External Link/Members OnlyA few months back, was advertising as lovely.kat then.
Comms: Pretty standard, no particular complaints, response on texts, seen in NW London.
The Location: At the time was seen in a block of flats, slightly annoying to get in to, as had to ring and be buzzed in, and you were standing on a fairly main road. I see she has changed locations. It was a pretty standard flat with a bedroom. Bathroom was serviceable but not the greatest.
The Girl: Facially fairly attractive, the pictures on AW are overly flattering, but she's by no means unattractive probably facially 7/10. Body is pleasant enough probably a B cup, in the dim light of the room wasn't incredibly red headed, as she appears on the photos. Reasonably slim probably size 6. On the whole a fairly standard 7/10. You wouldn't be disappointed to wake up to her in your bed after a night out, but wouldn't exactly be rushing to tell your mates either.
The Service: Handed over the papers £80 for half an hour. Extremely perfunctory, not overly enthusiastic, OW condom (not a problem for me) fairly standard nothing to write home about, and then fairly standard sex in all the usual positions, wasn't overly keen on being penetrated too deeply, did the usual leg blocking thing. Really wasn't overly enthusiastic about it and it was a cum once and you're done kind of deal, which she hadn't mentioned upfront, the usual WG moaning, but not exceptionally vocal. Not overly loose, nor particularly tight. There was nothing particularly stand out about the service and on the whole it was a fairly vanilla service with no real stand outs.
Overall: 6/10. I hesitate to call this one positive. It was an incredibly standard service and nothing to really write home up. On the whole felt relatively "transactional".
I doubt I shall return. Probably VFM at £60. I wouldn't feel miffed about £70, but at £80 for a half hour there are better girls on offer.