Author Topic: English Gia - Elite Image Models - Outcall to C London hotel (£2500/hour )  (Read 10595 times)

Offline iq129

My comments were along those lines and I broadly stick to my opinion.

For example, looking at Amber's photographs I would no rather fuck her than Lucy Mayer, Michelle Independent or Gabi et al. All super hot girls who have given me fantastic realistic GFEs for a fraction of Amber's tariff.

Of course, fucking a woman in luxurious surroundings is going to enhance the experience, whoever the girl is. I don't envy your ability to do this, I honestly wish you continued prosperity. I'm not a member of the "socialist envy" brigade. I wish I had the money to see girls in a luxury pad but my chosen profession precludes that.

Amber, and her like, are profiting from some men's belief that if they pay more for sex then it will automatically be better and the girl has to be hotter. As I said, if men get extra pleasure from that charade then great. We're all after the same thing. The men want an orgasm and fantasy the women want money.

The filtering process may well be easier at the higher end, fair enough, but I can still "fly Emirates" for under £200. Fact.

You couldn’t have said it better. I made the same point but using Khloe and Sashalexxx as examples. The guy is an attention seeker and not a proper reviewer. He then wonders why he is getting some stick on this forum.

Offline Meursault


 don't want to sound rude but it grosses me out to be honest, I honestly think I can't even get hard! I get turned on by beauty, exclusivity and status of the girl! It's all in my mind and there is nothing I can do about it! Just being perfectly honest!
I honestly think that's the funniest thing I've ever read on this forum. Priceless (pardon the pun).
"grosses me out"  :D :D :D

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285

Last message on this topic. Everyone should do whatever makes them happy. It all comes down to your preferences. I just don't like the idea of booking £150 escorts, don't want to sound rude but it grosses me out to be honest, I honestly think I can't even get hard! I get turned on by beauty, exclusivity and status of the girl! It's all in my mind and there is nothing I can do about it! Just being perfectly honest!

I am amazed after this post anyone wouldn't know this poster was a billy bullshit merchant and in my view trolling. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: Thanks to Daviemac for his very swift action. :thumbsup:

Offline iq129

I don't think it's about their beauty. It's about the fact they have many many clients per day/week/month and it puts the OP off.

In that case he should get some virgin wife. If he is a wealthy Arab Muslim then he can have several virgin wives.

Offline SamOmar

I don't think it's about their beauty. It's about the fact they have many many clients per day/week/month and it puts the OP off.

Bollocks , quantity of clients has no correlation to quantity of sex had.
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline iq129

I am amazed after this post anyone wouldn't know this poster was a billy bullshit merchant and in my view trolling. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: Thanks to Daviemac for his very swift action. :thumbsup:

Brilliant work by Daviemac. The OP got what he deserved.

Offline Kriss_De_Valnor_

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 32
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
Bollocks , quantity of clients has no correlation to quantity of sex had.

Or quality of sex.
Banned reason: Uploading pictures of children .
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
And you were not grossed out having a smelly bum near near you, I started to change my opinion of you and give you the benefit of the doubt, however I can say with all my years of being around escorts and punters that your are full of bs. I feel that your bookings did not happen. You are posting fake reviews and making up the details as you go along and just talking down to genuine punters.

So £150 per hour girls cannot give you a hard on because they are ugly? Exclusivity and status have got nothing to do with service. This is arrogance, and I don’t think this forum is for you. Your views and style of language is shameful on my honest opinion.

I don't think OP is posting fake reviews. Just a lack of detail as prob not used to reviewing yet. If anything OPs views towards £150 girls makes his reviews more believable. I've certainly come across individuals that believe more paid money = better in every circumstance and I am sure many others have aswell. A lot of members are giving OP flack. Sure, most of us don't punt in his price range and realistically speaking his reviews will not help those of us who do not punt at such a level. However, he has given some insight with his reviews so far on what actually happens with WGs at that price range, in terms of there existence, comms and structure although not the acutal punt itself too much. I don't think it's fair to try to run off OP from the site because he is coming across as arrogant and defensive just because of how much he spent. There's no need for a mob mentality just because of how much he spent, it's not like he withdrew the money from your bank accounts.

It's clear that the OP punts in a niche level, him "overpaying"  by the thousands will not effect us that punt £60 or £150-"£200 girls. Damn, money spent subjects really brings out the worst of people sometimes. Give OP a break  :lol:.


EDIT: I see OP got banned LOOOL FFS.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2021, 10:00:23 pm by Payyourwaymate »

Offline Meursault

His profile could have been an elaborate marketing ploy by one, or more,  of the agencies lol

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,658
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Knew it after the answer to my question 😂

Well done mods!  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: January 09, 2021, 10:01:33 pm by hendrix »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I don't think OP is posting fake reviews. Just a lack of detail as prob not used to reviewing yet. If anything OPs views towards £150 girls makes his reviews more believable. I've certainly come across individuals that believe more paid money = better in every circumstance and I am sure many others have aswell. A lot of members are giving OP flack. Sure, most of us don't punt in his price range and realistically speaking his reviews will not help those of us who do not punt at such a level. However, he has given some insight with his reviews so far on what actually happens with WGs at that price range, in terms of there existence, comms and structure although not the acutal punt itself too much. I don't think it's fair to try to run off OP from the site because he is coming across as arrogant and defensive just because of how much he spent. There's no need for a mob mentality just because of how much he spent, it's not like he withdrew the money from your bank accounts.

It's clear that the OP punts in a niche level, him "overpaying"  by the thousands will not effect us that punt £60 or £150-"£200 girls. Damn, money spent subjects really brings out the worst of people sometimes. Give OP a break  :lol:.

Up to you what you think but I knew that was a fantasist and troll as soon as I read their posts, confirmed by the being grossed out by £150 an hour WGs. But more importantly Daviemac thought they were a fantasist and banned them, this rubbish is no longer a review, or their other one. :rolleyes:

Offline unknownpunter

Brilliant work by Daviemac. The OP got what he deserved.

Granted he may be a billy bullshitter or not but we must acknowledge that people do spend £££ on punting and although not many decide to share there experience we must appreciate the fact everyone’s budget is different and enjoys different things.

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Up to you what you think but I knew that was a fantasist and troll as soon as I read their posts, confirmed by the being grossed out by £150 an hour WGs. But more importantly Daviemac thought they were a fantasist and banned them, this rubbish is no longer a review, or their other one. :rolleyes:

I guess I was wrong then. The top balling punters are still Jack Saint and Hendrix.

Offline iq129

@Payyourwaymate. It wasn’t about the money he was spending on those escorts or whether his reviews were genuine or not, to me it was his wealth bragging, arrogance and attitude that got up my nose. The guy was bragging about spending £2500 a night on hotels and being upgraded to a £8500 room. What does that have to do with punting? His final post is where he really showed his arrogance. I am glad he’s been banned and rightfully so.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Knew it after the answer to my question 😂

Well done mods!  :thumbsup:

I thought you were sussing him out and read his reply to you. :thumbsup: I knew straight away he was making it up and I think trolling with the £150 an hour gross out comment which is why I reported him.

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,658
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Granted he may be a billy bullshitter or not but we must acknowledge that people do spend £££ on punting and although not many decide to share there experience we must appreciate the fact everyone’s budget is different and enjoys different things.

Yep, OP was a bs merchant imo, but there are plenty of genuine punters spending those amounts. It's a shame, because I'd genuinely like to see proper detailed reviews from guys spending that much.

Offline Alexmck

I'd genuinely like to see proper detailed reviews from guys spending that much.

Ditto

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
@Payyourwaymate. It wasn’t about the money he was spending on those escorts or whether his reviews were genuine or not, to me it was his wealth bragging, arrogance and attitude that got up my nose. The guy was bragging about spending £2500 a night on hotels and being upgraded to a £8500 room. What does that have to do with punting? His final post is where he really showed his arrogance. I am glad he’s been banned and rightfully so.

Fair enough, I can't argue with that.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I guess I was wrong then. The top balling punters are still Jack Saint and Hendrix.

Unlike you I don't know who spends most on WGs or care, that is unless they post bollocks about paying more for better service. My interest is having genuine punters and reviewers on UKP not fantasists like this twat was. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Offline unknownpunter

Yep, OP was a bs merchant imo, but there are plenty of genuine punters spending those amounts. It's a shame, because I'd genuinely like to see proper detailed reviews from guys spending that much.

Indeed I do have a review or Nora from ISB that I punted end of 2020 so I’ll post that in due course once I got through 3 others but I can say price doesn’t equal performance for sure.

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,658
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
I thought you were sussing him out and read his reply to you. :thumbsup: I knew straight away he was making it up and I think trolling with the £150 an hour gross out comment which is why I reported him.

If you tell the Shangri La that you're expecting a "Ms X" they will ask for full names and real ID from the guest.. Which doesn't really work for discretion purposes. Other hotels might not bother, but security at The Shard ( Shangri-la starts at floor 32 I think) is much more intense for obvious reasons.

The WG would have to tell security downstairs, they'd have to put her in the lift,  she'd be met by reception on the 30 something floor, they'd take her ID again, and put her into another lift for the suite he said he had. Possible..but... Much easier to walk her in from the front entrance as I've done, which respects everyone's privacy.


Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
If you tell the Shangri La that you're expecting a "Ms X" they will ask for full names and real ID from the guest.. Which doesn't really work for discretion purposes. Other hotels might not bother, but security at The Shard ( Shangri-la starts at floor 32 I think) is much more intense for obvious reasons.

The WG would have to tell security downstairs, they'd have to put her in the lift,  she'd be met by reception on the 30 something floor, they'd take her ID again, and put her into another lift for the suite he said he had. Possible..but... Much easier to walk her in from the front entrance as I've done, which respects everyone's privacy.

Classic, he wasn't smart enough to have covered this. :thumbsup:

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Unlike you I don't know who spends most on WGs or care, that is unless they post bollocks about paying more for better service. My interest is having genuine punters and reviewers on UKP not fantasists like this twat was. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:

Sorry, the second part of my statement was not a reference to your post. That's my fault I should not have put that in my post; it was a reference to my earlier post when I said he took first place of most spent punting wise. I understand your viewpoint. I'm just surprised the amount of flack OP got over what he spent and not the details in his reviews overall from other members regarding his reviews but another member explained it was OPs arrogance so I really can't defend OP anymore as it is understandable.

I just hope genuine punters that really do spend those amounts that OP was claiming to are not put off from reviewing by witnessing the witch hunt of OP, whether he was a bullshitter or not, although he did not help himself with his attitude. 

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Sorry, the second part of my statement was not a reference to your post. That's my fault I should not have put that in my post; it was a reference to my earlier post when I said he took first place of most spent punting wise. I understand your viewpoint. I'm just surprised the amount of flack OP got over what he spent and not the details in his reviews overall from other members regarding his reviews but another member explained it was OPs arrogance so I really can't defend OP anymore as it is understandable.

I just hope genuine punters that really do spend those amounts that OP was claiming to are not put off from reviewing by witnessing the witch hunt of OP, whether he was a bullshitter or not, although he did not help himself with his attitude.

No need to apologise to me, I have no idea what you are talking about on that point. In reality there was no witch hunt, he was a fantasist. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: On UKP genuine punters are free to post what they like, if they think a reviewer is a mug they are able to post so. IF that puts a punter off reviewing my advice to such a punter is grow a pair. UKP is for grown men not delicate flowers.

Its 1 thing doing a review saying you paid £2500 for an hour, that's up to the punter, its another thing to then post £150 an hour WGs gross you out as that's denigrating punters who choose to pay that rate in my book. If a punter pays £2500 an hour to me they are a mug and I may or may not post so, if they didn't like me posting that or another/other posters didn't bad luck. UKP hasn't fought for 10 years against all comers trying to bring it down for views held not to be posted within the rules. And of course a post can be reported to a mod if a poster wants to do that.
« Last Edit: January 09, 2021, 10:33:21 pm by smiths »

Offline Meursault



It's clear that the OP punts in a niche level, him "overpaying"  by the thousands will not effect us that punt £60 or £150-"£200 girls. Damn, money spent subjects really brings out the worst of people sometimes. Give OP a break  :lol:.


EDIT: I see OP got banned LOOOL FFS.
There are several people on here who spend loads of money on multiple £200-300 girls who don't get stick. If some punters are doing well for themselves great. This OP's attitude was so ridiculously patronising though he did deserve digging out a little.
However, I wouldn't have banned the guy; I would have enjoyed more of his elitist, deluded bullshit for comedy value alone.

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,658
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
I think if he'd just said he likes spending his money, including on expensive hotels, without slagging off the £150 or less market, most people wouldn't care, and some, like me, would welcome genuine intel for that type of punting.

No secret that I like those types of hotels too, because they add to the experience for me, but I know for a fact that as far as WG's go, price does not equal quality.

Offline SamOmar

There are several people on here who spend loads of money on multiple £200-300 girls who don't get stick. If some punters are doing well for themselves great. This OP's attitude was so ridiculously patronising though he did deserve digging out a little.
However, I wouldn't have banned the guy; I would have enjoyed more of his elitist, deluded bullshit for comedy value alone.

I think the forum for us punters to help each other out, he was helping no one apart from someone being tempted to flush 1000 pounds down the drain by him saying a wg they are an 11/10. It's good he got banned and personally I held back when it came to discrediting him
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I think the forum for us punters to help each other out, he was helping no one apart from someone being tempted to flush 1000 pounds down the drain by him saying a wg they are an 11/10. It's good he got banned and personally I held back when it came to discrediting him

My advice is IF your sure a poster is dodgy don't hold back within the rules, I reported their £150 an hour post as the final confirmation they were dodgy but knew from the first post I read.

Offline Helloyou75001

Awww.. I will never know what was his job...

I wanna be rich too

Offline S1MPLEK1NG

wait, why did he get banned :o someone fill me up with the summary

Offline golden bull

Few things to add:

1. That day was the best day I've had since I started punting 2years ago. I had arranged a booking with a famous British reality show celebrity for £5k/hour. Had to sign a NDA, so I have to be really careful if i decide to write a review. Gia was the second most expensive as mentioned in my review. Most expensive punting day of my life that I don't intent to repeat too often! 

2. My next review will be a negative review. £1000/hour bait and switch. I booked a famous British Instagram model, instead I got a fucking Romanian!

3. When you book these girls, you have to be firm with the agency. I will always tell them that if the girl doesn't treat me like a king, they will never hear from me again! Fortunately I've had only handful of bad experiences!

Offline SamOmar

Awww.. I will never know what was his job...

I wanna be rich too

I do not think he was as wealthy as he was making himself out to be
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline magnetico

Awww.. I will never know what was his job...

I wanna be rich too

Probably the least interesting part of that thread.
Plenty of rich people in London   :unknown:

Offline SamOmar

wait, why did he get banned :o someone fill me up with the summary

He got banned as his reviews were make belief, caught out by Hendrix as not knowing the guest procedures @ The Shangri La hotel, a hotel he apparently uses for is extravagant punts.
Banned reason: Undesirable, convicted sex trafficker / pimp
Banned by: daviemac

Offline golden bull

In a sick way I’m kinda sad he got banned so soon😁. This bull shitting is more entertaining than the crap on tv at the moment.
Thank you to all you Colombo’s and sherlocks fir adding to the fun.
It’s been emotional 😁👍🙏

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
wait, why did he get banned :o someone fill me up with the summary

Obituary???
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Helloyou75001

Probably the least interesting part of that thread.
Plenty of rich people in London   :unknown:

How many are rich enough to afford £2500/h escort on a whim? He must earn £1M+/year or so.

Offline Alexmck

Much easier to walk her in from the front entrance as I've done, which respects everyone's privacy.

I've done this but walked up to the wrong lady on the ground floor.  :dash:

Damn those fuzzed out faces and vague descriptions ("she's wearing a blue dress")!

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
How many are rich enough to afford £2500/h escort on a whim? He must earn £1M+/year or so.

Some guys in that bracket are extremely miser... That's why they are rich
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Helloyou75001

Some guys in that bracket are extremely miser... That's why they are rich

I can take a bit of their misery for half of their money lol. I've been fantasysing on how many punt I could have with £2500!! fuck it's 40+ punt of 4/week?

Imagine being able to shag 4 times / week all year around  :dance:

Offline Helloyou75001

Actually my dream life would be to be able to afford 1 punt a day every day of the year!

So it would be like £70*365/12 = £2130/month in punting spending!

That's how much spare cash I'd like to have! If only!  :wacko:

Offline Jtnonny

I'm probably going to get told to go away.

But an NDA for sex sounds like it would be the other way round where a footballer or celebrity wants to keep things quiet.

Is it even enforceable - Ryan Giggs.

I was asked to sign an NDA on purchasing a lease on business premises as the owner didn't want his staff finding out, and I laughed about that. How enforceable are these?

Maybe I'm just a loser.

I did blow £10'000+ over a few short weeks when I came into money and doing a lot of "partying". But that was a one off and more to do with my frame of mind on drugs

I dare say this market exists but it just seems you are paying an extra £1500 an hour because you can.

It's like gambling or throwing money away - that's the buzz and thats fine, it's just got nothing to do with buying sex.

I enjoyed pissing the money up the wall.

This is probably the least whore related thing ive put here, but typically, under english law, NDAs are worthless. In terms of remedies, an injunction is the norm but thats expensive to get. Damages arent usually awarded for breaching one, as its very difficult to demonstrate loss.

Offline iq129

Actually my dream life would be to be able to afford 1 punt a day every day of the year!

So it would be like £70*365/12 = £2130/month in punting spending!

That's how much spare cash I'd like to have! If only!  :wacko:

£70 per punt will hardly get you anything these days even if you go for half hour punts.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2021, 12:46:06 am by iq129 »

Offline Helloyou75001

£70 per punt will hardly get you anything these days even if you go for half hour punts.

I just checked on adultwork. In london there are about 4000 escort (bareback filtered out). If I just filter to £70/30min, I end up with 1400...

So at that I can have access to 1/3 of the escort pool. I didn't realise I was looking at such a small pool lol.


Now, if money was no issue, it would need a budget of £250/h to cover most of the 4000 escort. So if I wanted to have 1/day I'd need £7600/month... an impossible amount unless I have a job paying me millions

Offline iq129

I just checked on adultwork. In london there are about 4000 escort (bareback filtered out). If I just filter to £70/30min, I end up with 1400...

So at that I can have access to 1/3 of the escort pool. I didn't realise I was looking at such a small pool lol.


Now, if money was no issue, it would need a budget of £250/h to cover most of the 4000 escort. So if I wanted to have 1/day I'd need £7600/month... an impossible amount unless I have a job paying me millions

Fair enough. 1400 escorts are a lot to choose from. Enjoy.

Offline PatMacGroin

There are several people on here who spend loads of money on multiple £200-300 girls who don't get stick. If some punters are doing well for themselves great. This OP's attitude was so ridiculously patronising though he did deserve digging out a little.
However, I wouldn't have banned the guy; I would have enjoyed more of his elitist, deluded bullshit for comedy value alone.

Yep, shame he got banned so quickly. His reviews, and the comments they produced, were becoming the most entertaining threads for a long while.

Something not right about him from his very first post. As he continued I wasn't sure if he was a fantasist, a troll, a tout, or maybe even someone trying to pull some elaborate con (I was waiting for him to say he made his money in BitCoin and if anyone wanted to PM him their details he could explain how  :lol: )

I wanted to try and draw some more ridiculous comments out of him, to see how much he could hang himself. I figured he had probably fucked up as soon as hendrix asked the question about hotel security. But then he really shot himself in the foot with the condescending £150 hookers comment, that sort of talk never endears anyone to the UKP audience. Still, I was hoping for a bit more mileage out him before he got he boot.

On the flip side, I also hope this doesn't put off anyone with reviews of £1,000 hookers. Always good to have the variety of reviews. And you never know, one day, maybe, could be tempted... but probably not.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2021, 03:09:03 am by PatMacGroin »

Offline tobyk1

He’s a 16 yr old kid sitting in a council flat making shit up and you’ve all fallen for it.

On the other hand, thanks OP for highlighting an Agency who accept BTC.x!!! 😃 Fantastic news.

Hopefully Bojo opens schools back up for you soon.
Banned reason: Posting on 2 accounts
Banned by: daviemac

Offline massagepuntingfan

Since admin has reopened registration there seem to been have been a flood of bogus members.

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Since admin has reopened registration there seem to been have been a flood of bogus members.

which shitcookie was obviously 1...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline bukowski

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 516
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
Cut the hate bro ... jealousy is a horrible trait!

just woke up to find he's banned for being a `fantasist`

so maybe you should cut your fantasy that you have mind-reading talents
Banned reason: No reviews in 5 years, refuses to explain when asked, fair enough
Banned by: Iloveoral