Stefani Aniston - Harrow - Neutral bordering on negative

[Pupil2021]

External Link/Members Only

OH now being called into office occassionally so more time for sneaky punts. This was was during Lockdown so apologies beforehand, also I reviewed Stefani recently from a visit in early Nov but hope Mods will grant some leeway here for reasons that will become clear. This happened this weekend.

£60 for 30 minutes (was just under 15 in the end)

Comms

Excellent, replies to texts within minutes, agreed £60 for 30 minutes (basic service is inclusive of OWO and DFK, and I should of confirmed this  )

Location

Usual place. Average enough flat, nothing to write home about but relatively clean. Bed really is on it's last legs and did nothing for the experience.

Punt

Stefani greeted me at the door in a tight pink t-shirt and a thong. Have to say, for her age still stunning. However I did notice she seemed a bit distant this time. Asked me to wash hands and take off shoes then we proceeded to the bedroom, no shower offered. She went off to stash the cash and I got undressed, she came back in and asked me to lay face down as she started with a full body message and some small talk, things were looking good....
She finished the message after a couple of minutes (there is a wall clock opposite the bed so it's clear how long things are taking) then (to my astonishment) takes a condom on and proceeds to OW, I asked if we could do it without but she just smiles and carries on (WTF!?), admittedly this was quite good. after a few mins of this she mounts me in cow, and proceeds to ride me with what must be the most disinterested face I have ever seen, as if she had better things to do (I am the one paying here!), I attempt to DFK as I find this helps me finish more quickly but this was half hearted on her part to say the least and I was now in no mood to ask for some kissing. Ended up finishing in her with her on top, she cleaned me up and got up and smiled, "Happy 30 minutes!". What!? Barely 15 mins. I get dressed and made some inane small talk (more for the sake of avoiding the silence), she showed me to the door and kissed me, she seemed much more happier seeing me go then she seemed when I arrived. All very different to my first visit (and review)

So basically a fine SP that I was hoping would become a regular gives a poor service. Would I go back? No, had my fill now and some good options in NW London/South Herts. If you want to try a good looking MILF/GILF maybe give her a go but make sure you are clear upfront, and I mean really clear on details.

Saw Amy A in Colindale recently who was VFM but as I have also seen her a month ago I will just update that review rather then write a new one as per Mods advice.

Pupil out

[smiths]

External Link/Members Only

OH now being called into office occassionally so more time for sneaky punts. This was was during Lockdown so apologies beforehand, also I reviewed Stefani recently from a visit in early Nov but hope Mods will grant some leeway here for reasons that will become clear. This happened this weekend.

£60 for 30 minutes (was just under 15 in the end)

Comms

Excellent, replies to texts within minutes, agreed £60 for 30 minutes (basic service is inclusive of OWO and DFK, and I should of confirmed this  )

Location

Usual place. Average enough flat, nothing to write home about but relatively clean. Bed really is on it's last legs and did nothing for the experience.

Punt

Stefani greeted me at the door in a tight pink t-shirt and a thong. Have to say, for her age still stunning. However I did notice she seemed a bit distant this time. Asked me to wash hands and take off shoes then we proceeded to the bedroom, no shower offered. She went off to stash the cash and I got undressed, she came back in and asked me to lay face down as she started with a full body message and some small talk, things were looking good....
She finished the message after a couple of minutes (there is a wall clock opposite the bed so it's clear how long things are taking) then (to my astonishment) takes a condom on and proceeds to OW, I asked if we could do it without but she just smiles and carries on (WTF!?), admittedly this was quite good. after a few mins of this she mounts me in cow, and proceeds to ride me with what must be the most disinterested face I have ever seen, as if she had better things to do (I am the one paying here!), I attempt to DFK as I find this helps me finish more quickly but this was half hearted on her part to say the least and I was now in no mood to ask for some kissing. Ended up finishing in her with her on top, she cleaned me up and got up and smiled, "Happy 30 minutes!". What!? Barely 15 mins. I get dressed and made some inane small talk (more for the sake of avoiding the silence), she showed me to the door and kissed me, she seemed much more happier seeing me go then she seemed when I arrived. All very different to my first visit (and review)

So basically a fine SP that I was hoping would become a regular gives a poor service. Would I go back? No, had my fill now and some good options in NW London/South Herts. If you want to try a good looking MILF/GILF maybe give her a go but make sure you are clear upfront, and I mean really clear on details.

Saw Amy A in Colindale recently who was VFM but as I have also seen her a month ago I will just update that review rather then write a new one as per Mods advice.

Pupil out

Sorry to hear but thanks for this review. I did see Stefani for a half hour some time ago now and she did offer me some FK not DFK same as when I reviewed her. And OWO, ok again but no wow factor with her for me. Since Carla has left the FH is worse overall in my book. As to doing this review not long after the previous positive there is no problem as its a neutral so you have updated the rating, plus a punter can do more than 1 review on a WG anyway. Its it being seen as touting which this doesn't that's not on.

[lillythesavage]

I always think when there is a restricted time on profiles, in this case 12 or 13 days, or it says leaving in a few days, they are only grabbing what they can while they can knowing they do not need regulars.

My thoughts are they are best avoided, though she does look good for her age.

[hornypnter]

Cheers for the review.

I contacted her for a booking. Agree, the comms were prompt but then tier system cam into effect in December and Harrow ended up in tier 4 so couldn't make it.

So was thinking of visiting her now but based on the review might need to look at alternatives.

Also her rates have gone up including the extras. When I booked in December it was 80/hr and there were no extras.

[dubhcarr]

sorry to hear OP but thanks for the review. Never been tempted with this one but agree with Mr S that since the sisters have gone the rest look avoidable.   

[smiths]

I always think when there is a restricted time on profiles, in this case 12 or 13 days, or it says leaving in a few days, they are only grabbing what they can while they can knowing they do not need regulars.

My thoughts are they are best avoided, though she does look good for her age.

ALL FH WGs come for a set time and then go and have done so for years, like many EE WG brothels. If a WG is good that has never made any difference to her service in my experience, just her availability.

[Pupil2021]

I always think when there is a restricted time on profiles, in this case 12 or 13 days, or it says leaving in a few days, they are only grabbing what they can while they can knowing they do not need regulars.

My thoughts are they are best avoided, though she does look good for her age.

Yes, that is the kind of vibe I got, she talked about her family in Hungary. Obviously a tad jaded and would rather be there. In that case maybe think about another job?

[smiths]

Yes, that is the kind of vibe I got, she talked about her family in Hungary. Obviously a tad jaded and would rather be there. In that case maybe think about another job?

I imagine most WGs would rather be at home with family if they could be, they aren't going to be WGs for the fun of it. Some can offer a good service despite this, Stefani didn't in your case.

[lillythesavage]

ALL FH WGs come for a set time and then go and have done so for years, like many EE WG brothels. If a WG is good that has never made any difference to her service in my experience, just her availability.

Agree in principal, though some stay for years, but few put date of leaving on profile, they just come and go, when they do it feels like trying to drum up business for the leaving fund and counting the days rather than giving a service. Or coming for a few days because they are skint with no plans to return.
Good ones would have plenty of regulars getting in a good bye fuck.

[smiths]

Agree in principal, though some stay for years, but few put date of leaving on profile, they just come and go, when they do it feels like trying to drum up business for the leaving fund and counting the days rather than giving a service. Or coming for a few days because they are skint with no plans to return.
Good ones would have plenty of regulars getting in a good bye fuck.

The FH pimp Nikki assuming its still her running it now would of put that, she has done so before with other WGs. I also assume the idea is to try to tempt punters in case they miss out. A well used thing some WGs do of course.

In my experience from brothels in North London very few WGs stay static for years at the same brothel, they come and go, get rotated and end up back where they started in many cases. Stefani comes and goes on a regular basis and has for a few years now. The difference in her case and other FH WGs as far as I know is in this country they only work at the FH. Some have left though and gone to work elsewhere here. Reeka did that and is still in Harrow not far from the FH, now calling herself Cheeky Curvy Milf I see. That's assuming it IS still Reeka obviously.

[Pupil2021]

I imagine most WGs would rather be at home with family if they could be, they aren't going to be WGs for the fun of it. Some can offer a good service despite this, Stefani didn't in your case.

Yeah, I do not doubt that for a second, but if it leads to a poor service than it will get written up on here.

[smiths]

Yeah, I do not doubt that for a second, but if it leads to a poor service than it will get written up on here.

Indeed, which is what UKP is here to do.

[Pupil2021]

Indeed, which is what UKP is here to do.

Real shame, just such a big difference from my first experience of her

[Diggler fights back!]

Good review and your experience is similar to mine with the so called funhouse and the hit and miss punts I’ve had there. I did still have her on my hotlist and would have considered her a solid plan B when I do jump back in the saddle after this lockdown. What a shame, increased rates and a waning service. Hopefully is an off day and isn’t indicative of things to come.

[Pupil2021]

Good review and your experience is similar to mine with the so called funhouse and the hit and miss punts I’ve had there. I did still have her on my hotlist and would have considered her a solid plan B when I do jump back in the saddle after this lockdown. What a shame, increased rates and a waning service. Hopefully is an off day and isn’t indicative of things to come.

Yeah, could well of been an off day, you could be right there, that is the only thing that stopped the review being a negative.

[oneeyesnake]

Thanks for the review Pupil. I was wondering what had happened to the FH as I had not seen any reviews. It seems as if the quality of service has dropped. Have not seen any reviews to say otherwise.

[Pupil2021]

Thanks for the review Pupil. I was wondering what had happened to the FH as I had not seen any reviews. It seems as if the quality of service has dropped. Have not seen any reviews to say otherwise.

Yeah, I am not as seasoned as many others on here, but basic customer service is lacking. As mentioned, the flat is showing it's age, the bathroom quite old, the fact that you are making very good money laying on your back yet cannot afford the £400-£500 for a proper bed/matress (yes, I am aware the nice ones are more than that) means you are actually showing little regard for the punter, as someone mentioned previously it could just be they do not really care, want to make as much cash as possible and than head back home.

Again, real shame as Stefani is a proper stunner with a great body and amazing rack. If she put 50% more effort in and did not rush this could of gone from a low neutral to a high positive.

[oneeyesnake]

I had seen her when I had met one of the twins...who no longer provide services in London as far as I know.  She definitely looked fit, but have seen neutral reviews since.  So will hold on to the cash and go elsewhere more reliable. 

[Pupil2021]

I had seen her when I had met one of the twins...who no longer provide services in London as far as I know.  She definitely looked fit, but have seen neutral reviews since.  So will hold on to the cash and go elsewhere more reliable. 

 

[Pupil2021]

Oh wow! Profile now disapeared! She had that AW profile for quite some time.

[smiths]

Oh wow! Profile now disapeared! She had that AW profile for quite some time.

Nikki the pimp has deleted 1 or more of her WGs profiles on A/W before then put a new one online a while later, and she has also lost WGs like Carla and the profile just disappears suddenly. Who knows in this case. Candy, Aisha and Madisons profiles are still up if not active today as I didn't see their green lights on so they haven't all been deleted which is another thing Nikki did last year. In that case a week or two later new profiles appeared with slightly changed names.

[Pupil2021]

Nikki the pimp has deleted 1 or more of her WGs profiles on A/W before then put a new one online a while later, and she has also lost WGs like Carla and the profile just disappears suddenly. Who knows in this case. Candy, Aisha and Madisons profiles are still up if not active today as I didn't see their green lights on so they haven't all been deleted which is another thing Nikki did last year. In that case a week or two later new profiles appeared with slightly changed names.

I see, great intel, thanks Smiths. Noticed she had gone from my HL when going to actually take her off. In terms of the other three you mentioned, chances are their service levels have reduced too you think?

[smiths]

I see, great intel, thanks Smiths. Noticed she had gone from my HL when going to actually take her off. In terms of the other three you mentioned, chances are their service levels have reduced too you think?

I gave Candy and Madison both Neutral reviews, both didn't really want to offer kissing to me but did so a little bit, both quite attractive in my view, plenty of face pics of Candy, or there were. Aisha I gave a Positive review to but she is no looker face or body in my view, not that that is a problem for me nowadays. ALL 3 WGs vanilla like most FH WGs have been for years. If you want raunch and a wow factor you wont get it off any of these 3, at least I didn't. And for me this sums up the FH in recent times, vanilla WGs with no wow factor.

[Pupil2021]

I gave Candy and Madison both Neutral reviews, both didn't really want to offer kissing to me but did so a little bit, both quite attractive in my view, plenty of face pics of Candy, or there were. Aisha I gave a Positive review to but she is no looker face or body in my view, not that that is a problem for me nowadays. ALL 3 WGs vanilla like most FH WGs have been for years. If you want raunch and a wow factor you wont get it off any of these 3, at least I didn't. And for me this sums up the FH in recent times, vanilla WGs with no wow factor.

Top info, thanks fella, certainly points to a man (WG!) management issue if the theme of nice girls with sliding levels of performance is to go by. Shame as the FH is quite near me.