Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: twat storms off Good Morning Britain - Now quits  (Read 3222 times)

Offline David1970

Quote from: Jimmyredcab link=topic=300054.msg3147523#msg3147523 date=1615895365
Woman have a right to go out and have lots to drink but not to reach the stage where they pass out.
[/quote


I think Jimmy’s wording is wrong, but his sentiment is correct. It is not sensible for people to drink until they pass out.
Saying that a woman passing out does not give a rapist a free pass. 
« Last Edit: March 16, 2021, 01:05:41 pm by David1970 »


Offline winkywanky

It's a matter of degree and it would need careful application, but to my mind intimidation and harrassment of women, whether online or IRL, should be classed as a hate crime.

It's no different from putting the hate on someone because of their race, you single out someone from a particular group for abuse, and it's just not on.

It would need to be done carefully and clear guidleines as to what is and isn't acceptable, but it should happen.

There are various reasons behind why some men exhibit this behaviour, some of them societal like perhaps the number of boys brought up without a father (and in some cases women need to take some responsibility for that), neverthless there is a problem and unfortunately it seems like there will probably need to be intervention at school level, yet another thing heaped on them when a proper homelife should be doing it  :unknown:.


Offline Jimmyredcab



But (I think) JRC's point was no matter how we see things in the perfect sense, 'personal responsibility' should always be 'in the mix'.

Thank you.  :drinks:

That doesn’t just apply to women.
When I visit Thailand I drink every night but I am also aware that I must keep my wits about me, passing out in a hotel room with a Thai prostitute is not something I would recommend.  :scare:

Offline willie loman

It's a matter of degree and it would need careful application, but to my mind intimidation and harrassment of women, whether online or IRL, should be classed as a hate crime.

It's no different from putting the hate on someone because of their race, you single out someone from a particular group for abuse, and it's just not on.

It would need to be done carefully and clear guidleines as to what is and isn't acceptable, but it should happen.

There are various reasons behind why some men exhibit this behaviour, some of them societal like perhaps the number of boys brought up without a father (and in some cases women need to take some responsibility for that), neverthless there is a problem and unfortunately it seems like there will probably need to be intervention at school level, yet another thing heaped on them when a proper homelife should be doing it  :unknown:.

this is the man who thinks its ok to use the c word.

Offline Liverpool

this is the man who thinks its ok to use the c word.

I think someone who usually goes for "pilled up milfs" can't really take the moral high ground.

Offline winkywanky

Thank you.  :drinks:

That doesn’t just apply to women.
When I visit Thailand I drink every night but I am also aware that I must keep my wits about me, passing out in a hotel room with a Thai prostitute is not something I would recommend:scare:


Why, did you wake up with a very sore bottom Jimmy?  :scare:  :D

Offline winkywanky

this is the man who thinks its ok to use the c word.


Ah, don't I conveniently fit in the box you want to put me in willie?

Sometimes you are total imbecile, aren't you?

Offline winkywanky

this is the man who thinks its ok to use the c word.


Further to my above post, I would occasionally also apply the word cunt to you, depending on what tripe you posted.

Just in case you think I'm discriminatiing against women, like  :hi:.

Offline winkywanky

I think someone who usually goes for "pilled up milfs" can't really take the moral high ground.

Nor someone who advocates legalising the supply of heroin  :unknown:.

Offline willie loman

Nor someone who advocates legalising the supply of heroin  :unknown:.

why dont you read up about the drug problem, particularly what experts have been saying for 40 years, you seem to have learnt your views from readers digest.

Offline winkywanky

why dont you read up about the drug problem, particularly what experts have been saying for 40 years, you seem to have learnt your views from readers digest.


Why don't you stop advocating legalising the supply of heroin?

You're so thick you just immediately put me in the ban all drugs because they're naughty box  :rolleyes:.

There's a big difference between treating addicts as victims/medical patients (which I would agree with), and simply allowing them to kill themselves by legalising their supply of heroin by rich drug dealers, which is effectively what you said with your blanket statement.

Offline willie loman


Why don't you stop advocating legalising the supply of heroin?

You're so thick you just immediately put me in the ban all drugs because they're naughty box  :rolleyes:.

There's a big difference between treating addicts as victims/medical patients (which I would agree with), and simply allowing them to kill themselves by legalising their supply of heroin by rich drug dealers, which is effectively what you said with your blanket statement.

as i said read up about the topic, and read peoples posts before attributing opinions to them.

Offline Blackpool Rock

this is the man who thinks its ok to use the c word.
Willie you seem to have switched from swimming against the tide on the covid thread to swimming against the tide on this and other threads, any reason why  :unknown:

Offline winkywanky

as i said read up about the topic, and read peoples posts before attributing opinions to them.


I'm not attributing an opinion to you, I'm simply quoting you, and you haven't denied it yet  :unknown:.

Citing Portugal as an example (which has applied the principle I outlined above, of treating an addict as a victim and a medical patient), they have not made it legal to supply heroin.

I believe a similar stance has been mooted for Scotland, but of course you would know that because you know everything about drugs, and I know shit  :rolleyes:.


Offline hermanmunster

It's a matter of degree and it would need careful application, but to my mind intimidation and harrassment of women, whether online or IRL, should be classed as a hate crime.

It's no different from putting the hate on someone because of their race, you single out someone from a particular group for abuse, and it's just not on.

It would need to be done carefully and clear guidleines as to what is and isn't acceptable, but it should happen.

There are various reasons behind why some men exhibit this behaviour, some of them societal like perhaps the number of boys brought up without a father (and in some cases women need to take some responsibility for that), neverthless there is a problem and unfortunately it seems like there will probably need to be intervention at school level, yet another thing heaped on them when a proper homelife should be doing it  :unknown:.

WW, I always agree with most of what you say, and I do believe that education (in a brainwashing type of way) from an early age is almost required now to rid society of many undesirables.  You can understand why some people want to ban pornography and prostitution as it allows men to think that they can have/take a sexual experience whenever they chose. But there is no quick fix, it will take a generation to see the results - so then adequate policing of the problem is perhaps the only immediate answer?

Offline willie loman


I'm not attributing an opinion to you, I'm simply quoting you, and you haven't denied it yet  :unknown:.

Citing Portugal as an example (which has applied the principle I outlined above, of treating an addict as a victim and a medical patient), they have not made it legal to supply heroin.

I believe a similar stance has been mooted for Scotland, but of course you would know that because you know everything about drugs, and I know shit  :rolleyes:.
scotland doesnt have the powers to have their own drugs policy, we have to follow the english. stop pretending you have informed yourself about drugs,

Offline winkywanky

WW, I always agree with most of what you say, and I do believe that education (in a brainwashing type of way) from an early age is almost required now to rid society of many undesirables.  You can understand why some people want to ban pornography and prostitution as it allows men to think that they can have/take a sexual experience whenever they chose. But there is no quick fix, it will take a generation to see the results - so then adequate policing of the problem is perhaps the only immediate answer?


I would agree with that. If kids are growing up to abuse women in the way some of them do, cat-calling, overbearing chat-up lines in pubs, name-calling, online abuse, social media abuse, general intimidation, that needs dealing with. And yes, even if measures were brought in now it would take 10yrs before that 7yr old grew up to be a 17yr old who respected girls.

I think the social reasons are many and varied, and porn will play a part in that. Unfortunately you can't uninvent porn though, and it'd be very difficult to stop kids getting access to it as they seem to now. So education, at school and hopefully at home, will be key.

And yes, if as a young man you go out for a night with your mates now, if you hear one of them slagging off a girl for not responding to his advances, then don't simply stand by. Stick up for the girl. Sadly, most of these are already lost causes  :(.

In all of this though, I would very much make the distinction between what happened to this poor girl on her way home, and the general, 'everyday abuse' which most women seem prey to. I do not think they are linked. To actually abduct, murder and dismember a random girl is thankfully a very rare thing, and I don't think any amount of social engineering will stop that. In the same way that you'd never stop murder generally by say, having the death penalty. You can perhaps modify young boy behaviours from an early age with policy and legislation, but you can't legislate away something like murder.

FWIW, although I wouldn't in any way wish to downplay this recent horrific murder of an innocent young woman, the fact of the perpetrator exposing himself three days before in McDonalds would suggest to me some kind of mental meltdown, which sadly went unchecked, leading to the murder three days later. Certainly the Met are coming under strong scrutiny for not suspending him from duty immediately, but of course he was off-duty when he committed the murder (I guess he may have used his warrant card to assist him, and I guess all this will become clear).

But if you or I exposed ourselves in McDonalds, would we be immediately incarcerated? I don't think so? There would be due process.

It will be interesting (if not totally unpleasant) to hear submissions to the court when the trial takes place this Autumn. Was this titally out of character for this copper? When the indecent exposure was reported, was there total incredulity at his local station because he had a previously unblemished record? Or was he known as having a genunely bad attitude to women?

Offline winkywanky

scotland doesnt have the powers to have their own drugs policy, we have to follow the english. stop pretending you have informed yourself about drugs,


I find it hard to believe if there was the political will in Scotland to have its own distinct legal stance on drugs, that it couldn't be made to happen? But you're Scottish so you ought to know for sure.

I'm not pretending that I have much knowledge about drug abuse willie, but I do know that legalising the supply of heroin would be utter madness. Check out that link about the way Portugal have dealt with heroin abuse, I cannot see where they have legalised heroin dealers selling the stuff? They have decriminalised addicts, they are two very different things.

Offline willie loman


I find it hard to believe if there was the political will in Scotland to have its own distinct legal stance on drugs, that it couldn't be made to happen? But you're Scottish so you ought to know for sure.

I'm not pretending that I have much knowledge about drug abuse willie, but I do know that legalising the supply of heroin would be utter madness. Check out that link about the way Portugal have dealt with heroin abuse, I cannot see where they have legalised heroin dealers selling the stuff? They have decriminalised addicts, they are two very different things.

i cant recall advocating legalising heroine dealers, and as you know didnt, my interest is an end to this madness of the war on drugs and the money it costs us all, certain powers were retained by london after devolution, and drug , legislation was one field, let drug policy be set by experts, and they are all against the pointless war on drugs, unfortunately politicians have to follow the whims of the electorate who dont have the leisure to inform themselves on what is essentially an off grid topic.

Offline winkywanky

i cant recall advocating legalising heroine dealers, and as you know didnt, my interest is an end to this madness of the war on drugs and the money it costs us all, certain powers were retained by london after devolution, and drug , legislation was one field, let drug policy be set by experts, and they are all against the pointless war on drugs, unfortunately politicians have to follow the whims of the electorate who dont have the leisure to inform themselves on what is essentially an off grid topic.


You made some blanket statement about legalising supply and use of all drugs.

So if that's not exactly what you mean then just say so. You haven't denied it yet? This has been going backwards and forwards for quite a few posts now, if it's not what you mean then just clarify.

Or do you just like having needless arguments on a public forum?  :unknown:

Online Kev40ish

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,950
  • Likes: 22
  • Reviews: 24
i cant recall advocating legalising heroine dealers, and as you know didnt, my interest is an end to this madness of the war on drugs and the money it costs us all, certain powers were retained by london after devolution, and drug , legislation was one field, let drug policy be set by experts, and they are all against the pointless war on drugs, unfortunately politicians have to follow the whims of the electorate who dont have the leisure to inform themselves on what is essentially an off grid topic.

New rule:

30 No discussions on illegal drugs


Online daviemac

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,653
  • Likes: 396
  • Reviews: 24
Just a couple of reminders.

The thread topic -

I don't watch it but apparently he had over 41000 complaints for his comments about Meghan Markle then gets the hump when the weather man calls him out  :dance:
Seems he's very outspoken and says what he wants but can't take the flak himself  :rolleyes:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only


Just for the avoidance of doubt the title has auto corrected, class  ;)  :D  :drinks:

And the rules. -

30 No discussions on illegal drugs

Offline Matrix

Just a couple of reminders.

The thread topic -

And the rules. -

30 No discussions on illegal drugs

For clarification; Can it be mentioned in a review, if you believe the girl to be taking them?

Offline willie loman


You made some blanket statement about legalising supply and use of all drugs.

So if that's not exactly what you mean then just say so. You haven't denied it yet? This has been going backwards and forwards for quite a few posts now, if it's not what you mean then just clarify.

Or do you just like having needless arguments on a public forum?  :unknown:
you really are an arse, ive repeatedly made the point that we should follow what experts say on this topic, and they have made clear that they want an end to the war on drugs, you are the one who incessantly makes these irrelevant remarks about dealers, as if this proves your point, dealers follow the money, once something is no longer illegal they move on and make money elsewhere. have you changed your view on anything since you were 14?

Online Kev40ish

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,950
  • Likes: 22
  • Reviews: 24
For clarification; Can it be mentioned in a review, if you believe the girl to be taking them?

I think it’s more around the use of them and the legality of it..
 :hi:

Offline winkywanky

New rule:

30 No discussions on illegal drugs


you really are an arse, ive repeatedly made the point that we should follow what experts say on this topic, and they have made clear that they want an end to the war on drugs, you are the one who incessantly makes these irrelevant remarks about dealers, as if this proves your point, dealers follow the money, once something is no longer illegal they move on and make money elsewhere. have you changed your view on anything since you were 14?


Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see you get yourself banned willie, so intent are you on being a confrontational little twat.

Offline Matrix


Offline willie loman


Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to see you get yourself banned willie, so intent are you on being a confrontational little twat.

you have a curious lack of self knowledge.

Offline king tarzan

Chris Evans as replacement??? :cool: :lol:
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Paris69

Banned reason: Idiot fantasist
Banned by: daviemac


Offline Paris69

Banned reason: Idiot fantasist
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Adoniron