Quickie Review Section

[Cpro1979]

Hi

I’m fairly new to UKP and because of COVID haven’t seen many girls in the last year but hopefully soon..

However the 1 review I did make was basically shot down for not having enough detail.
TBH personally I’m happy to say a girl was good/bad etc.. but don’t feel particularly comfortable or tbh good enough at writing  to go into the kind of detail others on here do.

My question was is there any merit in having a “quickie” for want of a better description  review thread/section where we can just say +/- girl in pic and a few key points without describing the meeting in detail. Might be a good place to do a quick check on a girl?

Anyway shoot me down if needed just a thought 

[Pablo02]

Going into the meet with actual details makes a review. 

I don’t really understand why you wouldn’t want to go into detail.
For example your last review with that SP is very vague there has been more reviews of her after yours which go into detail about her and on the basis of those reviews I’ve decided not to see her.

Content is key 

[Punterperson1971]

Hi

I’m fairly new to UKP and because of COVID haven’t seen many girls in the last year but hopefully soon..

However the 1 review I did make was basically shot down for not having enough detail.
TBH personally I’m happy to say a girl was good/bad etc.. but don’t feel particularly comfortable or tbh good enough at writing  to go into the kind of detail others on here do.

My question was is there any merit in having a “quickie” for want of a better description  review thread/section where we can just say +/- girl in pic and a few key points without describing the meeting in detail. Might be a good place to do a quick check on a girl?

Anyway shoot me down if needed just a thought 

This site  has been running for years no need to change or add things if not not needed,just take your time make some form of contribution and you will soon get the hang of things on here.

[Hoping]

When you write a review ask yourself the question "why have you written it?"  Would other readers of this site decide from your review to visit the WG or avoid?  What might not seem important to you might be to someone else (big tits/arse/good looking/cheap/good value/expensive but worth it etc etc).  The more information you put in the better.  Other members can then make their own decision and visit, or not. 

[Cpro1979]

I was thinking some kind of index that could be quickly skimmed might be useful to some. Could have maybe had some standard bits of information but tbh these are the responses I was expecting.

I just don’t want to go into intimate details on who put what where etc..

If it works for you all though good luck to you.

[Cpro1979]

This site  has been running for years no need to change or add things if not not needed,just take your time make some form of contribution and you will soon get the hang of things on here.

I guess progress or change is never good or needed

[JontyR]

However the 1 review I did make was basically shot down for not having enough detail.
TBH personally I’m happy to say a girl was good/bad etc.. but don’t feel particularly comfortable or tbh good enough at writing  to go into the kind of detail others on here do.

You're explanation here proves you are more than capable of writing a decent report.

My question was is there any merit in having a “quickie” for want of a better description  review thread/section where we can just say +/- girl in pic and a few key points without describing the meeting in detail. Might be a good place to do a quick check on a girl?

No. You can do this through seeing the aggregation of reports.

Anyway shoot me down if needed just a thought 

BANG BANG!!

I just don’t want to go into intimate details on who put what where etc..

Don't want to? You thought it was a confidence issue earlier on.

If it works for you all though good luck to you.

It seems to be pretty successful.

I guess progress or change is never good or needed

So you don't want to be shot down then? I don't see how this is progress. Anyway the rules aren't ours they are set by admin. And we are members by consensus. If any of us don't like it we are welcome to not engage  / set up an alternative site or something else.

Look, you don't review a restaurant and just talk about the tablecloth do you? You talk about the food, how it looks, how it smells, how it tastes. And if you are looking to be a good food critic then you talk about the ambience, how it makes you feel, what could be improved etc etc.

If you are a bit embarrassed then don't be, read fuggedabout's reecnt review. If you are concerned about the standard of your writing look at the recent reviews from posters with dyslexia and other barriers to expressing themselves. Yes, they are at times awkward to read but folks are generally forgiving because they have made the effort to write a decent review and engaged with the ethos of the site.

If I may proffer some advice...your mindset may need to change a bit if you want any suggestions to gain any traction.

[Cpro1979]

Look, you don't review a restaurant and just talk about the tablecloth do you? You talk about the food, how it looks, how it smells, how it tastes. And if you are looking to be a good food critic then you talk about the ambience, how it makes you feel, what could be improved etc etc.

No, I say was it clean/good location , is the service/food any good and what were the prices like

I don’t go into details on how much I put on the fork, did it dribble down my chin were there 4 chips or 5.

I think what some want on here is pretty much voyeurism which is absolutely fine, we are all adults, and as you said it’s worked for all of you for years. However it’s not really for me and seeing as it’s not my page and I rightfully was shot down in flames I guess I will bid you all good luck and leave you to it

I hope the COVID situation improves things for all of us.

Admin I guess you may as well remove this thread and my account before the inevitable hostilities that I have seen in so many other posts start.

[vindici]

However the 1 review I did make was basically shot down for not having enough detail.
TBH personally I’m happy to say a girl was good/bad etc.. but don’t feel particularly comfortable or tbh good enough at writing  to go into the kind of detail others on here do.

My question was is there any merit in having a “quickie” for want of a better description  review thread/section where we can just say +/- girl in pic and a few key points without describing the meeting in detail. Might be a good place to do a quick check on a girl?

Anyway shoot me down if needed just a thought 

The minimum I would expect from a review should include the following details:

• Link to the ad/source for the booking
• How easy was it to make the booking? Smooth and painless, arsey and obtuse?
• What was the premises like, parking, cleanliness, discretion?
• Price paid
• Did the WG match her photos/description, what was her attitude like, were there hygiene issues?
• Services delivered, OWO, Anal, DFK?
• Detail of any weird/unexpected shit that we should be aware of
• Your overall impression, e.g. you got your full time and it was worth it etc

Reporting back just those details, does not need to take a long time, nor does it need reams of text. I can give an example below of a fictitious review that is short, concise and get's the information across, use it as a template if you wish 👍


     www. wglinkaddress .co.uk

     Booking was simple, number was displayed on the profile, called it and was there on time.

     No on street parking, but there was a multi storey nearby, apartment was a little messy, but out of the way from nosey neighbours.

     £60/30mins

     She looked a little older than her AW pics and maybe a little heavier, but on the whole it was her, she was clean and fresh.

     Got OWO, DFK, Rimming, Anal with CIM to finish.

     Pretty good punt, was in and out in 25mins, would probably return when in the area again.



As you can see, I'm sharing quite of lot of helpful, relevant information without needing to write War & Peace. Punters read reviews to make good decisions for their wallets and their cocks, if your review doesn't help with either, then it's not worth sharing.

[JontyR]

Admin I guess you may as well remove this thread and my account before the inevitable hostilities that I have seen in so many other posts start.

Extract from rules:

8 Account deletion
Do not post-resignation posts to announce you are leaving. Just logout and don't be a drama queen.

9 Post deletion
Not possible unless you accidentally include too much personal info.

[Cpro1979]

Extract from rules:

8 Account deletion
Do not post-resignation posts to announce you are leaving. Just logout and don't be a drama queen.

9 Post deletion
Not possible unless you accidentally include too much personal info.

 

[Jayne_cobb]

Vindici  :thumbsup you nailed it. Great post. I really can’t see why it is so difficult for some people to write useful reviews.
Doesn’t have to be war and peace or an erotic novel. Just follow Vindici’s helpful template

[petermisc]

I was thinking some kind of index that could be quickly skimmed might be useful to some. Could have maybe had some standard bits of information but tbh these are the responses I was expecting.

There is already an index function, and there is the search and advance search buttons.  Provided your review includes the AW profile number, it can easily be found by anyone looking for info on that WG, and it can be indexed.  Likewise for non-AW girls, include the telephone number if it is publicly stated in her ad.  Note the index function, that shows how many reviews a girl has and provides a link to them, rarely seems to show the correct number (often wrongly showing zero), but click on the link and it will show them all.

Not sure what you mean by "standard bits of information".  As others have already pointed out, there is already a template that details the minimum info required.  If you are expecting something like a ticklist of services, then it would be as long as that on AW, only you would have to specify not just whether a girl provided each service, but how well, and at what extra charge.  Would take ages to fill in.