Author Topic: Green Valley Ranch (Meg), Glasgow  (Read 4902 times)


17 review(s) for greenvalleyranch (13 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Thepunteruk

External Link/Members Only
£80
30min
Jan. 2021

Finally, a positive experience. Contacted Meg on AW, quick to reply and telephone number given after a few emails. Arranged for later the same  day.
Easy and straightforward. Nice clean flat at her G11 location.
Buzzer number given on arrival.

Meg was wearing the black outfit from her profile. Sexy heels and stockings. Very nice. Shower taken and on to the bed. OWO, not too deep but got better after a few minutes. Returned the favour on her, clean and fresh. Some French kissing throughout. Couple of positions then I came in the bag. Nice clean up, water offered and nice bit of chat.

I'll add one caveat, Meg does look her age. Be aware she is a mature MILF.
In her 50s. I found her attractive, but I don't mind an older woman.

An easy positive.

Offline deano658

I'll never understand why they hide their face in all the gallery pics but its clear to see in the movie stills  :wacko:

Offline capman02

I tried to get a booking with her not so long ago and she said she only see’s people with AW reviews. Do you know if this is still the case?

Offline J_H

I'll never understand why they hide their face in all the gallery pics but its clear to see in the movie stills  :wacko:
+1!

Crazy. Or dumb.

Offline Thepunteruk

I tried to get a booking with her not so long ago and she said she only see’s people with AW reviews. Do you know if this is still the case?

Yes, I believe so.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Yes, I believe so.
Probably a bit difficult to get AW FB at the moment aswell, when that function is temporarily turned off... 😳

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,781
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
I'll never understand why they hide their face in all the gallery pics but its clear to see in the movie stills  :wacko:

Although most will say it's to protect their privacy/anonymity...there's usually a more obvious reason ;)

My personal bugbear, is GILF's charging £80 for half an hour :wackogirl:

Offline Topgear88

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 82
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Saw this one over a year ago, she rents a flat in the west end and also works from her own private flat in possil,
It’s a new build and really nice, but found her service a bit robotic and tired tbh. Decent body though.

Offline Thepunteruk

Although most will say it's to protect their privacy/anonymity...there's usually a more obvious reason ;)

My personal bugbear, is GILF's charging £80 for half an hour :wackogirl:

Your choice jock.

She admits to her age on her profile, so that's not a negative. Her service however deserves a positive IMO.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,781
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
Your choice jock.

She admits to her age on her profile, so that's not a negative. Her service however deserves a positive IMO.

Absolutely, it's your review and rating...and I don't have any issues with it, at all.

I was just stating that, I wouldn't be paying £80 for a HH appointment with someone 50+ :hi:

Offline Trickus

It says on her Q&A that she is 10.5 st. Is she a big unit? I know it states she’s size 12.

Offline pieeyedpiper

Your choice jock.

She admits to her age on her profile, so that's not a negative. Her service however deserves a positive IMO.
+1  :)

Offline pieeyedpiper

It says on her Q&A that she is 10.5 st. Is she a big unit? I know it states she’s size 12.
I would say that she is a size 12 IMHO and def not "a unit"  :D