NicolettenaughtyPSE hebburn

[Golfinggent]

Sorry, I thought I made it clear in my first reply that I don’t lie about anything on my profile other than my name. This includes who I’m in a relationship with. I haven’t approached it as I really don’t think it’s any of your business. But for anyone who has had the pleasure of booking us both together, I’m sure they can vouch I’m in a very happy relationship with alexei.

Sorry you must have misinterpreted my original question. It's not who your in a relationship with that's none of my business you stand corrected.It's the sexual activities bareback I was more interested in, sorry rather disinterested and I did see you mentioned on the other site which is banned

[Golfinggent]

How many times have you had an appointment with her, or how many times have you seen her for a booking? Whichever way of putting it makes sense to you.

Two. Both times text late at night which is why I posted the negative review. Clearly states in the review itself if you care to gaze through it

[nicolettenaughtypse]

Without the risk of actually insulting you, do you have intercourse with your wife unprotected?
I feel the only difference between our marital situation is that my partner knows I’m seeing different people

[daviemac]

Two. Both times text late at night which is why I posted the negative review. Clearly states in the review itself if you care to gaze through it

I just wanted to make sure it was correct that you have seen her twice. If you feel so strongly about unsolicited txt (text) messages why did you go back a second time.

Must just be me then but if an escort did something that might have caused me major problems at home she wouldn't get a repeat visit.

[Golfinggent]

I just wanted to make sure it was correct that you have seen her twice. If you feel so strongly about unsolicited txt (text) messages why did you go back a second time.

Must just be me then but if an escort did something that might have caused me major problems at home she wouldn't get a repeat visit.

Have a read of my review. It's there in black and white

[Kev40ish]

I just wanted to make sure it was correct that you have seen her twice. If you feel so strongly about unsolicited txt (text) messages why did you go back a second time.

Must just be me then but if an escort did something that might have caused me major problems at home she wouldn't get a repeat visit.

Seems a tad strange.. and the videos were there, he is obviously so  concerned about and had researched on the banned site but still visited her twice 

[daviemac]

Without the risk of actually insulting you, do you have intercourse with your wife unprotected?
I feel the only difference between our marital situation is that my partner knows I’m seeing different people

You really need to leave this now, the rules are very clear regarding service providers being members.  For what it's worth if I see pictures of unprotected sex on a profile I will not book them, I have no doubt escorts have BB sex with partners just I don't need to see it.

I want to see pictures that make them look attractive to me and them getting shagged does the opposite.

I do not expect you to respond to this post, this is just my opinion.

[nicolettenaughtypse]

You’re fine to have a personal opinion but for anyone who cares, I started making content with my partner so I could minimise how much I work escorting during the pandemic. An extra way to make money, stay at home and be able to be a full time parent/teacher. So for me it’s a little more than just being shagged as you put it. I’m going to bed now because I think it’s shedding a really bad light on my personal circumstances being aired out and I’d hate to lose composure after articulating myself so well

[PunTor13]

Agree with Daviemac, about the two bookings aspect, with an addition.

Rather than just “not go back”, the other option would be “mention it, either during the first booking or when booking for the second time”

“You texting so late nearly caused me a problem, last time I booked”.
Based solely on the SP’s (appropriate) responses on this thread, that would have staved off the issue, as they’d have known the OP’s preference.

As for “not seeing an SP because they BB with their partner” : I suspect that’d narrow down the pool of SP’s the OP would consider, massively. Again, did they ask? What did they expect??

For these reasons, the OP doesn’t present themselves well.
Be that they are being unreasonable / obsessive (about the BB with partner), unreasonable (about the ‘no text late at night, but not telling the SP either during first booking or when making the second booking), or a neg without cause (the review is still useful, but the red seems unfair) : they are coming across as having a grudge / not being realistic!

[Kev40ish]

You really need to leave this now, the rules are very clear regarding service providers being members.  For what it's worth if I see pictures of unprotected sex on a profile I will not book them, I have no doubt escorts have BB sex with partners just I don't need to see it.

I want to se pictures that make them look attractive to me and them getting shagged does the opposite.

I do not expect you to respond to this post, this is just my opinion.

Unlike you I understand the need for escorts to get views on their PG to pay for AW fees and if they make it clear it’s their partner it doesn’t concern me overly much, as I look after my own protection. I just assume that everyone is BB someone.

But totally understand how it can put some people off

[daviemac]

You’re fine to have a personal opinion but for anyone who cares, I started making content with my partner so I could minimise how much I work escorting during the pandemic. An extra way to make money, stay at home and be able to be a full time parent/teacher. So for me it’s a little more than just being shagged as you put it. I’m going to bed now because I think it’s shedding a really bad light on my personal circumstances being aired out and I’d hate to lose composure after articulating myself so well

I don't want to have to ban you but I will if you keep on, you have been told this has gone way past the review, you have been told to leave it and you really need to now.

[Kev40ish]

I don't want to have to ban you but I will if you keep on, you have been told this has gone way past the review, you have been told to leave it and you really need to now.

??? For what reason I haven’t seen any sign of
“touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters”
She is just answering things that have been asked and defending herself.. it seems fair enough to me..

[daviemac]

Unlike you I understand the need for escorts to get views on their PG to pay for AW fees and if they make it clear it’s their partner it doesn’t concern me overly much, as I look after my own protection. I just assume that everyone is BB someone.

But totally understand how it can put some people off

I totally agree they need to make as much as they can and whatever they put in their PG is fair enough, but her's is visible when you look at the movies.  I'm very much a 1 on 1 punter, parties or MMF do nothing for me so I want to see something that attracts me in a profile, a representation of what she will be like when I get in the room if you like. If I want to look at someone getting shagged there's tons of free porn.

I also expect them all to be BBing someone so take the necessary precautions.   

[Kev40ish]

I totally agree they need to make as much as they can and whatever they put in their PG is fair enough, but her's is visible when you look at the movies.  I'm very much a 1 on 1 punter, parties or MMF do nothing for me so I want to see something that attracts me in a profile, a representation of what she will be like when I get in the room if you like. If I want to look at someone getting shagged there's tons of free porn.

I also expect them all to be BBing someone so take the necessary precautions.

Totally understand your view, I’m just not so worried about it, but obviously can see her thinking as a lot of well reviewed escorts have increased their content to get views.

[daviemac]

??? For what reason I haven’t seen any sign of
“touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters”
She is just answering things that have been asked and defending herself.. it seems fair enough to me..

I think it's all been covered from her point of view and previous experience has shown me that with some SPs no matter how often the rules are pointed out they don't take notice and start with the insults.

I would rather not take the chance of this going the same way.

[Kev40ish]

I think it's all been covered from her point of view and previous experience has shown me that with some SPs no matter how often the rules are pointed out they don't take notice and start with the insults.

I would rather not take the chance of this going the same way.

I think she has conducted herself really well and not shown any signs of insulting anyone. But can understand your concerns, it’s not as if I’m new here and would have posted the rules if she had broken any.
I personally would have been banned, if I was her and called the OP a stupid obnoxious cunt.. but thankfully I’m not in her position and don’t take it personally,  so can moderate my language 

[daviemac]

I think she has conducted herself really well and not shown any signs of insulting anyone. But can understand your concerns, it’s not as if I’m new here and would have posted the rules if she had broken any rules.
I personally would have been banned if I was her and called the OP a stupid obnoxious cunt.. but thankfully I’m not in her position and don’t take it personally,  so can moderate my language 

I agree she has conducted herself very well, her responses have been calm and well put. I would rather she stopped a little too early than a little too late though. (we get complaints)

[Kev3773]

I stand by my opinion of the Op, sounds like someone with a grudge, joined a week ago and reviewed a north east favourite ( a gentle introduction ? ) then an hour and a half later asks for help regarding leaving this review. Although he is horrified about her contacting him late at night he still went ahead with the booking and had a great time also he tried for a second meet.  His condemnation of her has increased as the thread goes on even though he had said his "last" on the matter a while back.
There has been no WK that I can see (that's WhiteKnighting for you Op)
Only people questioning your errors/motives.

[daviemac]

I stand by my opinion of the Op, sounds like someone with a grudge, joined a week ago and reviewed a north east favourite ( a gentle introduction ? ) then an hour and a half later asks for help regarding leaving this review. Although he is horrified about her contacting him late at night he still went ahead with the booking and had a great time also he tried for a second meet.  His condemnation of her has increased as the thread goes on even though he had said his "last" on the matter a while back.
There has been no WK that I can see (that's WhiteKnighting for you Op)
Only people questioning your errors/motives.

His reply to this was 2  " how many times have you seen her for a booking?" So has he seen her twice and cancelled once making 3 appointments.

[Sar-Major]

I believe a WK is a fucking great guy 

I wouldn't go "That Fucking Far"...............................            

 

[Kev3773]

I believe a WK is fucking a great guy 

Fixed 

[Bigbowsie]

Hahaha some of these comments are class. The guy that's posted it is clearly someone with a vendetta though. Caught him out on his other posts. In the hollyjane review he's said that he used to smoke green 30 years ago in his YOUTH yet claims to be 60 plus on this post so being in his 30s to him means youth?. Sad pathetic individual getting kicks out of  trying to put women down. Even getting the sly dig in at the end about scar on her belly wow you really are low . I've seen Nicolette loads of times she's a little darling a haven't got a bad word to say about her she's the type of lass ya could fall in love with she's that beautiful. It must have upset her otherwise she wouldn't have made an account to defend herself. Golfing gent is deffo a fake profile he's been caught out straight away the woppa

[Golfinggent]

Hahaha some of these comments are class. The guy that's posted it is clearly someone with a vendetta though. Caught him out on his other posts. In the hollyjane review he's said that he used to smoke green 30 years ago in his YOUTH yet claims to be 60 plus on this post so being in his 30s to him means youth?. Sad pathetic individual getting kicks out of  trying to put women down. Even getting the sly dig in at the end about scar on her belly wow you really are low . I've seen Nicolette loads of times she's a little darling a haven't got a bad word to say about her she's the type of lass ya could fall in love with she's that beautiful. It must have upset her otherwise she wouldn't have made an account to defend herself. Golfing gent is deffo a fake profile he's been caught out straight away the woppa

Excuse my naivety but what is a 'woppa' ? I wasn't brought up on a council estate so don't speak in these terms unfortunately

[Bigbowsie]

Excuse my naivety but what is a 'woppa' ? I wasn't brought up on a council estate so don't speak in these terms unfortunately

It means idiot or moron. Do you have any convictions for being a wrongUn by any chance? If you want to know what wrongUn means it means stalker/paedophile. Been caught watching kids through your binoculars or anything ????? Not suprised you have to hide your phone from your wife you've probably got more pics of kids on it that would make jimmy Savile look like a part timer

[Golfinggent]

It means idiot or moron. Do you have any convictions for being a wrongUn by any chance? If you want to know what wrongUn means it means stalker/paedophile. Been caught watching kids through your binoculars or anything ????? Not suprised you have to hide your phone from your wife you've probably got more pics of kids on it that would make jimmy Savile look like a part timer

Very sad troll. I've reported you to admin

[tynetunnel]

I think she explained quite eloquently why she did it and had taken on the comments given.

I agree Kev, Nicolette has dealt with this well in terms of her apology, understanding and how she has presented her points on here, while all the time balancing on the tightrope of being a WG (that’s Working Girl) on a punters forum. The OP (Original Poster) has favoured less well, and is the master of his own downfall. Not least because (almost) every punter knows, a punting phone is an essential piece of punting kit if you have anyone at home who might be less than pleased to learn of your ‘hobby’

Anyway, back to “that Lunden” for you, you chirpy Cockney type 

[Ericshon]

I'm sure other gents on here can make their own minds up about what I have said. Maybe I should have done a neutral but the fact I'm married and Nicolette texts at night when I'm in bed turns it into a negative. I should have brought this up with Nicolette during the meet but I was so awestruck by her beauty I didn't want to put a dampener on proceedings.

A WG texting you late at night is a derived negative OP. I think you’ve given a very balanced review 

[Kev3773]

A WG texting you late at night is a derived negative OP. I think you’ve given a very balanced review 

If a wg did that to you, would you still go and see her the next day, then try and arrange another meeting another day (like the op) 

[daviemac]

If a wg did that to you, would you still go and see her the next day, then try and arrange another meeting another day (like the op) 

I'm wondering if, given the other site he was searching on, the OP has been knocked back for something he asked for.

There is a NE punter actively propositioning escorts for bareback. I don't yet know who it is and not accusing the OP here.

[bushman]

I'm wondering if, given the other site he was searching on, the OP has been knocked back for something he asked for.

There is a NE punter actively propositioning escorts for bareback. I don't yet know who it is and not accusing the OP here.

Glad you mentioned that, I was wondering about this since I can't see anything else causing the OP to behave the way he does.
If WG's are offering BB then that is their prerogative. But punters pressuring WG into BB is a whole other level of cuntishness.

[daviemac]

Glad you mentioned that, I was wondering about this since I can't see anything else causing the OP to behave the way he does.
If WG's are offering BB then that is their prerogative. But punters pressuring WG into BB is a whole other level of cuntishness.

I know for a fact one NE punters is asking SPs for bareback, he's willing to pay extra for it so he must think that makes it OK.   

[bushman]

I know for a fact one NE punters is asking SPs for bareback, he's willing to pay extra for it so he must think that makes it OK.   

Let's hope the culprit(s) come out of the closet soon enough.

[marbella punts rule]

Others have said that my point is valid about the night texting. So she has other commitments so what? No other escort have children or a 'normal job '? It's not even an excuse

As much as I agreed about the text message part of this I've gotta say you are sounding more and more like a complete bellend with every tippy tap of your keyboard, surely you must realise calling a WG a "whore" is a bit shitty...

[naza733]

I have seen this lady twice and she is amazing. She has never faked it when I have seen her. She always does what other escorts can't I think.

Amazing lady I would say.

[daviemac]

Let's hope the culprit(s) come out of the closet soon enough.

I've got his AW nic but can't link him to here.

[Kev40ish]

I've got his AW nic but can't link him to here.

I’m sure he’ll give himself away eventually they normally do.

[stardust]

I have seen this lady twice and she is amazing. She has never faked it when I have seen her. She always does what other escorts can't I think.

Amazing lady I would say.

I have seen her twice also. I agree with your post and would have booked again if it hadn’t been for the  Covid 19 situation.
I was not sent a postcode the night before but wouldn’t be too bothered because it would go to my punting phone. Seems really stupid for the OP to have to worry about an unsolicited text conning to his personal phone when that text could be seen by his wife.
The Op seems to have an issue with her age too. Her age was the last thing I was thinking about when I saw her. I’m not great at guessing age but there is no way I would have said she looked mid 30’s. Her stated age seems accurate to me.
She’s an intelligent women and has given a good account of herself her in my opinion.
Hope I don’t sound too much like a white knight!!

[datwabbit]

I know for a fact one NE punters is asking SPs for bareback, he's willing to pay extra for it so he must think that makes it OK.   

He must be talking about being a member on here then. Is it BB for a good review?

[daviemac]

He must be talking about being a member on here then. Is it BB for a good review?

No it was just BB for extra money, no mention of any reviews. He wanted an appointment then put "will you ride me bare for £120 half hour". I don't know if he is even a member here, I can't link his AW nic with anyone here.

[nicolettenaughtypse]

I don't quite get how the OP works this bit out,  You don't have to be from the same area to be in a relationship. In any case she's a tourer so that will make even less of a difference.   

David Mac could you please inbox me so I can send you a message enquiring about something please 😌😌😌

[snooker]

A punters rule should be to always put do not disturb on your phone when you go home.

[daviemac]

A punters rule should be to always put do not disturb on your phone when you go home.

Any punter with anything to lose should not only have a punting phone but should turn it off when not in use.

[CELICA GT]

Any punter with anything to lose should not only have a punting phone but should turn it off when not in use.

Makes sense really.