make money from webcamming, audio, Private Galleries, and many other sources.  Seemingly small amounts but multiply it by the 1,000s of profiles, I suspect that they are raking it in, so do not expect and action from them.

+1

AW is what it is and they aren't going to change anytime soon because some guys moan about it no matter how "justified" those moans maybe!

Offline DrGFreeman

I don't want to filter out new legitimate escort profiles.
If only we could share blacklists. That would be a way to solve this and many problems with AW. I think we could, with some clever browser extension or userscript programming.

how are you determining what's a legitimate escort profile with no feedback ?

Offline Londonpunter30

To be fair to AW I’ve reported some of these and they have removed some of them , but not all

Offline Kelgon85

I've found that a big indicator is when they have the Escort box ticked and have loads of feedback, yet not one for escorting. I call them "Webscammers". They're basically webcammers only.

Offline isaac_gauss

how are you determining what's a legitimate escort profile with no feedback ?

No surefire way to tell, but the collective wisdom of the London TOFTT thread goes a long way.

For the developers, found this. I'm sure it could be put to use:
External Link/Members Only[ID_goes_here]

Offline Plan R

so just filter them out
on the search screen, bottom right, you can order results by, escort
then any girl with no escort feedback is at the bottom

^^^^
Also tick the 'escorts'  and the  'can accommodate' buttons.
Not foolproof, but will filter out a lot of the camer scamers as I call em.

Offline Jimmy83

Easiest way for me is to see which have listed their phone number. Cam girls aren't going to list their number because they won't get any money if someone calls them through their phone.

Offline Gordon Bennett

It gets on my wick. It's worse over past 12 months because ladies that do meets can't receive feedback so you can't fall back to looking for escort feedback to get a sense of if they really offer meets.

I was feeling grumpy one day and found one that had escort box ticked but in her Q+A had something like "I do NOT do meets - anyone asking to meet will be blocked!!" so I reported her profile and fair do's the escort tick disappeared a few hours later.

Offline Taggart

Good thread. Lots of cockteasers out there on AW. However I've been camming with a girl who I believe is genuinely going to start escorting post-lockdown. Cant wait to get my jab and go see her. The only problem is she is on the expensive side

External Link/Members Only

Think she’s expensive? Here’s a cammer  at £500 hr with some flaky feedback - External Link/Members Only

And I don’t find her attractive whatsoever 🤷🏽‍♂️

Offline ir34

^^^^
Also tick the 'escorts'  and the  'can accommodate' buttons.
Not foolproof, but will filter out a lot of the camer scamers as I call em.

It doesn't. Had it done, I'd not have started this thread. The whole issue is for girls deliberately ticking all the buttons. Misleading ads.

Offline Londonpunter30

It doesn't. Had it done, I'd not have started this thread. The whole issue is for girls deliberately ticking all the buttons. Misleading ads.

As I said report them to AW.  Say “it goes against the spirit of the club” and they are misleading ads.  I’ve had a few removed that I’ve reported

Offline Londonpunter30

although this group AW seem to do fuck all about and they create about 5 profiles a day all with the same MO.  I suspect AW are partly behind this

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Offline Slinky

yes, drives me up the fucking wall... i've been just blacklisting them whenever i see them, and also if they are part of a group i tend to just blacklist the lot

i've also got bored reporting them, it's pointless, adultwank make money off fools viewing private galleries so they don't remove them... i'd also bet some are fake created by AW as suggested

« Last Edit: March 30, 2021, 10:33:54 pm by Slinky »
Banned reason: Previously Banned Member Avg_Joe, The Black Knight, Norfolk-n-Chance, Blind Git
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline ilovekungfu

My mitigation for this nonsense is to sort by _escort_ rating. This will relegate cam frauds to the bottom of the list. You can still combine this with a location and radius to restrict results to a given location.

The main issues with this approach is the most well-established escorts will always be listed first. Sometimes this isn't what you want as it might prioritise jaded, semi or fully retired WGs.

Those who are just flat out bad based on reviews here but somehow have high escorting feedback can be black listed. However, you'll miss more easily new, upcoming or part time talent which can be a shame as sometimes part-time WGs can be the best meets. One way to counter this is to find the point in the list where the feedback score initially drops down to low single digits and work backwards from there. Those listed after this point but with higher feedback are those with little to no escorting feedback and more cam/phone/IM etc. This will be typically be a mixed bag until you get into double figures but will at least give you sight of potentially decent providers with low feedback.

I've noticed in recent years that these fake escorts usually get one or two fake escort feedbacks to muddy the waters but they are usually obvious when you look.

Challenge with the pandemic is that it hasn't been possible for genuine escort feedback to be accrued for 12 months but once we unlock that should improve.

« Last Edit: March 31, 2021, 10:59:58 am by ilovekungfu »

Offline Trex

What I do is go to search on adultwork.

Tick escort
Tick dislike bareback
Go to rates & availability hourly rate 80 to 200
Tick pictures and tick a picture gallery

If you do that method, most of the webscammers are gone. And I don’t have to blacklist them.

Offline Slinky

hourly rate filter is a good idea
Banned reason: Previously Banned Member Avg_Joe, The Black Knight, Norfolk-n-Chance, Blind Git
Banned by: CoolTiger

Offline Moby Dick

This one;
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Over 700 AW feedbacks for CAM meets.

Escorting ticked and £400ph advertised = no escort feedback other than meet never went ahead.