Author Topic: Sophie Fylde.  (Read 12636 times)


9 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5904222) (7 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline cideruk

Beggining to realise why you have thick in your nane just need to take the big out of it and that will be perfect.

Cleaning up creampies your thang?

Live and let live and all that but deffo not mine

Offline bigthickdick

I received some private messages from punters that met her and now are concerned so I wanted to clarify that I have no information of her being infected with anything, not saying that she is or isn't as I know absolutely nothing about that. All I'm saying is that BB is a possibility with her, even though not openly advertising it and not agreeing to it via comms, in person it is available.

Offline usroads

Me thinks with all this exposure she's going to be very popular with UTC bareback punters - shame we'll never know who they are.  :(

Offline touchythefishy

Why would you care with who the punters are? As long as we know a WG is a potential UTC BBer that's good enough for us.

Offline usroads

I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?

Offline Zaksmith

I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?
can't argue with logic.

Offline Briddy

I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?
+1

Offline bigthickdick

can't argue with logic.


Can you really not? I can...

I don't see what the drama's about - All girls fuck someone bareback - If I booked her I'd rubber up and enjoy ploughing her.

versus

I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?


Is it just me or there is a bit of a contradiction in the logic.

Offline NigelF

One minute you say this:
I don't see what the drama's about - All girls fuck someone bareback - If I booked her I'd rubber up and enjoy ploughing her.

Then you say this:
I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?

If you actually did that then you would hardly have any WGs to punt with. Virtually every popular WG on here has seen a punter who has AW feedback from an open barebacker (albeit it doesn’t mean they actually did BB). I know this because I’ve actually checked myself (it was quite a reality check). And that’s just based on traceable AW feedback, the real number of bareback punters will be far higher. I’d honestly put the percentage of WGs who’ve seen at least one punter who’s barebacked another escort at damn close to 99%. And obviously every WG has seen a punter who’s barebacked civvies.

Offline usroads

If I booked her - And I wouldn't knowingly

Offline bigthickdick

I care because then I can avoid the SPs those punters have shagged - clear enough for you sonny?

Regardless of the contradiction, that is kind of pointless, with that logic you should stop punting completely. It is impossible for the VGs to avoid every single punters that fucked other WGs bareback. Most we can hope is that the girls we see don't bareback any punters and get checked regularly, as long as we can believe that and we rubber up we do our best IMHO.

Offline usroads

Hell Nigel it's a scary hobby  :(

Offline bigthickdick

Hell Nigel it's a scary hobby  :(

Not for the faint-hearted  :lol:. And definitely not for the squeamish either.

Offline bigthickdick

Virtually every popular WG on here has seen a punter who has AW feedback from an open barebacker

And on top of that there are loads of WGs offering bareback UTC, some of those WGs are very popular on here too...

Offline cideruk

And on top of that there are loads of WGs offering bareback UTC, some of those WGs are very popular on here too...

If you know of them best add mentions to previous reviews


Offline bigthickdick

If you know of them best add mentions to previous reviews

No, I won't.

Offline marcus1985

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
I'm pretty sure most of us have been offered bb by girls who are well reviewed and worshipped on here.
Banned reason: No recent contributions
Banned by: Iloveoral

Online wibbles

Never been offered BB by any of the girls I have seen, but I assume many of them do offer it. I have a don't ask don't tell policy.

Offline bigthickdick

I'm pretty sure most of us have been offered bb by girls who are well reviewed and worshipped on here.

Yep. Also we might know of it from someone else. But I've been called a liar and a barebacker after being the 2nd person confirming this WG being a barebacker and she is not even a forum's favourite WG. Imagine if I shared this kind of information about some of the well reviewed ones. :scare:

Offline Access

Yep. Also we might know of it from someone else. But I've been called a liar and a barebacker after being the 2nd person confirming this WG being a barebacker and she is not even a forum's favourite WG. Imagine if I shared this kind of information about some of the well reviewed ones. :scare:
I’ve been offered BB, or had BB attempted on me.

I’m pretty sure it won’t be a surprise. No one disbelieved you though about this SP barebacking, more how it was approached I think. But, I’ll retract my previous statement on my assumption.

Offline marcus1985

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 85
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Yep. Also we might know of it from someone else. But I've been called a liar and a barebacker after being the 2nd person confirming this WG being a barebacker and she is not even a forum's favourite WG. Imagine if I shared this kind of information about some of the well reviewed ones. :scare:

Ive been offered it by very well reviewed girls. Ive said nowt as you would get run out of town by all the fanboys and cynics on  here
Banned reason: No recent contributions
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline cideruk

No, I won't.

Prefer to keep them to yourself rather than warn others?


Offline bdyno

Yep. Also we might know of it from someone else. But I've been called a liar and a barebacker after being the 2nd person confirming this WG being a barebacker and she is not even a forum's favourite WG. Imagine if I shared this kind of information about some of the well reviewed ones. :scare:
I was among those who assumed you'd barebacked her after your initial post in the thread.  But what do you think people will believe when you make claims as boldly as you did?

You said you know for a fact she does it, so the obvious conclusion is that you that did it otherwise that 100% certainty cannot exist.  The alternative holds little more credibility than the stories you get told by someone who heard it from a bloke down the pub.

Then you said you'd confirm the story via PM to people you trust.  I didn't bother getting in touch, because you have no more reason to trust me than I do you. 

Now you say you know of loads of others who offer it under the counter but won't say who.  Again, what conclusion are we supposed to jump to on hearing that?

The last thing I want to do is piss anyone off, and if you've taken offence to anything I've said anywhere in the thread, I apologise.  Although I don't know you from Adam, some of the other comments in the thread seem to back up your assertion that what you say has some credibility around here.  But surely you can see how things would look to someone like me who doesn't know you?

Offline cideruk

You said you know for a fact she does it, so the obvious conclusion is that you that did it otherwise that 100% certainty cannot exist.  The alternative holds little more credibility than the stories you get told by someone who heard it from a bloke down the pub.

Now you say you know of loads of others who offer it under the counter but won't say who.  Again, what conclusion are we supposed to jump to on hearing that?

+1

Logical conclusion really

Either was told by someone else or did the deed.

If I knew of a bb then I'd pass it on to protect others, only right and proper.

I sometimes struggle with condoms and the SP has offered without but this was ages ago and they are no longer on AW

Always annoying (not to mention dangerous) when I've been down on them and then realise they may well be a jizz bucket.

Offline bigthickdick

Prefer to keep them to yourself rather than warn others?

Nope, just avoiding potential problems. I received many PMs and I replied to some of them, they were all satisfied enough with the explanation. One of them was one of the moderators  and it was good enough for him too (at least I think it was as I'm not banned and my privileges haven't been revoked.) But as I said, I knew it for 100% sure.

The girls I was talking about I can't name yet as I can't say for 100% sure yet. I will try to get proof and will name them once I have the proof. Not before, sorry. Too risky for me and wouldn't be fair on them either.



Offline bigthickdick

I was among those who assumed you'd barebacked her after your initial post in the thread.  But what do you think people will believe when you make claims as boldly as you did?

You said you know for a fact she does it, so the obvious conclusion is that you that did it otherwise that 100% certainty cannot exist.  The alternative holds little more credibility than the stories you get told by someone who heard it from a bloke down the pub.

Then you said you'd confirm the story via PM to people you trust.  I didn't bother getting in touch, because you have no more reason to trust me than I do you. 

Now you say you know of loads of others who offer it under the counter but won't say who.  Again, what conclusion are we supposed to jump to on hearing that?

The last thing I want to do is piss anyone off, and if you've taken offence to anything I've said anywhere in the thread, I apologise.  Although I don't know you from Adam, some of the other comments in the thread seem to back up your assertion that what you say has some credibility around here.  But surely you can see how things would look to someone like me who doesn't know you?

Not pissed off, don't worry. I was inactive for a very long time so some newer members may not know me at all, but I'd like to believe that some of the older ones remember me as a fairly reliable source of information, I don't just make allegations like this very often and when I do I am very certain, but can't always disclose the source without risking of outing my real life identity.

Offline bigthickdick

+1

Logical conclusion really

Either was told by someone else or did the deed.



Let's put it this way, I was told by someone I trust but the person also had proof.


If I knew of a bb then I'd pass it on to protect others, only right and proper.

I sometimes struggle with condoms and the SP has offered without but this was ages ago and they are no longer on AW

Always annoying (not to mention dangerous) when I've been down on them and then realise they may well be a jizz bucket.

I agree, hence I named this one.

Offline cideruk

Let's put it this way, I was told by someone I trust but the person also had proof.

I agree, hence I named this one.

Photos, showing his and her face?

You said

And on top of that there are loads of WGs offering bareback UTC, some of those WGs are very popular on here too...

Which is pretty unequivocal to me, to claim that just on a hunch seems a bit off to me.

But it is looking very likely Sophie Fylde is a bare backer, surprised all those others that have fucked her didn't realise.




Offline bdyno

But it is looking very likely Sophie Fylde is a bare backer, surprised all those others that have fucked her didn't realise.
If they didn't request it, why would they realise?  It's obviously not something she openly advertises and other posts indicate she'll even decline a booking if you request it in advance so it seems she's only offering it to those who turn up and try it on.

I'd hope she has a thorough shower & clean out between clients, so it's not like she's going to be filled up with the stuff even if she has seen a barebacker before you.  There's no way to tell a UTC barebacker simply by fucking one with a condom.

Offline cideruk

If condoms are completely optional you'd know I'd have thought.

Doubt a quick shower will get all the baby gravy out of her pussy and ass before the next punter arrives.


Offline bigthickdick

If condoms are completely optional you'd know I'd have thought.

Doubt a quick shower will get all the baby gravy out of her pussy and ass before the next punter arrives.
You aren't really this daft, so you must be taking the piss...

Optional, but condom is default. Have to ask for BB.

And if not a conveyor belt she can clean properly (tbh even if a conveyor belt), takes about 30 seconds longer...


Offline cideruk

You aren't really this daft, so you must be taking the piss...

Optional, but condom is default. Have to ask for BB.

And if not a conveyor belt she can clean properly (tbh even if a conveyor belt), takes about 30 seconds longer...

And you still claim to have not seen her and barebacked her?


Offline bigthickdick

And you still claim to have not seen her and barebacked her?

I have to withdraw my previous statement. You are this daft.

Offline cideruk

I have to withdraw my previous statement. You are this daft.

A quick douche ain't going to get it out

Ask the person who proved she was a BB to say how it tasted.