Author Topic: Pete218  (Read 1368 times)

Offline Eager Thighs

Anyone else keep finding this bellend when navigating AW? He seems to get his kicks from making fake bookings and leaving bad feedback for many, many WG's around the NE. Not sure if he goes further afield as I only really check out escorts within 20 miles of my house. Whenever I see his username I just ignore anything he writes. Come to think of it I guess it could be a prossie slandering the competition.

Offline jarrovian

Aye I've seen him crop up a few times. I don't think he's a prossie because he does have some feedback, or at least he did but had it removed. He certainly pisses them off, and I doubt he'll get many more bookings. Seems a right twat

Toshiba

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Sorry bud i dont use aw, can you report him?

Offline jarrovian

I am sure if you can one of the girls will have done

Captain Kang

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Yeah whoever he is he must have a very low IQ if he thinks he is fooling anyone.   

Offline AnthG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 8,861
  • Likes: 9
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
Yeah whoever he is he must have a very low IQ if he thinks he is fooling anyone.
The guy has been around for a long time it seems. Here is a post on the forums here from November 2010 quoting one of his negative feedbacks he had left.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg13221#msg13221

So you'd think if he was a faker AW would have kicked him off in those four years of using them. Looking at his stats it is:

70 ratings - 18 positive - 18 neutral - 1 negative - 36 disputes.

So I am guessing the disputes means 36 negatives that he has challenged with AW an won to have them removed?
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Eager Thighs

The guy has been around for a long time it seems. Here is a post on the forums here from November 2010 quoting one of his negative feedbacks he had left.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=420.msg13221#msg13221

So you'd think if he was a faker AW would have kicked him off in those four years of using them. Looking at his stats it is:

70 ratings - 18 positive - 18 neutral - 1 negative - 36 disputes.

So I am guessing the disputes means 36 negatives that he has challenged with AW an won to have them removed?

That's quite a record. No wonder he hides his feedback.

Edit: I did once see a positive he had left and the WG left a follow up something along the lines of 'I have never met this person. Think he's a fantasist. Avoid!'.

 :crazy:
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 10:38:17 pm by Eager Thighs »