Author Topic: Busty_Bailey - Birmingham  (Read 7516 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6048217) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline MrKhan

Reviewing a few of my favourites I’ve seen recently!!!

So I saw the sexy Bailey some time last week I believe and wow wow wow. She is even better in person. She has such a bubbly fun atmosphere about her and she made me excited from the get go.

I paid £160 an hour. The apartment was really nice inside. Clean and the room was very nice and classy.

Services - OWO, DFK, cowgirl,

Lady- exactly like photos, stunning. Dressed to impress, tight black bodysuit and stripper heels

So i usually go for the standard GFE service which I got but she added a little twist I don’t usually enjoy but I did with this lady. She undressed for me a s her body was stunning. She teased me and i sucked her nipples and kissed her. She began to lick and kiss down my body and preform oral. Amazing. Wow wow wow. Honestly incredible. She gave me a slow deep blow job ans I could have cum just from that honestly lol. Probably one of if not the best I have ever had But I asked her to stop as I had an hour and so she got on top and rode me, her ass was massive so it wasn’t the best position. She turned around and did reverse cow girl, wow. This was the first time I’ve done this with an escort as I usually feel it’s just like a PSE and I don’t enjoy it. But seeing her ass shake from the back was incredible, I cum within about 5/10 mins of that and I was left orgasming.

I would definitely go back for the ass again, I haven’t seen one like it in a while!!! Natural.

External Link/Members Only

« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 02:28:25 pm by MrKhan »

Offline Pablo02

She looks different in close up pics compared to pics at a distance.
Weird stretch marks around her ass. 

£160 a bit steep IMO
but looks like that’s the new norm now

Offline MrKhan

She looks different in close up pics compared to pics at a distance.
Weird stretch marks around her ass. 

£160 a bit steep IMO
but looks like that’s the new norm now

She was a curvier lady mate so she did have stretch marks I’ll be honest but she still looked incredible. She looks just as good as photos I believe. If not I preferred her in person

Offline Pablo02

£160 I’d be expected minimum a low elite level of SP.

This should be £120 for a hour IMO.

Close up pics look airbrushed which make her tits look good
Look at the ones at a distance boobs look spotty and have stretch marks.
Based on that how can you honestly say she looks better in person

Offline Pablo02

Did you forget to mention she has a gut?

Offline MrKhan

Did you forget to mention she has a gut?

I guess it is down to opinion mate, I prefer her in person. I prefer a natural woman. I don’t like all this fakeness

Offline MrKhan

Did you forget to mention she has a gut?


No need to be harsh

Of course she will have a belly, she is a curvier lady. You can see that in photos... I was happy with what I received

Offline Pablo02


No need to be harsh

Of course she will have a belly, she is a curvier lady. You can see that in photos... I was happy with what I received

This site isn’t about being harsh or not it’s about true reviews
She has a belly yet you didn’t mention that in your review because you thought you would be harsh on her!!


Offline MrKhan

No I didn’t mention it because you can quite clearly see that In photos

Offline chadpitt

I'd have thought with a username like MrKhan you'd be a bit more parsimonious.

But a £160 on a size 16+ landwhale ain't no catch of the day.

Offline vindici

No I didn’t mention it because you can quite clearly see that In photos

For future reference, you really need to mention it, for many punters (myself excluded 😋) it's a deal breaker, especially at those eye watering prices 💸

Offline Denholm

Thanks for the review MrKhan  :thumbsup:

Seems to me like this WG's public gallery makes it pretty clear she's a bigger lady. It's not a reviewer's job to describe photographs to us imo. We can all see them. If the pics are unclear or misleading then yeah, some description is helpful. Otherwise it's pointless and seems like people are demanding to be spoon-fed

Offline warypunter

Did this WG used to be known as Breathtaking Bailey who I believe was also mixed race?

Offline MrKhan

Thanks for the review MrKhan  :thumbsup:

Seems to me like this WG's public gallery makes it pretty clear she's a bigger lady. It's not a reviewer's job to describe photographs to us imo. We can all see them. If the pics are unclear or misleading then yeah, some description is helpful. Otherwise it's pointless and seems like people are demanding to be spoon-fed

Thank you  :hi: I did think it was very clear she was a bigger woman so I didn’t feel the need to mention  :dash:
Her pictures match what you receive, she didn’t catfish, looks the same as pictures.

Offline MrKhan

Did this WG used to be known as Breathtaking Bailey who I believe was also mixed race?

That’s a possibility. I’m not sure on that though mate so I wouldn’t want to confirm..

Offline Straightsix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,973
  • Likes: 3
  •  
  • Reviews: 37
Did you have the complimentary pegging session afterwards? I can understand if you don't want to talk about it?
Banned reason: Warned before but doesn’t seem to learn
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Imp8

I'd have thought with a username like MrKhan you'd be a bit more parsimonious.

But a £160 on a size 16+ landwhale ain't no catch of the day.


Come on Chad.....Behave.
Has to Google that. Funny though

Offline vindici

Seems to me like this WG's public gallery makes it pretty clear she's a bigger lady. It's not a reviewer's job to describe photographs to us imo. We can all see them. If the pics are unclear or misleading then yeah, some description is helpful. Otherwise it's pointless and seems like people are demanding to be spoon-fed

That's right, although it is the reviewers job to describe what she looked like on the day. Did she match her photographs, are they out of date, is she bigger, is she smaller, etc.

Offline Denholm

That's right, although it is the reviewers job to describe what she looked like on the day. Did she match her photographs, are they out of date, is she bigger, is she smaller, etc.

Review clearly states she looks "exactly like photos"
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 11:45:40 am by Denholm »

Offline pingo

I guess it is down to opinion mate, I prefer her in person. I prefer a natural woman. I don’t like all this fakeness

Whats the area of incall?

Offline bozzyman

Wow £160 ph for a fatty, i don't think so.

Offline MrKhan


Offline Philloveit21

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 219
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Careful bozzyman , your criticising and mentioning the cost of a working girl , I did that and got crucified and warned ?
Banned reason: Taking the piss.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline bozzyman

Please ignore last post, i was messing about in messages and don't know what the fuck happened......

Offline bozzyman

Perhaps she sets her price by the kilo  :unknown:?

Offline Whore Master

Did this WG used to be known as Breathtaking Bailey who I believe was also mixed race?

One and the same! She was £120 on another profile, not so long ago.

Not worth £160. I wouldn't encourage a visit to her. She is also a poor service provider.
Banned reason: Posting inappropriate links / threats.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Pablo02

One and the same! She was £120 on another profile, not so long ago.

Not worth £160. I wouldn't encourage a visit to her. She is also a poor service provider.

If you have seen her I would encourage a review  :hi:

Offline jay121

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


thats the old profile which has been reviewed on a few occasions


Offline vindici

Has changed her AW profile. Is now External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Gut is no longer in any of the pictures. Conspicuous by it's absence...

Online Punterperson1971

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


thats the old profile which has been reviewed on a few occasions
I saw this one in Oct 2015 she is darker than this one are we sure it’s actually her?

Offline jay121

One and the same! She was £120 on another profile, not so long ago.

Not worth £160. I wouldn't encourage a visit to her. She is also a poor service provider.

Whore master reckons she is the same PP

Online Punterperson1971

Whore master reckons she is the same PP
I’m not convinced,although if I’m wrong I’ll hold my hands up all I’m saying is the pictures don’t look like the same girl I met who was a lot darker than this lady in the profile

Offline Whore Master

I’m not convinced,although if I’m wrong I’ll hold my hands up all I’m saying is the pictures don’t look like the same girl I met who was a lot darker than this lady in the profile

PP, check her out  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: Posting inappropriate links / threats.
Banned by: daviemac